South Korea's Leader Pushes for Extended US Trade Negotiations
South Korea's newly inaugurated President has signalled an intent to extend negotiations with the United States over critical trade agreements, aiming to secure more favourable terms that could shape the trajectory of the country's export-driven economy. The administration recognises the complexity of current talks and the high stakes for sectors that form the backbone of South Korea's global economic influence, including semiconductors, automotive manufacturing, and shipbuilding.
The president, Lee Jae-myung, who took office following a highly competitive election, has prioritised trade diplomacy with Washington as a cornerstone of his economic agenda. South Korea's reliance on exports to the US market makes the outcome of these talks pivotal for sustaining growth and competitiveness. The decision to request additional time highlights the government's cautious approach amid mounting international uncertainties and intensifying global supply chain disruptions.
Lee's administration faces pressure to address contentious issues such as tariff reductions, intellectual property protections, and technology transfers that have been key sticking points in negotiations. American officials have pushed for greater access to South Korea's semiconductor sector, a world leader in chip production, while Seoul is equally keen to safeguard its industrial strengths against onerous restrictions. Balancing these priorities requires delicate diplomacy, with the stakes heightened by rising geopolitical tensions in the Indo-Pacific region.
ADVERTISEMENT
Economic analysts observe that the extended timeframe could provide South Korea with a strategic advantage, allowing deeper consultation with domestic industries and stakeholders. The government is expected to leverage this period to refine proposals that accommodate emerging global trends, including shifts in supply chain localisation, heightened environmental standards, and evolving digital trade frameworks.
South Korea's chipmakers, which dominate global markets with advanced memory and logic chips, are particularly attentive to outcomes of the talks. Recent moves by the US to incentivise domestic semiconductor manufacturing through legislative packages have raised concerns about potential trade barriers and competitive disadvantages for South Korean firms. The extended negotiation window offers a chance to clarify terms and possibly negotiate exemptions or compensatory measures to protect the industry's international standing.
Similarly, the automotive sector, a pillar of South Korea's industrial base, stands to gain or lose significantly depending on trade terms. The rise of electric vehicles and changing regulatory regimes worldwide necessitate adaptive trade policies that accommodate new technologies and market realities. The extended talks will enable Seoul to press for provisions that support its carmakers' access to the US market, while also addressing issues related to tariffs and environmental regulations.
Shipbuilding, another vital sector for South Korea's economy, faces challenges from global competition and evolving demand patterns, especially as the maritime industry shifts towards greener technologies. Negotiations with the US could influence the sector's export potential, especially if environmental standards or subsidy regulations become part of trade discussions. Lee's government is likely to emphasise the need for fair competition frameworks that protect the industry while fostering innovation.
The broader geopolitical context also plays a significant role in shaping these negotiations. South Korea's balancing act between its strategic alliance with the US and its economic ties with China demands a nuanced trade policy. With tensions escalating between the US and China, Seoul must navigate these complexities carefully, ensuring that its trade agreements do not alienate either partner while maximising economic benefits.
ADVERTISEMENT
South Korea's trade ministry has indicated a willingness to engage constructively with American counterparts, stressing the mutual benefits of a comprehensive deal. The government has also engaged business leaders and experts to gather insights and build consensus on negotiation priorities. This inclusive approach aims to ensure that trade agreements align with long-term national interests rather than short-term gains.
Lee's outreach to Washington comes at a time when global trade dynamics are undergoing rapid transformation. Protectionist sentiments and the realignment of supply chains following the pandemic have created both risks and opportunities for export-driven economies. South Korea's strategic response through extended negotiations seeks to position the country favourably in this new environment.
Industry observers note that while additional time may raise concerns about potential delays or uncertainties, it also reflects a pragmatic recognition of the complexities involved in modern trade agreements. The extended timeline allows for more thorough impact assessments, stakeholder engagement, and the incorporation of emerging trade issues such as digital commerce, data security, and sustainability commitments.
Lee's government is also expected to pursue parallel initiatives to strengthen domestic competitiveness alongside trade talks. Investments in innovation, infrastructure, and workforce skills development are seen as complementary measures to enhance South Korea's economic resilience in a volatile global market.
The trade discussions have attracted close attention from international partners and economic forums, given South Korea's integral role in global supply chains. The outcome will not only influence bilateral relations with the US but also set precedents for future trade policies across the Asia-Pacific region.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Today
14 hours ago
- Gulf Today
US slaps sanctions on four ICC judges over Israel, US cases
The United States on Thursday imposed sanctions on four judges at the International Criminal Court including over an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as it ramped up pressure to neuter the court of last resort. The four judges in The Hague, all women, will be barred entry to the United States and any property or other interests in the world's largest economy will be blocked -- measures more often taken against policymakers from US adversaries than against judicial officials. "The United States will take whatever actions we deem necessary to protect our sovereignty, that of Israel, and any other US ally from illegitimate actions by the ICC," Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a statement. "I call on the countries that still support the ICC, many of whose freedom was purchased at the price of great American sacrifices, to fight this disgraceful attack on our nation and Israel," Rubio said. The court swiftly hit back, saying in a statement: "These measures are a clear attempt to undermine the independence of an international judicial institution which operates under the mandate from 125 States Parties from all corners of the globe." Marco Rubio Israel's Netanyahu welcomed the move, thanking US President Donald Trump's administration in a social media post. "Thank you President Trump and Secretary of State Rubio for imposing sanctions against the politicised judges of the ICC. You have justly stood up for the right of Israel," he wrote on Friday. War crimes Human Rights Watch urged other nations to speak out and reaffirm the independence of the ICC, set up in 2002 to prosecute individuals responsible for the world's gravest crimes when countries are unwilling or unable to do so themselves. The sanctions "aim to deter the ICC from seeking accountability amid grave crimes committed in Israel and Palestine and as Israeli atrocities mount in Gaza, including with US complicity," said the rights group's international justice director, Liz Evenson. Two of the targeted judges, Beti Hohler of Slovenia and Reine Alapini-Gansou of Benin, took part in proceedings that led to an arrest warrant issued last November for Netanyahu. The court found "reasonable grounds" of criminal responsibility by Netanyahu and former Israeli defence minister Yoav Gallant for actions that include the war crime of starvation as a method of war in the massive offensive in Gaza following Hamas's unprecedented October 7, 2023 attack on Israel. Israel, alleging bias, has angrily rejected charges of war crimes as well as a separate allegation of genocide led by South Africa before the International Court of Justice. The two other judges, Luz del Carmen Ibanez Carranza of Peru and Solomy Balungi Bossa of Uganda, were part of the court proceedings that led to the authorization of an investigation into allegations that US forces committed war crimes during the war in Afghanistan. Return to hard line Neither the United States nor Israel is party to the Rome Statute that established the International Criminal Court. But almost all Western allies of the United States as well as Japan and South Korea, the vast majority of Latin America and much of Africa are parties to the statute and in theory are required to arrest suspects when they land on their soil. Trump in his first term already imposed sanctions on the then ICC chief prosecutor over the Afghanistan investigation. After Trump's defeat in 2020, then president Joe Biden took a more conciliatory approach to the court with case-by-case cooperation. Rubio's predecessor Antony Blinken rescinded the sanctions and, while critical of its stance on Israel, worked with the court in its investigation of Russia's invasion of Ukraine. ICC judges in 2023 issued an arrest warrant for Russian President Vladimir Putin over the alleged mass abduction of Ukrainian children during the war. Both Putin and Netanyahu have voiced defiance over the ICC pressure but have also looked to minimize time in countries that are party to the court. The ICC arrest warrants have been especially sensitive in Britain, a close US ally whose Prime Minister Keir Starmer is a former human rights lawyer. Downing Street has said that Britain will fulfil its "legal obligations" without explicitly saying if Netanyahu would be arrested if he visits. Hungary, led by Trump ally Viktor Orban, has parted ways with the rest of the European Union by moving to exit the international court. Orban thumbed his nose at the court by welcoming Netanyahu to visit in April. Agence France-Presse
Gulf Today
16 hours ago
- Gulf Today
China's export curbs on rare earth minerals worry Europe
China is flexing its economic muscle in more senses than one. Its decision to restrict exports of the rare minerals and magnets has sent shivers down the spines of global automakers in Germany and in the United States. Rare earth minerals are needed in key sectors like car manufactures, semi-conductor industry, aerospace industry. The Chinese possess half of the global rare earth mineral reserves. The Chinese decision was mainly to counter US President Donald Trump's refusal to export crucial computer chips needed for AI, and the US' refusal to allow imports from Chinese chipmaker Huawei. More importantly, what has angered the Chinese is the refusal of student visas to Chinese students, and the cancellation of the visas of those who are students in American universities. Europe is caught in a crossfire in the trade war between the giants, the US and China. Europeans, as well as Americans, have suddenly realised that it is not such a good thing to depend on China for either rare earth minerals or even manufactured goods including cars. The West is desperately looking to reduce its dependence on China and it is seeking to diversify its supply chain. European Union (EU) Commissioner for Industrial Strategy Stephane Sejourne said, 'We must reduce our dependencies on all countries, particularly on a number of countries like China, on which we are more than 100 per cent dependent.' Meanwhile EU Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic said that he was in touch with his Chinese counterpart and they had agreed to clarify the rare earth minerals situation. Major automakers like Mercedes and BMW are claiming that they have enough inventories and their production schedules will not be affected. But it is clear that shortages are looming on the horizon. The US-China trade talks are quite crucial, even as American President Donald Trump wrote on his social media platform, Truth Social, 'I like President Xi of China, always have, and always will, but he is VERY TOUGH, AND EXTREMELY HARD TO MAKE A DEAL WITH.' Trump is blaming China for breaking the deal made in Geneva to roll back the tariffs that each side had imposed on the other, Trump reduced the tariffs from 145 per cent to 30 per cent, and China reduced it from 135 per cent. Mercedes-Benz production chief Jeorg Burzer said he was talking to top suppliers of the company about building 'buffer' stocks anticipating trouble in the future. He said that Mercedes is well stocked for now and production schedules are not affected. But automakers in Europe and America have aired their worries about the curbs on Chinese exports of the rare earth minerals. Many of the captains of industry are lobbying with their governments to solve the deadlock. Wolfgang Weber, CEO of Germany's electrical and digital industry association, ZVEI, said in an emailed statement, 'Companies currently feel abandoned by politicians and are partly looking for solutions to their difficult situation on their own in China.' Trump's declaration of the tariff war against America's trade partners had mostly caused quiet murmurs, and many countries from the EU and other countries like Japan are trying to work out a trade deal without crossing swords with the US. But China was not willing to take Trump's tariffs passively. It is aware that it has power enough to counter American tariffs with tariffs of its own. The Chinese have always been defiant of the Western world, even when they did not have the economic power they now have. There is of course the harsh fact. China needs the Western countries to maintain its economic growth. It is its exports to Western countries that have made it rich and powerful. Europe and US need the cheap labour of China, and China needs the Western markets. They have to strike a deal with each other.
Middle East Eye
a day ago
- Middle East Eye
What is stopping Israel from bombing Iran's nuclear sites?
Israel has been threatening a preemptive military strike on Iran as the Trump administration tries to negotiate a nuclear deal with the Islamic Republic. But current and former US and Israeli officials say the Israeli bluff is becoming stale and that Trump has effectively boxed Netanyahu into towing his line as talks continue. On one hand, current and former US officials say there is little the US can do to prevent Israel from unilaterally bombing Iran if it chooses to do so. Unlike other American partners, Israel is less dependent on American intelligence for such an operation, especially in Iran, where it has operated for decades, assassinating scientists and senior officials. One senior US official, speaking to Middle East Eye on the condition of anonymity, said that the Trump administration has been impressed by plans Israel shared with it that lay out unilateral strikes against Iran's nuclear programme without American direct involvement. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The plans were discussed in April and May with CIA director John Ratcliffe. 'The Israelis have pinpointed everything they can take out that supports Iran's nuclear sites down to the water supply and power generation, etc,' the US official told MEE, referring to a process called Target Systems Analysis, by which militaries assess specific nodes to attack, which support a bigger main target. Israel has also discussed combining cyberattacks and precision military strikes. 'Can Israel go it alone? Yes, course,' Bilal Saab, a former Pentagon official in the first Trump administration, told MEE. 'They definitely can disrupt large parts of the programme without destroying all of it. They have demonstrated that by rehearsing similar contingencies. You can also get some clues from the tit-for-tat with Iran last year when they (Israel) took out air defence systems,' he added. Israeli and US officials say that Israel took out many of Iran's surface-to-air missiles and radars, like the Russian-made S-300 systems, during unprecedented strikes on the Islamic Republic in October and April 2024. However, in April 2025, Iran displayed an S-300 at a military parade. 'Netanyahu is plain scared of Trump' Iran's nuclear facilities are buried deep in fortified bunkers in the Natanz desert and inside a mountain called Fordow. Defence analysts often say one reason Israel has refrained from bombing Iran's sites alone is because they lack the B-2 stealth bombers the US has stationed at Diego Garcia military base and the 30,000lb GBU-57 bunker buster bombs the warplanes could drop on those sites. But current and former officials say that, should Israel want to attack, it has other options. 'They have the capabilities to set the Iranians back for at least a few years,' the US official said. The strikes would likely include ballistic missile attacks and a combination of F-35 stealth fighters dropping 2,000lb precision bombs and F-15s dropping 4,000lb GBU-28 bombs, experts say. Exclusive: Saudi Arabia pressed Trump to stop attacks on Yemen ahead of visit Read More » Combined with the degradation of Hezbollah in Lebanon, hawks in Israel have cited all of these factors to advocate for a preemptive attack. But Aaron David Miller, a former US Middle East negotiator who is a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, told MEE that even accounting for Iran's weakening over the past two years, Israel is still unnerved by the unknown. 'We lived for eight years in a situation where there had been no restraints on Iran's nuclear programme without a major strike by Israel on its nuclear sites,' Miller said, referring to the period starting in 2018 when Trump unilaterally withdrew from the 2015 nuclear deal and Iran responded by ramping up its enrichment of uranium. 'That tells me a unilateral Israeli strike is risky and the implications are uncertain.' Alon Pinkas, a former Israeli diplomat, said US President Donald Trump is perhaps the biggest obstacle to Netanyahu crossing the Rubicon on striking Iran. In May, Trump said that he told Netanyahu it would be 'inappropriate' to attack Iran when he believes 'we're very close to a solution' on its nuclear programme. 'Netanyahu is plain scared of Trump,' Pinkas said. 'If Trump concludes that Israel attacked Iran in defiance of his request, he could leave Israel to face Iranian retaliation alone. That is what Netanyahu is thinking." Israel afraid of blame? Understanding how Netanyahu views the American backstop following any unilateral military strike is key to assessing the Israeli leader's risk appetite, analysts and former officials say. Trump's mercurial governing style makes it difficult to predict how he would respond to an act of Israeli defiance. Even officials briefed on Israeli war plans simply don't know. Trump fires slew of pro-Israel officials in America First 'course correction' Read More » 'There is a strain of thought that says it would be political suicide for a US president not to defend Israel. There could be political rhetoric, but not shooting down missiles fired at Israel from Iran is a stretch," the US official said. While the Biden administration came to Israel's direct defence twice in 2024 amid Iranian attacks, Trump has shown he relishes tearing up the foreign policy establishment's playbook. He sidestepped Israel to negotiate directly with Hamas on the release of a US-Israeli captive and cut a truce with Houthi rebels in Yemen as they continued to bomb Israel. Trump did all that before he spurned Netanyahu on a whirlwind trip to the Gulf in May. Cristopher McCallion, a fellow at Defense Priorities, a think-tank that taps into Trump's 'America First' foreign policy instincts, told MEE, 'I can imagine Trump breaking with Israel, not over a nuclear deal per se, but over avoiding US involvement in a war with Iran more generally.' Pinkas said that Israel's threats to launch preemptive strikes on Iran are also constrained by the Gulf states. When tensions with Israel soared in October 2024, Iran threatened to shut down the flow of oil through the Strait of Hormuz and strike American military bases. 'If Israel acts alone, it will be blamed in Riyadh and Abu Dhabi for Iranian retaliation on the Gulf,' Pinkas said. 'Wiser to wait' Netanyahu would much rather share the political responsibility for attacking Iran jointly with the US. 'As long as the possibility exists of a joint military strike with the US, with Washington concluding that negotiations are hopeless, it is wiser for Israel to wait. But that time window is not unlimited,' Eran Lerman, a former deputy director at Netanyahu's National Security Council, told MEE. Lerman said that a deal that allows Iran to enrich uranium on its soil is a red line for Israel. He believes we could be "weeks away" from that moment. The Trump administration itself has been unclear on enrichment, the most contentious part of the negotiations. Reports in Axios and The New York Times this week said the White House may concede to a low level of enrichment by Iran, perhaps temporarily. But Miller said, given Israeli restraint over all of these years, even that might not be enough to provoke a unilateral strike. 'The situation would need to be one where the Mossad and the CIA come to very different conclusions about the advanced state of Iran's weaponisation and the Israelis were persuaded they had entered a zone of inevitability where Iran would have a bomb," he said. 'Short of that, even Netanyahu has limits. He is not going to preemptively strike Iran without an American green or flashing yellow light,' he added.
