
As an ex-army captain, I'd back national service. But conscription? No way...
A citizens' army is in the news once again after a major defence review unveiled by the prime minister.
As part of a pledge to make the UK 'battle-ready', Keir Starmer has ordered up to a dozen new attack submarines, £15bn worth of nuclear warheads and thousands of new long-range weapons. The report made 62 recommendations, including creating a British Army that is 'ten times more lethal' with more personnel, long-range missiles and land-drone swarms.
Welcome: the MOD's planned military service 'gap years'.... aka Gen Z conscription. And it's here that we run into a problem.
It's not the first time we've heard the idea of national service mooted this year – in January, General Sir Patrick Sanders said that the British army must expand, following years of personnel and financial cuts. But the government would have a tough task forcing people to the parade ground, especially in light of the current recruitment struggles.
Seeking to roll back on the cuts that have been forced on the army, with regular forces at 100,000 in 2010 shrinking to fewer than 76,000 today, Sanders was on record as saying recent cuts [from the 2015 Strategic Defence and Security Review and the 2021 Defence in a Competitive Age report] were a 'mistake'.
Sanders ambitiously urged the UK to raise the army to 120,000, in preparedness for the unexpected.
So, why do we need more troops? The British army being overstretched may come as a surprise to irregular military listeners, after the close of the Afghanistan and Iraq conflicts. But contributions to the UN mission in Cyprus, Nato mission in Kosovo and commitments in the Falklands, Belize, Germany and Canada continue.
Enter President Putin: instability in Ukraine means the Enhanced Forward Presence (EFP) deployments in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland bear an unpredictability. These activities require resources. British army retention is struggling. Sanders's – and now Starmer's – solution? An expanded 'citizen army'.
It might work if it is voluntary, but conscription would face enormous challenges unless the UK faced the most existential threat.
The UK recruits soldiers who are aged between 16 and 35 and you must be at least 18 to serve in combat. In Ukraine, where the conscription age is set at 25, there has been strong resistance against the push for younger conscripts. The average age of Ukrainian soldiers is estimated currently to be 43.
An expanded recruitment pool from a wide cross-section of society might include qualified engineers, tradespeople or IT professionals for intelligence and communications, areas where the army has struggled to recruit recently. It is a mistake to imagine that combat soldiers can be spawned overnight: modern soldiering is more complex than ever.
It is an open secret that we have been training Ukrainians in the UK on short, sharp, bootcamp-style training programmes. British conscripts could expect something similar. Eighteen-hour days, combat camping, building up to section and platoon attacks, ready to be inserted into units led by experienced soldiers incentivised or pulled back into service.
Mobile phones are an unhelpful aspect of military campaigns. In initial training, mobiles are locked in a box for most of the week, except for a few hours, to remove distractions. In combat, modern targeting systems have made phones a beacon to enemy missile attacks.
Recruitment preclusions already exist for people with certain medical histories; asthma sufferers are currently unsuitable for service, as are eating disorder sufferers, people diagnosed on the autistic spectrum and those with serious muscular skeletal injuries, which would restrict suitability.
Infanteers (combat soldiers) need to run an 8.7 'beep test'. There has been an ongoing relaxation in some areas recently because what it really comes down to is: how many people you need, where you need them and for what.
National service has long held appeal, especially within the Gen Z 16-24 age group. Bringing together people from every corner and community in our society could build bridges at a time when they are sorely needed. The Swiss and Norwegians both have compulsory military registration for all 18-year-old men. There are things we admire in both societies.
This form of national service could bring a sense of social cohesion and mixing that we need. Any effort to create a citizen army should be rooted in volunteering, creating broad, cross-societal engagement with tangible benefits and a fixed commitment.
But compulsory immediate conscription would be a disaster in the UK: the protests, civil disobedience and helicopter parenting would be abrupt unless the threat was broadly accepted.
Be warned, for this is what it would entail. Phones in the box. Stand by your beds. Pile your plate high at breakfast with whatever food is on offer, you will need the energy for 18 hours a day of basic training...
Mike Crofts is a former British army captain who served two tours of Afghanistan. He is now the CEO of human performance company Leading Purpose and the founder of criminal justice charity 3Pillars Project
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
22 minutes ago
- BBC News
XL bully owner admits offences after fatal attack near Banbury
A woman has admitted having two XL bullies which were dangerously out of control and killed another Roberts, 36, admitted two counts of possession of a fighting dog and two counts of allowing the dogs to be in a public place without a muzzle or lead at Oxford Magistrates' Court on of De La Warr Drive, Banbury, also admitted two counts of being in charge of a dog dangerously out of control and one count of causing unnecessary suffering to a protected charges relate to an incident in which a schnoodle dog, Winnie, was killed by the two XL bullies, Kobi and Kardi, in Hanwell, near Banbury, on 26 March. Roberts' sentencing was adjourned for a pre-sentence report to be prepared. She will be sentenced at the magistrates' court on 18 July. You can follow BBC Oxfordshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.


BBC News
22 minutes ago
- BBC News
Lack of Devon and Cornwall transport funding criticised
The government has been accused of leaving Devon and Cornwall behind in terms of transport Rachel Reeves announced £15.6bn of funding for transport projects across parts of England including Greater Manchester, the Midlands, West England and Yorkshire on and business leaders based in Devon and Cornwall have criticised the government for overlooking the region after no money was earmarked for projects in either Department for Transport (DfT) said it was committed to delivering infrastructure that would boost the whole country. 'Underfunded services' Leigh Frost, leader of Cornwall Council, said the county's roadwork of more than 4,500 miles (7,242km) would have to be maintained with limited Liberal Democrat councillor said: "Our residents deserve a reliable, affordable, and integrated public transport system."Instead, we're left to struggle with making the Cornish pound stretch further to support our underfunded services, while other areas receive the lion's share of investment."Ben Maguire, Lib Dem MP for North Cornwall, said the county had "yet again been overlooked" by the government and the area deserved much better."We've had promises of 'levelling up', but this £15bn plan doesn't offer a single penny for our region," Mr Maguire added. Lib Dem MP for St Ives Andrew George accused the government of targeting "handpicked mayoral zones" with its £15.6bn of George added: "So we're expected to believe this is a politically neutral decision based on need?"Cornwall's Chamber of Commerce said transport consistently ranked as the top priority for businesses in the county, but said there was still not enough support from the Brown, the chamber's chief executive, said Cornwall was being left behind."Our businesses struggle daily with connectivity issues that limit growth potential," he said. "While metro mayors across England receive billions for trams and mass transit, Cornwall's economy continues to be hampered by inadequate bus services and rail connections that fail to meet business needs." 'Languishing behind' The funding announcement also received criticism in Smith, Conservative MP for South West Devon, said she was "deeply disappointed" that no money had been given to Devon or Cornwall."Anyone living in our corner of the UK will know that our transport infrastructure languishes behind the rest of the nation," Ms Smith said."I have warned before that the South West risks becoming Labour's forgotten region. It seems this remains true." 'Pushing our government' Jayne Kirkham, Labour MP for Truro and Falmouth, defended the government, saying the funding was focused on city said she and Perran Moon, Labour MP for Camborne and Redruth, had been told more help was expected in Spending Review due to be set out by the chancellor on 11 June."We will be pushing and pushing and pushing our government to make sure we get as much as we can for Cornwall, because we know how much we need it here," Ms Kirkham DfT said Wednesday's announcement would help more than a quarter of England's population get better transport infrastructure.A spokesperson added decisions on future transport spending would be announced as part of the Spending Review."We are committed to delivering transport infrastructure that will boost growth and opportunity across the whole country, as part of our 'Plan for Change'," the spokesperson said."This includes investing in Cornwall – where this year alone we are already providing £10m towards better bus services, up to £48m for highways and local transport maintenance and £1.1m to enable better walking, wheeling and cycling opportunities."


Telegraph
27 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Terrorism the only issue Starmer handling well, poll finds
Terrorism is the only issue that British people think Sir Keir Starmer is handling well, new polling suggests. In a damning audit of Labour's first year in office, voters gave the Government bad marks on 14 out of 15 key policy areas, from taxation to immigration. The YouGov survey, conducted over the past month, makes grim reading for the Prime Minister, who has struggled with plummeting approval ratings since entering No 10. It indicates the scale of the challenge he faces to win back the public's trust amid the rise of Reform UK, with Labour still reeling from disastrous results at last month's local elections. Asked how the Government was faring in 15 key policy areas, voters indicated that terrorism was the only one they thought Sir Keir was handling well, with a net score of +3. The 14 other issues all received net negative ratings, with immigration the lowest at -60, followed closely by taxation on -58 and welfare on -53. Sir Keir also got bad marks on the economy, with a net score of -52, as well as housing, the NHS, crime, inflation, unemployment, Brexit, the environment, education, transport and defence. The survey, published on Thursday, was conducted between May 3 and June 2, using a representative sample of 8,538 British people. It will come as a blow to the Prime Minister before the spending review next week, at which the Chancellor is expected to unveil cuts to day-to-day spending to keep within her self-imposed fiscal rules. The positive feedback on Labour's handling of terrorism will be encouraging for the Government, suggesting Sir Keir is broadly trusted to keep the country safe. But the lack of confidence in the Prime Minister's ability to tackle the small boats crisis will concern No 10 as Reform storms ahead in the opinion polls. A similarly dire score on welfare suggests Sir Keir has work to do to win back Labour's traditional supporters on the Left, many of whom were dismayed by his sweeping cuts to benefits earlier this year. No 11 will also be disappointed by the lack of faith in Labour's ability to handle the economy, despite Rachel Reeves's attempt to put fiscal responsibility front and centre of her plans. Sir Keir declared Reform his main opposition last month, setting him up for a battle with Nigel Farage on highly charged issues such as migration and net zero. Meanwhile, the Reform leader parked his tanks on Labour's lawn by promising to reverse the cut to winter fuel payments for pensioners in full and lift the two-child benefit cap. The YouGov poll found that nearly three-quarters of voters thought Sir Keir was doing 'very badly' or 'fairly badly' on immigration, compared to just 13 per cent who thought he was doing well. Labour has been accused of losing control of Britain's borders after close to 1,200 small boat migrants crossed the Channel in a single day.