MP opposes plan for East Claydon energy storage plant
An MP has opposed plans for an electricity storage plant in the countryside the size of 10 football pitches. Statkraft UK Ltd, which produces renewable energy, wants to build the 8.6-hectare (21-acre) plant close to a substation at the village of East Claydon in Buckinghamshire. Greg Smith, the Conservative MP for Mid Buckinghamshire, said: "Once again, I will be objecting to this in the strongest possible terms."A Statkraft spokesperson said the site - to store excess electricity generated by wind and solar farms which could then be released into the National Grid - could "help play an important role in decarbonising the UK".
They added the plant, called a Greener Grid Park, would "ensure the electricity grid can remain resilient, replacing the stability previously provided by fossil fuel generation".The spokesperson said East Claydon was a "strategically important area on the transmission grid, with a need for storage and stability". "Projects like this are a crucial part of the transition towards using cleaner forms of home-grown renewable electricity, which will mean cheaper bills for homes and businesses," they added.
Claydons Solar Action Group (CSAG), which describes itself as "a collective of concerned residents from nearby villages", told the Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS) it was "passionate" about keeping the countryside "safe".CSAG claimed battery energy storage units and solar farms were "destroying our countryside". In the application to Buckinghamshire Council, Statkraft said the plant would be a "reserve power supply" for the local electricity grid.The electricity would be stored in batteries in rows and rows of containers.Statkraft said the plant was "sensitively designed" existing woodland would be retained. The plan includes lighting, CCTV masts, fencing, office buildings, internal access roads and underground water tanks to help with fire protection. In June, CSAG is holding a walk to "highlight just how much of our beautiful countryside will be lost to battery energy storage systems and solar".
Follow Beds, Herts and Bucks news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
27 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The Government's ill-judged prisoner-release scheme puts the public at risk
SIR – I, along with the majority of my countrymen, am appalled by the Government's decision to release certain prisoners early (' Met chief: Starmer's early release scheme will lead to more crime ', report, May 28). This is to compensate for the shortage of prison spaces, as our population grows ever larger, in part due to poorly controlled immigration. First, the punishment meted out by the courts should match the gravity of the crime. Stricter sentencing would surely act as a deterrent to help reduce criminality, whereas the present system allows certain sentences to be commuted or for the prisoner to be granted parole. This in itself creates too much recidivism, and it is now to be exacerbated by the early release of offenders, many of whom are likely to reoffend. This is not the decision of a sensible government that is weighing up all the facts with balanced judgment. Secondly, we should consider our already overworked police officers, many of whom do a fantastic job and lack the high regard they deserve, particularly given the much wider range of policing responsibilities they are now expected to undertake compared to 20 years ago. Policing the streets is of paramount importance, especially in inner-city areas, where regard for the law is often lax. Presumably the Government will now expect the police to monitor those on early release. What has happened to our once highly regarded system of justice and policing? It appears to be yet another casualty of this ludicrous Labour Government. Tony Millard Redhill, Surrey SIR – Week after week, our local magistrates' court deals with an endless list of people who have been caught driving drunk or high on drugs. At present, they are fined and disqualified from driving for a period. Isn't it time that our society made people wholly responsible for their actions, by imposing a lifetime driving ban on them if caught? It may make them think twice before getting behind the wheel when they are drunk or stoned, and consider the devastating impact that such selfish behaviour could have on others. It would also save the magistrates from having to deal with repeat offenders. The roads are dangerous enough without people who view driving as a right, rather than as a privilege with enormous responsibilities. Andy Breare Plymouth, Devon
Reuters
30 minutes ago
- Reuters
UK faces choice next week between health and other spending, IFS think tank warns
LONDON, June 1 (Reuters) - British finance minister Rachel Reeves' key decision in next week's multi-year spending review will be how much to spend on healthcare versus other public services, the Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank said on Sunday. Reeves is due to set out day-to-day spending limits for other government departments on June 11 which will run through to the end of March 2029 - almost until the end of the Labour government's expected term in office. Britain has held periodic government spending reviews since 1998, but this is the first since 2015 to cover multiple years, other than one in 2021 focused on the COVID pandemic. The non-partisan IFS said this spending review could prove to be "one of the most significant domestic policy events" for the current Labour government. Prime Minister Keir Starmer's announcement in February that defence spending would reach 2.5% of national income by 2027 had already used the room for further growth in public investment created in Reeves' October budget, it said. "Simultaneously prioritising additional investments in public services, net zero and growth-friendly areas ... will be impossible," said Bee Boileau, a research economist at the IFS. Non-investment public spending is intended to rise by 1.2% a year on top of inflation between 2026-27 and 2028-29, according to budget plans which Reeves set out in October - half the pace of spending growth in the current and previous financial year. The IFS sees no scope for this to be topped up, as Reeves' budget rules leave almost no room for extra borrowing and tax rises are now limited to her annual budget statement. This forces Reeves and Starmer to choose between the demands of the public healthcare system - plagued by long waiting times and a slump in productivity since the COVID-19 pandemic - and other stretched areas. In past spending reviews, annual health care spending has typically risen 2 percentage points faster than total spending. If that happened this time - equivalent to an annual increase of 3.4% - spending in other departments would have to fall by 1% a year in real terms, the IFS forecast. Raising healthcare spending at roughly the same pace as other areas - a 1.2% rise - would only just keep pace with an ageing population and not allow any reversal of recent years' deterioration in service quality, the IFS said. Spending cuts could be achieved by scaling back services provided by the state, reducing public-sector employment or real-terms cuts in public-sector pay, it added. But it warned the government needed to be specific about how it planned to make cuts, or risk financial markets losing confidence in its ability to keep borrowing under control. The review does not cover spending on pensions or other benefits, which the government is tackling separately.
BBC News
31 minutes ago
- BBC News
Disposable vapes ban begins but will teens quit?
The ban on the sale of single-use disposable vapes will come into force on Sunday across the UK, aimed at protecting children's health and the environment. It means shops and supermarkets will no longer be able to stock them - but they can still sell rechargeable or refillable devices. Disposable vapes have been cited as a key driver in the rise in youth vaping, while every year five million vapes are thrown predict it will have a significant impact but health experts say further regulation is needed to tackle youth vaping. Retailers in England and Wales breaching the ban face a £200 fine for the first offence with potentially unlimited fines or jail for those who repeatedly ban was first announced for England and Wales by the previous Conservative government but the law was not enacted before last summer's general then pushed ahead with it. Scotland and Northern Ireland have introduced their own bans, timed to coincide with the one in England and Wales. Less harmful Vape use has risen rapidly over the last decade with 9% of the British public now buying and using figures suggest about one in four vapers use the disposable versions, although that proportion has fallen since the ban was while it is illegal to sell vapes to anyone under 18, disposable vapes, often sold in smaller, more colourful packaging than refillable ones, have been cited as an important factor in the rise of youth one in seven 18 to 24-year-olds vape but have never is substantially less harmful than smoking but it has not been around for long enough for its long-term risks to be known, according to the NHS. The environmental impact is considerable. Single-use vapes are difficult to recycle and typically end up in landfill where their batteries can leak harmful chemicals like battery acid, lithium, and mercury into the environment, the government thrown into household waste also cause hundreds of fires in bin lorries and waste-processing centres every Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs estimates almost five million single-use vapes were either littered or thrown into general waste each week last minister Mary Creagh said: "For too long, single-use vapes have blighted our streets as litter and hooked our children on nicotine. That ends today."The government calls time on these nasty devices."But Action on Smoking and Health chief executive Hazel Cheeseman questioned what impact the ban would have, pointing out new refillable vape kits were coming on to the market that look and cost similar to the single-use said it would not be until the Tobacco and Vapes Bill, which includes powers to regulate marketing, branding and advertising, came into power that the issue of youth vaping could be truly tackled."Their appeal is driven by bright colours, wide availability and cheap prices," she said."The new regulations will hopefully help to address the environmental impact, but government will need further regulations to address the appeal of products to teenagers."She said this was very much a balancing act as vapes were an important tool to help people quit."Vaping is very much less harmful than smoking and is the most popular aid to quitting in the UK," she added. John Dunne, of the UK Vaping Industry Association, said bans were "not the answer".He said he was concerned that a black market in single-use vapes could develop and some people may be tempted to return to smoking cigarettes."Disposables have played a huge role in reducing smoking levels amongst adults to record low levels. It's why we are seeing stockpiling in the lead up to the ban," he Butler, executive director of Material Focus, an independent not-for-profit organisation, said that he was still concerned that vapes are still difficult to recycle and reuse. He said customers and businesses should demand sustainable options. "Given the rampant binning and littering that we already see, will we see any behaviour change? Only if producers, importers and retailers step up and meet their long existing legal obligations to provide and pay for takeback and recycling," he said.
