'I came to get a sack of flour … a sardine tin or anything,' : Aid site attack witnesses
Mahmoud Ismael was one of the desperate Palestinian aid seekers who gathered outside the GHF- run Rafah aid distribution point before Israeli quadcopters and tanks fired on them. He had walked miles on crutches to get there.
'I came to get a sack of flour … a sardine tin or anything,' he told AFP.
'There is no food in my house, and I can't get food for my children,' he said.
Sameh Hamuda walked from Gaza City and spent the night with relatives in a tent near Rafah before heading to the aid point.
'They began distributing aid, but suddenly quadcopter drones opened fire on the people, and tanks started shooting heavily. Several people were killed right in front of me,' he told the AFP news agency.
'I ran and survived. Death follows you as long as you're in Gaza.'
" I don't understand why they call people to the aid centres and then open fire on them,' he said. 'What are we supposed to do?' Abdullah Barbakh said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Today
2 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Man attacks Colorado crowd with firebombs, 8 injured
Eight people were injured on Sunday when a 45-year-old man yelled "Free Palestine" and threw incendiary devices into a crowd in Boulder, Colorado where a demonstration to remember the Israeli hostages who remain in Gaza was taking place, authorities said. Four women and four men between 52 and 88 years old were transported to hospitals, Boulder police said. Authorities had earlier put the count of the injured at six and said at least one of them was in a critical condition. "As a result of these preliminary facts, it is clear that this is a targeted act of violence and the FBI is investigating this as an act of terrorism," the FBI special agent in charge of the Denver Field Office, Mark Michalek, said. Michalek named the suspect as Mohamed Soliman, who was hospitalised shortly after the attack. Reuters could not immediately locate contact information for him or his family. Police tape cordons off the site of an attack that injured multiple people in Boulder. Photos: Reuters FBI Director Kash Patel also described the incident as a "targeted terror attack," and Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser said it appeared to be "a hate crime given the group that was targeted." Boulder Police Chief Stephen Redfearn said he did not believe anyone else was involved. "We're fairly confident we have the lone suspect in custody," he said. The attack took place on the Pearl Street Mall, a popular pedestrian shopping district in the shadow of the University of Colorado, during an event organized by Run for Their Lives, an organisation devoted to drawing attention to the hostages seized in the aftermath of Palestinian's 2023 attack on Israel. Policemen gather near the scene. In a statement, the group said the walks have been held every week since then for the hostages, "without any violent incidents until today." Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar said on X he was shocked by the "terrible antisemitic terror attack," describing it as "pure antisemitism." The incident comes amid heightened tensions in the United States over Israel's war in Gaza, which has spurred both an increase in antisemitic hate crime as well as moves by conservative supporters of Israel led by President Donald Trump to brand pro-Palestinian protests as antisemitic. His administration has detained protesters of the war without charge and cut off funding to elite US universities that have permitted such demonstrations. Reuters
Middle East Eye
3 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Trump nuclear proposal allows Iran to enrich uranium: Report
The US will allow Iran to enrich Uranium at a low level for a predetermined amount of time as part of a nuclear deal, according to a proposal passed to Iran from the Trump administration, Axios reported on Monday. The report could reassure advocates of a deal, given Iran's insistence that it retain the right to enrich Uranium at some level, but is likely going to be met with fiery criticism by Israel and its allies in the US Congress. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been advocating for preemptive military strikes on Iran. Israel says the only nuclear deal it wants is akin to that which former Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi agreed to in 2003, which saw the full destruction of Libya's nuclear infrastructure. Trump said last week that he warned Netanyahu not to launch preemptive strikes on Iran. But he also said on Friday that he wanted a deal in which "we can blow up whatever we want, but nobody getting killed". His proposal is a serious climbdown from that kind of talk. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters It would allow Iran to enrich uranium up to three percent within its borders to maintain a civilian nuclear programme. The figure is substantially below the 60 percent level it is currently at, according to Axios. It is close to the 3.67 percent enrichment level the Obama administration agreed to with Iran as part of the 2015 nuclear deal. What we know The previous Trump administration unilaterally withdrew from the 2015 nuclear deal, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), in 2018. If the proposal stands as reported by Axios, it would mark a major concession by the Trump administration, which stated its own red line on a deal was preventing Iran from enriching uranium. "An enrichment programme can never exist in the state of Iran ever again. That's our red line. No enrichment," US envoy Steve Witkoff told Breitbart News in May. Like the Obama agreement, Iran would be restricted to enriching at the three percent threshold for a certain time period. The JCPOA imposed a 15-year time limit on Iran's enrichment limit. The Trump proposal leaves the time limit open for the following rounds of negotiations. The US and Iran have held five rounds of talks so far. The negotiations have been mediated mainly by Oman, but Witkoff and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi have met in person. The Trump proposal reported by Axios also appears to echo the 2015 deal in other areas. Iran will not be allowed to build any new enrichment facilities and must "dismantle critical infrastructure for conversion and processing of uranium", Axios reported. That language is similar to the 2015 nuclear deal, which mandated Iran to dismantle and remove two-thirds of its centrifuges. The Trump proposal calls for Iran to make its underground enrichment facilities "non-operational" for a period of time to be negotiated by the parties. The 2015 deal prevented enrichment at the underground Fordow facility until 2031. Witkoff sent the US proposal to Iran on Saturday. Enrichment Consortium According to Axios, it relies heavily on a "strong system for monitoring and verification" by the International Atomic Energy Agency. One key difference between the 2015 deal and the Trump proposal is that it envisions a regional enrichment consortium including Iran. Several reports have said that Saudi Arabia and the UAE - two key US partners - could join Iran as part of the consortium. The Gulf states vehemently opposed the 2015 nuclear deal, as they were locked in proxy struggles with Iran throughout the region. However, Riyadh and Abu Dhabi have had a rapprochement with the Islamic Republic over the last several years. Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan said after Trump's visit to Riyadh in May that the kingdom 'fully supports' the nuclear talks. The White House neither confirmed nor denied the Axios report. Iran has yet to comment on it. On Monday, Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei told a news conference that Tehran was seeking clarification on debilitating sanctions relief as part of a deal. 'We want to guarantee that the sanctions are effectively lifted,' he said. "So far, the American side has not wanted to clarify this issue.' The Wall Street Journal editorial board published an article on Sunday saying the Trump administration had paused all new sanctions activity toward Iran.
Middle East Eye
3 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
‘Smirker of the genocide': Outrage after Matthew Miller says Israel committed war crimes
Former US State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller has sparked outrage after saying he believed 'without a doubt" that Israel has committed war crimes. On Monday's episode of Sky News' Trump 100 podcast, Miller, now speaking as a private citizen, said he does not believe Israel is carrying out a genocide, but that it is failing itself as a democracy by not holding soldiers accountable for their actions in Gaza. He added that there were "disagreements all along the way" on how to handle Israel's war on Gaza. Miller served as the State Department spokesperson from 2023 until the end of Biden's presidential term, during which he frequently defended Israel's war on Gaza. When asked if he believed Israel was committing a genocide in Gaza, Miller replied: 'I don't believe it's genocide, but I think it is without a doubt true that Israel has committed war crimes.' The host then pressed on why Miller had publicly denied accusations of war crimes against Israel for more than a year, to which Miller said he was a spokesperson for the US government, not for himself. 'The United States government had not concluded they've (Israel) committed war crimes – they still have not concluded that," he said. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters 'You are a spokesperson for the president, the administration, and you espouse the positions of the administration. And when you're not in the administration, you can just give your own opinions." Miller continued to specify that it is still open to question whether the Israeli state has committed war crimes, but that there have been 'individual incidents' from soldiers in the Israeli military who undoubtedly committed "war crimes". The responsibility, he said, lies with Israel to hold these individuals accountable, which he believes they have not done. 'Characteristic smirk' Miller took heavy criticism throughout his time at the White House, from both the general public and reporters who attended State Department press conferences. On multiple occasions, reporters pushed back against Miller as he continuously deflected blame from the US or Israel, despite any evidence presented. One viral moment took place when journalist Sam Husseini accused Miller of 'smirking' while he was talking about the death toll in Gaza. This, in particular, has been continuously referenced by social media users who say that Miller's recent admission of Israel's war crimes is not only too late but will not "save him' from complicity in the war crimes he says Israel has committed. Middle East Eye requested comment from Miller regarding the backlash that has ensued, but did not receive a response by the time of publication. Palestinian journalist Abubaker Abed, who recently arrived in Dublin after fleeing Gaza, took to X to respond to Miller, writing: 'You will always be remembered as the smirker of the Gaza Genocide'. We will also never forgive and forget you, and you will always be remembered as the smirker of the Gaza Genocide. You also must be held accountable. — Abubaker Abed (@AbubakerAbedW) June 2, 2025 Another wrote that Miller wore his 'characteristic smirk' while he was 'quite literally the face of the US covering for Israel, denying their war crimes on the podium day in and day out'. 'We're seeing more and more cases like his as the scale of the horrors that happened - and are still happening - in Gaza is becoming more and more impossible to deny,' he continued. 'They're nothing more than opportunists trying to salvage their reputations on the graves of those they helped kill. The lowest of the low.' Others echoed the sentiment that Miller is among the many figures, ranging from journalists to international leaders, who have only recently condemned Israel for its bombardment of the enclave, which has killed over 54,000 Palestinians so far, after defending the state for a year and a half. 'Public opinion has shifted and now everyone needs to get a quote that they can point that says they knew the whole time and were secretly working behind the scenes,' one Reddit user wrote. "At some point, all of these criminals will claim they acted under compulsion," Palestinian-American imam Dr Omar Suleiman wrote in an Instagram post. "We will not let them sanitize their role in this genocide." Popular political commentator and streamer Hasan Piker pointed out that the potential war crimes Israel has committed were done, in part, because of Miller and the US government's constant support. you directly helped cover for those war crimes so we could keep sending more munitions to do new crimes with! — hasanabi (@hasanthehun) June 2, 2025 "How many times did this piece of shit say something like 'we've asked the IDF to investigate these reports and we'll let you know what they say'? How many times did he invoke the phrase 'hamas propaganda' when referring to these reports?" a Reddit user wrote in a thread discussing the podcast episode. Some took it even a step further in pointing the blame back at Miller, saying that he could be tried as a war criminal - like those who were spokespeople for the Nazi party in Germany - for his role in defending Israel. "The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him." - Nuremberg Principle IV. Miller is a war criminal! — Sunny Singh (@ProfSunnySingh) June 2, 2025 In an X post responding to Miller's statement, investigative journalist Asa Winstanley wrote: "Matthew Miller without a doubt belongs in jail for the rest of his life."
