Sir Sadiq Khan: 20mph limits in London not making buses slower
Twenty mile per hour speed limits on some roads in London are not responsible for slower buses, the mayor of London has claimed.Sir Sadiq Khan said while there was "a perception of declining bus speeds following returning traffic and roadworks after the Covid-19 period", in reality buses were about as slow as they were five years ago.In a written question the leader of City Hall Conservatives, Neil Garratt, said there was "clear evidence" that bus speeds were declining across London and asked what work had been done to determine whether lowering speed limits was a possible factor.The mayor said the average bus speed in London in 2019-20 was 9.29mph (15km/h) and in 2023-24 it was 9.27mph.
Sir Sadiq said that was "a very small decline of 0.02".
A report by the watchdog London Travelwatch revealed in November last year that in parts of central London, bus speeds had dropped below 7mph (11km/h).The research found that average bus speeds range from 8.1mph (13km/h) in inner London to 10.3mph (17km/h) in outer London. Bus speeds were lower in every borough in 2023-24 compared with 10 years previously.In the 'square mile' of the City of London, buses travel at only 6.6mph (11km/h) – and at 7.1mph in Westminster and in Camden, the report said.In his written answer to Mr Garratt, Sir Sadiq said more than of half of London's roads now had a 20mph speed limit and 19 of the 33 London boroughs had 20mph speed limits across their roads.The mayor said preliminary data showed a 24.9% reduction in fatal and serious injuries after the introduction of 20mph speed limits.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
North Wales Chronicle
4 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Sadiq Khan criticises ‘disappointing' spending review
The mayor of London pledged to 'continue to fight for the investment we need' as he said there must never be an attempt to 'level down London'. Sir Sadiq is frustrated that Chancellor Rachel Reeves did not use her spending review to support proposed projects such as the extension to the Docklands Light Railway (DLR) and the Bakerloo Tube line. He did welcome the decision to provide Transport for London (TfL) with a long-term funding settlement, which it has sought for a number of years. This set out £2.2 billion in capital funding over four years. Sir Sadiq said: 'It's … disappointing that there is no commitment today from the Treasury to invest in the new infrastructure London needs. 'Projects such as extending the Docklands Light Railway not only deliver economic growth across the country, but also tens of thousands of new affordable homes and jobs for Londoners. 'Unless the Government invests in infrastructure like this in our capital, we will not be able to build the numbers of new affordable homes Londoners need. My response to the government's Spending Review ⬇️ — Sadiq Khan (@SadiqKhan) June 11, 2025 'As mayor, I'll continue to make the case to the Government that we must work together for the benefit of our capital and the whole country. 'The way to level up other regions will never be to level down London. 'I'll continue to fight for the investment we need so that we can continue building a fairer, safer and greener London for everyone.' Andy Lord, London's transport commissioner, said the funding settlement means TfL can complete the introduction of new trains on the Piccadilly Tube line and DLR, and new signalling on 40% of the Tube network. He said it will also be able to obtain a new tram fleet, make progress in discussions on new Bakerloo line trains, and renew 'critical' roads, tunnels and flyovers.
The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on Labour's spending review: the chancellor tightened belts and loosened seams
Brexit's ghost haunts a Labour spending review intended to lay the foundations for a second term. Its headlines echo the twin themes of the referendum campaign: control immigration, fund the NHS. The chancellor, Rachel Reeves, said she would end the use of hotels for asylum seekers 'in this parliament' saving £1bn a year, while NHS spending will rise by 3% a year. Ms Reeves framed it as a politics of security and compassion. Yet it reads as Brexit's populist promises, filtered through Westminster orthodoxy. The risk is that this is all slogan and very little solution. The asylum savings are speculative, and the annual increase in NHS budgets is below its historical average. There are also real-terms cuts or essentially flat budgets for key departments such as transport, education and local government. The Home Office faces cuts deeper than asylum savings alone, prompting alarm from police and the London mayor, Sadiq Khan. Plainly, what looks good today for the chancellor may feel insufficient tomorrow on hospital wards, high streets or in the classroom. The everyday experience of voters will shape their judgment. That is why there were nods from Ms Reeves to cost-of-living pressures by keeping the cap on bus fares and the insistence that police and council funding would see 'spending power' rises. Despite negative briefing, Ed Miliband secured significant wins in the review, notably protecting the £13bn Warm Homes insulation scheme and cementing his influence over the GB Energy agenda, while bolstering the UK's net‑zero energy strategy. Ms Reeves shrewdly tightened belts and loosened seams. Britain, under Labour, will be a place where 'every pound is spent wisely' while billions in capital investment would level up the country. This is down to a welcome change in the fiscal rules brought in by the chancellor last October that allows more room for such investment. That shift enables the fanfare of the review: the nuclear reactors, the affordable housing and the new Manchester-to-Liverpool railway. What has not changed is the government's rule that says its current budget must be in surplus by the end of the forecast. This restricts the state's day-to-day spending and – despite being relaxed next year – leads to real-terms cuts in departments as well as curbing options to directly boost household income. The spending review is a bet that infrastructure spending will lead to higher productivity. But it lacks the demand-side fuel to make these projects generate inclusive growth within this parliament. That makes it harder to hit the government's economic mission milestone of higher disposable household income and GDP per capita. Ms Reeves will probably have to raise taxes to meet her fiscal rules, not least because the government's promises keep stacking up and money needs to be found to restore winter fuel payments and reconsider the two-child benefit cap. Yet neither the prime minister nor the chancellor dares to say it aloud. Higher taxes, especially on wealth, would be a good thing. These may become inevitable as Ms Reeves' calculations rest upon £14bn of projected efficiency gains – as if cuts can be pain-free. Political storytelling only goes so far when the effects of policy show up in threadbare services and flatlining household incomes. For all the investment, the worry must be voters see more drift than renewal. Without a shift in fiscal doctrine, Labour risks governing in prose while the public still waits for the poetry it was promised.
Rhyl Journal
5 hours ago
- Rhyl Journal
Sadiq Khan criticises ‘disappointing' spending review
The mayor of London pledged to 'continue to fight for the investment we need' as he said there must never be an attempt to 'level down London'. Sir Sadiq is frustrated that Chancellor Rachel Reeves did not use her spending review to support proposed projects such as the extension to the Docklands Light Railway (DLR) and the Bakerloo Tube line. He did welcome the decision to provide Transport for London (TfL) with a long-term funding settlement, which it has sought for a number of years. This set out £2.2 billion in capital funding over four years. Sir Sadiq said: 'It's … disappointing that there is no commitment today from the Treasury to invest in the new infrastructure London needs. 'Projects such as extending the Docklands Light Railway not only deliver economic growth across the country, but also tens of thousands of new affordable homes and jobs for Londoners. 'Unless the Government invests in infrastructure like this in our capital, we will not be able to build the numbers of new affordable homes Londoners need. My response to the government's Spending Review ⬇️ — Sadiq Khan (@SadiqKhan) June 11, 2025 'As mayor, I'll continue to make the case to the Government that we must work together for the benefit of our capital and the whole country. 'The way to level up other regions will never be to level down London. 'I'll continue to fight for the investment we need so that we can continue building a fairer, safer and greener London for everyone.' Andy Lord, London's transport commissioner, said the funding settlement means TfL can complete the introduction of new trains on the Piccadilly Tube line and DLR, and new signalling on 40% of the Tube network. He said it will also be able to obtain a new tram fleet, make progress in discussions on new Bakerloo line trains, and renew 'critical' roads, tunnels and flyovers.
