logo
Congress' budget aims to target Medicaid fraud. In Massachusetts, the reality is more complicated.

Congress' budget aims to target Medicaid fraud. In Massachusetts, the reality is more complicated.

Boston Globe20-05-2025

Locally, the cost of MassHealth, the state's Medicaid administrator, grew almost 50 percent in inflation adjusted dollars from 2014 to 2023, according to the
'The growth that we've seen, that line item year over year, that has to flatten,' said State Representative Marc Lombardo, a Billerica Republican.
Related
:
Advertisement
The proposal passed Sunday by the House Budget Committee would make it more difficult for people to apply for Medicaid, such as by requiring some beneficiaries to be employed and requiring the state to more frequently confirm MassHealth members' eligibility. The proposal could cut the national deficit by $625 billion over 10 years, according to a
by 2034, according to the CBO.
Advertisement
It's a myth that there are hordes of people fraudulently receiving Medicaid benefits, experts said.
'These are right-wing rhetorical covers for kicking people off Medicaid,' said Jonathan Gruber, an MIT economics professor who specializes in health care.
Many of those who could end up uninsured are people who are eligible for Medicaid but would struggle to overcome barriers, such as additional paperwork and record keeping, which the Congressional proposal would likely create, he said.
MassHealth officials offered a 'high estimate' that the budget proposal could make Medicaid inaccessible to hundreds of thousands and could cost the state $1 billion. More people participate in MassHealth than they did a decade ago, but the increasing cost of the program is also attributable to the increasing cost of health care and because MassHealth recipients tend to have more serious health needs.
At the heart of Congressional Republicans' budget priorities are trillions in
The Centers for Medicaid & Medicare Services reported about 5 percent of Medicaid payments nationally, about $31 billion, were
About three-fourths of those improper payments are attributable to paperwork or record-keeping errors, not intentional fraud, said Timothy Hill, senior vice president for Health at the American Institutes for Research, a nonprofit that works with providers to improve health care delivery, in a recent discussion about Medicaid fraud and abuse hosted by the health policy analysis organization KFF.
'It doesn't mean a service wasn't provided, it doesn't mean somebody didn't get care,' Hill said. 'What it does mean is that the rules that the agency established for getting payment weren't followed. All those errors could be corrected.'
Advertisement
When it comes to spotting true fraud, Massachusetts has a complex, overlapping screening process that involves the Office of the State Auditor, the Office of the Inspector General, the Attorney General's Office, the federal government, and MassHealth itself. They run algorithms that spot questionable billing patterns and assign state investigators to pore over records and interview MassHealth recipients, doctors, and care providers. What they find accounts for far less than one percent of the state's $20 billion MassHealth budget.
Gina Cash, a lawyer who runs the state auditor's Bureau of Special Investigations, described the process her team uses to investigate fraud. Their focus is usually on individuals improperly receiving benefits, and the work starts with hundreds of tips, reports of people whose spending habits have raised questions about whether they are eligible for the MassHealth benefits they receive. About half of those warrant investigations, including scrutiny of people's circumstances and medical conditions.
Her office identified close to
Cash received public assistance to help pay for child care when she was a young mother just out of law school and has empathy for those who need such services.
Related
:
'The solution is not to cut, it's to continue to make oversight reforms,' she said.
Experts noted fraudulent billing from providers, not individuals seeking benefits dishonestly, accounts for the vast majority of Medicaid fraud. Such cases can be prosecuted by the state Attorney General's Office Medicaid fraud unit. One recent case includes indictments against a
Advertisement
Massachusetts reported 13 Medicaid fraud convictions and 21 settlements in fiscal year 2024, according to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
The state Office of the Inspector General focuses on specific aspects of the health insurance system, primarily looking for improper practices from providers.
In a review of MassHealth services for children with autism from 2022 and 2023, the inspector general identified more than $17 million in
'We put a decent web together with the oversight agencies in the Commonwealth,' said Jeff Shapiro, the state's inspector general.
Health policy experts noted that fraud has a specific definition: intentional deception to obtain an undeserved benefit. Waste and abuse are more subjective. Waste can involve a provider taking advantage of billing rules, but it's harder to identify. What may look like a glut of unneeded tests, for example, could turn out to be warranted after a deeper investigation into a person's medical needs.
What qualifies as abuse can also be a matter of policy preferences.
Almost all states use revenue from taxes on health care providers to support Medicaid expenses, and in the process boost their federal reimbursements. Some federal legislators say it's a way to
Advertisement
Massachusetts is expected to raise $2.3 billion through these taxes in fiscal year 2025, according to the
Gruber, the MIT economist, said he generally doesn't like loopholes, but states wouldn't be able to afford coverage for poorer populations without taking advantage of this one.
'They are dramatically cutting the ability of states to take advantage to help Medicaid pay for underfunded programs,' he said.
He is infuriated, he said, about the hypocrisy of public officials who are outraged by the idea of taxpayer money wasted through Medicaid. He contrasted the rhetoric around Medicaid fraud with the decision to cut staff at the
'Catching one or two rich tax cheats would raise so much more money than we can save with these provisions,' he said.
Jason Laughlin can be reached at

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Most Americans Think Trump's Parade Is a Huge Waste of Money
Most Americans Think Trump's Parade Is a Huge Waste of Money

Yahoo

time38 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Most Americans Think Trump's Parade Is a Huge Waste of Money

Six in 10 Americans don't think that a $45 million military parade on President Donald Trump's birthday is a good use of taxpayer money, according to an Associated Press poll. The extravaganza, which will feature as many as 25 tanks rolling through the streets of Washington, D.C., is slated for June 14—the day Trump turns 79. The parade is billed as a 250th-anniversary celebration of the U.S. Army's founding. Just 40 percent of Americans polled by the AP approved of the lavish celebration, while 29 percent disapproved and the rest were neutral. Along political lines, only 20 percent of Democrats approved, in contrast with 67 percent of Republicans. When it came to the price tag, 80 percent of Democrats and 72 percent of Independents did not think it was worthwhile spending. Republicans were of a different mind—nearly two thirds signed off on the hefty bill. The parade will feature approximately 8,000 soldiers marching alongside the tanks. Its cost includes a new paint job for the tanks and repairing D.C. roads not equipped to bear their weight. On Tuesday, Trump offered a bizarre justification for the parade: without the military, Americans would have lost WWII and would now be speaking German or Japanese. 'If it weren't for us, you would be speaking German right now, ok?' he told reporters in the Oval Office. 'You might be speaking Japanese, too. You might be speaking a combination of both.' 'It's gonna be an amazing day,' Trump added. 'We'll have tanks, we'll have planes, we'll have all sorts of things. I think it's gonna be great.' Despite the president's enthusiasm, not many of his Republican colleagues are planning to attend. Out of 50 surveyed by Politico, just seven said they would go—including, of course, Trump diehard Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene. The army anticipates that 200,000 people will attend.

'No Kings' Protests See Major Crowds, Violence in Some States
'No Kings' Protests See Major Crowds, Violence in Some States

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

'No Kings' Protests See Major Crowds, Violence in Some States

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Demonstrators turned out across the U.S. on Saturday to participate in coordinated "No Kings Day" protests, aimed at denouncing President Donald Trump's leadership. While many of the events reportedly remained largely peaceful, several cities saw violent altercations, including a vehicular assault in Virginia and a shooting in Utah. Why It Matters The protests took place in hundreds of U.S. cities, according to Reuters, with large-scale gatherings reported in major hubs such as Philadelphia; Los Angeles; Austin, Texas; Portland, Oregon; and New York. The rallies coincided with the president's 79th birthday and the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary parade in Washington D.C. Protesters carry a banner representing the U.S. Constitution in downtown Los Angeles during a "No Kings Day" demonstration on June 14, 2025. Protesters carry a banner representing the U.S. Constitution in downtown Los Angeles during a "No Kings Day" demonstration on June 14, To Know In Portland, Oregon, officers deployed tear gas and flash grenades, with demonstrators breaching an Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility, according to the Daily Mail, which reported that four police officers were injured during the clashes. In Culpeper, Virginia, a 21-year-old man, Joseph R. Checklick Jr., was arrested after allegedly driving his SUV into a dispersing crowd in a parking lot, striking at least one person. Meanwhile, in Salt Lake City, shots were fired during a No Kings march, critically injuring one person. KUTV reported that police took a person of interest into custody after the shooting, which occurred downtown just before 8 p.m., according to the outlet. Despite clashes at some, local reports from around the country noted that many of the demonstrations were large, but peaceful. Protests also took place in cities such as Detroit, and Chicago, where marchers held signs including "Deport Trump to Hell" and "America Is the Land of Immigrants." In Washington D.C., demonstrators wheeled a caricature of Trump wearing a crown and sitting on a golden toilet, the Daily Mail reported. What People Are Saying The San Diego Police Department said on X, formerly Twitter, following protests on Saturday: "You stayed classy, San Diego. Thank you to the thousands who demonstrated peacefully today. No arrests, and no incidents." WGN News Reporter Courtney Spinelli posted on X, Saturday: "Police estimate the crowd at the "No Kings" protest in Chicago was ~15,000 deep. Chicago Police Department Superintendent Larry Snelling: 'What I saw from the start, was a bunch of people that came out here to exercise their first amendment right. They were very peaceful, very complimentary of the officers.' Republican congressional candidate Lily Tang Williams said on X, Saturday: "We ran into the first 'No Kings' protest in Fort Lauderdale, FL. It is peaceful so far, police officers are present, traffic is slow. I heard Miami might have bigger one. Be careful out there and stay calm!" Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said on X, Saturday: "30,000 people showed up across our city to exercise their constitutional right to peaceful protest today—that's powerful. A curfew is in effect in Downtown Los Angeles to stop bad actors who do not care about immigrants' rights. Get home safe, LA." What Happens Next Whether more protests are held in response to Trump's policies remains to be seen.

Padilla handcuffing raises the stakes for Democrats confronting administration
Padilla handcuffing raises the stakes for Democrats confronting administration

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

Padilla handcuffing raises the stakes for Democrats confronting administration

The handcuffing of Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) raises the stakes for future clashes between Democrats and the administration as acts of protest have been met with swift law enforcement action. Democrats have vowed to continue their pressure campaign on the administration over its immigration policies, but the incident involving Padilla and President Trump's forceful response to Democratic protestors raise questions over how such confrontations will intensify. The remarkable video shows Padilla being forced to the ground and then handcuffed after interrupting Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem's press conference, with the lawmaker identifying himself by name and title and saying he wished to ask a question. Trump administration officials said Secret Service agents responded as trained — removing an unknown figure as he pushed his way toward the front of a press conference. Democrats see it as the manhandling of a colleague and an escalation after the administration brought charges against Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-N.J.) over her involvement in a scuffle that erupted when she and colleagues were attempting to visit a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility. 'This is another incident of Trump and his administration abusing their power and stopping members and elected officials from doing their jobs. I mean, this is just going to keep escalating,' McIver said in response to a question from The Hill. 'This is why we must continue to do oversight. We must continue to do our jobs, and be vocal about what this administration is doing. And it's a threat to our democracy. It's very sad. It's a sad day in America to see everything that is happening, from the situation with me to now with the United States senator being basically tackled to the ground.' Rep. Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.) raised a more chilling prospect. 'It is a further dissension into anarchy and authoritarianism, and it is time that Republicans in the House and the Senate not only stand up for our institution, but stand up for democracy and call on Donald Trump to stop this lawlessness, or someone is going to get killed,' he told The Hill. The condemnation from Democrats of Padilla's treatment was immediate, with California Democrats walking down the Capitol steps in unison for a press conference that swelled as more of their colleagues from other states arrived. Rep. Adriano Espaillat (D-N.Y.) said Padilla was 'assaulted.' Numerous lawmakers said he was 'manhandled.' And Rep. Jimmy Gomez (D-Calif.) raised concerns that Democrats could face violent consequences even as he stressed the need to push back on what he dubbed an effort by Trump 'to show that he is not controlled by our Constitution.' 'We're heading down a dark, dark path, something that in my imagination I never thought we would reach. But this is where we are, and if, if they can do that to a member of Congress from New Jersey, a senior senator who was shouting at the top of his lungs, 'I am Sen. Alex Padilla,'' Gomez said. 'If it can happen to Alex, it can happen to any of those senators on the other side, or any member of Congress, or anybody. So I want to just stress that we're not going to give up. We're not going to be intimidated. We're not going to be cowards. We're going to keep fighting for our communities. …When is it going to be enough? When somebody gets shot in the streets of Los Angeles? When a member gets shot?' he said before trailing off as he became overcome with emotion. But many also urged caution and stressed the need to respond peacefully. 'They are trying to stage as many violent and political provocations as possible. And so we're in a dangerous situation right now. So I urge everybody on our side to act with maximum restraint and in the best traditions of non-violence,' Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, told The Hill before referencing Trump's Saturday parade. 'Because Donald Trump has a $100 million military extravaganza parade coming to Washington. They told people not to come to work on Friday. And he's threatening to send troops to other cities. So I regard the situation with immense gravity.' The potential for charges for Democrats engaging with law enforcement are no small matter. McIver, who was indicted by a grand jury this week after the administration accused her of using her forearms to attack law enforcement, could face up to 17 years if convicted. Democrats have called the prosecution a politically motivated case that twists her efforts to brace herself in the scuffle. And while Padilla is the only lawmaker who has been handcuffed, a staffer for Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) was also handcuffed after Department of Homeland Security officers pushed their way into the office without a warrant while looking for those protesting arrests at immigration courthouses. At the same time, there are risks to law enforcement, though it's highly unlikely the Trump administration would pursue any charges. 'These thugs who manhandled the senator probably don't know it's a federal offense to attack a member of Congress, but that's not what it's about,' Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said on the Capitol steps. 'It shouldn't be anybody in our country [who is] treated this way. So we speak out for Senator Padilla. We're speaking out for everyone who has a right to speak.' Shortly after Padilla was removed, Noem addressed the matter, saying the lawmaker behaved inappropriately but said she would meet with him, which she did not long after the press conference ended. 'I think everyone would agree that wasn't appropriate,' she said. 'When I leave here I'll find him and visit and find out really what his concerns were. I think everybody in America would agree that that wasn't appropriate, that if you wanted to have a civil discussion, especially as a leader, a public official, that you would reach out and try to have a conversation,' she said. The Department of Homeland Security later incorrectly said Padilla failed to identify himself and said he was not wearing his Senate pin, though he was wearing a shirt with the Senate logo on it. Few Republicans have answered Democrats' calls to rebuke the response to Padilla. Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) called the incident 'horrible.' 'It's horrible. It is shocking at every level. It's not the America I know,' she said. Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) said, 'it looks like he's being manhandled and physically removed, and it's hard to imagine a justification for that.' But Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) leveled criticism at Padilla for missing scheduled votes that day. 'I think he should have been here in Washington voting,' Barrasso told reporters. 'He has a responsibility to his constituents to show up at work,' he continued. 'Not to go try to make a spectacle of himself.' For his part, Padilla was also surprised by his treatment, saying in an interview with Pod Save America that it took 'maybe half a second for multiple agents to be on me.' He said he snapped when he heard Noem describe herself as in Los Angeles to 'liberate' the city from its governor and mayor, motivating him to interject. He encouraged people to 'continue to speak up.' 'We have First Amendment rights in this country. Speak up, protest peacefully. But continue to speak up because Donald Trump would want nothing more than for all of us to just cower away and say nothing, and let him continue to abuse his power,' he said. 'We cannot let this be the norm.' But in the aftermath of the incident, he said he's left wondering what happens when there aren't cameras rolling, and people who do not have powerful positions like the one he holds encounter DHS and ICE agents conducting the raids. 'If a senator asking a question scares them so much that they'll deploy agents to put a United States senator in handcuffs, imagine what they're doing to people out there, maybe subject to an immigration raid, who have a question…may be requesting their lawyer but not getting that opportunity,' he said. 'These are dangerous times for the United States of America.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store