Trump leans on GOP senators as they gear up to make changes to his domestic policy bill
President Donald Trump spoke with several GOP senators on Monday, including ones who have raised concerns about his domestic policy bill, as the chamber gears up to make changes to the legislation and congressional leaders aim to put the package on Trump's desk by July 4.
In a sign of the challenges ahead for GOP leaders, a number of Republican senators have raised concerns about the House-passed package, demanding changes that could be tough for Speaker Mike Johnson's narrow majority to swallow when it moves back over to the House.
The president met with Senate Majority Leader John Thune at the White House on Monday, who said they 'covered a lot of ground. A lot about the big, beautiful bill.' A White House official confirmed Thune and Trump met.
Several of the senators who have been most vocal about their concerns — Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri, Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky — said that they discussed the package with the president.
Paul told CNN that he 'had a lengthy discussion' with Trump this week and told the President that he can't back the bill if an increase to the debt ceiling remains in the package.
'It's just not a conservative thing to do, and I've told him I can't support the bill if they are together. If they were to separate out and take the debt ceiling off that, I very much could consider the rest of the bill,' said Paul, who noted that Trump 'did most of the talking' on their call.
Johnson said he 'got a real nice call from the President this morning, had a nice conversation, very respectful,' as the Wisconsin Republican continues to press the President for further assurances that Congress will commit to more stringent spending cuts than what were included in the House bill.
Johnson opened the door, however, to being flexible in how the White House could assuage his concerns and said he was open to getting assurances for future cuts to be made outside of just the framework of Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.'
Asked if he would be open to passing something that looked like the House bill but with a 'promise' for other spending changes in the future, Johnson said, 'I want to help the president succeed in this thing so I've got a pretty open mind. My requirement has always been a commitment to a reasonable pre-pandemic level of spending and a process to achieve and maintain it.'
Trump addressed Senate Republicans in a Truth Social post on Monday, writing, 'With the Senate coming back to Washington today, I call on all of my Republican friends in the Senate and House to work as fast as they can to get this Bill to MY DESK before the Fourth of JULY. Thank you for your attention to this matter!'
Hawley, who has expressed deep concerns with potential changes to Medicaid, posted on X that he also spoke with the president about the bill.
'Just had a great talk with President Trump about the Big, Beautiful Bill. He said again, NO MEDICAID BENEFIT CUTS,' wrote Hawley.
He told reporters later that he is very concerned about the impact of the tax on providers because it could cause already struggling rural hospitals in his state and around the county to close, something that would be akin to a cut in benefits if Medicaid recipients can't access health care.
'I'm also worried about this sick tax, you know, where now charging people to go to the doctor, pay before they can see a doctor. You know, they're on Medicaid because they can't afford to buy private health insurance. So, if they could afford to be paying out of pocket, they wouldn't be on Medicaid. So I don't know why we would tax them and penalize them,' said Hawley.
Hawley said in his phone call with Trump, the president asked him what he thought the prospects for the bill are in the Senate.
'I said, 'good if we don't cut Medicaid, if we do no Medicaid benefit cuts. And he said, I'm 100% supportive of that',' he said. 'He specifically said, 'waste, fraud and abuse, fine and work requirements, fine…but no benefit cuts'. And I said, 'we are singing from the same handbook.'
The various changes that GOP senators would like to see to the sweeping domestic policy bill make clear that the process of passing the 'big, beautiful bill' is far from the finish line.
'The world hasn't changed since we've been on recess,' Sen. Thom Tillis told reporters on Monday evening. 'There's work to do there.'
The North Carolina Republican, who's up for reelection in 2026, noted that about 620,000 recipients have enrolled in Medicaid since his state expanded the program. It's been a concern among some lawmakers that work requirements implemented in the House's bill could particularly impact coverage in Medicaid expansion states.
'We've got to work on getting that right, giving the state legislatures and others a chance to react to it, make a recommendation or make a change, and that's all the implementation stuff that we're beginning to talk about now that we're in possession of the bill,' Tillis said.
Maine Sen. Susan Collins, who will also have to defend her seat next year, finds the House-drafted work requirements 'acceptable,' but voiced other concerns with a provision related to provider taxes that could impact how states receive federal dollars.
'I'm very concerned about not only low-income families, but our rural hospitals,' she said.
Sen. Shelley Moore Capito told CNN that she did roundtables with constituents in West Virginia over the recess and 'there's a lot of concern' about Medicaid at home.
'We haven't had a chance to digest how it's going to impact our hospitals,' she said.
Sen. Jerry Moran of Kansas said he was also worried about 'harming hospitals that we just spent COVID money to save,' adding that he'll be 'lobbying to try to get something that's acceptable to me' on Medicaid in the bill.
Another red line floated by some Senate Republicans is the roll back of Biden-era clean energy tax credits, which could begin with several consumer credits as soon as the end of this year.
Tillis said he's looking at the issue 'through the lens of a businessperson,' explaining, 'it's easy, you know, from a political standpoint, to cancel programs that are out there. We need to be smart about where capital has been deployed and to minimize the impact on the message that we send businesses that every two or four years we have massive changes in our priorities for energy transition.'
He said lawmakers should 'show some respect' to businesses that have employed capital on clean energy initiatives, adding 'I think we can get there' before walking into a meeting of the Senate Finance Committee.
On the clean energy tax credit phaseout timeline, Moran said, 'I think there's a lot of Senate sentiment that it's too rapid.'
Still, he wouldn't say if he'd vote against the existing bill, noting that he would lose 'leverage,' adding that the whole package has 'lots of things that I care about.'
Sen. Markwayne Mullin, who has been playing a key role in talks with his former House colleagues, said he thinks there are 'two big issues' that the Senate can't touch, which were central in House GOP leadership's down-to-the-wire negotiations with holdouts.
'We have a structure, a great structure, the House sent over. We don't have to tear down that structure. We may have to put some more decorations in some of the rooms and maybe repaint some of the walls, but it's got a good structure to it,' he said.
The Oklahoma Republican said the Senate should not go below the about $1.6 trillion in spending cuts promised to conservative hardliners or change the state and local tax deduction provisions carefully negotiated with House Republicans from high tax states.
'As long as we leave those two things there, and then we put our fingerprints on the rest of it, I think we're in good shape,' he said.
Sen. John Cornyn, an ally of GOP leadership, said he thinks they'll try to have the bill on Trump's desk by July 4, 'which means things are going to have to move at a much faster schedule.'
He noted that with the debt ceiling limit closing in, the House may have to just accept what passes the Senate, telling reporters, 'I've been around here long enough to see the Senate jam the House and the House jam the Senate.'
CNN's David Wright and Kristen Holmes contributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
19 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
FCC Commissioner Simington Steps Down, Joining Starks
Two members of the Federal Communications Commission announced that they'll leave the agency this week. Democrat Geoffrey Starks, who had previously announced he was stepping down without identifying a departure date, said he will leave on Friday. Republican Nathan Simington will also depart at the end of the week.


The Hill
20 minutes ago
- The Hill
Collins opposed to PEPFAR, global health rescissions proposed by Trump
Senate Appropriations Chair Susan Collins (R-Maine) said Wednesday that she is opposed to a Trump White House proposal that would claw back money Congress has already appropriated for global health programs, including the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR). 'I do not support the rescission for PEPFAR and global health programs,' Collins told reporters as she walked into a meeting in the Capitol on Wednesday afternoon. The White House on Tuesday sent lawmakers a request to rescind $9.4 billion in funding for foreign aid and public broadcasting, which were targeted for cuts by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Congress needs to approve the rescissions package to codify the DOGE cuts. The package would cut nearly $9 million from PEPFAR and $400 million from global programs intended to control the spread of HIV/AIDS. Congress has 45 days to act on the package, which will be considered on a procedural fast-track in the Senate, allowing it to pass the upper chamber with a simple majority vote. Collins in a statement Tuesday said the Appropriations Committee 'will carefully review the rescissions package and examine the potential consequences of these rescissions on global health, national security, national security' and other congressional priorities.


Chicago Tribune
20 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
President Donald Trump tax bill will add $2.4 trillion to the deficit and leave 10.9 million more uninsured, CBO says
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump's big bill making its way through Congress will cut taxes by $3.75 trillion but also increase deficits by $2.4 trillion over the next decade, according to an analysis released Wednesday by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. The CBO also estimates an increase of 10.9 million people without health insurance under the bill by 2034, including 1.4 million who are in the United States without legal status in state-funded programs. The package would reduce federal outlays, or spending, by nearly $1.3 trillion over that period, the budget office said. What is the CBO? A look at the small office inflaming debate over Trump's tax bill'In the words of Elon Musk, this bill is a 'disgusting abomination,'' said Rep. Brendan Boyle of Pennsylvania, the top Democrat on the House Budget Committee, reviving the billionaire former Trump aide's criticism of the package. House Speaker Mike Johnson said he called Musk late Tuesday to discuss the criticism but had not heard back. 'I hope he comes around,' Johnson told reporters. The analysis comes at a crucial moment in the legislative process as Trump is pushing Congress to have the final product on his desk to sign into law by the Fourth of July. The work of the CBO, which for decades has served as the official scorekeeper of legislation in Congress, will be weighed by lawmakers and others seeking to understand the budgetary impacts of the sprawling 1,000-page-plus package. Ahead of the CBO's release, the White House and Republican leaders criticized the budget office in a preemptive campaign designed to sow doubt in its findings. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the CBO has been 'historically wrong,' and Senate Majority Leader John Thune said the CBO was 'flat wrong' because it underestimated the potential revenue growth from Trump's first round of tax breaks in 2017. The CBO last year said receipts were $1.5 trillion, or 5.6% greater than predicted, in large part because of the 'burst of high inflation' during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021. White House Budget Director Russ Vought said when you adjust for 'current policy' — which means not counting some $4.5 trillion in existing tax breaks that are simply being extended for the next decade — the overall package actually doesn't pile onto the deficit. He argued the spending cuts alone in fact help reduce deficits by $1.4 trillion over the decade. Democrats and even some Republicans call that 'current policy' accounting move a gimmick, but it's the approach Senate Republicans intend to use during their consideration of the package to try to show it does not add to the nation's deficits. Vought argued that the CBO is the one using a 'gimmick' by tallying the costs of continuing those tax breaks that would otherwise expire. Leavitt also suggested that the CBO's employees are biased, even though certain budget office workers face strict ethical rules — including restrictions on campaign donations and political activity — to ensure objectivity and impartiality. 'When it comes time to make prognostications on economic growth, they've always been wrong,' House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., said at a press conference. Asked if it's time to get rid of the CBO, Scalise did not dismiss the idea, saying it's valid to raise concerns. Alongside the costs of the bill, the CBO had previously estimated that nearly 4 million fewer people would have food stamps each month due to the legislation's proposed changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, known as SNAP. The bill, called the One Big Beautiful Bill Act after the president's own catch phrase, is grinding its way through Congress, as the top priority of Republicans, who control both the House and the Senate — and face stiff opposition from Democrats, who call it Trump's 'big, ugly bill.' All told, the package seeks to extend the individual income tax breaks that had been approved in 2017 but that will expire in December if Congress fails to act, while adding new ones, including no taxes on tips. It also includes a massive buildup of $350 billion for border security, deportations and national security. To help cover the lost revenue, Republicans want to slash some federal spending. They propose phasing out green energy tax breaks put in place during Democrat Joe Biden's presidency. New work requirements for some adults up to age 65 on Medicaid and SNAP would begin in December 2026 and are expected to result in less spending on those programs. Republicans argue their proposals are intended to make Medicaid and other programs stronger by rooting out waste, fraud and abuse. They want the federal funding to go those who most need health care and other services, often citing women and children. But Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer said those claims are bogus and are simply part of long-running GOP efforts to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, as most states have expanded Medicaid to serve more people under the program. 'They just want to strangle health care,' Schumer said. The package also would provide a $4 trillion increase to the nation's debt limit, which is now $36 trillion, to allow more borrowing. The Treasury Department projects the debt limit will need to be raised this summer to pay the nation's already accrued bills. Now in its 50th year, the CBO was established by law after Congress sought to assert its control, as outlined in the Constitution, over the budget process, in part by setting up the new office as an alternative to the White House's Office of Management and Budget. Staffed by some 275 economists, analysts and other employees, the CBO says it seeks to provide Congress with objective, impartial information about budgetary and economic issues. Its current director, Phillip Swagel, a former Treasury official in Republican President George W. Bush's administration, was reappointed to a four-year term in 2023.