Tim Cartmell kicks off mayoral run with pledge to ‘fix what's broken' in Edmonton
Article content
With about six months to go before the next municipal election, mayoral hopeful Tim Cartmell officially launched his campaign Thursday, promising to build bridges, literally and figuratively, for a city he says has 'drifted into big spending with little value.'
In a packed convention room where some 600 Edmontonians and Albertans had lunch while listening to Cartmell speak, the applause swelled as the current city councillor walked on stage to deliver a speech that focused squarely on rebuilding Edmonton's infrastructure and restoring trust in city leadership.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Calgary Herald
28 minutes ago
- Calgary Herald
Morton: Yes or No separation question wrong way to hold referendum
The First Ministers' conference in Saskatoon has come and gone. Premier Danielle Smith says she was 'encouraged' by Prime Minister Mark Carney's remarks. Article content Maybe because Carney stated that there is 'real potential for an oil pipeline to tidewater.' But later, he qualified that it would have to be 'decarbonized oil.' Article content Article content What will that mean? We just don't know. Article content What we do know is that if Quebec were treated like Alberta has been treated, it would have separated long ago. And if Albertans had the opportunity to renegotiate the terms of our relationship with Canada, we would never consent to the status quo. Article content Article content This does not mean Alberta (or Western Canada) should secede from Canada. But it does mean making the rest of Canada understand that for Alberta — and really all of Western Canada — the status quo is just as unacceptable. Article content Article content There is a lot of room between these two extremes for constitutional reforms to strike a fairer balance. Finding that balance, defining it, will be the challenge for Smith in the coming months. Article content Which brings us to the referendum. It's going to happen. Article content The UCP's new rules for initiating a citizens' referendum can and will be met by separatist groups such as Alberta Prosperity Project (APP). But there are good ways and bad ways to use referendums to inform public policy. And right now, we are headed in the wrong direction. Article content The APP's referendum question is blunt: 'Do you agree that Alberta shall become a sovereign country and cease to be a province of Canada? Yes or No.' The APP claims that it already has 220,000 'pledges.' And the No forces are already mobilizing and fundraising to defeat them. Article content Article content A referendum framed like this would be a waste of time. It would simply tell us what we already know: that about 20 per cent of Albertans are ready to leave now. It also ignores the 60 per cent of us who are neither separatist nor status quo, and would undermine Alberta's efforts to persuade Carney to roll back the Trudeau anti-oil and gas policies. Article content The right way for Alberta to hold a referendum on this issue would be to use the referendum model that New Zealand used to replace its first-past-the-post electoral system. Article content The New Zealand referendum presented voters with two questions. The first was do you support the status quo? In New Zealand, 85 per cent said no. This vote then triggered the second question: Which of the following alternatives do you support? Article content Of the four options, 70 per cent favoured mixed-member proportional. And that is what New Zealand now has. The details are not relevant to us. What is relevant is that this two-question referendum model would empower the majority of Albertans to have a meaningful say in what comes next.
Calgary Herald
an hour ago
- Calgary Herald
Bell: Premier Smith says Trudeau lives in Carney's camp and that's a problem
Article content Smith says she recognizes 'a real challenge' for Carney in 'climbing down' on some of the nasty laws and regulations the Trudeau Liberal government put in place, nastiness that amounted to an attack on Alberta oil and gas and on Albertans. Article content 'The challenge is he has a lot of people in his caucus who still believe those policies are the right way to go.' Article content Article content Smith is walking on the sunny side of the street. Article content She says Carney 'demonstrated pragmatism' on rolling the consumer carbon tax back to zero. Article content No, he didn't. Article content He knew the consumer carbon tax would kill his chances to be prime minister so he deep-sixed it. Article content Does Carney really think if he doesn't give the Alberta government what it wants it kills his chances to stay on as prime minister? Article content While we wait for the next chapter in The Mystery of the Prime Minister Who Wouldn't Give Straight Answers Smith is working with oilpatch types on a pitch for a pipeline to the west coast. Article content Article content Smith feels strongest about a pipeline to the B.C. port of Prince Rupert and 'some of the American options.' Article content But a pipeline can't get built with Liberal policies making it impossible to get a pipeline built. Article content She mentions nine nasty Liberal brainwaves such as the cap on oil and gas emissions and the tanker ban off the west coast and the so-called No More Pipelines law. Article content 'That's my short list. I have a much longer list of things we need to fix.' Article content The energy crowd erupts in applause. Article content Smith tells Albertans thinking of Alberta independence the province has to 'give it one more shot' to get a new deal for Alberta. Article content As for those wagging their finger and saying separatist talk is hurting investment, Smith fires back. Article content 'As compared to what? Compared to half a trillion dollars worth of investment we lost because of terrible federal policy that scared away investment. Article content 'There could have been pipelines, LNG projects, the Teck Frontier Mine.' Article content
Calgary Herald
a day ago
- Calgary Herald
Fairy Tales: Filmmaker revisits Delwin Vriend case in new documentary
There is anger in Darrin Hagen's voice when he talks about the Delwin Vriend case in Alberta. Article content The landmark decision, which came down from the Supreme Court of Canada in 1998 and extended human-rights protections to queer Albertans, was certainly groundbreaking. Hagen calls it 'one of those dominoes' that led to change that impacted LGBTQ+ rights in Alberta, Canada and even the world. When the Alberta government was forced by the courts to treat queer people equally, it eventually lead to progress in other areas such as same-sex marriage and queer adoptions. Article content Article content The story about how Vriend's case, which began after he was fired in 1991 from his job as a laboratory instructor at King's College for being gay, went all the way to the Supreme Court is inspiring, of course. But it is also infuriating, Hagen says. The hostility of the Alberta government, which continued to fight even after realizing it had no legal standing to do so, is a major part of the story and one that seems particularly timely today as ugly divisions re-emerge in the province and around the world regarding LGBTQ+ rights. Article content Article content 'The government kept paying (lawyers) to push this thing forward even though they knew that they would lose,' says Hagen. 'I think that is something we all need to recognize about the provincial government that we lived through. They used our money to fight our rights. I'm a taxpayer, right? It's my money, and they are using my money to fund a battle to withhold me from full participation in Alberta society. Every queer in Alberta should be (expletive) pissed off about that.' 'You can tell I'm not neutral about this,' he adds. Article content Hagen, an award-winning playwright, drag performer and queer historian, spent years studying the case as director of the documentary Pride vs. Prejudice: The Delwin Vriend Story. He was aware of the case as it was happening. Everybody in the community was, even if they were watching from afar. One of the biggest misconceptions of the case was that it pitted Vriend and his supporters against King's College. The college wasn't being sued; Alberta was. After being fired, Vriend attempted to file a discrimination complaint with the Alberta Human Rights Commission but was told sexual orientation was not protected under the Human Rights Code in Alberta. So the case was not against the college, but the Government of Alberta and its Human Rights Commission. The Alberta government lost. That would have been the end of it had the Alberta government not appealed, which is how the case went to the Supreme Court of Canada. The government had used queer rights and queer equality as a wedge issue, a 'divisive tool in their arsenal,' Hagen says. 'So this was about taking that tool away from them.
