Rap group Kneecap claims pro-Palestine messages were cut from its Coachella set
The outspoken Northern Irish hip-hop trio Kneecap is well-known for scathing criticism of Israel's attacks on Gaza during its live sets. But the band says a few pointed moments from its two Coachella sets were cut from the fest's official livestream, and wonders if its messaging played a role.
The band's performance at the fest's second weekend featured projections of text reading 'Israel is committing genocide against the Palestinian people. It is being enabled by the U.S. government who arm and fund Israel despite their war crimes. F— Israel Free Palestine.'
The band said on social media that those messages were supposed to have appeared during their Weekend 1 set as well, but 'our messaging on the US-backed genocide in Gaza somehow never appeared on screens either.'
Representatives for Goldenvoice, the fest's promoter, did not immediately return a request for comment.
During its first weekend set, the band reportedly led a boisterous chant celebrating the 2013 death of former British prime minister Margaret Thatcher, which they said was cut from the livestream as well.
No sets from Coachella's Sonora Tent — the indoor venue reserved for the punk-inspired acts that made Goldenvoice's early reputation — were filmed for the livestream during the second weekend. There, the group reportedly said onstage that 'the Irish are not so longer persecuted under the Brits, but we were never bombed under the f— skies with nowhere to go.'
'Some uncensored messaging to Coachella,' the band wrote after its Weekend 2 set, posting images of its projections.
Kneecap was far from alone in criticizing Israel's attacks on Gaza during Coachella. Headliners Green Day altered the lyrics of 'Jesus of Suburbia' to sing, 'Runnin' away from pain, like the kids from Palestine.' Other acts like Blonde Redhead and Bob Vylan displayed Palestinian flags during their sets.
Music manager and executive Scooter Braun, who organized a museum exhibition on the Nova festival massacre in Israel, said on Instagram that Coachella founder Paul Tollett 'is a good man and has been an outspoken advocate on behalf of survivors of the Nova Music Festival.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
38 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Israeli forces seize Gaza-bound aid boat and detain Greta Thunberg and other activists
JERUSALEM (AP) — Israeli forces seized a Gaza-bound aid boat and detained Greta Thunberg and other activists who were on board early Monday, enforcing a longstanding blockade of the Palestinian territory that has been tightened during the war with Hamas. The activists had set out to protest Israel's ongoing military campaign in the Gaza Strip, which is among the deadliest and most destructive since World War II, and its restrictions on the entry of humanitarian aid, both of which have put the territory of some 2 million Palestinians at risk of famine . The Freedom Flotilla Coalition, which had organized the voyage, said the activists were 'kidnapped by Israeli forces' while trying to deliver desperately needed aid to the territory. 'The ship was unlawfully boarded, its unarmed civilian crew abducted, and its life-saving cargo — including baby formula, food and medical supplies — confiscated,' it said in a statement. It said the ship was seized in international waters some 200 kilometers (120 miles) from Gaza. Israel's Foreign Ministry portrayed the voyage as a public relations stunt, saying in a post on X that 'the 'selfie yacht' of the 'celebrities' is safely making its way to the shores of Israel.' It said the activists would return to their home countries and the aid would be sent to Gaza through established channels. It circulated footage of what appeared to be Israeli military personnel handing out sandwiches and water to the activists, who were wearing orange life vests. Lt. Col. Nadav Shoshani, an Israeli military spokesperson, said the ship was still en route to Israel around midday Monday. It was expected to dock at the port of Ashdod. A weeklong voyage Thunberg, a climate campaigner, was among 12 activists aboard the Madleen, which set sail from Sicily a week ago. Along the way, it had stopped on Thursday to rescue four migrants who had jumped overboard to avoid being detained by the Libyan coast guard. 'I urge all my friends, family and comrades to put pressure on the Swedish government to release me and the others as soon as possible,' Thunberg said in a pre-recorded message released after the ship was halted. Rima Hassan, a French member of the European Parliament who is of Palestinian descent, was also among the volunteers on board. She has been barred from entering Israel because of her opposition to Israeli policies toward the Palestinians. She was among six French citizens aboard the boat. French President Emmanuel Macron asked Israel to allow them to return to France as soon as possible, his office said in a statement. Adalah, a rights group in Israel that said it was representing the activists, said Israel had 'no legal authority' to take over the ship because it was in international waters and because it was headed not to Israel but to the 'territorial waters of the state of Palestine.' 'The arrest of the unarmed activists, who operated in a civilian manner to provide humanitarian aid, amounts to a serious breach of international law,' Adalah said in a statement. After a 2 1/2-month total blockade aimed at pressuring Hamas, Israel started allowing some basic aid into Gaza last month, but humanitarian workers and experts have warned of famine unless the blockade is lifted and Israel ends its military offensive. An attempt last month by Freedom Flotilla to reach Gaza by sea failed after another of the group's vessels was attacked by two drones while sailing in international waters off Malta, organizers said. The group blamed Israel for the attack , which damaged the front section of the ship. An 18-year blockade Israel and Egypt have imposed varying degrees of blockade on Gaza since Hamas seized power from rival Palestinian forces in 2007. Israel says the blockade is needed to prevent Hamas from importing arms, while critics say it amounts to collective punishment of Gaza's Palestinian population. Israel sealed Gaza off from all aid in the early days of the war ignited by the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, but later relented under U.S. pressure. In early March, shortly before Israel ended a ceasefire with Hamas , the country again blocked all imports, including food, fuel and medicine. Hamas-led militants killed around 1,200 people, mostly civilians, in the Oct. 7 attack and abducted 251 hostages, most of whom have since been released in ceasefire agreements or other deals. Hamas is still holding 55 hostages, more than half of them believed to be dead. Israel's military campaign has killed more than 54,000 Palestinians, according to the Gaza Health Ministry, which doesn't distinguish between civilians and combatants but has said women and children make up most of the dead. The war has destroyed vast areas of Gaza and displaced around 90% of the territory's population, leaving people there almost completely dependent on international aid. Efforts to broker another truce have been deadlocked for months. Hamas says it will only release the remaining hostages in exchange for a lasting ceasefire and an Israeli withdrawal, while Israel has vowed to continue the war until all the captives are returned and Hamas is defeated or disarmed and exiled. ___ Follow AP's war coverage at Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Is Peter Kyle Labour's David Brent?
We don't yet know if, when the Science and Technology Secretary Peter Kyle finally reveals to the Commons his new plans to regulate social media usage for children, he will choose to wear a baseball cap round the wrong way or if he will straddle a backwards-facing chair, his arms folded on its back like a 1980s 'cool teacher' seeking desperately to get down wif da kidz. In reality he risks looking like David Brent. For Kyle is the cabinet minister tasked with being a 'fun dad' to all those rebellious teenagers who spend all their days on their smartphones instead of, as his department undoubtedly would prefer, spending time playing ping-pong at the local church youth club while drinking fizzy pop. He wants to respond to mounting concern from parents about how much time their precious offspring waste on browsing social media – a recent YouGov poll suggested that nearly a quarter of children aged between eight and 15 spent more than four hours a day using an internet-enabled device with a screen, such as a computer, phone, tablet or gaming console. Who knew Pac-Man would still be so popular after all this time? The task facing Kyle is a challenging one. As part of a government and a party that believes instinctively that it knows better than we do how we should live our lives, it is incumbent on him to legislate for anything and everything that annoys certain newspaper leader writers. And the potentially catastrophic obsession teenagers in particular have with social media apps qualifies as a priority. But Kyle has begun by ruling out a complete ban on social media apps for young people, presumably on the basis that such a ban would be unworkable. As any parent who has tried installing filters and Wi-Fi blockers on home networks to restrict smartphone usage for teenagers, the annoying little buggers can always find a way to outsmart us. Kyle's latest suggestion of a two-hour 'app cap' on social media probably sounded like a reasonable compromise, but to the black heart and demented mind of your average British teenager such aspirations are laughable. Which is a pity, because there can be little doubt that over-exposure to social media is unhealthy, for adults and parents as well as for our children. But since adults have already ruined our lives by staying up late to argue with complete strangers far too frequently, we hold out some hope that our children might be persuaded to avoid the same mistakes. Causality is not causation, but no one makes the case that over-exposure to TikTok and Instagram is at all healthy. Nevertheless, is it the role of the Government to regulate such activity, and if it is, do ministers even have the tools to implement restrictions effectively? It feels like another one of those areas where parents' responsibilities are being usurped by a state that believes it knows better than them. Which is not to say that there is no role at all for the Government when it comes to access to smartphones in schools. But extending that jurisdiction to the home and making judgements about how teenagers should spend their free time feels like government over-reach. Maybe Kyle needs to take his cool ghetto blaster on the streets, indulge in some wicked break-dancing moves to impress his young audience, start fist-bumping some school kids and sparking some actual conversations with them about why they want to spend so long reading and responding to celebrities' and friends' latest earth-shattering updates on music, fashion and filters. No, minister, not coffee filters. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
British government reverses policy that limited home heating subsidies for retirees
LONDON (AP) — The British government on Monday reversed its unpopular plan to end winter home heating subsidies for millions of retirees. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer had signaled the u-turn last month after a loud outcry from the public and some members of his Labour Party who thought the relatively modest 1.5 billion-pound ($2 billion) savings were too politically costly. Treasury chief Rachel Reeves, who canceled the payment for home heating on all but the poorest retirees after Labour came to power last summer, said the benefit would be restored to 9 million people, or three-quarters of pensioners, in England and Wales whose incomes are below 35,000 pounds ($47,500). Reeves said the move was necessary last year because the previous Conservative government had left public finances in a dire state. 'Targeting winter fuel payments was a tough decision, but the right decision because of the inheritance we had been left by the previous government," Reeves said. 'It is also right that we continue to means-test this payment so that it is targeted and fair, rather than restoring eligibility to everyone including the wealthiest.' The payments are worth between 200 and 300 pounds ($271 and $406) a year. The reversal will cost the government 1.25 billion, Reeve said. Canceling the payments for most people last winter was blamed for contributing to Starmer's swift decline in popularity after his party came to power in a landslide. He was blamed for punishing elderly people on limited incomes who struggled to make ends meet during a cost-of-living crisis. Labour fared poorly in local elections in England last month, with many party representatives blaming the removal of the winter fuel payment. Kemi Badenoch, leader of the main opposition Conservative Party, quickly pounced on Starmer's about-face. 'Keir Starmer has scrambled to clear up a mess of his own making," she said. 'This humiliating u-turn will come as scant comfort to the pensioners forced to choose between heating and eating last winter. The prime minister should now apologize for his terrible judgment.'
