This is what could happen next after an Israel-Iran ceasefire
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The whipsaw chain of events involving Iran, Israel and the United States that culminated in a surprise ceasefire has raised many questions about how the Trump administration will approach the Middle East going forward.
Yet, the answer to the bottom line question -- "what's next?" -- remains unknowable and unpredictable. That is because President Donald Trump has essentially sidelined the traditional U.S. national security apparatus and confined advice and decision-making to a very small group of top aides operating from the White House.
While there is uncertainty about whether the ceasefire between Iran and Israel will hold, it opens the possibility of renewed talks with Tehran over its nuclear program and reinvigorating stalled negotiations in other conflicts.
Watching for next steps on Trump's social media
Outside experts, long consulted by presidential administrations on policy, have been forced like the general public to follow Trump's social media musings and pronouncements for insights on his thinking or the latest turn of events.
Even Congress does not appear to be in the loop as top members were provided only cursory notifications of Trump's weekend decision to hit three Israeli nuclear facilities and briefings on their impact scheduled for Tuesday were abruptly postponed.
State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce, whose agency has played a key role in formulating Iran policy for decades, repeatedly on Tuesday deferred questions to the White House and Trump's posts.
"The secretary of state was in a dynamic with the president that is a private dynamic as that team was addressing a war and the nature of how to stop it," she told reporters. "I can't speak to how that transpired or the decisions that were made."
Trump's announcement Monday that Israel and Iran agreed to a ceasefire took many in the administration by surprise -- as did his post Tuesday that China is now free to import Iranian oil.
It's an apparent 180-degree shift from Trump's "maximum pressure campaign" on Iran since he withdrew from the 2015 Iran nuclear agreement during his first term. U.S. officials were left wondering if that meant wide-ranging sanctions aimed at cutting off Iran's energy revenue were being eased or reversed.
Assessing the damage to Iran's nuclear program
While the extent of the damage from 11 days of Israeli attacks and Saturday's strikes by U.S. bunker-buster bombs is not yet fully known, a preliminary assessment from the Defense Intelligence Agency said the nuclear program had been set back only a few months and was not "completely and fully obliterated" as Trump has said.
According to people familiar with the report, it found that while the strikes at the Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan nuclear sites did significant damage, they were not totally destroyed.
Still, most experts believe the facilities will require months or longer to repair or reconstruct if Iran chooses to try to maintain its program at previous levels.
Vice Admiral Brad Cooper, deputy commander of U.S. Central Command, who has been nominated to lead forces in the Middle East, told lawmakers Tuesday that Iran still possesses "significant tactical capability" despite the American strikes. He pointed to Iran's attempt to retaliate with missile launches at a U.S. base in Qatar.
In response to a question about whether the Iranians still pose a threat to U.S. troops and Americans worldwide, Cooper replied, "They do."
Trump, after announcing the ceasefire, boasted that Iran will never again have a nuclear program.
However, there are serious questions about whether Iran's leadership, which has placed a high premium on maintaining its nuclear capabilities, will be willing to negotiate them away.
Restarting US-Iran nuclear talks is possible
Another major question is what happens with negotiations over Iran's nuclear program. It is not entirely clear who in Iran has the authority to make a deal or even agree to reenter talks with the U.S. or others.
Ray Takeyh, a former State Department official and senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, said Iranian leadership is at a moment of disarray -- making it difficult to return to the table.
"The country's leadership and the regime is not cohesive enough to be able to come to some sort of negotiations at this point, especially negotiations from the American perspective, whose conclusion is predetermined, namely, zero enrichment," he said.
Karim Sadjadpour, an Iran expert at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, agreed, saying that "the biggest challenge right now is who is in charge in Tehran."
"Is there an Iranian negotiation team empowered to make consequential decisions?" he said. "The issue is that (Trump) is dealing with an Iranian government whose longtime identity has been based on hostility toward the the United States."
Still, a U.S. official said Tuesday that special envoy Steve Witkoff is ready to resume negotiations if Trump tells him to and Iran is willing. The official spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive diplomatic matters.
Witkoff has maintained an open line of direct communication via text messages with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi.
In the aftermath of the U.S. strikes, Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio both stressed that diplomacy is still Trump's preferred method for ending the conflict permanently.
"We didn't blow up the diplomacy," Vance told NBC's "Meet the Press" on Sunday. "The diplomacy never was given a real chance by the Iranians. And our hope -- is that this maybe can reset here. The Iranians have a choice. They can go down the path of peace or they can go down the path of this ridiculous brinksmanship."
Rubio echoed those comments.
"We're prepared right now, if they call right now and say we want to meet, let's talk about this, we're prepared to do that," he said. "The president's made that clear from the very beginning: His preference is to deal with this issue diplomatically."
The Israel-Iran ceasefire could affect Trump's approach to other conflicts
If it holds, the ceasefire could offer insight to the Trump administration as it tries to broker peace in several other significant conflicts with ties to Iran.
An end -- even a temporary one -- to the Iran-Israel hostilities may allow the administration to return to talks with mediators like Egypt and Qatar to seek an end to the war between Israel and the Iranian-backed militant group Hamas.
In Syria, a further shift away from now-weakened Iranian influence -- pervasive during ousted leader Bashar Assad's reign -- could open new doors for U.S.-Syria cooperation. Trump already has met the leader of the new Syrian government and eased U.S. sanctions.
Similarly, tense U.S. relations with Lebanon also could benefit from a reduced Iranian role in supporting the Hezbollah militant group, which has been a force of its own -- rivaling if not outperforming the Lebanese Armed Forces, particularly near the Israeli border.
If an Iran-Israel ceasefire holds, it also could allow Trump the time and space to return to stalled efforts to broker a ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine.
Russia and Iran have substantial economic and military cooperation, including Tehran providing Moscow with drones that the Russian military has relied on heavily in its war against Ukraine.
Russia has stepped up attacks on Ukraine in recent days as Israel attacked sites in Iran, perhaps expecting the world's attention to shift away from its three-year-old invasion.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Asahi Shimbun
19 minutes ago
- Asahi Shimbun
EDITORIAL: Japan must not forget rule of law principle in its diplomacy
Wasn't maintaining international order based on the rule of law the fundamental policy of Japanese diplomacy? If that principle was to waver because undue priority was placed on maintaining good relations with the Trump administration, it would be difficult to avoid criticism of holding a double standard and there could even be negative effects on the national security situation in East Asia. At a news conference, Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba expressed understanding toward the U.S. attack on Iranian nuclear facilities and said it 'demonstrates (the U.S.) determination to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons while seeking to calm the situation as soon as possible.' He added that it was difficult for Japan to assess the move in terms of international law because it was not in a position to accurately grasp the detailed facts behind the attack. Without providing clear evidence that Iran was proceeding with the development of nuclear weapons, Iran cannot be considered a pressing threat to the United States. Washington argued that the act was the exercise of its right to collective self-defense in support of Israel. But the consensus among experts is that it cannot be allowed under international law. When the United States began the war on Iraq in 2003, then Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi clearly expressed his support. Although Ishiba did not go that far, it is clear that he selected his words so it could not be considered a criticism of the United States. After Israel launched an attack on Iranian nuclear facilities, Ishiba initially said he strongly condemned the move that was 'totally unacceptable.' But at the Group of Seven summit held soon thereafter, Ishiba went along with the leaders' statement expressing support for Israel's right to defend itself out of consideration for the U.S. support of Israel. Because the United States is Japan's only ally, the reality is that it must depend on U.S. protection as the security environment in East Asia worsens. If criticism was directed at U.S. President Donald Trump's judgment, that might also affect ongoing negotiations over tariffs. European nations face a similar situation so the joint statement issued by Britain, Germany and France did not make a clear assessment of the U.S. attack. But now with the international order on the brink of collapse with the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the fighting in Gaza and the latest attack on Iranian nuclear facilities, Japan must play a role in making the maximum diplomatic effort for the peaceful resolution of such conflicts rather than allowing domination through force. In the vicinity of Japan, China continues its aggressive maritime advances and applying pressure on Taiwan while North Korea continues with its development of nuclear weapons and missiles. Japan's position was supposed to have sought regional peace and stability while not allowing the unilateral change of the status quo through force. It must avoid a situation that places doubt on its resolve about the rule of law, which could damage trust from the so-called Global South group of newly emerging and developing nations. --The Asahi Shimbun, June 25
The Mainichi
2 hours ago
- The Mainichi
Japan, NATO agree to collaborate on Iran, Ukraine, N. Korea issues
TOKYO (Kyodo) -- Japan and NATO agreed Tuesday to closely collaborate to address "security challenges" such as the Middle East crisis, Russia's war against Ukraine and North Korea's past abductions of Japanese nationals. During their talks in The Hague, Japanese Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte also affirmed that they would work to elevate their cooperation to "a new height" in various fields including defense industries, the Japanese Foreign Ministry said. The talks came as the United States, a NATO member and Japan's close ally, conducted airstrikes on key Iranian nuclear facilities amid the conflict between Israel and Iran, although the regional rivals said earlier Tuesday they had agreed to a cease-fire. Russia and North Korea have been strengthening their military partnership as Moscow's full-scale invasion of Ukraine -- which began in 2022 -- drags on and Pyongyang continues its missile and nuclear development. NATO has been stepping up cooperative ties in recent years with its Indo-Pacific partners of Japan, Australia, New Zealand and South Korea, sharing the view that security in the Euro-Atlantic and Indo-Pacific regions is inseparable. Iwaya met with Rutte on the sidelines of an ongoing NATO summit as a stand-in for Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, who canceled his planned visit to the Dutch city at the last minute due to the absence of other Indo-Pacific leaders and concerns over the Middle East situation.
The Mainichi
2 hours ago
- The Mainichi
Tokyo stocks slightly lower in morning on stronger yen
TOKYO (Kyodo) -- Tokyo stocks were slightly lower Wednesday morning, weighed down by some exporter shares on a stronger yen in directionless trading. The 225-issue Nikkei Stock Average fell 40.09 points, or 0.10 percent, from Tuesday to 38,750.47. The broader Topix index was down 9.42 points, or 0.34 percent, at 2,771.93. The U.S. dollar remained weak in the upper 144 yen range in Tokyo as tensions in the Middle East eased after U.S. President Donald Trump said Monday that Israel and Iran had agreed to a cease-fire. At noon, the dollar fetched 144.78-82 yen compared with 144.82-92 yen in New York and 145.30-32 yen in Tokyo at 5 p.m. Tuesday. The euro was quoted at $1.1620-1622 and 168.24-31 yen against $1.1604-1614 and 168.12-22 yen in New York and $1.1590-1592 and 168.41-45 yen in Tokyo late Tuesday afternoon. The Nikkei stock index was supported by heavyweight chip-linked shares following the rise of a key U.S. semiconductor index overnight. However, some export-oriented auto issues were sold on a firmer yen, which decreases exporters' overseas profits when repatriated. Despite a solid advance on Wall Street overnight, Tokyo stocks were directionless as the market had already digested the news the previous day of the cease-fire agreement between Israel and Iran, brokers said.
