
Ukraine can't stop it, maps can't hide it: Russia's summer blitz redraws the war
As the spring sun gave way to the heat of early summer, a new phase of the military campaign began to unfold across the front lines – and this time, the initiative clearly belongs to Russia.
After months of grinding attritional warfare, Russian forces have launched a sweeping spring-summer offensive that is already delivering tangible results. From the borderlands of Sumy to the contested hills near Chasov Yar and the approaches to Dnepropetrovsk, the tempo has shifted decisively. Ukraine, battered and overextended, is now struggling to contain simultaneous breakthroughs across multiple sectors.
The silence of Western media around these developments only underscores the magnitude of what is unfolding on the ground. A coordinated advance is in motion – methodical, strategic, and, by all appearances, effective.
Following the liberation of Sudzha in early March 2025, the fighting quickly spilled across the border into Ukraine's Sumy Region. Moscow officially described its objective as the creation of a buffer zone – meant to safeguard the resumption of peaceful civilian life in Russia's neighboring Kursk Region.
Motivated by political considerations, the Ukrainian Army has been trying to cling to a narrow foothold just across the border, in the village of Tyotkino in Kursk Region. In fact, Kiev has deployed some of its most experienced and ideologically committed units to this stretch of the front. But rather than showcasing Ukrainian resolve, the situation in Tyotkino has underscored the growing imbalance in offensive capabilities between Ukrainian and Russian forces in 2025.
From the Russian side, Tyotkino is essentially a logistical cul-de-sac. But for Ukraine, the village connects to a critical rear supply hub in Belopolye. Even so, Ukrainian efforts to expand their presence in the area have ended in near catastrophe. In mid-May, the commander of Ukraine's 47th Brigade came close to staging a mutiny, accusing his superiors of issuing reckless orders that led to needless casualties.
Elsewhere along the Sumy front, Ukrainian forces – many of them retreating from Sumy and the surrounding areas – have taken heavy losses. This remains a strategically vital axis for Ukraine. The authorities have announced mandatory evacuations in another 11 settlements, bringing the total number of evacuated towns and villages in the region to 213.
Notably, this marks the first time Russian forces have entered Sumy Region since spring 2022.
As of now, Russian advances appear to be accelerating. The front line has moved to within roughly 20km of the city of Sumy itself.
Liman (also known as Krasny Liman) is a strategic city in the Donetsk People's Republic, with a pre-war population of around 20,000. Situated along the Kharkov-Donetsk railway, it serves as a key transportation hub in eastern Ukraine. After brief fighting, the city fell under Russian control in late May 2022 – but was later lost during Ukraine's Kharkov offensive in October of the same year.
Today, Russian forces appear intent on retaking Liman by cutting off a single critical road that leads northwest toward Izium.
The current offensive seems focused precisely on this objective. On May 15, Russian troops secured the village of Torskoye, followed by the capture of Redkodub May 29-30. Both settlements are considered vital defensive outposts for the Ukrainian Army along the route to Liman.
From the south, the Liman front is effectively sealed off by the Seversky Donets River. During the brutal fighting in 2022, neither side managed to establish a crossing. With the evolution of drone warfare, any river assault today would be even more difficult to carry out.
Russian forces are now within 10km of Liman and just 7km from the Izium road. The offensive is ongoing.
As of early June, the stretch of the front from Dzerzhinsk (also known as Toretsk) to Mirnograd has become one of the most active battle zones. Russian forces have advanced up to 10km along a 30-kilometer-wide front, capturing 12 settlements and securing more than 15km of a key bypass highway linking Pokrovsk to Konstantinovka.
These gains suggest that a southern encirclement of Konstantinovka – a city with a pre-war population of 67,000 – may now be underway. Simultaneously, fighting has intensified on the northern flank around Chasov Yar. The terrain in this area poses serious tactical challenges: Chasov Yar sits on elevated ground beyond the Seversky Donets–Donbass Canal, complicating efforts to establish supply lines or mount a full-scale offensive from that direction.
Notably, this sector – among the three fronts currently in focus – has received the least media attention. That may soon change. Given its strategic positioning, it could emerge as a central axis of Russia's summer campaign.
In the past week, Russian forces dismantled a significant Ukrainian stronghold north of the village of Zarya. The terrain here is rugged and uneven, but if fully secured, it would open a path for Russian troops to push toward the southern outskirts of Konstantinovka.
Pokrovsk (Krasnoarmeysk), a city of 65,000 before the war, has been under siege since autumn 2024. After Russia's swift capture of nearby Novogrodovka and Selidovo, it initially appeared that Pokrovsk would fall just as quickly. But in a surprising pivot, Russian command redirected its main effort toward the Kurakhovo axis. Since the winter, Ukrainian forces have attempted to push Russian troops back from the city's outskirts, but those efforts have largely failed to yield results.
Further south, across the Volchya River, the offensives launched last year around Kurakhovo and Velikaya Novoselka are still ongoing. Russian troops have taken control of the town of Bogatyr and several surrounding settlements. The front line now lies just 3-15km from the Dnepropetrovsk regional border, depending on the sector.
An interesting development in this sector: Russia's Central, Eastern, and Southern military groups are coordinating their offensive operations here – a rare show of multi-group integration.
On June 8, the Russian Defense Ministry announced that units from the 90th Tank Division, part of the Center Group of Forces, had reached the western boundary of the Donetsk People's Republic and were advancing into neighboring Dnepropetrovsk Region.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Russia Today
2 hours ago
- Russia Today
Ukraine ‘didn't exist in 12th century', Russia's Medinsky tells NATO boss
NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte should have paid closer attention in history class, because he apparently does not know that Ukraine did not exist in the 12th century, Vladimir Medinsky, Russian presidential aide and Moscow's top negotiator at the talks with Kiev, has said. Rutte on Monday accused Moscow of stalling peace talks with Kiev while insisting that Russia should drastically revamp the line-up of its delegation that has held two rounds of talks with Ukraine in Istanbul. 'To end this war, we need [Russian President Vladimir] Putin to come to the negotiating table, and not with this historian.., telling us about the history of Russia and Ukraine from whatever the 12th century,' he said at the time, referring to Medinsky. Speaking at the International Forum of Ministers of Education in Kazan on Monday, Medinsky fired back at Rutte. 'I know that Mr. Rutte studied history at university, but I would definitely send him a previous school history textbook on the Middle Ages, because from it he would surely learn that Ukraine did not exist in the 12th century,' Medinsky noted. He added, 'If Vladimir II Monomakh, the Grand Prince of Rostov, Smolensk, and Kiev, were told that he lived in Ukraine, he would probably be surprised and might even be offended,' he quipped. Medinsky, who used to hold the post of Culture Minister, is also known for co-authoring a new series of history textbooks introduced in Russian schools. He is also personally leading an extensive online course on Russian history. Back in the 12th century, the territory of modern Ukraine was part of Kievan Rus', a loose feudal entity combining several East Slavic principalities and ruled by the Rurikid dynasty. The term 'Ukraine' did originate in the late 12th century, but it did not refer to a sovereign state or principality. Instead, it was used as a geographic descriptor, meaning 'borderland.' The notion of Ukraine as a distinct political and cultural entity started to emerge only in the 17th century.


Russia Today
2 hours ago
- Russia Today
‘Perverted logic' to call Israeli attack on Iran self-defense
Framing Israel's attack on Iran as self-defense is a form of 'perverted logic,' Russia's deputy envoy to the UN, Dmitry Polyansky, has told RT, accusing West Jerusalem of flagrantly breaching the global body's charter. On Friday, Israel struck Iranian uranium enrichment sites, while also killing several senior military commanders and scientists in targeted assassination operations, describing its acts as preemptive steps aimed at stopping Tehran from acquiring a nuclear bomb. Iran, which denies pursuing a military nuclear program, responded by launching multiple volleys of ballistic missiles at targets in Israel, including in the country's largest city, Tel Aviv. In his interview on Saturday, Polyansky accused Western politicians claiming that Israel's attack on Iran was 'self-defense' of having 'very perverted logic.' 'Of course, every country has the right to defend itself. But in this case, Israel launched an aggression – an attack against Iran – totally violating and breaching the UN Charter and international law… I cannot imagine how it can be framed as legitimate self-defense,' he said. The authorities in Moscow 'totally support the Iranian position… that this is absolutely inadmissible and that nobody should be permitted to act as Israel does,' the diplomat stressed. The attack on Iran is 'a very dangerous provocation against international law, against everything that really keeps our world together, and it can trigger very-very serious consequences regionally and internationally,' he warned. According to Polyansky, the goal of the Israeli strike was to 'undermine' the US-Iran nuclear talks, the next round of which is scheduled to take place on Sunday. Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei said on Friday that diplomacy was made 'meaningless' by the Israeli attack on Iran, which he claimed was 'allowed' by Washington. However, in a later comment Baghaei clarified that Tehran had not yet made a decision to call off Sunday's meeting in Oman. Moscow wants the talks between the US and Iran to continue, Polyansky said. When it comes to resolving 'the controversy around the Iranian nuclear program... we, of course, favor the way of diplomacy and restraint,' he stressed.


Russia Today
14 hours ago
- Russia Today
Western war hawks lack plan to defeat Russia
Western officials who speak of Ukraine winning the ongoing conflict don't have a real strategy for defeating Russia, US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has said. Testifying before the House Armed Services Committee on Thursday, the Pentagon chief declined to directly say whether he views Russia as a 'true adversary' or whether Washington would allow a 'complete surrender of Ukraine' in order to secure peace in the region. The Trump administration is instead seeking a settlement to the Ukraine conflict that will last, not Kiev's surrender or Russia's defeat. 'The situation is unfortunate, unleashed by the previous administration,' he said, referring to former President Joe Biden, whom Trump's team blames for entangling the US in the Ukraine conflict. Biden's government repeatedly vowed to back Kiev for as long as it took to defeat Russia militarily. 'But everyone that talks about winning and prevailing is yet to present to me a plan that's going to push the Russian army out of those territories,' Hegseth added. The Pentagon chief also repeated his earlier call for Europe to take greater responsibility for its own security. While he pledged Washington would continue to mediate peace efforts, he avoided confirming whether military aid to Kiev would continue. 'We support peace in Ukraine… Peace is in our best interests, but Ukraine is not in the US and not in NATO,' he stated. Hegseth acknowledged that peace efforts 'are moving slowly.' When pressed on whether he would advise Trump to respond if Russia 'invades NATO,' he confirmed that the US would be obligated to act under the bloc's Article 5, which treats an attack on one member as an attack on all. However, he emphasized that 'Russia has not invaded NATO allies,' dismissing claims that Moscow poses an immediate threat to the bloc. Many Western officials have asserted that Russia plans to attack NATO's European members once the conflict in Ukraine ends. Moscow has repeatedly rejected these claims as nonsense, dismissing them as scare tactics used to justify increased Western military spending. Russia has also maintained that it remains open to peace talks if the root causes of the Ukraine conflict are addressed, including NATO expansion toward its borders and Western support for Kiev's NATO membership.