Amid arrest of pro-Palestinian student organizer, what rights do visa holders and others have?
The federal government's move to revoke a Columbia University graduate student's green card and deport him for his involvement in a pro-Palestinian student encampment last year is raising fresh questions about the risks associated with political activism for non-United States citizens.
Mahmoud Khalil was a prominent negotiator representing student protesters at Columbia, which was one of many campuses nationwide that was roiled by demonstrations over the war in Gaza. A number of protests featured the establishment of pro-Palestinian student encampments, such as those that were eventually dismantled at UCLA, UC Irvine, Cal Poly Humboldt, UC Santa Cruz, UC Berkeley, Stanford and San Francisco State.
Khalil, a permanent U.S. resident, was arrested March 9 at his university-owned apartment by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents. According to the Associated Press, agents said they were executing a State Department order to revoke Khalil's student visa. When Khalil's lawyer clarified that he is a green card holder, officials said they were revoking that, as well.
Khalil's ultimate fate is not yet clear — his possible deportation is on hold while a court considers the legal argument that he was engaging in protected free speech. But the move mirrors an executive order President Trump signed at the start of his term to deport and cancel the student visas of all "Hamas sympathizers on college campuses."
Read more: ICE arrests Palestinian activist who helped lead Columbia University protests, his lawyer says
Secretary of State Marco Rubio doubled down on the administration's actions at a press conference soon after Khalil's arrest, saying, "This is not about free speech. This is about people that don't have a right to be in the United States to begin with."
Khalil's arrest has "undoubtedly sent a chill through university communities all around the country, and it has definitely sparked a round of fear amongst university students, particularly those who are involved in Gaza [related] political protests," and faculty, said Ahilan Arulanantham, co-director of the Center for Immigration Law and Policy at UCLA's School of Law.
So what protections are there for non-U.S. citizens participating in political activism? Here's what some experts have to say.
Read more: Government asks that detained Columbia student's legal fight be moved to New Jersey or Louisiana
Immigration advocates and legal experts say everyone who lives in the United States has the 1st Amendment right to participate in activism and political demonstrations, including protests, regardless of their immigration status.
Revoking a person's green card, temporary visa or Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals status just because of their political activity would violate the 1st Amendment, Arulanantham said.
"The problem is it's very difficult to prove that's what's happening and the avenues for challenging such revocation are extremely limited," he said.
Even though non-U.S. citizens have the right to protest, though, there is a risk of "being charged with something that could put your status in danger," such as a vandalism misdemeanor or resisting arrest, said Veronica Garcia, staff attorney with the Immigrant Legal Resource Center.
Rubio alluded to that rationale in his press remarks.
"When you apply for a student visa or any visa to enter the United States, we have a right to deny you for virtually any reason, but I think being a supporter of Hamas and coming into our universities and turning them upside down and being complicit in what are clearly crimes of vandalization, complicit in shutting down learning institutions — there are kids at these schools that can't go to class," he said.
"If you told us that's what you intended to do when you came to America, we would have never let you in," he added. "And if you do it once you get in, we're going to revoke it and kick you out."
Read more: Fear and loathing grip L.A. hotels as Trump deportation threats loom
Generally, no. But there are some caveats.
The government has no authority to revoke your green card status because "it's a distinct legal category and under the law you have the right to reside here permanently," unless you violate a set of rules laid out specifically in the statute, Arulanantham said.
Under Section 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, a green card holder could be subject to deportation for being charged with a violent crime or marriage fraud, for example.
"In the context of protests, someone might be convicted of vandalism, assault and battery with a police officer or resisting arrest so that could lead to [the green card holder] being deportable," said Miosotti Tenecora, staff attorney with the Immigrant Legal Resource Center.
Pro-Palestinian tent encampments remained peaceful on some campuses and descended into violence at others, leading to law enforcement interventions and damage to university property.
In a recent blog post Arulanantham co-authored on Just Security, he argued that in Khalil's case, the Supreme Court has held that "the law does not permit the government to deport a non-citizen on grounds that are too vague to provide fair notice of what they did wrong."
"But the question is, if the government is violating the 1st Amendment and wants to deport you for it, can you do anything to stop them?" he told The Times.
Read more: Trump invokes Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to declare a gang invasion. A judge stalls deportations
The government can revoke a temporary student or faculty visa and does not have to give a reason, Arulanantham said.
The student would then have to try to prove that the revocation was because of their pro-Palestine activity, which is difficult to prove.
Another example Arulanantham gave is if the student goes home for spring break and they're trying to come back into the U.S., an official at the airport can deny them entry — and again, they don't have to give a reason.
This, too, would be difficult to prove in litigation.
Read more: Immigration officials arrest second person involved in pro-Palestinian protests at Columbia
If you're a DACA recipient, you're at risk of having your status rescinded or deemed ineligible for renewal if you've been convicted of three or more misdemeanors, Garcia said. Participating in a protest is not a violation of the program.
"There are some grounds that are beyond just criminal activity, like national security-related grounds, but the government would have to argue that just your protest activity is sufficient," Arulanantham said.
Legal experts say non-U.S. citizens, regardless of their status, have 4th Amendment constitutional rights, so they can choose not to answer questions or open their door without seeing a valid warrant.
Arulanantham's advice for foreign students with temporary visas, other temporary visa holders and DACA recipients is: If you have employment authorization or other proof of status, you should carry it with you.
Students shouldn't carry documents that show they were born outside the U.S., he said, but instead those that prove they have lived here for more than two years. The government typically takes the position that if you lived here for less than two years, then you can be deported without an immigration court hearing under the expansion of expedited removal, he said.
Green card holders should carry their green card.
ICE agents could question people at a protest, for example, but Tenecora says they can't go any further without "reasonable suspicion that this person doesn't have lawful status."
Read more: UC unveils steep price tag for handling campus protests: $29 million, most for policing
Tenecora and Garcia advise against posting your participation in a protest, because the government can use it as evidence to connect you to the event.
If the protest turned violent, for example, and there is proof you at some point attended the protest, the government could use the photo or video and link you to a violent charge.
Both attorneys said non-U.S. citizens have a right to participate in protests and other forms of peaceful activism. However if you want to more clearly understand the risks associated with that, they recommend consulting a lawyer.
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
32 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
UN to vote on resolution demanding Gaza ceasefire, hostage release and aid access
UNITED NATIONS (AP) — The U.N. General Assembly is expected to vote Thursday on a resolution demanding an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, the release of all hostages held by Hamas, and the opening of all Israeli border crossings for deliveries of desperately needed food and other aid. The resolution, drafted by Spain and obtained Wednesday by The Associated Press, 'strongly condemns any use of starvation of civilians as a method of warfare.' Experts and human rights workers say hunger is widespread in Gaza and some 2 million Palestinians are at risk of famine if Israel does not fully lift its blockade and halt its military campaign, which it renewed in March after ending a ceasefire with Hamas. Last week, the U.N. Security Council failed to pass a resolution demanding a ceasefire in Gaza and calling on Israel to lift all restrictions on the delivery of aid. The United States vetoed the resolution because it was not linked to the release of the hostages, while all 14 other members of the council voted in favor. There are no vetoes in the 193-member General Assembly, where the resolution is expected to pass overwhelmingly. But unlike in the Security Council, assembly resolutions are not legally binding, though they are seen as a barometer of world opinion. After a 10-week blockade that barred all aid to Gaza, Israel is allowing the United Nations to deliver a trickle of food assistance and is backing a newly created U.S. aid group, which has opened several sites in the center and south of the territory to deliver food parcels. But the aid system rolled out last month by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation has been troubled by near-daily shootings as crowds make their way to aid sites, while the longstanding U.N.-run system has struggled to deliver food because of Israeli restrictions and a breakdown of law and order. The draft resolution being voted on Thursday references a March 28 legally binding order by the top United Nations court for Israel to open more land crossings into Gaza for food, water, fuel and other supplies. The International Court of Justice issued the order in a case brought by South Africa accusing Israel of acts of genocide in its war in Gaza, charges Israel strongly denies. The resolution stresses that Israel, as an occupying power, has an obligation under international law to ensure that humanitarian aid reaches those in need. It reiterates the assembly's commitment to a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, with the Gaza Strip as part of a Palestinian state. The assembly is holding a high-level meeting next week to push for a two-state solution, which Israel has rejected. The resolution supports mediation efforts by Egypt, Qatar and the United States aimed at implementing a January ceasefire agreement. When the U.S. vetoed last week's Gaza resolution, acting Ambassador Dorothy Shea said it would have undermined the security of Israel and diplomatic efforts to reach a ceasefire 'that reflects the realities on the ground.' Like the failed Security Council resolution, the resolution to be voted on Thursday also does not condemn Hamas' deadly attack in southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, which ignited the war, or say the militant group must disarm and withdraw from Gaza. Both are U.S. demands. The Hamas-led militants killed around 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and took 251 hostage. About 55 hostages are still being held. Israel's military campaign has killed over 55,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. It says women and children make up most of the dead, but doesn't distinguish between civilians and combatants. Israel says it has killed more than 20,000 militants, without providing evidence.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Orders Revealed for Trump's Army Speech: ‘No Fat Soldiers'
Directives for the Army audience at President Donald Trump's speech at Fort Bragg on Tuesday included one frank line: 'No fat soldiers.' Attendees were also given the option to not be in the audience at all if they disagree with the Trump administration, reported. 'If soldiers have political views that are in opposition to the current administration and they don't want to be in the audience then they need to speak with their leadership and get swapped out,' read the unit-level note to troops in the 82nd Airborne Division. In his speech, which on paper was meant to mark the Army's 250th birthday, Trump unleashed blatantly political attacks on former President Joe Biden, California Gov. Gavin Newsom, and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass. The criticisms were met with agreement from the audience, in the form of booing, in what called a 'a shocking and rare public display of troops taking part in naked political partisanship.' The outlet said service officials declined to comment on whether any potential discipline for booing—or cheering—soldiers was in store. One commander at Fort Bragg—the name of which Trump restored earlier this year—anonymously called the event 'shameful.' 'This has been a bad week for the Army for anyone who cares about us being a neutral institution,' the person said. 'This was shameful. I don't expect anything to come out of it, but I hope maybe we can learn from it long term.' An 82nd Airborne noncommissioned officer said, 'I bet none of those soldiers booing even know the mayor's name or could identify them in a lineup; they're nonexistent in the chain of command.' They added: 'So, any opinion they could possibly have can only be attributed to expressing a political view while in uniform.' Yet Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell didn't see an issue. 'Believe me, no one needs to be encouraged to boo the media,' he said in a statement to 'Look no further than this query, which is nothing more than a disgraceful attempt to ruin the lives of young soldiers.' Another problematic occurrence Tuesday was the selling of pro-Trump items and apparel on Army property, which 'likely' violates Defense Department regulations, noted. Parnell did not address this issue when asked. Trump's speech wasn't the only instance in which the optics of soldiers near him was front-of-mind. In 2019, Trump reportedly told then-Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley during a welcome ceremony for injured Army captain Luis Avila that 'no one wants to see' wounded soldiers. A few years prior, Trump also reportedly said that he didn't want 'wounded guys' in his planned military parade in Washington, D.C., which ended up being scrapped. This Saturday's costly parade, purportedly to honor the Army's 250th anniversary, is on Flag Day, which is also Trump's birthday.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Judge says government must release Mahmoud Khalil
The Brief A federal judge ruled that ICE must release Mahmoud Khalil, a Palestinian student and recent Columbia graduate, unless the government appeals within 40 hours. Khalil, a green card holder, was detained in March by DHS agents and held in Louisiana for his involvement in pro-Palestinian campus protest. The Trump administration argues Khalil's activism threatens U.S. foreign policy interests, but has not alleged criminal conduct or presented evidence linking him to extremist groups. NEW YORK - A federal judge has ruled that the government must release Mahmoud Khalil, the former Columbia University student who has been in ICE custody for over two months over pro-Palestinian demonstrations. The government has 40 hours to appeal the decision; until then, Khalil will remain in custody, likely through at least Friday. MORE: Mahmoud Khalil update: Government must provide evidence in case Wednesday, judge says MORE: Over 80 arrested after anti-ICE protest erupts in NYC: 'We will not tolerate chaos' MORE: Lawyers for Mahmoud Khalil urge judge to release him from ICE custody in Louisiana "The court's decision is the most significant vindication yet of Mahmoud's rights," said Ramzi Kassem, co-director of CLEAR, a legal nonprofit and clinic at the City University of New York that represents Khalil. "But we aren't out of the woods until Mahmoud is free and back home with his wife and child." Timeline The Trump administration has been pushing to deport Khalil and other student demonstrators over their involvement in campus protests against Israel. "We gave you a visa to study and earn a degree, not to become a social activist and tear up our university campuses," Sen. Marco Rubio said shortly after Khalil's arrest. Khalil, a 30-year-old Palestinian by ethnicity who was born in Syria, was arrested back on March 8 in New York and taken to a detention center in Louisiana. The immigration detention center in Jena, Louisiana, is thousands of miles from his attorneys and wife (a U.S. citizen), who gave birth to their first child while he was in custody. He recently finished his coursework for a master's degree at Columbia's school of international affairs. The backstory Khalil has adamantly rejected allegations of antisemitism, accusing the Trump administration in a letter sent from jail last month of "targeting me as part of a broader strategy to suppress dissent." "Knowing fully that this moment transcends my individual circumstances," he added, "I hope nonetheless to be free to witness the birth of my first-born child." Facing a deadline from an immigration judge to turn over evidence for its attempted deportation of Khalil, the federal government submitted a brief memo, signed by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, citing the Trump administration's authority to expel non-citizens whose presence in the country damages U.S. foreign policy interests. The two-page memo, which was obtained by the Associated Press, does not allege any criminal conduct by Khalil. Rather, Rubio wrote, Khalil could be expelled for his beliefs. Judge Farbiarz had ruled earlier that expelling Khalil from the U.S. on those grounds was likely unconstitutional. Big picture view The Trump administration has pulled billions of dollars in government funding from universities and their affiliated hospital systems in recent weeks as part of what it says is a campaign against antisemitism on college campuses, but which critics say is a crackdown on free speech. To get the money back, the administration has been telling universities to punish protesters and make other changes. The U.S. government has also been revoking the visas of international students who criticized Israel or accused it of mistreating Palestinians. At the time of Khalil's arrest, a Department of Homeland Security spokesperson accused Khalil of leading activities "aligned to Hamas," referring to the militant group that attacked Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. But the government has not produced any evidence linking Khalil to Hamas, and made no reference to the group in their most recent filing.