logo
Poll suggests support for better end-of-life care over assisted dying Bill

Poll suggests support for better end-of-life care over assisted dying Bill

The polling, commissioned by a group opposed to assisted dying being legalised, 'blows apart the arguments that the public are desperate' for a change in the law, a campaigner claimed.
Bill sponsor Kim Leadbeater said last week that MPs should not have to choose between supporting assisted dying or palliative care as it is not an 'either/or' conversation for dying people.
She said palliative care and assisted dying 'can and do work side by side to give terminally-ill patients the care and choice they deserve in their final days', and urged MPs to support 'all options available to terminally ill people'.
An amendment to the Bill, requiring the Health Secretary to publish an assessment of the availability, quality and distribution of palliative and end-of-life care one year after the Bill passing into law, could be voted on on Friday.
Friday is also set to be the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill's third reading stage, which is likely to see the overall Bill voted on for the first time since November's historic yes vote, when a majority of 55 supported the principle of assisted dying for England and Wales.
The latest polling, commissioned by Care Not Killing and carried out by British Polling Council member Whitestone, saw 2,089 UK adults surveyed online between May 30 and June 1.
Respondents, who are said to have been weighted to be a representative sample, were told of concerns raised by the Royal Colleges of Physicians and Psychiatrists and the Association for Palliative Medicine about the Bill in its current form as well as opposition from disability campaigners.
Campaigners gathered in Parliament Square earlier this month (James Manning/PA)
In this context, they were asked about replacing the Bill with a plan to improve and invest in palliative care – to which 69% agreed, and about a Royal Commission being set up to consider and make recommendations for a holistic end-of-life and palliative care service – with which 61% agreed.
Almost two thirds (65%) said the Government's priority should be sorting out palliative and social care before changing the law – down very slightly from 66% last year.
Gordon Macdonald, chief executive of Care Not Killing, said: 'This major new poll blows apart the arguments that the public are desperate for a so-called assisted dying law.
'The public want the Government and MPs to focus on fixing the NHS and palliative care which they know are broken. After all one in four Brits who would benefit from palliative care aren't currently receiving it, while in many places services are piecemeal, part-time or facing cuts.'
Former prime minister Gordon Brown (Lucy North/PA)
It comes as former prime minister Gordon Brown repeated his opposition to assisted dying.
Writing in the Guardian, he said: 'It has become clear that whatever views people hold on the principle, passing the terminally ill adults (end of life) bill into law would privilege the legal right to assisted dying without guaranteeing anything approaching an equivalent right to high-quality palliative care for those close to death.'
He said MP's personal preferences 'cannot be separated off from the duties they have as members of a community to ensure that the way we treat the dying reflects the values of a decent, compassionate country'.
He added: 'That should mean upholding the role of the medical professions as care-givers, and exclusively care-givers; avoiding the possibility of private profiteering by legal-medical consortiums which might well commercialise assisted dying as a lucrative business; safeguarding vulnerable people about whose fate the royal medical colleges have all expressed concern; preventing unacceptable coercive pressures that can be brought to bear on disabled people, and those who are incapacitated or mentally stressed; and thus showing that as a society we value life above death.'
Dozens of Labour MPs called for Friday's overall vote to be delayed, asking for more time to scrutinise a Bill they brand as 'perhaps the most consequential piece of legislation that has appeared before the House in generations'.
Writing to Commons leader Lucy Powell, they said: 'We implore you as the Leader of the House to allocate more Parliamentary time to the scrutiny of this Bill, the valid concerns that members have about its implementation, and the consequences it could have on vulnerable populations.'
A Government spokesperson said: 'This Bill has been brought as a Private Members' Bill. The amount of time for debate is therefore a matter for the House.'
Labour MP Kim Leadbeater is the sponsor of the Bill (Jordan Pettitt/PA)
The Bill's sponsor, Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, has repeatedly stated that her proposed legislation has been strengthened since it was first introduced last year, insisting it is subject to robust safeguards.
Medical staff are among some of the MPs who back the Bill.
As it stands, the proposed legislation would allow terminally-ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist.
MPs are entitled to have a free vote on the Bill and any amendments, meaning they decide according to their conscience rather than along party lines.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer voted in favour of the Bill last year, but said the Government remains neutral on the issue.
Both Health Secretary Wes Streeting and Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood voted against.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The signs of cancer you should be checking for every three weeks
The signs of cancer you should be checking for every three weeks

Telegraph

time42 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

The signs of cancer you should be checking for every three weeks

Assessing your body for lumps, unusual moles or unexplained bruising every three weeks might seem a little over zealous, but that's what we should all be doing to spot cancer at its earliest and most treatable stage – and, crucially, to save lives. According to a new NHS survey of 2,000 people, only 39 per cent of Brits examine our bodies regularly, with many of us far more likely to check our bank balance, the weather forecast and what's coming up on TV during the same timeframe. But complacency can lead to deadly consequences: Dr Richard Lee, a champion for early cancer diagnosis at The Royal Marsden Hospital, says delays in people mentioning concerns to their GP are one of the primary causes for early-stage cancers getting missed. 'Many cancers do present with symptoms,' he says. 'The earlier that a cancer is diagnosed, treatments are easier [to tolerate] and treatment success is more likely.' While the NHS offers national screening programmes for breast, bowel and cervical cancers, and is in the process of expanding lung-cancer screening, such programmes only cover a proportion of cancers, making self-checking vitally important, especially as more cancers are being diagnosed under the age of 50. According to the American Cancer Society, one general feature of many cancers is sudden or unexplained weight loss – for example, losing 5 per cent of your body weight over six to 12 months when you're not intentionally trying to lose weight. 'Cancer can be associated with reduced appetite and weight loss, essentially due to the metabolic effects of the cancer on the body,' says Dr Lee. 'It's partly because there's something there that's growing and it's also a feature of cancer which makes muscles weak while the metabolism is increasing; you've got this inflammation and all these things combined make it hard to keep your weight steady.' Of course, this doesn't always occur, but certain cancers can be picked up through regular self-checking. Here are some of the most notable symptoms to look out for. Testicular cancer Warning signs: Lump or swelling Testicular cancer usually presents through a testicular lump or swelling or sudden pain in the testicles. There could be a perfectly benign cause for lumps and swelling, but if you're experiencing these symptoms, Dr Robert Stevenson, Consultant Clinical Oncologist at The Harborne Hospital, says it's critical to be examined by a doctor quickly. 'A lump can be a cyst at the back of the testicle, or a varicocele, which is a collection of [enlarged] veins,' he says. 'Incidentally, this can also be an early sign of kidney cancer and that would be looked into too.' If caught early, the cure rates for testicular cancer are very high, while patients will also avoid more debilitating treatments such as multiple rounds of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. 'If it's stage one – so, still confined to the testicle – you may just need the testicle removed, maybe a bit of chemotherapy, and that's it,' says Dr Stevenson. What to do? If you feel any sort of lump, swelling or unusual pain in the testicle region, this should prompt a visit to the doctor. An ultrasound scan will be required to diagnose whether it's cause for alarm or benign. Survival rate if caught early: 99 per cent. Leukaemia Warning signs: Unexplained bleeding or bruising In adults, leukaemia can be one of the more aggressive and difficult to treat cancers, but, when detected early, oncologists say that there are far more options, from chemotherapy to newer immunotherapies and stem-cell transplants. With leukaemia being a blood cancer, Dr Premini Mahendra, Consultant Haemato-Oncologist at The Harborne Hospital, says that a major warning sign is unexplained bleeding or bruising on the body. 'Patients also sometimes feel unusually fatigued, they're getting recurrent infections, or they have unexplained shortness of breath,' she says. What to do? Consult your GP. To rule out leukaemia, Dr Mahendra says you will be given a simple blood test. 'There are lots of other possible explanations, but a full blood cell count, which is one of the cheapest tests to do, will indicate if leukaemia could be responsible or not,' she adds. Survival rate if caught early: 67 per cent. Breast cancer Warning sign: Lumps According to the NHS, visible signs of breast cancer typically present as hard, irregular, painless lumps that feel slightly different from the surrounding breast tissue, sometimes accompanied by the formation of dimples or changes in the nipple's appearance. While the disease is most common in women over the age of 50, it can occur in younger women and, as a result, the charity Breast Cancer Ireland has long promoted self-checking as crucial. 'It's important to check yourself regularly so you know what your baseline is, which helps you spot any unusual changes,' says Aisling Hurley, the charity's CEO. What to do? While women aged 50-70 are offered mammograms as part of the NHS screening service, you can get a free mammogram earlier if you detect a lump or a concerning sign. Newer, more effective screening tools are also in the pipeline, with Cancer Research UK-funded researchers developing an enhanced mammogram to detect cancer in women with extra-dense breasts (which can make it more difficult to spot the signs of cancer in the first place). Survival rate if caught early: 95 per cent. Lymphoma Warning sign: Swelling As a cancer that affects the lymphatic system (the complex network of vessels and glands that represent a vital part of the immune system), early signs of lymphoma typically present as painless swellings that form around the body's lymph nodes. 'You can get these swellings which people feel most commonly in the neck, the armpit and the groin,' says Dr Mahendra. 'You can also get swollen glands after a viral infection, but those tend to be tender and painful, while it could be lymphoma if it's painless and it has persisted for more than two weeks.' What to do? There isn't a blood test for lymphoma, but, if concerned, specialists will carry out a biopsy of the swollen lymph gland to come to a definitive diagnosis. Again, the key is to seek medical attention as soon as possible. 'You'd be surprised at how many people sometimes just ignore an unexplained swelling, and only present [themselves] at a much later stage with significant weight loss and enlarged lymph glands, as an emergency patient,' adds Dr Mahendra. Survival rate if caught early: 84-95 per cent. Bladder cancer Warning sign: blood in the urine Blood in urine is known to be a potential sign of prostate cancer (symptoms of which present mainly in late-stage cancer), but it could also indicate the presence of a bladder tumour. According to Dr Stevenson, this is because the vast majority of bladder cancers arise from cells in the lining of the bladder. 'Bleeding, a more frequent need to urinate, pain when urinating and recurrent infections are signs of bladder cancer,' he says. What to do? If bladder cancer can be detected before it has penetrated the bladder muscle layer, it is far easier to treat and send into remission. Doctors will likely recommend a flexible cystoscopy – a test in which a fibre-optic tube is used to directly examine the bladder lining. Survival rate if caught early: 80 per cent. 6. Skin cancer Warning sign: Irregular, unhealing moles Knowing whether a new spot or discolouration on the skin is just a standard mole or something more sinister is a common challenge and, to assist, skin cancer experts commonly refer to the so-called ABCD rule – where A stands for Asymmetry, B for Border Irregularity, C for Colour and D for Diameter. 'Essentially, you're looking for anything that's changing; which doesn't really look as it did previously,' says Dr Lee. 'So, either a new mole, an existing mole which is now bleeding or looking more lumpy than before, or looking more irregular. Or a sore that isn't healing, is very painful or seems to be spreading.' Because skin cancers can sometimes emerge in parts of the body where it isn't so easy to examine, such as the back, shoulders or backs of legs, Dr Lee advises asking for help from a partner or family member in self-checking. What to do? If concerned, consult your GP or a dermatologist. Skin cancers will be diagnosed through a combination of visual inspection, examination using a magnifying tool and, finally, a biopsy.

G7 leaders call for de-escalation in Middle East as Trump leaves summit
G7 leaders call for de-escalation in Middle East as Trump leaves summit

The Herald Scotland

time44 minutes ago

  • The Herald Scotland

G7 leaders call for de-escalation in Middle East as Trump leaves summit

The White House said Mr Trump had left the G7 leaders' conference after a group dinner on Monday because of 'what's going on in the Middle East,' without elaborating. US President Donald Trump shakes hands with Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer (Stefan Rousseau/PA) The US president said his reason for leaving the summit had 'nothing to do with a ceasefire' between Israel and Iran. In their statement, the leaders called for a 'ceasefire in Gaza' and said they 'stand ready to coordinate' to protect market stability in the face of rising oil prices amid spiralling hostilities between Israel and Iran. It said: 'We, the leaders of the G7, reiterate our commitment to peace and stability in the Middle East. 'In this context, we affirm that Israel has a right to defend itself. We reiterate our support for the security of Israel. 'We also affirm the importance of the protection of civilians. 'Iran is the principal source of regional instability and terror. 'We have been consistently clear that Iran can never have a nuclear weapon. Diana and I were honoured to welcome the @G7 leaders to Kananaskis this morning. This Summit is an opportunity for us to create more prosperity, stability, and security for the world. — Mark Carney (@MarkJCarney) June 16, 2025 'We urge that the resolution of the Iranian crisis leads to a broader de-escalation of hostilities in the Middle East, including a ceasefire in Gaza. 'We will remain vigilant to the implications for international energy markets and stand ready to coordinate, including with like-minded partners, to safeguard market stability.' In a post on X on Monday, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said: 'Much was accomplished, but because of what's going on in the Middle East, President Trump will be leaving tonight after dinner with Heads of State.' Mr Trump posted on Truth Social: '(Macron) has no idea why I am now on my way to Washington, but it certainly has nothing to do with a ceasefire. Much bigger than that. He added: 'Stay tuned!' President Donald Trump, left, meets Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney on the sidelines of the G7 Summit (Mark Schiefelbein/AP) Downing Street declined to comment on Mr Trump's early exit. It means the US president will miss meetings with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum that had been scheduled for Tuesday, when leaders outside the G7 will join discussions. Iran said at least 224 people had been killed in the country since strikes began on Friday, while Israeli officials said 24 people had been killed and more than 500 injured. Earlier on Monday the president said Iran should have signed a deal that he proposed to them and also urged citizens to 'immediately evacuate' Tehran, a city of up to 17 million people, without offering further details. 'Simply stated, IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON,' he wrote on his Truth Social platform. 'I said it over and over again!' The Leader's Summit is a forum for open discussion, collaboration, and consensus-building on pressing global issues. Read about the #G7 priorities guiding the discussions: — G7 (@G7) June 17, 2025 During an impromptu media spray with Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer after the two leaders announced a US-UK deal had been finalised on Monday, Mr Trump was asked if he supported regime change in Tehran. 'I want to see no nuclear weapons in Iran, and we're well on our way to making sure that happens,' he said. Elsewhere on the sidelines of the summit, Sir Keir held a bilateral meeting with French President Emmanuel Macron during which Downing Street said the leaders agreed 'on the need to find a route to peace through diplomacy and dialogue.' French media later reported that Mr Macron had said the US president informed G7 leaders of ongoing discussions for a ceasefire between Israel and Iran.

G7 leaders call for de-escalation in Middle East as Trump leaves summit
G7 leaders call for de-escalation in Middle East as Trump leaves summit

South Wales Argus

timean hour ago

  • South Wales Argus

G7 leaders call for de-escalation in Middle East as Trump leaves summit

Allies from the world's major economies affirmed their 'commitment to peace and stability' in a statement agreed shortly before the US president's abrupt departure from a major global summit in Canada. The White House said Mr Trump had left the G7 leaders' conference after a group dinner on Monday because of 'what's going on in the Middle East,' without elaborating. In their statement, the leaders called for a 'ceasefire in Gaza' and said they 'stand ready to coordinate' to protect market stability in the face of rising oil prices amid spiralling hostilities between Israel and Iran. US President Donald Trump shakes hands with Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer (Stefan Rousseau/PA) It said: 'We, the leaders of the G7, reiterate our commitment to peace and stability in the Middle East. 'In this context, we affirm that Israel has a right to defend itself. We reiterate our support for the security of Israel. 'We also affirm the importance of the protection of civilians. 'Iran is the principal source of regional instability and terror. 'We have been consistently clear that Iran can never have a nuclear weapon. 'We urge that the resolution of the Iranian crisis leads to a broader de-escalation of hostilities in the Middle East, including a ceasefire in Gaza. 'We will remain vigilant to the implications for international energy markets and stand ready to coordinate, including with like-minded partners, to safeguard market stability.' In a post on X on Monday, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said: 'Much was accomplished, but because of what's going on in the Middle East, President Trump will be leaving tonight after dinner with Heads of State.' President Donald Trump, left, meets Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney on the sidelines of the G7 Summit (Mark Schiefelbein/AP) Downing Street declined to comment on Mr Trump's early exit. It means the US president will miss meetings with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum that had been scheduled for Tuesday, when leaders outside the G7 will join discussions. Iran said at least 224 people had been killed in the country since strikes began on Friday, while Israeli officials said 24 people had been killed and more than 500 injured. Earlier on Monday the president said Iran should have signed a deal that he proposed to them and also urged citizens to 'immediately evacuate' Tehran, a city of up to 17 million people, without offering further details. 'Simply stated, IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON,' he wrote on his Truth Social platform. 'I said it over and over again!' During an impromptu media spray with Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer after the two leaders announced a US-UK deal had been finalised on Monday, Mr Trump was asked if he supported regime change in Tehran. 'I want to see no nuclear weapons in Iran, and we're well on our way to making sure that happens,' he said. Elsewhere on the sidelines of the summit, Sir Keir held a bilateral meeting with French President Emmanuel Macron during which Downing Street said the leaders agreed 'on the need to find a route to peace through diplomacy and dialogue.' French media later reported that Mr Macron had said the US president informed G7 leaders of ongoing discussions for a ceasefire between Israel and Iran.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store