
Thames Water nationalisation ‘not the answer' says minister after private equity rescue fails
Nationalisation of struggling Thames Water is 'not the answer,' environment secretary Steve Reed has warned after a private equity giant pulled out of a £4bn rescue deal, throwing the company's future into doubt.
A bailout of the debt-laden utility would take money away from the NHS and other public services, he said.
Thames Water is about £19 billion in debt and MPs were told last month that at one point this year it had about five weeks' worth of cash left before going bust.
Britain's biggest water supplier, which has 16 million customers, chose KKR at the end of March to be its preferred bidder under plans to invest around £4 billion of new equity. But the firm said on Tuesday that KKR was no longer 'in a position to proceed' and that its status as preferred bidder had lapsed.
At the despatch box, Conservative shadow environment secretary Victoria Atkins accused ministers of having 'talked themselves out of' a rescue plan.
Mr Reed told MPs: 'The government stands ready for any eventuality and will take action as required. We are not looking at nationalisation because it would cost over £100 billion of public money that would have had to be taken away from other public services like the National Health Service to be given to the owners of the water companies.
'It will take years to unpick the current model of ownership, during which time pollution would get worse and we know that nationalisation is not the answer - you only have to look at the situation in Scotland to see that.'
Mr Reed said he would 'make no apology' for tackling the behaviour of water companies under the previous government. 'I mean, we even had stories that have been confirmed by water companies of previous Conservative secretaries of state shouting and screaming at water company bosses but not actually changing the law to do anything about the bonuses that they were able to pay themselves.'
Liberal Democrat environment spokesman Tim Farron said Thames Water should go into special administration and emerge 'as a public interest company.'
Reform UK deputy leader Richard Tice proposed a plan to 'buy it for a pound - it's a good deal for the taxpayer - then it won't have to pay huge, egregious rates of interest, and the taxpayer and the customers will be the beneficiaries.'
The move by KKR comes as an interim report by the Independent Water Commission found the water sector in England and Wales needs a 'fundamental reset' and called for a 'strengthening and rebalancing' of Ofwat's regulatory role.
It is understood Thames Water is now working on alternative plans with senior creditors. These creditors are the bondholders who effectively own Thames Water after the High Court earlier this year approved a financial restructuring through a loan of up to £3 billion to ensure it can keep running until the summer of 2026.
Sir Adrian Montague, chairman of Thames Water, said: 'We continue to believe that a sustainable recapitalisation of the company is in the best interests of all stakeholders and continue to work with our creditors and stakeholders to achieve that goal.'
KKR declined to comment.
An Ofwat spokesperson said: 'We are liaising with the company on its next steps in light of its recent announcement to ensure its equity raise process continues to secure improved financial resilience and operational performance.'
The firm was put under further pressure last week when it was fined a record £122.7 million by Ofwat after it was found to have broken rules over sewage treatment and paying out dividends.
Water companies have faced public and political outrage over the extent of pollution, rising bills, high dividends, and executive pay and bonuses.
Thames hiked consumer water bills for customers by an average of 31% in April and incurred further wrath over plans to pay senior bosses large bonuses linked to the water company securing a £3 billion emergency loan, which were later dropped.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Rhyl Journal
33 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Faro Airport to let Brits use passport e-gates for first time
Faro Airport in Portugal will start this rollout ahead of the peak summer season in the Algarve. This announcement comes after a UK-EU deal where the government shared that British passport holders will be able to use e-gates at more European airports. Since Brexit, British travellers arriving at EU airports have generally been forced to queue for manned desks to have their passports stamped. 📍Faro airport. Horrendous This is instead of using automated gates with facial recognition technology, which has led to long waits in peak periods, The Daily Mail reports. British passports can currently be used at e-gates in the EU at only a limited number of airports in Spain and Portugal. Nick Thomas-Symonds, the minister for EU relations, told Parliament today (Thursday, June 5) that UK tourists arriving at Faro over the coming days will be able to use e-gates. He said: "The historic deal that we signed with the EU on May 19 is in our national interests. "Good for bills, borders and jobs. It slashes red tape and bureaucracy, boosts British exporters and makes life easier for holidaymakers. "Indeed, I'm delighted to confirm this morning that Faro Airport in Portugal will start the rollout of e-gate access to UK arrivals this week." The EU plans to introduce a new Entry/Exit system (EES) in October 2025, which will remove the need for people from non-member countries to have their passports stamped. The UK Government website says: "If you are travelling to a country in the Schengen area using a UK passport, you will be required to register your biometric details, such as fingerprints or a photo, when you arrive." It adds: "When EES is introduced, you will need to create a digital record on your first visit to the Schengen area at the port or airport on arrival. "You will be required to submit your fingerprints and have your photo taken at dedicated booths. You will not need to provide any information before travelling to a Schengen area country, and this data will be kept for three years. There are concerns this will cause queues at EU airports when first rolled out, as well as at the Port of Dover and Eurostar terminals. The countries that make up the Schengen area are: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Italy, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, and Switzerland. According to the UK Government website, you do not need a visa for short trips to the EU or countries in the Schengen area if both of the following apply: Other reasons include: Recommended reading: Why are passports different colours and what does each colour mean? How to claim compensation for flight delays and cancellations Does buying from duty free at the airport save you money and how does it work? You can travel to more than one country in a 180-day period, but how long you can stay in individual countries depends on their rules. The website adds: "Your total stay in the Schengen area must be no more than 90 days in every 180 days. "It does not matter how many countries you visit. The 180-day period keeps 'rolling'."


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Breakingviews - Wise's US listing switch lacks financial wisdom
LONDON, June 5 (Reuters Breakingviews) - Wise (WISEa.L), opens new tab helps customers exchange money more cheaply, transparently and, well, wisely. But the $15 billion firm's plan, opens new tab to shift its primary listing to New York from London seems less clever. CEO, co-founder and largest shareholder Kristo Käärmann wants to tap deeper pools of liquidity and attract more American investors. Yet for a company already trading at a premium valuation, the move raises more questions than it answers. Käärmann's case rests on two key points. Wise's shares are thinly traded in London, meaning investors risk moving the market by offloading stock in large volumes. Second, a U.S. listing would boost the company's appeal to American investors and even customers. There's truth to both. The total daily value of Wise's trading volume has averaged about half of $4 billion American peer Remitly Global over the past two years according to a Breakingviews analysis of LSEG data, even though the London-listed group is much bigger. And some domestic-focused U.S. investors prefer to hold stocks listed in their home market. Yet Wise needn't cross the Atlantic Ocean to boost liquidity. One possible obstacle to winning more investors at home is the company's quirky governance, where Class B owners have nine votes per share. The effect is that Käärmann has a tight grip on the company despite owning less than 20% of the tradable Class A stock, according to LSEG data. The alternative to hopping across the pond would be to get rid of some of the CEO's special rights, which could in turn smooth Wise's entry into Britain's main stock benchmark, the FTSE 100 Index (.FTSE), opens new tab. That would boost liquidity to U.S. levels: LSEG research, opens new tab found that, relative to the volume of companies' tradable shares, FTSE 100 trading levels were slightly higher than in the S&P 500 Index (.SPX), opens new tab in 2022. Nor is the United States Wise's biggest geography, as it was for other listing switchers like CRH and Ferguson Enterprises. For Käärmann's company, the American market comes third after Europe and Asia, making up 20% of group revenue. As for brand awareness, switching trading venue seems like a strange way to gain publicity compared with a marketing campaign. Moving the listing also brings possible downside. Wise trades at 29 times consensus 2027 earnings – beating Remitly, Block, PayPal and others. Other metrics tell the same story: there's no evidence of a valuation penalty because of the company's UK trading venue. That means Käärmann has much to lose if the company ends up as one of the many 'orphaned' pond-hoppers, which switch listing but never quite catch fire in the U.S. market. Research by think tank New Financial earlier this year found that just 44% of the 16 European companies that had moved across the Atlantic subsequently beat the performance of their home continent. The one consolidation is that this doesn't seem to be about extra CEO pay: Käärmann, as a major shareholder, has taken a roughly 200,000-pound ($270,000) cash salary in recent years, which is tiny compared to most bosses. There are no plans to raise that, according to a person familiar with the matter. But for investors, Wise's shift looks like a poor financial trade-off. Follow Karen Kwok on LinkedIn, opens new tab and X, opens new tab.


Economist
an hour ago
- Economist
Can Britain untangle the mess in its water industry?
Bowing to the Byzantine financial complexity of privatised water in Britain, the government made an unusual choice for its 'once-in-a-generation' review into the troubled sector: putting a central banker in charge. Sir Jon Cunliffe, until recently of the Bank of England, released his interim findings on June 3rd. That same morning the industry laggard, Thames Water, announced that rescue plans had collapsed. After ten weeks of due diligence KKR, a private-equity giant, decided not to inject fresh cash into the struggling and over-indebted utility.