Why Zelensky suddenly remembered Africa exists

Russia Today

24-04-2025

When Ukraine's leader Vladimir Zelensky lands on African soil, he is not just making another stop in a diplomatic tour. He is bringing with him the full weight of the Euro-American agenda, crafted in Washington, Brussels, and London, with the aim of drawing Africa into a war it did not start and does not benefit from. This is not about Ukraine seeking understanding or empathy – it is about maintaining a global hierarchy, in which Africa is expected to follow, not to lead.
To understand the gravity of this moment, we must move beyond the spectacle and soundbites and revisit the deeper currents shaping the world today. The war in Ukraine is not a self-contained event. It is the product of decades of NATO expansion, Western military-industrial escalation, and the relentless refusal of the West to accept a multipolar world. Ukraine, tragically, is not a sovereign protagonist in this story – it is a pawn.
Since the 2014 Western-backed coup and subsequent civil war in the Donbass, Ukraine has been absorbed into the orbit of NATO's militarism and the West's ideological war against Russia. It has become a client state of Washington, surviving on IMF loans, EU aid packages, and American military hardware. Its economic decisions are dictated by external creditors. Its war effort is sustained by Western arms. Its diplomacy is choreographed by the same apparatus that once orchestrated regime change and military interventions across the Global South.
And now, this same apparatus is seeking to globalize the conflict by dragging Africa into its fold. Zelensky's visit to South Africa is thus not a bilateral courtesy – it is part of a greater project to fracture the Global South's solidarity with Russia, China, India, and the BRICS alliance.
Africa must resist this.
Let us not be seduced by the sudden charm offensive. Ukraine's voting record at the United Nations has consistently been aligned with the West – even when it meant opposing African interests. Ukraine has supported anti-Palestinian resolutions, abstained on decolonization issues, and followed the European bloc in rejecting anti-racism initiatives. Its sudden discovery of Africa is opportunistic, not principled.
Even more disturbing was the treatment of African students and migrants during the early stages of the 2022 war. As Ukrainians fled to neighboring countries, black students were denied transport, harassed, and pushed to the margins of safety corridors. This racial hierarchy is not incidental – it is embedded in the very white European supremacist frameworks that Africa has struggled against for centuries.
So we must ask: What kind of partnership is this? What solidarity do we owe to a nation that, in its moment of crisis, showed Africa its back?
Ukraine's diplomatic messaging is powered not by traditional diplomacy, but by Western PR firms, Hollywood scripts, and media manipulation. Zelensky himself is a product of entertainment politics, styled to mimic Churchill one day, and a Netflix hero the next. This soft power offensive is designed to induce guilt, moral pressure, and emotional submission.
Africa must not confuse media saturation with moral legitimacy. Our memory is long. We know that NATO has never cared for peace – only for hegemony. We know that selective outrage is a weapon. And we must see Zelensky's appeal for what it is: a geopolitical script to preserve Western dominance by appealing to the sympathies of the formerly colonized.
Africa's philosophical traditions – such as Ubuntu – emphasize reconciliation, communal healing, and justice. These values are incompatible with the logic of military escalation, sanctions, and permanent war that defines the NATO worldview.
Africa must call for peace – but not the hypocritical, self-serving peace that only ends when NATO says so. We must demand peace rooted in justice, mutual respect, and non-alignment. A peace that recognizes the security concerns of all parties, including Russia. A peace that ends the militarization of diplomacy.
Zelensky speaks often of 'sovereignty.' But this rhetoric rings hollow when his government does not respect the sovereignty of African nations to make independent foreign policy choices. His message is not: 'stand with peace.' It is: 'stand with us, or be morally condemned.'
This is not diplomacy. It is coercion. It is the colonial logic of moral superiority, updated for the twenty-first century.
Zelensky's outreach targets African political elites, not African peoples. It follows the old colonial playbook: seduce the chiefs, bypass the masses. But African liberation was never won by elites alone. It was built by grassroots mobilization, mass consciousness, and continental unity.
If we are to engage in international diplomacy, it must be people-centered, not elite-centered. We must resist being used as pawns in another man's war.
We are not new to these games. We remember that it was the Soviet Union, Cuba, and China – not the United States or the UK – who supported our freedom struggles.
Gamal Abdel Nasser nationalized the Suez Canal and defied imperialism. Patrice Lumumba was assassinated for rejecting Belgian neocolonialism. Kwame Nkrumah warned us that neocolonialism would be the final stage of imperialism. Julius Nyerere taught us that development without dignity is slavery. Muammar Gaddafi envisioned a United States of Africa and sought economic independence from the West.
These leaders understood that Africa cannot be free unless it speaks with one voice. Zelensky's visit, if not checked, could divide Africa and weaken that collective voice.
Ukraine has for decades been a source of illicit arms, many of which have found their way into African conflict zones. It has fed the very violence it now claims to abhor. Its military-industrial complex is now aligned with NATO's, and its survival depends on the continuous flow of weapons.
How can such a state offer us lessons on peace?
Ukraine is not economically sovereign. Its national budget is underwritten by Western lenders. Its economy is molded by IMF conditionalities. Its development model is designed to serve Western European capital – not its own people.
Africa must not emulate this model. We must resist being pulled into a network of economic dependencies that serve only to preserve the dominance of the dollar and the euro.
South Africa is a member of BRICS, a group committed to multipolarity and alternative development models. Welcoming Zelensky without a Pan-African mandate undermines the strategic coherence of this alliance. It sends the wrong signal to Russia, China, Brazil, and India.
Diplomacy must be collective, not individualistic. South Africa cannot and should not define Africa's position unilaterally. This is a continental issue, not a national one.
Rather than becoming a battleground for foreign influence, Africa must lead a new peace movement. We can propose an Afrocentric peace framework – grounded in non-alignment, historical justice, and multipolar negotiation.
This would place Africa at the moral center of global politics. It would revive our legacy as peacebuilders, not proxies. We can revive the spirit of the Non-Aligned Movement, not as nostalgia, but as a living strategy for independence in global affairs.
This framework should include:
● A continental summit on African neutrality and peace diplomacy.
● A new African Peace and Justice Commission to investigate foreign interference.
● Direct people-to-people peace forums between African and Eurasian societies, bypassing elite mediation.
Africa faces urgent crises: climate change, debt slavery, extractive neocolonialism, and social inequality. Zelensky's visit risks distracting from these existential threats and diverting attention, resources, and discourse away from the real work of liberation. Let us not trade our future for a cameo in a European drama.
Zelensky's visit is not neutral. It is a test.
Will we remember who we are? Will we honor the legacy of our martyrs? Will we reject the seduction of Western agendas and assert a sovereign, Pan-African voice?
Africa must rise – not as a tool for others, but as a sovereign force for peace, justice, and dignity. We do not need permission to define our destiny. We need only the courage to stand together. We are not the audience to Europe's tragedy. We are the authors of our own liberation.