logo
Librarians, teachers and others plan day of action to fight book bans and preserve history

Librarians, teachers and others plan day of action to fight book bans and preserve history

USA Today13 hours ago

Librarians, teachers and others plan day of action to fight book bans and preserve history
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Major publishers and authors are suing Florida over its book ban law
Major publishers and authors are suing Florida over its law banning books deemed to have sexual content, saying the law violates free speech.
Straight Arrow News
In Gainesville, Florida, The Lynx Books will host a screening of 'Banned Together" on its back patio.
In Washington, D.C., participants will march on the National Mall stopping at museums to highlight the importance of preserving history.
And in Seattle, visitors to some public libraries will join a ''silent read-in'' of banned books.
Across the country, librarians, teachers, bookstore owners, civil rights activists and others plan to hold as many as 100 events June 7 as part of Teach Truth Day of Action. The national campaign aims to support the teaching of unvarnished history and to encourage people to read more, including banned books.
The actions come in the wake of efforts by the Trump administration and some conservative groups to restrict the teaching of certain history and to ban some books, many written by authors of color.
'This wave of book banning is not new, but now it's being not only supported by the federal government, but the federal government is using it to threaten to withhold funds so it's making it worse," said Rebecca Pringle, president of the National Education Association. 'Now we have more and more who are realizing we need to stand up and we need to use our voice."
It's not censorship, but education, some say
Dozens of states mostly led by Republicans have adopted or proposed measures that activists said overlook critical parts of Black history or restrict language related to race, sexuality and gender issues in public schools. Some have also restricted what books and materials are available in classrooms, many that focus on race or sexuality.
These mostly conservative lawmakers and groups argue that some books are offensive and should be kept from children, and that key parts of Black history are already taught in schools.
Jonathan Butcher, a senior fellow at the conservative Heritage Foundation, said if school officials decide a book is too sexually graphic for young people, then it shouldn't be in the school library.
He said it is the responsibility of the school board and parents to make that decision.
'That's their job,'' Butcher said. 'It is entirely appropriate for school boards and parents to work together and decide what books should be kept on shelves."
More: The new Selma? Activists say under DeSantis Florida is 'ground zero' in civil rights fight
He said banned books are likely available online or in public libraries and that some claims of censorship are exaggerated.
'I think it's a tactic to make it appear as if censorship is happening, when actually this is what education is about," Butcher said. 'Adults come together, decide what should be taught in sex education, in health ed, in civics and history and they determine what books should be kept on the shelves."
March to preserve history
Pringle and leaders of libraries and civil rights groups said their concerns and actions extend beyond book bans to pushing back against narrow interpretations of history.
'We last year focused a lot on banned books because obviously those were a lot of the things that were happening in the public square," said Nakeesha J. Ceran, deputy director for Teaching for Change, an advocacy group. 'What feels different in this moment is really the deep concerted effort to undermine all spaces and sites of public education, inclusive of public schools, museums, libraries."
The D.C. march, led by Teaching for Change and others, will start at the National Museum of African American History and Culture with stops at the National Museum of American History, the Hirshhorn Museum, the National Air and Space Museum and end at the National Museum of the American Indian.
The popular African American history museum has been singled out by President Donald Trump who called its work part of a 'widespread effort to rewrite our nation's history.'
Ceran disagreed, saying it's important to educators, students and others to be able to teach the truth about the history of all Americans.
'It also matters in the midst of seeing all of the dismantling that's happening, to be inspired by people, movement and resistance that is happening every day," she said.
Reading material impacts 'the culture of a place'
In Florida, The Lynx Books will hold a discussion Saturday about book bans and proposals to restrict the teaching of history. It will be followed by a showing of 'Banned Together," a documentary about teenagers fighting book bans.
'In our local community there are a lot of people who are very saddened by the banning of books and the intense curriculum restrictions in Florida and really want to fight against that,' said Viv Schnabel, events and community outreach for the independent bookstore.
Lynx sells banned books year-round and hosts a monthly banned-book book club. Up next is 'If Beale Street Could Talk," by James Baldwin. The bookstore has also donated books, including banned ones, to community organizations.
''It's an issue that impacts every single community," Schnabel said. 'What is being taught and what is available for children to read and for everyone to read directly impacts the culture of a place. So I think everyone certainly should care.'
'Working on fighting book bans'
Pringle called Florida 'Exhibit A" in the fight against book bans and restrictions on teaching history, but said the pushback is happening in other states as well.
'We have to have activists in every community,'' she said.
The Seattle Public Library, for example, is hosting anti-book banning events on June 7, 14 and 21.
'The country is experiencing unprecedented levels of censorship," said Kristy Gale, a teen services librarian there. 'So many people wanted to get tapped into something like this. I think we're going to get a lot of interest from folks who want to support libraries … and the work that we do. "
In 2023, the library launched 'Books Unbanned," a free digital collection of audio and e-books, including some that are banned. More than 440,000 books have been checked out, library officials said.
'It's our way of taking our resources that we have and making them available to people in other parts of the nation who don't have the kind of support for libraries or are experiencing censorship,'' said library spokeswoman Elisa Murray.
More: Protestors rally to support the national African American museum and Black history
Schnabel of The Lynx Books hopes the efforts have impact beyond a day.
'We're working on fighting book bans year-round not just on this day," she said. "But we're excited and hopeful that this day will shed a particular light on the work that we're doing and the work that other people across the nation are doing.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Musk could lose billions of dollars depending on how spat with Trump unfolds
Musk could lose billions of dollars depending on how spat with Trump unfolds

The Hill

time30 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Musk could lose billions of dollars depending on how spat with Trump unfolds

NEW YORK (AP) — The world's richest man could lose billions in his fight with world's most powerful politician. The feud between Elon Musk and Donald Trump could mean Tesla's plans for self-driving cars hit a roadblock, SpaceX flies fewer missions for NASA, Starlink gets fewer overseas satellite contracts and the social media platform X loses advertisers. Maybe, that is. It all depends on Trump's appetite for revenge and how the dispute unfolds. Joked Telemetry Insight auto analyst Sam Abuelsamid, 'Since Trump has no history of retaliating against perceived adversaries, he'll probably just let this pass.' Turning serious, he sees trouble ahead for Musk. 'For someone that rants so much about government pork, all of Elon's businesses are extremely dependent on government largesse, which makes him vulnerable.' Trump and the federal government also stand to lose from a long-running dispute, but not as much as Musk. The dispute comes just a week before a planned test of Tesla's driverless taxis in Austin, Texas, a major event for the company because sales of its EVs are lagging in many markets, and Musk needs a win. Trump can mess things up for Tesla by encouraging federal safety regulators to step in at any sign of trouble for the robotaxis. Even before the war of words broke out on Thursday, the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration requested data on how Musk's driverless, autonomous taxis will perform in low-visibility conditions. That request follows an investigation last year into 2.4 million Teslas equipped with full self-driving software after several accidents, including one that killed a pedestrian. A spokesman for NHTSA said the probe was ongoing and that the agency 'will take any necessary actions to protect road safety.' The Department of Justice has also probed the safety of Tesla cars, but the status of that investigation is unclear. The DOJ did not respond immediately to requests for comment. The promise of a self-driving future led by Tesla inspired shareholders to boost the stock by 50% in the weeks after Musk confirmed the Austin rollout. But on Thursday, the stock plunged more than 14% amid the Trump-Musk standoff. On Friday, it recovered a bit, bouncing back nearly 4%. 'Tesla's recent rise was almost entirely driven by robotaxi enthusiasm,' said Morningstar analyst Seth Goldstein. 'Elon's feud with Trump could be a negative.' One often-overlooked but important part of Tesla's business that could take a hit is its sales of carbon credits. As Musk and Trump were slugging it out Thursday, Republican senators inserted new language into Trump's budget bill that would eliminate fines for gas-powered cars that fall short of fuel economy standards. Tesla has a thriving side business selling 'regulatory credits' to other automakers to make up for their shortfalls. Musk has downplayed the importance of the credits business, but the changes would hurt Tesla as it reels from boycotts of its cars tied to Musk's time working for Trump. Credit sales jumped by a third to $595 million in the first three months of the year even as total revenue slumped. Musk's foray into right-wing politics cost Tesla sales among the environmentally minded consumers who embraced electric cars and led to boycotts of Tesla showrooms. If Musk has indeed ended his close association with Trump, those buyers could come back, but that's far from certain. Meanwhile, one analyst speculated earlier this year that Trump voters in so-called red counties could buy Teslas 'in a meaningful way.' But he's now less hopeful. 'There are more questions than answers following Thursday developments,' TD Cowen's Itay Michaeli wrote in his latest report, 'and it's still too early to determine any lasting impacts.' Michaeli's stock target for Tesla earlier this year was $388. He has since lowered it to $330. Tesla was trading Friday at $300. Tesla did not respond to requests for comment. Trump said Thursday that he could cut government contracts to Musk's rocket company, SpaceX, a massive threat to a company that has received billions of federal dollars. The privately held company that is reportedly worth $350 billion provides launches, sends astronauts into space for NASA and has a contract to send a team from the space agency to the moon next year. But if Musk has a lot to lose, so does the U.S. SpaceX is the only U.S. company capable of transporting crews to and from the space station, using its four-person Dragon capsules. The other alternative is politically dicey: depending wholly on Russia's Soyuz capsules. Musk knew all this when he shot back at Trump that SpaceX would begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft. But it is unclear how serious his threat was. Several hours later — in a reply to another X user — he said he wouldn't do it. A subsidiary of SpaceX, the satellite internet company Starlink, appears to also have benefited from Musk's once-close relationship with the president. Musk announced that Saudi Arabia had approved Starlink for some services during a trip with Trump in the Middle East last month. The company has also won a string of other recent deals in Bangladesh, Pakistan, India and elsewhere as Trump has threatened tariffs. It's not clear how much politics played a role, and how much is pure business. On Friday, The Associated Press confirmed that India had approved a key license to Starlink. At least 40% of India's more than 1.4 billion people have no access to the internet. Big advertisers that fled X after Musk welcomed all manner of conspiracy theories to the social media platform have started to trickle back in recent months, possibly out of fear of a conservative backlash. Musk has called their decision to leave an 'illegal boycott' and sued them, and the Trump administration recently weighed in with a Federal Trade Commission probe into possible coordination among them. Now advertisers may have to worry about a different danger. If Trump sours on X, 'there's a risk that it could again become politically radioactive for major brands,' said Sarah Kreps, a political scientist at Cornell University. She added, though, that an 'exodus isn't obvious, and it would depend heavily on how the conflict escalates, how long it lasts and how it ends.' ___ Associated Press Writer Barbara Ortutay in San Francisco contributed to this report.

Appeals court lets Trump block AP from some White House spaces for now
Appeals court lets Trump block AP from some White House spaces for now

The Hill

time31 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Appeals court lets Trump block AP from some White House spaces for now

A federal appeals court on Friday ruled that the Trump administration may ban the Associated Press from the Oval Office and other limited spaces for now, pausing a judge's order to return the wire service's access. In a 2-1 decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia temporarily blocked U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden's April 8 order deeming AP's exile from the press pool, a small group of journalists who document the president's movements and statements in and around the White House, unlawful. The White House's exclusion of AP stemmed from the outlet's refusal to use the term Gulf of America in its popular stylebook. 'The White House is likely to succeed on the merits because these restricted presidential spaces are not First Amendment fora opened for private speech and discussion,' Judge Neomi Rao wrote in an opinion joined by Judge Gregory Katsas, both appointees of President Trump. 'The White House therefore retains discretion to determine, including on the basis of viewpoint, which journalists will be admitted.' The judges said that, without a stay, the government would suffer irreparable harm because the injunction 'impinges on the President's independence and control over his private workspaces.' McFadden, a Trump appointee, ordered the Trump administration to reinstate AP's access to the Oval Office, Air Force One and other small spaces that hold a limited number of officials and journalists. The AP's spot in the president's press pool has traditionally been secured daily, both at the White House and when the president is traveling. Its reporters are usually granted access in a tradition dating back decades. 'The AP and the district court again lean heavily on the history of the press pool as an institution,' Rao wrote. 'But the AP cannot adversely possess a seat in the Oval Office, no matter how long its tradition of access.' The panel did not pause the portion of McFadden's order restoring AP's access to the East Room, noting that it does not share the 'hallmarks' of spaces like the Oval Office. In a dissenting opinion, Judge Cornelia Pillard said that participation in the press pool or broader White House press corps has never been conditioned on a news organization's viewpoint 'until now.' 'The panel's stay of the preliminary injunction cannot be squared with longstanding First Amendment precedent, multiple generations of White House practice and tradition, or any sensible understanding of the role of a free press in our constitutional democracy,' the Obama appointee wrote. The Justice Department had argued that the spaces from which the White House sought to exclude the AP are not a press facility like the Brady Press Briefing Room and are intended for the president's personal use. Plus, presidents have the 'personal autonomy' to decide to whom they reveal their minds. Charles Tobin, a lawyer for the AP, argued that the White House can't single out an outlet for exclusion from the pool based solely on its viewpoints, though he acknowledged that it's the president's prerogative to revoke AP's daily spot in the press pool. After McFadden ruled in the AP's favor, the White House removed the spot typically reserved for wire services from the press pool, instead making those outlets eligible for selection as part of the pool's daily print-journalist rotation. Patrick Maks, a spokesperson for AP, said in a statement that 'we are disappointed in the court's decision and are reviewing our options.' The Hill requested comment from the White House.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store