Emirati Daily On Arab Summit And Egyptian Plan For Gaza: Arab Leaders Were Afraid To Address Hamas And Its Weapons; Everybody Is Evading Responsibility
In its March 5, 2025 front-page article, the Emirati London-based daily Al-Arab harshly criticizes the closing statement of the March 4 Arab League summit in Cairo. The summit convened to discuss a plan for the reconstruction of the Gaza Strip as an alternative to the plan proposed by U.S. President Donald Trump that involves the exile of the Gazans. Headed "The Cairo Summit: A Flawed Conclusion to an Anomalous Situation in Which Everyone Is Evading Responsibility," the article states that the summit took no decisions regarding Gaza's future, the source of the funds required for its reconstruction, and the way to deal with the issue of Hamas' weapons, which this organization has defined as a "red line." It claims that the Arab states in fact deliberately refrained from explicitly mentioning Hamas and its weapons, and preferred to take a vague stance out of fear of provoking the Arab street. It warns that leaving the weapons in Hamas' hands will enable it to torpedo the Egyptian plan for the reconstruction of Gaza, and to produce a new leader who will launch another war against Israel, so that the billions invested in the Gaza Strip will be lost and the Gulf states will be required to provide new funds for reconstruction.
Al-Arab's front-page article
The following are translated excerpts from the article: [1]
"The emergency Arab Summit yielded no clear decisions regarding the future of Gaza in light of the reconstruction plan proposed by Egypt, nor about how to deal with Hamas. The summit also failed to sufficiently address the sources of funding, and no country clearly committed to paying part of the reconstruction costs. In addition, there was a notable absence of leaders from the Gulf states.
"The summit's conclusion, which offered no solution for the pending problems, is a flawed conclusion to an anomalous situation in which everyone is evading responsibility. Even the Palestinians have shrugged off their responsibility for what happened: the PA proposed half-solutions and Hamas set out red lines, as though the Al-Aqsa Flood [i.e., Hamas' October 7 attack, in which 1,200 Israelis were murdered and 251 were abducted] never happened and as though the [Gaza] Strip and its people are in excellent condition and do not need courageous decisions that will prevent the tragedy from recurring.
"This time the situation is different, and the Arab Summit cannot issue a general statement. It needs precise positions, because U.S. President Donald Trump is following its outcomes [to see] whether they comply with his demands regarding Hamas, or whether he will have to press for implementing his plan to exile [the people of Gaza]. This places the Arab stance in a doubly embarrassing position that could have been avoided if the summit had only taken a stand regarding Hamas and its weapons, and clearly specified the scope of funds that will be provided for rebuilding the Strip and the elements that would guarantee [their provision].
"The Egyptian plan, which has been approved by the Arab leaders and officials, removes Hamas as the administrator of the Strip, in compliance with one of Israel's main demands. But it refrains from explicitly mentioning the disarming of Hamas and the other factions and the dismantling of their military infrastructures. The leaders who attended [the summit] clearly preferred to take a vague position in order to avoid confronting the Arab street, and in order to maintain the image they assumed during the war. They presented themselves as being close to the street and to the resistance, and [now] they find it difficult to take decisions that contradict this image.
"Ignoring Hamas' weapons will create problems for the Egyptian plan in the future, because Hamas will be able to thwart every stage of this plan or oppose the participation of certain countries. Furthermore, the presence [of these weapons] will facilitate the emergence of a new Sinwar, who will undertake to launch a war against Israel. Consequently, the billions invested in rebuilding [the Strip] will be lost in another ostentatious war between Hamas and Israel, and several months later another plan will be proposed requiring the Gulf states to provide new funds for reconstruction. This is an issue of contention that the summit should have resolved in an explicit manner.
"In addition, leaving the weapons in Hamas' hands can lead to an internal war if the Palestinian Authority eventually assumes responsibility for the Strip, as the Egyptian plan proposes. Hamas, [for its part], has prevented any option of interpretations or unclear Arab positions when it said that its weapons are a red line that nobody must [even] approach…"
[1] Al-Arab (UAE), March 5, 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Shafaq News
2 hours ago
- Shafaq News
Iraq's Al-Sistani warns: Strike on Iran's top leaders risks regional chaos
Shafaq News/ Iraq's top Shiite authority, Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, warned on Thursday that any strike on Iran's senior religious or political leadership could ignite uncontrollable chaos across the region. In a statement from his office in Najaf, al-Sistani denounced the ongoing Israeli military campaign against Iran, stressing that targeting the country's top leadership would violate religious principles, breach international law, and defy global norms. 'Such a criminal act would shatter regional stability, deepen human suffering, and inflict far-reaching harm on the interests of all nations.' Al-Sistani called on the international community—particularly Muslim countries—to mobilize diplomatic pressure, halt the aggression, and broker a lawful, peaceful solution to the Iranian nuclear issue.
Shafaq News
2 hours ago
- Shafaq News
Oil falls as investors weigh chance of US intervention in Iran-Israel conflict
Shafaq News/ Oil prices fell on Thursday with investors hesitating to take new positions after President Donald Trump gave mixed signals on potential U.S. involvement in the Israel-Iran conflict, while the Federal Reserve left interest rates unchanged. Brent crude futures fell 20 cents, or 0.26%, to $76.5 a barrel by 0421 GMT, after gaining 0.3% in the previous session when high volatility saw prices fall as much as 2.7%. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude for July fell 4 cents, or 0.05% to $75.10 a barrel, after settling up 0.4% in the previous when it dropped as much as 2.4%. The July contract expires on Friday and the more active August contract was down 8 cents, or 0.11%, to $73.42 a barrel. There is still a "healthy risk premium baked into the price as traders await to see whether the next stage of the Israel-Iran conflict is a U.S. strike or peace talks", Tony Sycamore, market analyst at IG, said in a client note. Goldman Sachs on Wednesday said a geopolitical risk premium of about $10 a barrel is justified given lower Iranian supply and risk of wider disruption that could push Brent crude above $90. Trump on Wednesday told reporters that he may or may not decide whether the U.S. will join Israel in its attacks on Iran. The conflict stretched into its seventh day on Thursday. Direct U.S. involvement would widen the conflict, putting energy infrastructure in the region at higher risk of attack, analysts said. As a result of the unpredictability that has long characterised Trump's foreign policy, "markets remain jittery, awaiting firmer signals that could influence global oil supply and regional stability," said Priyanka Sachdeva, senior market analyst at Phillip Nova. Iran is the third-largest producer among members of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, extracting about 3.3 million barrels per day (bpd) of crude oil. About 19 million bpd of oil and oil products move through the Strait of Hormuz along Iran's southern coast and there is widespread concern the fighting could disrupt trade flows. Separately, the U.S. Federal Reserve kept its interest rates steady on Wednesday but pencilled in two cuts by the end of the year. Chair Jerome Powell said cuts would be "data-dependent" and that it expects accelerated consumer inflation from Trump's planned import tariffs. Lower interest rates would stimulate the economy, and as a result demand for oil, but that could exacerbate inflation.
Iraqi News
2 hours ago
- Iraqi News
Iraq among key US military bases in Middle East amid rising tensions
Washington – The United States has thousands of troops deployed on bases across the Middle East, a region in which Washington's forces have carried out repeated military operations in recent decades. Israel launched an unprecedented air campaign against Iran last week, and US President Donald Trump has said he is weighing whether to join Israel in the fight. US involvement in the conflict would likely result in attacks by Tehran on American troops in the region, who were already targeted by Iran-aligned forces in the course of the Israel-Hamas war. Below, AFP examines countries with major concentrations of US forces in the Middle East, which falls under the US military's Central Command (CENTCOM). – Bahrain – The tiny Gulf kingdom hosts an installation known as Naval Support Activity Bahrain, where the US Navy's Fifth Fleet and US Naval Forces Central Command headquarters are based. Bahrain's deep-water port can accommodate the largest US military vessels, such as aircraft carriers, and the US Navy has used the base in the country since 1948, when the facility was operated by Britain's Royal Navy. Several US ships have their home port in Bahrain, including four anti-mine vessels and two logistical support ships. The US Coast Guard also has vessels in the country, including six fast response cutters. – Iraq – The United States has troops at various installations in Iraq, including Al-Asad and Arbil air bases. The Iraqi government is a close ally of Iran, but also a strategic partner of Tehran's arch-foe the United States. There are some 2,500 US troops in Iraq as part of the international coalition against the Islamic State jihadist group. Baghdad and Washington have agreed on a timetable for the gradual withdrawal of the coalition's forces from the country. US forces in Iraq and Syria were repeatedly targeted by pro-Iran militants following the outbreak of the Gaza war in October 2023, but responded with heavy strikes on Tehran-linked targets, and the attacks largely subsided. – Kuwait – Kuwait has several US bases, including Camp Arifjan, the location of the forward headquarters for the US Army component of CENTCOM. The US Army also has stocks of prepositioned materiel in the country. Ali al-Salem Air Base hosts the 386th Air Expeditionary Wing, the 'primary airlift hub and gateway for delivering combat power to joint and coalition forces' in the region. Additionally, the United States has drones including MQ-9 Reapers in Kuwait. – Qatar – Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar includes the forward components of CENTCOM, as well as of its air forces and special operation forces in the region. It also hosts rotating combat aircraft, as well as the 379th Air Expeditionary Wing, which includes 'airlift, aerial refueling intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance, and aeromedical evacuation assets.' – Syria – The United States has for years maintained troop presences at a series of installations in Syria as part of international efforts against the Islamic State group, which rose out of the country's civil war to overrun large parts of Syria and neighboring Iraq. The Pentagon announced in April that it would roughly halve the number of its forces in the country to less than 1,000 in the coming months as part of a 'consolidation' of US troops in the country. – United Arab Emirates – Al Dahfra Air Base in the UAE hosts the US 380th Air Expeditionary Wing, a force that is composed of 10 squadrons of aircraft and also includes drones such as MQ-9 Reapers. Combat aircraft have rotated through Al Dhafra, which also hosts the Gulf Air Warfare Center for air and missile defense training.
