Hong Kong rushes to tighten domestic version of national security law
The Hong Kong administration has fast-tracked the enactment of new legislation under its domestic security law to include a maximum of seven years of jail term for disclosing ongoing investigations by Beijing.
The new legislation appears to be enacted to consolidate Beijing's control over the financial hub, which has witnessed a steady clampdown on dissent.
The Safeguarding National Security Regulation was enforced on Tuesday, just a day after the government proposed the subsidiary legislations in a meeting at the Legislative Council.
The city authorities on Monday announced the new legislative changes to amend the Safeguarding National Security Ordinance to provide better "clarity" and support to Beijing's national security office. Hong Kong authorities last year imposed the domestic security law, also known as Article 23, despite growing international criticism that it could erode freedoms in the city.
The subsidiary laws were tabled before a Legislative Council panel on Tuesday and enacted through a 'negative vetting procedure" which allows the law to be first published before being reviewed by lawmakers.
A government spokesperson said the subsidiary law was enacted "against the increasingly turbulent global geopolitical landscape, national security risks to which the HKSAR [Hong Kong Special Administrative Region] is exposed can arise all of a sudden", according to Hong Kong Free Press.
'The two pieces of subsidiary legislation are essential from the perspective of protection in respect of the OSNS's [Beijing's Office for Safeguarding National Security] effective performance of its mandate under the requirements" of the city's national security legislation, the spokesperson added.
The spokesperson claimed the subsidiary legislation will not affect the lives of the general public, nor hinder the operations of any institutions and organisations.
The new legislation will facilitate the work of Beijing's national security office in the city, which includes investigating cases that it exercises jurisdiction over. The law includes designating premises linked to Beijing's national security offices, known as the Office for Safeguarding National Security (OSNS), as "prohibited places".
Anyone who discloses information related to Beijing's OSNS investigations will face a fine of up to HK$500,000 or up to seven years, the law states. Those found guilty of providing false or misleading information to Beijing will also be punished with a maximum fine of HK$500,000 and a jail sentence of up to seven years.
The legislation was gazetted and signed by acting chief executive Eric Chan due to city leader John Lee 's current trip to Kuwait.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
DAILY MAIL COMMENT: Israel's enemies are Britain's enemies
Having sown the wind, Iran is reaping the whirlwind. A day after the International Atomic Energy Agency warned that the rogue state has enough enriched uranium to make nine nuclear bombs, Israel struck at the head of its military command and the heart of its weapons programme. In a stunning series of air strikes, its forces attacked nuclear facilities and missile sites. They also took out three of Iran's most senior security chiefs and several of its top atomic scientists. It was swift and it was surgical – a triumph of intelligence and planning, as well as sheer military power. And it is far from over. The Israeli Defence Forces made it clear yesterday there was nothing they will not do to prevent Tehran developing the bomb. And who can blame them? Iran is dedicated to Israel's destruction. Over many decades it has backed the Jewish state's sworn enemies, from Hezbollah to Hamas. Supreme Leader the Ayatollah Khomeini believes there can be no Middle East solution without 'the annihilation of the Zionist state'. This is hardly the basis for measured negotiation. We should not forget either that Tehran's mullahs also loathe Western liberal values and scorn democracy, so if they managed to acquire nuclear weapons, the whole world would be at risk. In that regard, Israel's enemy is our enemy. No one wants to see an escalation in hostilities in this already benighted region, but Israel believes it has no option but to act pre-emptively. We should acknowledge and support it in that. This is a people who suffered the Holocaust. Why should they stand idly by while a new generation of anti-Semites plots their extermination? And what is our own great leader Sir Keir Starmer's response to this unfolding crisis? As usual, a load of flannel – calling for calm… engaging partners to de-escalate … committed to diplomacy. The Israeli Defence Forces made it clear yesterday there was nothing they will not do to prevent Tehran developing the bomb Isn't it a bit late for that? Hostilities are well under way. So, whose side is he on? Does he back an oppressive theocracy that hates the West, spies on Britain and has had a malign hand in every Middle Eastern conflict of the modern era, or a parliamentary democracy engaged in a fight for survival? Having professed 'ironclad' support for Israel immediately after the October 7 massacre when still in opposition, he and his ministers have been rowing back ever since – not least because many Labour MPs and voters are rabidly anti-Zionist. The Government has scaled back arms supplies, criticised operations in Gaza and Israeli politicians, and there are signs Sir Keir is about to recognise Palestine as a state. The Left constantly bangs on about a 'two-state solution' but how would it be achieved? Who would draw the boundaries? Israel rightly sees the UN as a bad actor in this drama and will not be bound by its prejudices. And it certainly wouldn't co-operate with the international courts, which it views as similarly pro-Palestinian. Who would live where? And how could the two states live in harmony when one is committed to the obliteration of the other? Hamas and Iran don't want a two-state solution for the Holy Land, they want a one-state solution – without Jews. Sir Keir fancies himself as a statesman as he parades around the world gladhanding leaders and looking earnest. But statesmanship is more than photo-opportunities. It sometimes requires hard choices. When it comes to choosing between backing Iran or Israel, there should be no hesitation.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Japan and US explored possibility of trade deal, Japan trade negotiator says
June 13 (Reuters) - Japan and the U.S. on Friday explored the possibility of a trade agreement, Japan's top tariff negotiator, Ryosei Akazawa, told a briefing, while refraining from commenting how close they are to reaching a deal. "We had a very detailed exchange and explored the possibility of a trade agreement," Akazawa told reporters after he met with U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick separately in Washington in a sixth round of tariff negotiations. It is likely to be the last round before Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and U.S. President Donald Trump are to meet in Canada on the sidelines of the Group of Seven leaders' summit, where Japan has been hoping to clinch a deal. Akazawa refrained from commenting on whether the talks have matured enough to reach an agreement, saying a deal is possible only when the leaders of both countries approve everything as a package. He also declined to comment on the chance of Ishiba and Trump reaching an agreement at their upcoming meeting. Japan faces a 24% tariff rate starting in July unless it can negotiate a deal with the U.S. It is also scrambling to find ways to get Washington to exempt its automakers from 25% tariffs on automobiles, Japan's biggest industry.
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Trump says Nippon-US Steel deal has resolvable national security risk
WASHINGTON, June 13 (Reuters) - Nippon Steel's (5401.T), opens new tab $14.9 billion bid for U.S. Steel (X.N), opens new tab poses a national security risk, but those concerns can be mitigated if the companies fulfill certain conditions laid out by the Trump administration, U.S. President Donald Trump said in a executive order on Friday. "I additionally find that the threatened impairment to the national security of the United States arising as a result of the Proposed Transaction can be adequately mitigated if the conditions set forth in section 3 of this order are met," Trump said in the order released by the White House.
