Deadly strings
Listen to article
Despite a province-wide ban on kite flying, Punjab's skies continue to turn into death traps, with the latest victim being a four-year-old girl in Rawalpindi who suffered serious wounds from a stray kite string while riding a motorcycle with her father. Unfortunately, kite flying continues unabated, especially in garrison cities, revealing serious lapses in enforcement and public compliance.
The problem is not the absence of laws but the absence of consistent enforcement. The Punjab Prohibition of Kite Flying (Amendment) Act, 2024, was meant to put an end to this hazard, imposing heavy penalties - up to seven years in prison and multi-million-rupee fines for violators, including manufacturers and suppliers. But the reality on the ground tells a different story. The law is being flouted with impunity, and the authorities' sporadic crackdowns are little more than cosmetic exercises. Kites still dot the skyline, and the sharp strings that have already killed and injured many remain a looming threat over Punjab's streets. Authorities must take a more aggressive stance. Authorities must adopt a zero-tolerance policy and ensure strict enforcement of the ban. Routine inspections in high-risk areas, coupled with continuous crackdowns on illegal kite production and sales, are essential to curbing this menace. Furthermore, imposing severe penalties - including substantial fines and legal consequences for repeat offenders - will serve as a strong deterrent.
Strict monitoring should also be implemented at the manufacturing and supply level to cut off the availability of hazardous materials used in kite strings. Additionally, law enforcement agencies should conduct periodic surprise inspections, collaborate with local communities to report violations. Without decisive and sustained action, the cycle of preventable tragedies will continue, putting countless lives at risk. The injury suffered by little Manahil should not be dismissed as an unfortunate accident.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
6 days ago
- Business Recorder
CCP warns consumers against bogus housing schemes
ISLAMABAD: The Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) has warned consumers that bogus housing schemes and deceptive marketing practices continue to harm growth in real estate sector. According to an order issued by the CCP against a housing society of Islamabad, the importance of responsible and accurate advertising in relation to real estate should not, in any circumstance, be undermined. The real estate market plays a vital role in the development of any country's economy as numbers of other associated sectors have close links with this sector. At the same time, the degree of regulation remains inadequate to the extent that bogus housing schemes and deceptive marketing practices continue to harm growth in this sector, ultimately causing a loss to the overall sustainability of Pakistan's economy. The Commission, at the outset, also bears in mind the specific circumstances of consumers that often fall victim to misleading claims in relation to real estate investments they may make. For the majority of the population in this country, it almost takes a lifetime of savings or obtaining credit or loans from banks to make an investment such as the acquisition of a plot to secure a more stable future. Such a transactional decision is a much more complicated and difficult one as compared to buying everyday household product from a supermarket. 'Therefore, we cannot stress enough, the higher burden placed on undertakings which operate in the real estate market, in relation to the accuracy of any claims or representations that they make in the course of their marketing campaigns, CCP order maintained.' In this case, the CCP Bench considered the seriousness of the infringement, particularly the nature of the deceptive marketing practices, effect on competitors and third parties, and Respondent's refusal to cooperate with the Commission for carrying out its investigations. The advertisement was disseminated widely through digital and print media. Accordingly, there is dire need to deter the Respondent and other such undertakings from committing such deceptive marketing practices in future in order to protect the market integrity and consumers' interests. The quantum of the penalty has been determined after taking into account all the relevant factors as enumerated in CCP, Fining Guidelines. Deceptive marketing and dissemination of false and misleading information appears to be the business strategy of housing scheme being advertised as another scheme of Islamabad as it started immediately after its incorporation and well before the promulgation of the PHATA Affordable Private Housing Scheme Rules 2020. Therefore, the CCP Bench hereby imposes a penalty of Rs 75,000,000/- (Seventy Five Million Rupees) upon the Respondent for violation of Section 10(2) (b) of the Act. The Bench also imposes a penalty of Rs 75,000,000/- (Seventy Five Million Rupees) upon the Respondent for violation of Section 10(2)(a) of the Competition Act. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
31-05-2025
- Business Recorder
There can be no criminal proceedings against taxpayer for recovery of arrears: LHC
LAHORE: The Lahore High Court has held that no criminal proceedings can be initiated against a tax payer for recovery of tax arrears until the final determination of liability against him by a competent authority. The court also observed that in the absence of assessment of tax or determination of tax involved, the special judge could not pass the sentence of fine which is the amount of tax involved and part of the penalty provided under the law. The court said the mechanism for recovery of arrears of tax provided in Section 48 of the Sale Tax Act would come into play only once the tax was finally assessed and penalties imposed continued to be unpaid. The court passed this order in a petition of a tobacco company and others who approached against the revenue officials for registration of criminal reports against the petitioner for their involvement in tax evasion. The court said no one is denying the competence of the complainant of carrying out criminal investigation in cases involving tax fraud, however, the dispute is the modus operandi in launching such investigation. The court said a taxpayer can prefer a departmental appeal against the decision of revenue official and then knock the door of appellate tribunal of Inland Revenue by way of filing appeal and that of the high court in the shape of tax reference. The court said civil and criminal proceedings can run side by side but it is a principle of law that where the criminal liability is dependent upon or connected with the result of civil adjudication, criminal proceedings can be stopped till the outcome of civil matter for safer administration of justice. The court, however, said the provisions of the Act gave a privilege to the tax payer to compound the offence subject to payment of amount of tax due against him. The court said if the amount of tax due against a tax payer was not assessed prior to launching of criminal proceedings, then it would amount to shut the window of compound ability for a tax payer, as without determination of amount of tax due, the commissioner would not be able to compound the offence. The court said the petitioners have been regularly filing sales tax returns and prior to launching of impugned complaint neither any audit report, show-cause notice nor any assessment order was in the field against them. The court, therefore, quashed the impugned complaint registered being unconstitutional, ultra vires of the Act and against the fundamental right of the petitioner. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
31-05-2025
- Business Recorder
SC suspends IHC order relating to enforcement of ICC London foreign arbitral awards
ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court suspended the Islamabad High Court (IHC) order relating to enforcement of International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) London foreign arbitral awards. A two-judge bench comprising Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah and Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi heard the appeals of Frontier Holdings Limited (petitioner) against an interim order of a division bench of the IHC. The apex court written order stated that the interim order of the IHC Division Bench shall remain suspended until the next date of hearing. The said appeals shall be listed before a three-member bench after a fortnight. The bench while issuing notice to the respondents (Petroleum Exploration Pvt Limited) ordered that the interim restraining order passed by the single judge of IHC shall remain in field and continue to operate. The case minutiae are that the dispute between the parties was referred for arbitration under the auspices of the ICC, London. Upon conclusion of the proceedings, a partial foreign arbitral award was rendered on 12.12.2024, and subsequently, a separate award on costs was issued on 31.03.2025. The awards were filed before the IHC for enforcement under the Recognition and Enforcement (Arbitration, Agreements and Foreign Arbitral Awards) Act, 2011 (Act). SC explains how a foreign arbitral award can be refused by local courts The single judge of the IHC while admitting the enforcement petition, issued interim relief vide order dated 24.04.2025, restraining the respondents from assigning, transferring, or alienating their working interest in Badin Fields and from creating any charge, lien, or encumbrance thereon. This interim order was subsequently challenged before a Division Bench in an intra-court appeal (ICA), which vide impugned order dated 19.05.2025, suspended the interim relief granted by the single judge. It is contended that the interim relief was granted in aid of enforcement under the Act and did not amount to final relief. Courts are empowered to pass interim measures to protect the integrity and efficacy of the enforcement process. Denial of such protection would defeat the very purpose of the Act and the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, 1958 ('Convention'). Reliance was placed on Taisei Corporation and another v. AM Construction Company (Pvt) Ltd (2024 SCMR 640), Orient Power Company (Pvt) Ltd, Lahore v. Sui Northern Gas Pipelines Ltd. (2021 SCMR 1728), Government of India v. Vedanta Limited and Ors (AIR 2020 SC 4550), and Zeiler v. Deitsch (500 F.3d 157 (2007)) which affirm that courts must maintain a pro-enforcement bias while dealing with foreign arbitral awards. It was further argued that the IHC Division Bench interfered at the interim stage without recording or satisfying any of the limited grounds of non enforcement under Article V of the Convention, as incorporated into the Act. Such premature judicial interference sends an adverse signal to the international community, undermines arbitral sanctity, erodes investor confidence, and undermines Pakistan's international obligations. A stable and enforcement-friendly legal environment is vital for encouraging foreign direct investment. It is further submitted with respect that the impugned order passed by the Division Bench, whereby the interim relief granted to the petitioners was suspended, has effectively obstructed the enforcement of the foreign arbitral award and is therefore inconsistent with the pro-enforcement mandate of the Act, the Convention, and the settled jurisprudence of this Court. Foreign arbitral awards are not to be treated as ordinary civil decrees; rather, they possess a binding character under international law, to which Pakistan has expressly committed itself. It is also contended that the ICA before the Division Bench was not maintainable. Orders passed therein are not amenable to an ICA appeal under Section 3(2) of the Law Reforms Ordinance, 1972. It is well settled that ICAs do not lie from orders passed under special laws that contain a self-contained appellate mechanism and do not expressly provide for such appeals. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
