Decision-Day For Masterton's Water
Masterton councillors will decide on Wednesday whether to progress a Wairarapa-Tararua water service entity, or go it alone.
The council was set to deliberate on submissions at 2pm on Wednesday and decide between the two options.
If the council voted to progress work on the Wairarapa-Tararua water services delivery model, it would enter into a commitment agreement with the participating councils and develop the Water Services Delivery Plan and foundation principles and documents to be carried forward into the plan.
Foundation principles would include: non-standardisation of pricing and debt; share allocation; and decision-making arrangements.
If council chose this option, there would be two further opportunities to exit the arrangement and to submit a Water Services Delivery Plan with a Masterton-only water services delivery model to the Department of Internal Affairs.
The Wairarapa-Tararua option was recommended by council staff because it 'enables council to work through the uncertainties and concerns of the Wairarapa-Tararua model while still providing council with two opportunities to exit the arrangement'.
Alternatively, the council could vote to not progress a Wairarapa Tararua water services delivery model and only progress a Masterton-only water services delivery model.
Analysis of the 139 submissions made to Masterton District Council showed the majority (60%) were in favour of the Wairarapa-Tararua proposal.
Key themes in the submissions from those who supported the proposal were economies of scale, long-term sustainability, support for increased borrowing capacity.
Of those who did not support the proposal, key themes were concerns about price standardisation, affordability, and the desire to have more localised control over water assets and services.
A report to council said that while protections against price standardisation could be put in place, standardisation in the future could not be guaranteed.
A memo from legal firm Morrison Low was also included in the agenda pack for Wednesday's meeting.
It provided advice and guidance to Masterton District Council on the council's desire to 'on establishment, protect Masterton from price standardisation' and 'ensure that there are sufficient protections over key decisions or changes to foundational documents over the longer term that protect Masterton from price standardisation to the extent that is desired'.
It said there was 'a path forward' that would provide council with assurance that price differentiation was possible; shareholding could be determined on a basis that reflected Masterton's position relative to the region; and decision making could be structured in a way that promoted regional focus and recognised Masterton's position relative to the region at the current time.
It also said protections could be enshrined in the series of foundational documents required to establish and then control and govern the council-controlled organisation.
It recommended voting mechanism provisions in both the shareholders agreement and constitution which ensured no single council had positive or negative control but which required 75% of the shareholders to agree to any changes to foundational documents.
'A super majority or similar threshold requires not just Masterton District Council but other councils to agree as well, giving a perception and reality that is more consistent with consensus decision making while preserving Masterton District Council's ability to protect the interests of its ratepayers," the memo said.
It recommended commencing with local pricing but having a review point for standardisation.
This could be a point in time, such as five years, or an 'identified cost differential', for example, when local prices were within 10% of each other.
South Wairarapa District Council has already voted to pursue the Wairarapa-Tararua option.
Carterton District Council were set to meet at 9am Thursday to deliberate on submissions and decide a path forward.
Tararua District Council would meet on May 28 to deliberate on submissions and would decide on the future of water management at an extraordinary meeting on June 11.
-LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
2 days ago
- Scoop
Porirua Backs Regional Approach To Water Services Delivery
Porirua City Council's Te Puna Kōrero committee has endorsed a joint regional approach for water services delivery. As part of the Local Water Done Well reform, the Government has mandated that councils must review how water services are delivered. Te Puna Kōrero met this morning to deliberate and made a recommendation to Council, after consulting on two options for a future water services delivery model - a new water services organisation, or a modified version of the status quo. They voted unanimously to recommend that Council should jointly establish and co-own a new water organisation with Upper Hutt City Council, Hutt City Council, Wellington City Council and Greater Wellington Regional Council. Under this model, a multi-council-owned water organisation will take ownership of public water assets. The alternative was a modified version of the current Wellington Water model, where councils retain ownership while Wellington Water manages water services. That recommendation will need to be endorsed at the full Council meeting on 26 June. All five councils are independently making decisions by the end of June on how to proceed. Officers will then develop a joint Water Services Delivery Plan and foundation documents for the new organisation, which must be lodged with the Department of Internal Affairs by 3 September 2025. The intention is that Council will transfer its assets, debt, liabilities and services in relation to drinking water, wastewater and stormwater to the new organisation by1 July 2026. In making today's decision, the committee unanimously supported an amendment from Councillor Geoff Hayward, setting out the principles Porirua City wants reflected in the new organisation's foundation documents. These include recognising water as a public good, safeguarding households from disconnection, value for money, fair pricing, supporting local employment, and upholding Te Mana o te Wai. Porirua Mayor Anita Baker said like many parts of the country, Porirua's water networks faced significant challenges. "We have old pipes that cause water leaks, contribute to water shortages and are a main contributor to pollution in the harbour. "While we've poured all the money we can into funding water assets, we simply can't address these challenges on our own. Doing nothing is not an option, and we believe the new model is the best way forward for Porirua."
RNZ News
2 days ago
- RNZ News
Internal Affairs to have another go at modernising births, deaths and marriages registry
The department will hold a briefing to hear from companies what the options might be later this month. Photo: RNZ / Alexander Robertson After spending $23m but failing to modernise the births, deaths and marriages registry, officials are having another go. The Department of Internal Affairs has written off $22.9m on the project abandoned last year, returned an unspent $58m to the Crown and remains locked in a dispute with the Australian company DWS over the contract it terminated in late 2023. "Although some of the work completed will be able to be used for a future civil registration system replacement project, from an accounting standards perspective, it [decided] should impair (write off) all capital costs incurred to date," DIA told RNZ. But it needs a replacement and is setting out again, tentatively, facing "uncertainty around funding and what a long-term replacement plan would look like". It also faced a "high risk" rating on the project, it said. "As part of the business case process the department would need to provide assurance of how risks could be sufficiently managed or mitigated," it said. The project to replace DIA's old unreliable tech with a new system to give people faster and more secure access to their identity data - among a total 80 million records - was central to a $150m phase of the department's $300m five-year Te Ara Manaaki project. This month the department will hold a briefing to hear from companies what the options might be, while working on a strategic assessment to go to Cabinet. Treasury last year imposed more checkgates that public sector projects must pass through, to try to prevent badly thought-out ones getting through. "We are in the early stages of a discovery phase," DIA said. This comes almost three years after it announced it was replacing its existing system and had chosen a vendor it was confident would deliver a robust system. "The new system will be more efficient, secure, and reliable," it said in August 2022. Some of the work done since 2022 would not be wasted, which should cut costs for a replacement, it said. This included work done on design, improving data quality, the data migration process and testing and delivery frameworks. The department offered reassurance that the existing system "while ageing, is stable and maintenance work continues to be undertaken to ensure secure, functional and legislative compliant systems remain in place while a new long-term replacement plan is progressed". It still had vendor support for the old system, DIA said. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Scoop
4 days ago
- Scoop
South Wairarapa Plans To Spend Almost $30m On Water Infrastructure
South Wairarapa District Council is set to spend almost $30 million on capital water infrastructure projects in the next two years, with all to be delivered in-house until a new water services entity is established. Significant projects on the horizon for the council included upgrades to wastewater treatment plants in Greytown, Martinborough, and Featherston, pipe renewals, and capacity upgrades to enable growth. The council's Management Services Agreement with Wellington Water Limited was set to expire on June 30 but the council has voted to keep operational expenditure with the water management entity for another year and do its capital expenditure programme in-house. This vote was done in public exclusion and the report has recently been released. The report said the council would need to build a team to deliver South Wairarapa's full capital expenditure programme for at least the next two years, however, the proposed Wairarapa-Tararua entity could start as early as July 1, 2026. Over the first two years of the council's 2025-34 Long-Term Plan, its capital investment programme totalled $10.85m and $18.31m respectively, the report said. 'The expected benefits of us managing capital expenditure in-house are anticipated to be more cost control, cost efficiency, on-time delivery, local contractor delivery, and optimisation of the programme leading into the new entity in which our forward investment programme will be a factor for negotiations,' the report to council said. 'The risks are that there might be some delay while we source resourcing, and this may impact on relationships with the community and the regulator, but this should be able to be managed with proactive and comprehensive communications.' The report said the relationship between the council and Wellington Water had been 'fraught' and councillors had voted in public-exclusion in December to exit the relationship with Wellington Water on June 30, 2025. Councillors had instructed staff to explore options for interim arrangements, citing dissatisfaction with Wellington Water's performance. The report said the Local Water Done Well process had provided 'additional impetus to consider an early exit from Wellington Water by SWDC'. 'Earlier exit carries the potential for upside in terms of both improved levels of service in the short to medium term, and for being better prepared for the transition into the new entity, if well executed,' the report said. 'There are also risks to an earlier exit including being able to procure sufficient resources to replace Wellington Water and the distraction from the Local Water Done Well transition work that managing an early transition could cause.' In January, council chief executive Janice Smith and Deputy Mayor and Wellington Water Committee representative Melissa Sadler-Futter met with Wellington Water Board chair Nick Leggett and chief executive Pat Dougherty and gave them informal notice that the council intended to exit the relationship on June 30 but that this could be extended 'depending on practicality'. The report said council staff then requested information to assist with this transition but Wellington Water staff had been 'disappointingly' slow to respond, 'in part because our requests distract Wellington Water resources from other matters such as planning for the new Wellington Regional entity'. Initially, council staff were asked to look at a full-service external provider option taking both operational and capital expenditure away from Wellington Water but councillors voted at the end of April to take back capital projects only. At a Wellington Water Committee meeting on Friday, Dougherty said Wellington Water was working to transfer all capital projects back to the council by July 1 and was 'starting to get systems in place to look at how we transfer responsibilities for operations and maintenance by July 1, 2026'.
