Officials in rural Texas are accused of paying campaign worker who told elderly people how to vote: docs
Six people, including multiple public officials, have been arrested and charged as part of a long-running investigation into an alleged 'vote harvesting' scheme in a rural Texas county against vulnerable seniors during 2022 and 2023 elections.
'The people of Texas deserve fair and honest elections, not backroom deals and political insiders rigging the system,' Texas Attorney General Paxton said in a statement Wednesday announcing the arrests. 'Elected officials who think they can cheat to stay in power will be held accountable. No one is above the law.'
The accused include Frio County Judge Rochelle Camacho; former Frio County elections administrator Carlos Segura; Pearsall City Council members Ramiro Trevino and Racheal Garza; Pearsall school district trustee Adriann Ramirez; and campaign worker Rosa Rodriguez.
Candidates for local office allegedly paid a campaign worker named Cheryl Denise Castillo to collect ballots from voters at senior citizens complexes, according to court documents obtained by The Washington Post.
Castillo, who died last year, allegedly prepared ballots for individuals, influenced their voting choices, and assisted individuals who were ineligible for such support under state voting law.
In one December 2023 instance, the campaign worker allegedly told a candidate for sheriff she wouldn't help voters who supported her clients' rivals.
In another instance a few months later, Castillo allegedly told a fellow campaign worker 'that 'honest to God' if you do not go after the elderly disabled, then you will lose your election,' according to the documents.
Investigators reportedly recovered a text message to Castillo during the time of the alleged scheme that read, 'So that means you have stolen ballots from the elderly in elections LMFAO HARD.'
'Several residents confirmed that Castillo picked up their ballots, and in some instances advised them how they should vote their ballot,' police wrote in a search warrant, adding that Castillo had been paid for her work.
Segura, the former county elections administrator, called the allegations 'ridiculous' in an interview with the Post.
The Independent has contacted Camacho and Ramirez for comment, and was unable to reach Rodriguez.
In August 2024, investigators carried out search warrants related to the case in Frio, Atascosa, and Bexar counties, with a grand jury arriving at charges on May 1 of this year.
The investigation dates back to 2022, when a county judge candidate running against Camacho filed a complaint.
Mary Moore told investigators she got a tip that Camacho hired Castillo to collect mail ballots for her, and that upon inspecting the ballots, the campaign worker filled out several without notifying officials she assisted anyone.
Moore later went to Pine Hill Estates II, a nursing home, and allegedly captured video of Camacho, Rodriguez, Ramirez, Castillo walking out of the home with 'what appeared to be carrier envelopes,' according to an affidavit obtained by KSAT.
'Several residents confirmed that Castillo picked up their ballot by mail, and in some instances advised them how they should vote their ballot,' per court records obtained by the outlet.
Records obtained by Texas Scorecard reportedly show a convoluted web of payments for the alleged scheme, in which Rodriguez allegedly paid Camacho in May 2022 and May 2023 for vote-harvesting services.
The funds then allegedly went to Ramirez, who made three Cash App payments in April 2023 to Castillo, according to the outlet.
The six individuals, who face charges ranging from vote harvesting to tampering with evidence, could face up to 10 years in prison with fines up to $10,000.
All suspects turned themselves in, and at least five have been released on bond. An arraignment is scheduled for May 23.
The case comes as both state and national Republicans seek to crack down on alleged vulnerabilities in election security, a cause many Democrats dismiss as tackling a largely non-existent issue in an effort to disenfranchise certain voters.
The indictment in the vote harvesting case in Texas comes just months after a September 2024 ruling from U.S. District Judge Xavier Rodriguez, who found that the state's SB1 voter security law was vague, overly broad, and violates freedom of speech and the 14th Amendment, Texas Public Radio reports. The decision also found there's little evidence of illegal 'vote harvesting.'
The decision temporarily paused Paxton's investigation, but he appealed, allowing the probe to move forward.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Screen Geek
25 minutes ago
- Screen Geek
'King Of The Hill' John Redcorn Actor Jonathan Joss Dead After Being Fatally Shot
King of the Hill voice actor Jonathan Joss voiced John Redcorn from 1998 to 2009, having taken over during the show's second season. He later returned for the upcoming revival which will air this year. Sadly, it's been confirmed that Jonathan Joss has been shot dead at age 59. This shocking news was broken by TMZ, and was confirmed by San Antonio police, via Variety. Variety notes that 'San Antonio officers were dispatched to a shooting in progress at a home on Sunday night around 7 p.m. When they arrived at the scene, they found Joss near the road after he was shot multiple times.' While 'officers attempted life-saving measures until medics arrived,' it was too late. 'Joss was pronounced dead at the scene.' Additionally, the man who shot Joss 'fled in a vehicle but was detained by officers a block away and booked for murder.' He was said to have been 'shot by a neighbor after a disagreement.' An additional statement on the matter was shared by Tristan Kern de Gonzales, the husband of Jonathan Joss, via Facebook. He added some alleged context to the situation, asserting that he and Joss were innocently checking their mail before a neighbor approached them and fired a weapon. Gonzales alleges that Joss pushed him out of the way and sacrificed his life to save him. 'My husband Jonathan Joss and I were involved in a shooting while checking the mail at the site of our former home. That home was burned down after over two years of threats from people in the area who repeatedly told us they would set it on fire. We reported these threats to law enforcement multiple times and nothing was done.' His statement continues: 'Throughout that time we were harassed regularly by individuals who made it clear they did not accept our relationship. Much of the harassment was openly homophobic. When we returned to the site to check our mail we discovered the skull of one of our dogs and its harness placed in clear view. This caused both of us severe emotional distress. We began yelling and crying in response to the pain of what we saw. While we were doing this a man approached us. He started yelling violent homophobic slurs at us. He then raised a gun from his lap and fired.' Gonzales insists that he and Jonathan were innocent bystanders at the time: 'Jonathan and I had no weapons. We were not threatening anyone. We were grieving. We were standing side by side. When the man fired Jonathan pushed me out of the way. He saved my life. Jonathan is my husband. He gave me more love in our time together than most people ever get. We were newlyweds. We picked Valentines Day. We were in the process of looking for a trailer and planning our future.' 'He was murdered by someone who could not stand the sight of two men loving each other,' he adds. 'I was with him when he passed. I told him how much he was loved.' 'To everyone who supported him, his fans, his friends, know that he valued you deeply. He saw you as family. My focus now is on protecting Jonathan's legacy and honoring the life we built together. If your concern is how someone coped with trauma or how loudly they speak when recounting injustice and being ignored by authorities then you never truly cared about my husband. Jonathan saved my life. I will carry that forward. I will protect what he built,' Gonzales concludes. Victor Aaron, the original voice for John Redcorn, was replaced by Joss after he himself passed away in 1996. As mentioned, Joss returned to voice the part for the show's fourteenth season, which Variety adds fans will get to see in Episode 2. It's unknown if Joss voiced Redcorn for any other moments in the new season but time will tell. Unfortunately, Joss had been dealing with several issues in his personal life, having recently lost his San Antonio home in a fire. In recent days, he actually appeared unannounced at a King of the Hill reunion panel at the ATX Television Festival in Austin, TX, where he emphasized his disappointment for not being invited to the stage. The shooting is currently still being investigated. Stay tuned to ScreenGeek for any additional updates regarding the situation as we have them. The revival of King of the Hill , which will allow fans to hear Joss voice the character at least one more time, will premiere via Hulu on August 4.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Boulder attack against Jewish demonstrators has local community concerned
The Brief The Houston area has roughly 60,000 Jewish residents. They say recent years have seen a growing and brazen animosity toward them, that's been fueled by October 7 Hamas attack on Israel. The recent murder of a Jewish couple in Washington, D.C., and the Boulder attack are seen as notable escalations in the violence. HOUSTON - Jewish leaders say there are sophisticated security measures in place to keep community events and facilities safe. What we know Houston Police and the Harris County Sheriff's Office both say they are not, currently, aware of any threats, but remain on high alert to keep Jewish residents, and everyone else, safe. What they're saying "Burning people who are engaging in a peaceful gathering; that is just not something that I think any of us expected to see in the Unites States in 2025," says Renee Wizig-Barrios of the Jewish Federation of Greater Houston, "We want people to be able to participate in Jewish life: to go to synagogue, camp, and know that we, as professionals, are doing everything we can to keep them safe." The Source Jewish Federation of Greater Houston, Houston Police, Harris County Sheriff's Office.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Harris County woman charged after putting GPS devices in spouses vehicles
The Brief Maria Gonzalez has been charged and is wanted for unlawfully installing GPS devices in her spouse's vehicles. Precinct 4 says their investigation dates back to 2023. Chris Tritico, Senior Legal Analyst for FOX 26, shared what you can do legally when it comes to tracking individuals. HARRIS CO, TX - Harris County Precinct 4 Constables say they need your help. They are looking for Maria Guadalupe Gonzalez, who is wanted for installing GPS devices illegally on her spouse's vehicle. Precinct 4 constables' office say Gonzales has been charged with a Class A misdemeanor. They add that this all started back in August 2023. The backstory "You have to get a subpoena for the investigation for the GPS records and ownership of all that is what has led us today to be able to file charges against the suspect," said Capt. Jose Garza. Precinct 4. "So it is my understanding they are not together, as of now, but the relationship then and what started all of this is closed for the investigation." "So there were several places that she did show up, which led us to further believe she was the one tracking, because she would not have known where these locations were," said Garza. Local perspective We also spoke with FOX 26 Senior Legal Analyst Chris Tritico about the legal ramifications of putting a tracking device on a car or using tracking apps, software and air tags like many people do. "If you own that vehicle, or you're leasing a vehicle, and it's your lease, and you're letting your spouse or your loved one use it, you can place the tracking device in the vehicle because you own it," Tritico said. "Phones now have this ability for family apps if you do that if you buy a phone for your child, and you put that app on there to know where your child is, that's not going to be a violation of the law because that is your phone, and you get to do that with your child. Once that child turns 18, that child has every right to turn that off. If your parent has dementia, yes, it would technically be a violation of the law, but I don't know of any court that would hold someone responsible under those circumstances," Tritico added. Precinct 4 Constables say a warrant has been issued for Maria Gonzalez's arrest. If convicted, she could face a $4,000 fine and one year in jail. If anyone has information, Precinct 4 says call their office immediately. The Source FOX 26 Reporter Leslie DelasBour spoke with Harris County Constable Precinct 4 and FOX 26 Senior Legal Analyst about the case.