A Big, Beautiful weekend on the Hill: 'Everybody having fun yet?'
Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., was ebullient Tuesday afternoon.
The South Dakota Republican just concluded a lengthy lunch meeting with fellow GOPers and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent about the Big, Beautiful Bill.
"Good afternoon. Everybody having fun yet?" Thune asked the Congressional press corps as he approached the microphone in the Ohio Clock Corridor of the Capitol for his weekly exchange with reporters.
"Ask us around 3:45 Sunday morning," suggested yours truly.
Reporter's Notebook: Marathon Weekend Awaits Senate As Johnson Prepares House For 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Battle
If you are an insomniac…
Read On The Fox News App
Or don't want to see the National Symphony Orchestra Pops perform Dolly Parton's musical canon at the Kennedy Center…
Or you don't have tickets to see the Savannah Bananas play at Nats Park this weekend…
The U.S. Senate may be the place for you.
Action on the Big, Beautiful Bill could happen at any time of the day or night this weekend.
The Senate is attempting to pass the Big, Beautiful Bill sometime on Saturday or Sunday. Maybe even early Monday.
Presuming Senate Republicans can pass the bill.
"If the bill is going to pass, do you expect that you at least have two or three members on your side who would vote no?" I asked Thune.
"Could be," replied Thune.
"Why?" I countered.
"Well, we've got a lot of very independent thinking senators who have reasons and things that they'd like to have in this bill that would, in their view, make it stronger," answered Thune. "Hopefully when push comes to shove and everybody has to say yes or no, we'll get the number of votes that we need."
House Conservatives Go To War With Senate Over Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill'
There's more political pushing and shoving in the U.S. Senate than there is in a line of fourth graders waiting for the water fountain after recess. And senators may advance beyond pushing and shoving to actual fighting as Republicans grouse about the bill's contents.
It's about the math. Senate Republicans can still lose three votes and pass the bill with a tie-breaking vote by Vice President Vance. Fox was told that the bill was in trouble if there are ten potential noes now. But if the universe of prospective nays is only five, they can probably whittle that down enough to pass the bill.
Here are the GOP senators worth keeping an eye on because of possible problems they could have with particular provisions in the legislation:
Sens. Rand Paul, R-Ky., Ron Johnson, R-Wisc., Rick Scott, R-Fla., Josh Hawley, R-Mo., Thom Tillis, R-N.C., Mike Lee, R-Utah, John Kennedy, R-La., Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, Susan Collins, R-Maine, John Curtis, R-Utah and Jim Justice, R-W.V.
That's 11. And many of those on the list could vote yes. They may hold out until the end to either score a provision in the bill they want. Or, they want to understand the final product.
"We don't know what's in the bill. The parliamentarian has thrown out some provisions," said Kennedy. "Look, I'm labor. I'm not management. But I got one vote, the same as management does. And I'm willing to work nights. I'm willing to work weekends. But what I'm not willing to do is have someone pat me on the head and say 'shut up and just vote for it.'"
Kennedy said he unearthed "a few things in this bill that we weren't told about. And I'm not happy."
With hat tips to boxing analysts Al Bernstein and Larry Merchant, Thune reverted to discussing the physicality of senators.
"When push comes to shove, you're looking at whether or not you're going to allow the perfect to become the enemy," said Thune. "You have to recognize that this is a process whereby everybody doesn't get everything they want."
Senate Gop Aims To Approve Major Legislation Next Week As Trump Touts Party Unity
One of the most outstanding issues remains SALT, the deduction for state and local taxes in high-tax states.
"We'll have a solution on that in 24 to 48 hours," said Bessent after his huddle with GOP senators.
"I know that there are a lot of conservatives who don't like it," said White House National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett on Fox Business. "A lot of very important people in the House, who want it as big as it can be. And, Secretary Bessent is in there working with people to find exactly the right number that'll land the bill."
So when does the Senate finish?
"The question of when will the Senate get it done, that's a great question," said House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith, R-Mo. "They've had it for over six weeks. I'm waiting."
The Senate will likely take a procedural vote to formally get on the bill on Friday. If the Senate votes to get on the bill, 20 hours of clock time starts to run under special Senate budget rules. The procedural vote only needs a simple majority.
The 20 hours of time is split. Democrats will probably burn all 10 of their hours. Republicans will use a few of their hours. So, the Senate probably begins its "vote-a-rama" on the bill late in the wee hours of Saturday morning.
A "vote-a-rama" is where the Senate takes hours and hours of consecutive roll call votes on amendments to the package.
It would culminate with passage of the Big, Beautiful Bill in the Senate late Saturday or early Sunday.
Senate Republicans Look To Sweeten Medicaid Pot To Silence Dissent On Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill'
Note that it is impossible to game out when this could happen. But frankly, a final vote could come at any time of the day or night all weekend long – if not early Monday.
Also, this scenario presumes everything goes swimmingly.
The most recent vote-a-rama ran just under ten hours earlier this year. A 2021 vote-a-rama consumed 14 hours and 48 minutes, with the Senate considering a total of 40 amendments.
We believe this vote-a-rama might be on the longer end.
Here's the other wild card:
How fast can the House pivot to pass the bill and align with the Senate?
House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., signaled the House may aim to vote on Tuesday.
Also, the "72-hour rule" to allow the House to read the bill before voting does not apply. The Senate is sending back to the House an "amendment" to the original House plan. Thus, the "72-hour rule" is not in play under these circumstances.
However, the question is if Johnson faces pressure to let the bill marinate for a few days.
Trump Pressures Congress To Pass 'Big, Beautiful Bill,' Insisting 'No One Goes On Vacation Until It's Done'
But some House conservatives aren't happy with the Senate measure.
"We're not going to get jammed on this. We're just not," said Rep. Ralph Norman, R-S.C.
Rep. August Pfluger, R-Texas, believes the Senate should just accept the House measure – since the House could barely pass its version in May.
"We did the hard work of threading a very tight needle with this legislation. So it does not need to come back looking too much different from what we ended up passing out of the House," said Pfluger.
So the question is whether the Senate can pass its bill. And if the House can accept whatever the Senate passes.
So, as I said, if you don't have a lot to do this weekend, Capitol Hill may be the spot to be.
Especially at 3:45 Sunday morning.Original article source: A Big, Beautiful weekend on the Hill: 'Everybody having fun yet?'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Minnesota Poll: Walz approval slips, voters evenly divided on whether he should seek third term
Jun. 25—By Ryan Faircloth, Star Tribune (TNS) Gov. Tim Walz's approval rating has dropped to 49% since his failed run for vice president last year, and about half of Minnesotans say he shouldn't seek a third term in 2026, according to a new poll. The results suggest the DFL governor could face headwinds if he runs for a third consecutive term, particularly from voters in greater Minnesota and suburbs outside Hennepin and Ramsey counties. A majority of independents also disapprove of Walz's performance, according to the new Star Tribune/Hubbard School of Journalism and Mass Communication Minnesota Poll, including about half who say he shouldn't run for re-election. Walz's standing at home appears to have taken a hit since his turn on the national stage; a Minnesota Poll conducted last September found 53% of Minnesotans approved of Walz's performance while 44% disapproved. Fifty percent of those surveyed in the latest Minnesota Poll disapprove of Walz's performance as governor, and just 1% are unsure. It's only the second time Walz's approval rating has fallen below 50% in the Minnesota Poll. "I think he's done harm to the state," said Gary Bettcher, an 82-year-old Republican from Bloomington. "He makes a fool of himself trying to get on the national scene like he's a big shot." (Scroll to the end of this article for full results for each question. More information about the poll methodology, a demographic breakdown of the sample and a map of the poll regions can be found Walz hasn't ruled out another run for national office in 2028, and he's recently traveled to key states in the Democratic Party's presidential nominating contest to give political speeches. He is still weighing whether to run for another term as governor and is expected to announce a decision this summer. On the prospect of Walz seeking a historic third consecutive term, 49% of respondents said he should step down while 45% said he should run again. Six percent aren't sure. Minnesota Republicans say the poll numbers suggest Walz could be vulnerable next year. They're seeking to win their first statewide election since Tim Pawlenty was re-elected governor in 2006. "The fact that more voters want Walz to step aside than run again says it all: His time is up," Minnesota GOP Chair Alex Plechash said in a statement Tuesday. "Outside of the DFL bubble, voters are sending a clear message—Governor Walz is out of touch and out of favor. Minnesota students are falling behind, fraud is rampant, and radical policies are taking priority over real people." Walz's spokesman, Teddy Tschann, said Tuesday that "we've seen polls that show him up and down and everywhere in between." "Here's what we know: Crime rates are down, graduation rates are up, and the Governor just balanced the state budget working with the most narrowly divided legislature in the whole country," Tschann said in a statement. "Governor Walz remains focused on doing the work of governor and making Minnesota the best state to live, work, and raise a family." The Minnesota Poll findings are based on interviews with 800 Minnesota registered voters conducted June 16-18. The margin of sampling error is plus or minus 3.5 percentage points. Men overwhelmingly disapprove of Walz's performance and believe he shouldn't run again, the poll found, while most women approve of the job he's doing and support him seeking a third term. Kathleen Jorde of South St. Paul said Walz has been a good governor and should run for re-election. She said she'd even like to see him run for president in 2028. Jorde, 73, said she appreciates Walz's support for public schools, including a policy he signed into law providing free school meals to all children. "There's been a lot of really positive things that have occurred in this state" during Walz's tenure, Jorde said, "and it's all for the betterment of the communities at whole." Bettcher criticized Walz's handling of the 2020 riots and some of the progressive policies he signed into law: "When he came into office, we had a nice surplus. Where'd that go? And my taxes didn't go down, my taxes went up." "It just doesn't make sense," Bettcher added. "Spend, spend, spend." In 2023, Walz and a DFL-controlled Legislature used most of a $17.6 billion surplus to pass a nearly $71 billion two-year budget, the largest in state history. It included some one-time spending while also creating new programs, such as free school meals. Walz has strong support among voters in Hennepin and Ramsey Counties. But his approval rating is underwater in the rest of the state, including in other suburban counties, where 60% of voters said they disapprove of his performance compared to 39% who approve. Gary Blanchard, a 62-year-old Republican from Lakeville, said he learned more about Walz's "extremely liberal" record when the governor ran for vice president last year. He said Walz "squandered" the previous budget surplus and signed into law policies many Minnesotans disagree with. A majority of college graduates and people of color approve of Walz's performance and said they would support him running for re-election. Most white voters and people without college degrees disapprove and don't want him to run again. Among independents, who said they don't lean toward either party, 54% disapprove of Walz's performance in office. A slightly smaller share of independents, 51%, do not want Walz to run for a third term, while 40% do and the rest aren't sure. Justin Prisendorf, an independent from Orono, said he isn't an enthusiastic Walz supporter, but he doesn't see any reason not to elect him again, either. Minnesota remains a great place to live and work, and Walz deserves some credit for that, Prisendorf said, though he believes taxes are a little too high. "The devil you know is better than the devil you don't know. If he feels there's still work to be done and he can persuade 51% of the electorate that he still can contribute, why not?" said Prisendorf, 57, who runs a home health care agency. David Sturrock, a political science professor at Southwest Minnesota State University, said the 4 point slide in Walz's overall approval rating isn't too alarming for a second-term governor. But he said Walz should be aware of the perils of seeking a third consecutive term. Rudy Perpich was the only Minnesota governor in recent history to run for a third consecutive term in 1990, and he lost. Minnesotans tend to be skeptical voters, Sturrock said, and they could want change after eight years of Walz. Sturrock said Walz's approval rating in the suburbs outside Hennepin and Ramsey counties should be of particular concern as he weighs running for a third term. "Approval rating in the outer suburbs, or the collar counties, should concern them," he said. "The suburbs are where statewide elections are won or lost in Minnesota." Mason-Dixon Polling and Strategy Inc. interviewed 800 Minnesota registered voters between June 16 and June 18, 2025. Findings from questions about Gov. Tim Walz are below. Totals may not add up to 100% due to rounding. Details about how the poll was conducted, the demographics of the 800 respondents and a map of the Minnesota regions used in this poll can be found at
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
The Trump administration is suing Minnesota over breaks in higher education for immigrant students
Minnesota became the latest state Wednesday to face a lawsuit from the Trump administration seeking to force it to give its high school graduates who entered the U.S. illegally as immigrants the same lower tuition rates reserved for in-state citizens. The U.S. Department of Justice's lawsuit also seeks to strike down a law that allows the same immigrant students to receive scholarships covering part or all of their tuition under the state's North Star Promise program. The department filed its case in federal district court in Minnesota, naming Democratic Gov. Tim Walz and Democratic state Attorney General Keith Ellison as defendants, along with the state's Office of Higher Education. The Justice Department has filed similar lawsuits this month against policies in Kentucky and Texas. Last week, a federal judge in Texas blocked that state's law giving a tuition break to students living in the U.S. illegally after the state's Republican attorney general, Ken Paxton, said he supported the legal challenge. Walz's office said it is reviewing the lawsuit 'to better understand what this means for the state.' The lawsuit argued that Minnesota is 'flagrantly violating' a federal law that prevents states from providing a benefit in higher education to resident students living in the U.S. illegally if U.S. citizens cannot receive the same benefits. States generally set higher tuition rates for out-of-state students. Also, President Donald Trump issued executive orders in February directing federal agencies to see that public benefits do not go to immigrants living in the U.S. illegally and to challenge state and local policies seen as favoring those immigrants over some citizens. The lawsuit argues that the Republican president's orders enforce federal immigration laws. The lawsuit also argues that Minnesota's policies discriminate against U.S. citizens. 'No state can be allowed to treat Americans like second-class citizens in their own country by offering financial benefits to illegal aliens,' U.S. Attorney General Pamela Bondi said in a statement. The Justice Department's lawsuit in Minnesota noted the cases filed earlier this month in Kentucky and Texas but did not mention any other states as potential targets of litigation. However, in discussing the Texas case, Bondi has suggested more lawsuits might be coming. Last year, Florida ended its tuition break for students living there illegally, but at least 21 states have laws or policies granting them, in addition to the University of Michigan system, according to the National Immigration Law Center, which favors them. Those states include Democratic-leaning ones such as California and New York, but also GOP-leaning ones like Kansas and Nebraska. According to the center, at least 16 states allow the immigrant students to receive scholarships or other aid to go to college. Supporters of the state tuition breaks argue that they don't violate federal law if they provide the same rates to U.S. citizens in the same circumstances — meaning they are residents of the state and graduates of one of its high schools. Generally states have imposed other requirements. For example, Minnesota requires male students to have registered with the U.S. Selective Service System and all students to be seeking legal resident status if that's possible. Backers of the laws also argue that the students generally were brought to the U.S. illegally by their parents, often when they were far younger, and are as much a part of their local communities as U.S.-born students. Also, they contend that such immigrants tend to be motivated high achievers.
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
The Trump administration is suing Minnesota over breaks in higher education for immigrant students
Trump legal cases Immigration Student lifeFacebookTweetLink Follow Minnesota became the latest state Wednesday to face a lawsuit from the Trump administration seeking to force it to give its high school graduates who entered the U.S. illegally as immigrants the same lower tuition rates reserved for in-state citizens. The U.S. Department of Justice's lawsuit also seeks to strike down a law that allows the same immigrant students to receive scholarships covering part or all of their tuition under the state's North Star Promise program. The department filed its case in federal district court in Minnesota, naming Democratic Gov. Tim Walz and Democratic state Attorney General Keith Ellison as defendants, along with the state's Office of Higher Education. The Justice Department has filed similar lawsuits this month against policies in Kentucky and Texas. Last week, a federal judge in Texas blocked that state's law giving a tuition break to students living in the U.S. illegally after the state's Republican attorney general, Ken Paxton, said he supported the legal challenge. Walz's office said it is reviewing the lawsuit 'to better understand what this means for the state.' The lawsuit argued that Minnesota is 'flagrantly violating' a federal law that prevents states from providing a benefit in higher education to resident students living in the U.S. illegally if U.S. citizens cannot receive the same benefits. States generally set higher tuition rates for out-of-state students. Also, President Donald Trump issued executive orders in February directing federal agencies to see that public benefits do not go to immigrants living in the U.S. illegally and to challenge state and local policies seen as favoring those immigrants over some citizens. The lawsuit argues that the Republican president's orders enforce federal immigration laws. The lawsuit also argues that Minnesota's policies discriminate against U.S. citizens. 'No state can be allowed to treat Americans like second-class citizens in their own country by offering financial benefits to illegal aliens,' U.S. Attorney General Pamela Bondi said in a statement. The Justice Department's lawsuit in Minnesota noted the cases filed earlier this month in Kentucky and Texas but did not mention any other states as potential targets of litigation. However, in discussing the Texas case, Bondi has suggested more lawsuits might be coming. Last year, Florida ended its tuition break for students living there illegally, but at least 21 states have laws or policies granting them, in addition to the University of Michigan system, according to the National Immigration Law Center, which favors them. Those states include Democratic-leaning ones such as California and New York, but also GOP-leaning ones like Kansas and Nebraska. According to the center, at least 16 states allow the immigrant students to receive scholarships or other aid to go to college. Supporters of the state tuition breaks argue that they don't violate federal law if they provide the same rates to U.S. citizens in the same circumstances — meaning they are residents of the state and graduates of one of its high schools. Generally states have imposed other requirements. For example, Minnesota requires male students to have registered with the U.S. Selective Service System and all students to be seeking legal resident status if that's possible. Backers of the laws also argue that the students generally were brought to the U.S. illegally by their parents, often when they were far younger, and are as much a part of their local communities as U.S.-born students. Also, they contend that such immigrants tend to be motivated high achievers.
