Questions grow over unprecedented illegal firearms seizure in Jamaica
Jamaicans are seeking answers after officials revealed a massive illegal firearms seizure described by experts as the largest in the country's history, with enough guns and ammunition to 'arm a small army'.
More than a week after the police and customs said they had intercepted 233 illegal rifles and handguns and more than 40,000 rounds of ammunition, the government has remained tight-lipped about the details of the find, arguing that revealing more information would hamper a sensitive cross-border investigation into their origin and the identity of those involved.
According to unconfirmed local reports, the guns and ammunition were discovered inside an industrial-sized water heater at a warehouse in the country's capital, Kingston.
Announcing the seizure in a hastily organised press conference, the deputy prime minister and minister of security, Horace Chang, told journalists that the operation was 'reported a bit early'. Chang refused to give details of the operation, telling reporters that 'the more we talk about it, the less likely we are to find' those responsible, adding: 'In fact, too much information [has] already gone out.'
Jason McKay, a criminologist, said that Jamaica – which is already battling high homicide rates linked to gun trafficking from the US – should be treating the discovery of 'enough guns to fight a government' as a crisis.
'You could literally arm a small army with that. At this point in time, our sovereignty is in question,' he said. 'That much guns and ammunition falling into any environment could cause mayhem. If you were to drop that much guns and ammunition into London, you could change the culture of London crime. So it has to be looked at as a crisis.'
The government has hailed the gun find as a product of a $50bn (£37bn) investment in security and efforts to tackle organised crime.
Andrew Holness, Jamaica's prime minister, told reporters it was the result of improvements in resources for the Jamaica Customs Agency, improved partnerships with international partners and 'significant investment' in scanning technology.
Holness also avoided details, saying the weapons had been discovered with scanning technology and predicting that increased interdiction would reduce the supply of guns in Jamaica. 'The investigations are ongoing, and I am certain that our security forces will track down, along with our international partners, those who were responsible for this,' he said.
Last year the New York attorney general, Letitia James, announced new measures and legislation to tackle gun trafficking from the US to the Caribbean. James quoted Jamaican government estimates that at least 200 guns are trafficked into the country from the US every month, and said that the weapons are fuelling violent crime and enabling networks that traffic drugs to the US.
The Jamaican government also pointed to a historic 43% drop in murders since last year. 'That means we have a reduction of … [about] 210 murders compared to the period last year, that is, January to May. This is the lowest rate of homicide in the island since 1991,' Chang told reporters.
Kamina Johnson Smith, the foreign minister, said the strong crime reduction trend has resulted in the US upgrading Jamaica's travel advisory from level three, which urges travellers to 'reconsider your travel to the destination due to serious risks to safety and security'. Jamaica's advisory, she said, is now at level two – the same as 'much larger and more developed countries' such as Spain and the UK.
'This improvement is a timely acknowledgment of Jamaica's continued progress in enhancing public safety, as well as the travel experience for visitors,' she added.
However, while McKay has lauded the 'amazing' reduction in crime, he has called for 'extreme measures' to deal with the rising number of guns being trafficked. He said: 'Of course, the police are doing their best to recover them, but if they're going to come in at this rate, then it's not going to be quantifiable. You have to do something drastic at this point.'
The criminologist said that capital punishment should be considered. 'Jail time isn't enough for somebody who's importing 220 guns. It's more than them just endangering one person's life or two [people's lives]; they're endangering the entire society's life in Jamaica,' he said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump's Deportation Numbers, Explained
A Jamaican man is detained by federal agents after his immigration court hearing at the Ted Weiss Federal Building in New York City on on June 9, 2025. Credit - Adam Gray—Getty Images President Donald Trump campaigned on delivering the largest mass deportation effort in US history. What he has delivered so far is a dramatic surge in arrests by Immigration and Customs Enforcement of people who were living in the U.S. The data shows that interior enforcement has more than doubled since Trump took office, filling up immigration detention facilities across the country. It's those stepped-up efforts by ICE agents in workplaces, courthouses and homes to arrest people that prompted protests in Los Angeles last week. Trump's decision to deploy the California National Guard there over the objections of state and local officials sparked an escalation in protests and violent clashes with law enforcement over the weekend, according to local officials. Trump's upswing in ICE arrests may be starting to yield a surge in deportations. The total number of deportations has stayed essentially level compared to the Biden era, until recently, when the numbers appear to have risen sharply. Here's what the data shows about how the Trump Administration has revamped immigration enforcement and deportations in a few short months. In Trump's first six months, the number of people being apprehended on the Southern Border has plummeted. Instead, an increasing share of those held in immigration detention are people who were arrested by ICE. The most recent ICE detention data shows the average number of people held has gone up 25% since Trump took office. This represents a dramatic shift from how immigration enforcement has long been conducted in the U.S. Under the Biden administration, the majority of people who ended up in immigration detention were those who had recently crossed the border and were arrested by agents with Customs and Border Patrol (CPB). Holding border crossers in detention put them on a faster docket in removal proceedings, paving the way to send them out of the country at a faster clip. One major reason for this shift away from CPB arrests is that fewer people are coming to the border illegally than they were during most of the Biden era. Read more: Inside Donald Trump's Mass Deportation Operation In a recent interview with TIME, Trump border czar Tom Homan said he would like to double the amount of bed space ICE has in detention from 50,000 to 100,000. Having more people held in detention centers could increase the pace of both ICE arrests and deportations. Trump told TIME last year he wanted to target 15 million people for removal. He said he was open to using the military to do it, in the face of restrictions in the Posse Comitatus Act that limits the use of the military on U.S. soil. In a campaign interview with ABC News in August, J.D. Vance said, 'Let's start with 1 million.' At the end of April, the Administration said it had deported more than 139,000 migrants, which was behind pace to reach their aggressive targets. That is a reflection of just how time-consuming and challenging it is to find and remove people living in communities. On Tuesday, the Department of Homeland Security provided TIME with updated figures from Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin: more than 207,000 deported. That represents a significant increase in the Administration's deportations and may reflect the more sweeping and intrusive actions immigration officials have taken in recent weeks. The total number of people being deported has basically been stable, if slightly up, even as an increasing portion are those arrested inside the US by ICE. In May, ICE increased the pace of removal fights, a sign that the number of deportations could increase at a faster rate in the coming months. The Trump administration has asked Congress for more funding to pay for deportations and an increased pace in immigration enforcement. The most recent version of the'Big Beautiful Bill' that Trump is pushing Congress to pass has $168 billion for immigration and border enforcement. That would be a five-fold increase in such funding over the current year, which Congress set at $33 billion. Part of the challenge is finding places to accept deportees. Trump has defied long-standing norms and, some argue, broken laws by sending migrants to a notorious prison in El Salvador and the U.S. military base at Guantánamo Bay in Cuba, while putting others on planes bound for Panama and South Sudan. Homan tells TIME the Administration is in talks with three more countries to accept U.S. deportees. With the number of deportations not increasing as fast as they would like, Trump officials are pressuring ICE and other government agencies to boost immigration arrests. They are also encouraging migrants in the U.S. to return to their home countries on their own. Trump has offered $1,000 and a free commercial flight to people willing to 'self deport.' But even with that incentive, immigrants aren't leaving the country at the pace Trump promised. Muzaffar Chishti, a senior fellow at the Migration Policy Institute, says the Administration's self-deport campaign is unprecedented. 'Once they realized that fast deportation is not an easy enterprise, they started selling the idea of self deportation at a scale of which probably has not been detected in our history,' he says. Contact us at letters@
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Federal crackdown on protests raises 1st Amendment concerns
It's been a chaotic few days in Los Angeles amid immigration raids, protests against those raids and violence that stemmed from the throngs who took to the streets of downtown Los Angeles. It's prompted the deployment of military personnel to augment law enforcement in L.A., something Gov. Gavin Newsom and other local leaders say is an unconstitutional use of power by federal officials. But the use of the military isn't the only alleged violation of the Constitution to emerge from this crackdown. Free-speech advocates have noted that some actions by law enforcement aren't targeting those suspected of being in the country illegally. Instead, they're taking aim at those who stand with immigrants and against federal law enforcement, which they characterize as violations of the First Amendment rights to free speech and peaceful protest. Perhaps the most prominent example over the weekend was the arrest of David Huerta, president of the California branch of the Service Employees International Union, who faces a felony charge of conspiracy to impede an officer after a protest on Friday. But the alleged infringement upon First Amendment rights in Southern California dates back farther than just this weekend. In a report about Stephen Miller, a top White House advisor, pressuring federal law enforcement to deport more people, the Wall Street Journal listed a May 1 U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement raid on a home in Irvine as an example of established rules and best practices being thrown out. That day, ICE was looking for Michael Chang, who'd allegedly put up fliers identifying ICE officers in the area. Even though Chang had moved to New York the month before, his parents' Turtle Rock home was raided while they slept by ICE agents who arrived in 'a phalanx of military vehicles.' Federal officials say Chang's fliers were an act of 'doxxing,' or publicizing personal information often with malicious intent. A Department of Homeland Security official responded to KTLA's request for an interview with an agency representative with the following statement: 'Homeland Security Investigations & U.S. Secret Service served a criminal search warrant in an upscale Irvine neighborhood, targeting the suspect they believe was responsible for posting fliers w/ the names, photos, phone numbers, & locations of ICE agents in Southern California in February.' However, Aaron Terr, director of public advocacy for the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, said identifying law enforcement officers is not a crime unless there's a call for violence or harm. 'In this case, from what we know about what was on the flier, there was nothing that amounted to a threat,' Terr told KTLA. 'There's no evidence of a threat or intent to harm anybody, just the dissemination of information coupled with political criticism.' In the weeks since that Irvine raid, federal officials have kept mum, even as FIRE requested more detailed information, Terr said. U.S. Rep. Dave Min (D-Irvine) released a statement last month saying his office also sought more information, but if they received any updates, they haven't been disclosed. Min's office did not return a request for more information prior to publication. Further complicating the issue, President Donald Trump and his so-called 'border czar' Tom Homan have threatened political opponents and protesters with criminal prosecution, which they say could be necessary to protect the safety of officers. But it's not just officers' safety that seems to be Trump's concern. He's said that anyone who protests the military parade on Saturday — which is also Trump's birthday — will be met with 'very heavy force.' 'If there's any protester that wants to come out, they will be met with very big force,' Trump said, as reported by NBC News. 'I haven't even heard about a protest, but you know, this is people that hate our country, but they will be met with very heavy force.' Terr said that notion doesn't align with the Bill of Rights. 'That's concerning because people who are peacefully protesting shouldn't be met with any level of government force … It's very important for the government and for law enforcement to understand what the First Amendment does and doesn't protect and to let that guide their actions.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
NY lawmaker lambastes failed commemoration of Oct 7 attack, as Dem leadership accused of 'antisemitism'
The New York assemblyman behind an effort to formally commemorate the Oct. 7, 2023, terror attack in Israel lambasted leadership for tanking what was supposed to be a "poignant" bill remembering the tragedy. Assemblyman Lester Chang, R-Brooklyn – one of the few GOP members from New York City in the 103-47 Democratic-majority chamber – said he had been working on a resolution for New York state to officially remember the terror attack since hostage negotiations began a year ago. "I'm a Navy veteran of 24 years and I did a tour in Afghanistan. So I understand what war is all about," said Chang. "I've seen atrocities out there." Once American figures like then-candidate Donald Trump began helping hostage negotiations, Chang said he directed his staff to craft a message – which he said took more than a month of back-and-forth to make sure it was "balanced" and did not have a partisan streak. House Gop Unveils Resolution To Condemn Boulder Terror Attack, Call For Mass Deportation Of Overstayed Visas "We submitted it in January, as a resolution, and it was rejected… because [leadership] said it was 'controversial,'" Chang said. Read On The Fox News App "We were astounded but not surprised. So we converted it to a bill," he said, adding that, in the end, a bill would be better because a resolution only commemorates an event for that year, while a bill would codify the remembrance for eternity. With a handful of Democratic co-sponsors, Chang and colleagues believed they had the right balance to attempt to put it up for a vote, but as the New York Post reported, it was reportedly ultimately blocked by House Speaker Carl Heastie, D-Bronx, and other top Democrats. Chang said the bill, destined for the smaller governmental operations committee, was redirected to the larger Ways and Means committee, and that four members were "switched out." The top Republican on that panel, Assemblyman Ed Ra, told the New York Post that remembering Oct. 7 and/or combating antisemitism should never be "political." Republican Assemblyman Ari Brown, who, like Ra, represents Long Island, accused Albany Democrats of "veiled antisemitism," telling the Post the legislature is "rotten" with it. Morning Glory: The Israel-iran War Is Closer To Its End Than Its Beginning The assembly also tanked a resolution from Brown that complimented Chang's bill. Compounding that was, as Chang described, no GOP bills have been successfully put through the process at all this session. "Having me as a Republican [sponsor] – that would [procedurally] choke them – not because of me, the person, but as a member of that party." Chang said he would just as soon "give this bill to a Democrat" to sponsor if it meant commemorating the Oct. 7 attack. He added that, as a person of Chinese ancestry who represents largely Asian and Italian Bensonhurst, he has no religious horse in the race. "That should make it more poignant as a non-Jewish person pushing this bill in a mostly Christian and Buddhist district," he said. At least seven Democrats did come out in support of the Oct. 7 remembrance legislation, all of whom hail from New York City. Senate Minority Leader Rob Ortt, R-Niagara Falls, echoed Chang's concerns in comments to Fox News Digital. "Many New Yorkers had loved ones injured or worse in the terror attacks in Israel on Oct. 7," Ortt said. "The least we can do is commemorate this tragic day." "Instead of taking commonsense action, Albany Democrats would rather play politics, and have time and again refused to defend our Jewish brothers and sisters." Fox News Digital reached out to Heastie for comment and response to the allegations but did not hear article source: NY lawmaker lambastes failed commemoration of Oct 7 attack, as Dem leadership accused of 'antisemitism'