A new era for the New Statesman
Welcome to a new era of the New Statesman. I hope it will be much like the last, updated for our new age. 'We do not propose… to ignore the tradition long associated with English weekly reviews,' wrote the first editor of this journal, Clifford Sharp, in the Leader of the very first issue in 1913: 'But our critical standpoint will be fresh.' As then, so now.
There is something a little daunting about assuming a role once held by the likes of Sharp, Kingsley Martin, Paul Johnson and, of course, Jason Cowley. In fact, rather like Keir Starmer – the subject of this week's cover story – before the general election, I feel as though I have been handed some beautiful Ming vase which I must protect until I pass it on to the next trustee in years to come, dusted off and – I hope – newly polished. An editor can dream.
For much of the last few months, I have been absorbing myself in the magazine's history and picking the brains of those who know it best. A special thank you must go to Tom Gatti, the magazine's outgoing acting editor. The result is before you: an issue I hope is true to all that has made the magazine great, but fresh all the same.
We have made no drastic alterations. All the great writers you have come to love are there: Kate Mossman, Nicholas Lezard, Andrew Marr, Hannah Barnes. The changes are gentle and true to the title's history.
How could I do otherwise? This is the magazine of Virginia Woolf and Martin Amis, not to mention Mehdi Hasan, Stephen Bush, Patrick Maguire and Helen Lewis. We were founded as a weekly review of politics and literature, and remain so. Only now we cover more. The eagle-eyed among you may have noticed a change to the strapline: the New Statesman, reviewing politics and culture since 1913.
We are a magazine of writers, but one that must look good too, as you can see from this week's extraordinary front cover put together by our head of design, Erica Weathers. Here is the Prime Minister as few have seen him, thanks to the wizardry of photographer Phil Sharp, and our creative editor, Gerry Brakus.
Starmer himself is the central focus of this issue, a man of far deeper emotions than I had expected. My profile of this most normal, and abnormal, of prime ministers is here.
Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe
Elsewhere, we have an expanded Commons Confidential and a refreshed culture section, now called The New Society – a nod to the magazine of the same name that was absorbed into the New Statesman in 1988. We have a few new additions: a sketch, written this week by the magazine's new deputy editor, Will Lloyd, a new column from Lamorna Ash and, to close the magazine, a piece 'From the Archives'. This week it features a ferocious polemic by Paul Johnson from 1977, castigating the government of Jim Callaghan one year into his premiership.
Elsewhere, the talented Nicholas Harris finds himself overwhelmed by nostalgia as he chats to Geoff Dyer about a lost England. Sondos Sabra details the everyday horror of life in Gaza with a dispatch of piercing tenderness. James Marriott offers a eulogy to English literature, which he believes is fading from our culture.
To round off the edition we have a hopeful dispatch from Syria by David Miliband, columns from Finn McRedmond and Rachel Cunliffe, and a Diary taking us behind the scenes of Donald Trump's America from His Majesty's most loyal ambassador, Peter Mandelson.
Over the coming weeks and months there will be much more to come, but the essence of the magazine will never change.
'We shall deal with all political, social, religious and intellectual questions; but in doing so we shall be bound by no ties of party, class or creed,' declared the Leader over a century ago. A spirit of detachment was required, it argued. 'The cultivation of such a spirit and its deliberate application to matters of current controversy is the task which the New Statesman has set for itself.' It is the task to which I happily recommit the magazine 112 years later.
[See also: What Keir Starmer can't say]
Related
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
4 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
When you're fighting crime, is it better with a rhyme?
If just one of our reporters had graduated primary school, there truly would be no stopping us. We are told of a Glasgow high school where A Midsummer Night's Dream is taught in the English department, and one young scholar submitted an essay which partially focused on the part in the play where Hippolyta says to Theseus, 'and then the moon, like to a silver bow new-bent in heaven, shall behold the night of our solemnities.' Only the young scholar had written in his essay, 'the night of our solemn nighties.' His teacher, reading this, concluded: 'Much better to have a jolly nighty.' Angus odd In the Highlands and Islands children are often named after their grandparents, reader Hugh Campbell explains. However, if a girl in the family has already been assigned the grandmother's name, the next girl born is then named after the grandfather, with the name slightly altered. So Murdo becomes Murdina. Says Hugh: 'My late father's cousin was named after her grandfather, Angus. Unfortunately when her father registered the birth, he missed out the 'us', and she was registered as Angina.' Perhaps unsurprisingly, adds Hugh, she adopted the far more conventional moniker, Jean. Present imperfect It's the birthday of reader Bill Hislop's wife next week. 'She's been leaving jewellery catalogues all over the house,' says Bill. 'So I know what to buy her for the big day… a magazine rack.' Orientalism On a recent holiday, Bill Galloway visited San Francisco with his wife and 12-year-old son, Robert, and they found themselves in that city's Chinatown district. Robert was fascinated by the oriental food and culture on display, so Bill explained that many of the world's great cities have a Chinatown, including London. Robert thought about this for a moment, before asking: 'Does Beijing have a Chinatown?' What a drag The internet isn't just a bunch of tiny pixelated dots that flicker on your mobile phone and computer screen. It also has similar properties to the tornado that dragged Dorothy all the way to Oz. One minute you're browsing the net, searching for important info. And the next minute? Well you're certainly not in Kansas, any more. Reader Jennifer McKinney says: 'I briefly went online to check the weather. Two hours later, I'm watching a tutorial explaining how to crochet cardigans out of weeds in the garden.' Read rage 'I cancelled my subscription to Anger Management Magazine,' reveals reader John Abbotts. 'Though I still have issues.'
Sky News
9 hours ago
- Sky News
Rachel Reeves 'a gnat's whisker' from having to raise taxes, says IFS
Rachel Reeves is a "gnat's whisker" away from having to raise taxes in the autumn budget, a leading economist has warned - despite the chancellor insisting her plans are "fully funded". Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), said "any move in the wrong direction" for the economy before the next fiscal event would "almost certainly spark more tax rises". Speaking the morning after she delivered her spending review, which sets government budgets until 2029, Ms Reeves told Wilfred Frost hiking taxes wasn't inevitable. "Everything I set out yesterday was fully costed and fully funded," she told Sky News Breakfast. Her plans - which include £29bn for day-to-day NHS spending, £39bn for affordable and social housing, and boosts for defence and transport - are based on what she set out in October's budget. That budget, her first as chancellor, included controversial tax hikes on employers and increased borrowing to help public services. 3:43 Chancellor won't rule out tax rises The Labour government has long vowed not to raise taxes on "working people" - specifically income tax, national insurance for employees, and VAT. Ms Reeves refused to completely rule out tax rises in her next budget, saying the world is "very uncertain". The Conservatives have claimed she will almost certainly have to put taxes up, with shadow chancellor Mel Stride accusing her of mismanaging the economy. Taxes on businesses had "destroyed growth" and increased spending had been "inflationary", he told Sky News. New official figures showed the economy contracted in April by 0.3% - more than expected. It coincided with Donald Trump imposing tariffs across the world. Ms Reeves admitted the figures were "disappointing" but pointed to more positive figures from previous months. 7:57 'Sting in the tail' She is hoping Labour's plans will provide more jobs and boost growth, with major infrastructure projects "spread" across the country - from the Sizewell C nuclear plant in Suffolk, to a rail line connecting Liverpool and Manchester. But the IFS said further contractions in the economy, and poor forecasts from the Office for Budget Responsibility, would likely require the chancellor to increase the national tax take once again. It said her spending review already accounted for a 5% rise in council tax to help local authorities, labelling it a "sting in the tail" after she told Sky's Beth Rigby that it wouldn't have to go up.
The National
13 hours ago
- The National
UK Government must 'urgently engage' with Scotland over migration
On Thursday, the Scottish Government led a debate on migration calling for the needs of Scotland's public services, businesses and communities to be 'supported, rather than harmed' by the incoming reforms. MSPs voted 67 in favour of the Scottish Government's motion, moved by Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes, and 42 against. A Scottish Tory amendment calling for a 'balance' to be struck on migration and 'reducing the numbers of illegal migrants who place added pressures on the welfare system and public services', did not pass. READ MORE: Mairi McAllan: I'm back and I want quick progress on housing emergency Scottish Labour's amendment in support of the UK Government's immigration plans also fell. In May, the Labour Government published an immigration white paper that contained sweeping changes to the system. The plans include ending automatic resettlement for those living in the UK for five years, moving to a decade, that migrants are required to display a higher standard of English, and an end to visa routes for care workers. Opening the debate, Forbes told MSPs: 'Migration is predicted to be the sole driver of population growth for decades to come. 'Right now, we need people to come here to live and work, to bolster our working age population.' (Image: Scottish Parliament) The Deputy FM reiterated calls for a bespoke approach to be taken towards Scotland's migration. She said: 'When I was first elected, I was often struck by the fact that there was a cross party support for the post graduate visa from both the Conservatives and Labour, a tailored nuanced approach with cross party support, and that's what we want to see again. UK ministers could choose to support us on this.' Forbes added: 'Migration enriches our society. It makes a net contribution to our economy, our public services and our public finances, it's the fertilizer that helps us to thrive, innovate and grow. 'In the face of these demographic challenges, we can't push them away. READ MORE: John Swinney and Anas Sarwar clash over reports of SNP secret meeting 'There are some things that we can do within devolved powers, but what we can't do is expand the workforce completely without control over that. And so I invite members from across the chamber to join us in making this call today.' MSP Liz Smith, Tory spokesperson for social security, said that debates around migration are generally based on 'increasingly unhelpful and damaging rhetoric which can border on racism and which clearly helps absolutely no one at all'. 'I agree that the current system of immigration controls is not working,' she added. 'In particular, I think the very high level of illegal immigration is a major concern, as is the fiscal cost associated with that, both in terms of accommodation and public service provision.' (Image: Scottish Parliament) Smith said she 'quite strongly' opposes a Scottish immigration system because of 'inherent complications', she did note the 'demographic challenges' of an aging population. Later in the debate, she claimed the debate on migration should not be framed as one of 'Scotland against the rest of the UK'. 'I think this debate is much more about different sectors across the UK,' Smith added. 'I don't like the idea that we often get into constitutional debate about this. I think it's much more to do with the sectors.' (Image: Scottish Parliament) Scottish Labour's Michael Marra said that any immigration system has to be 'safe, legal and well managed'. 'It's absolutely essential,' he added. 'Eleven months ago, the UK Labour Government inherited a chaotic broken system. 'Fixing that system will take time. 'Without any doubt, it's right that the UK Government has taken those steps necessary to ensure that immigration is safe, it's fair and also crucially that it meets the needs of our economy. READ MORE: SNP leadership challenge would not be a good idea, says John Swinney 'Because meeting those needs of the economy that's actually part of the basis of make sure that enjoys public support, which is absolutely crucial.' Scottish Greens MSP Maggie Chapman, joining the debate remotely, told the chamber that she wanted to 'challenge the toxic narratives that define UK immigration policy'. 'We must be absolutely clear immigration is a societal good, not a problem to be managed,' she said. 'We should celebrate it.'
