
Thousands expected at 22 protests planned across CT against Trump Administration, Elon Musk
With protests against the Trump Administration scheduled across the nation on Saturday, organizers have put together at least 20 in Connecticut in places ranging from the heavily blue big cities of Hartford and New Haven to the red-voting, mid-sized communities of New Milford and Torrington.
The 'Hands Off!' rallies are designed as a broad-brush rebuke of the policies of President Donald Trump and the unprecedented power he's given to his billionaire Senior Advisor Elon Musk.
'Donald Trump and Elon Musk think this country belongs to them,' begin online fliers for nearly all of the hundreds of Mobilize protests scheduled. 'They're taking everything they can get their hands on — our health care, our data, our jobs, our services — and daring the world to stop them. This is a crisis, and the time to act is now.'
But a few aim more specifically. In Stamford, protestors plan to march to the headquarters of World Wrestling Entertainment, complaining that cofounder and Trump-appointed Education Secretary Linda McMahon is damaging America's school system.
'Hands off our schools! Hands off our dollars,' is a key part of their message.
In Danbury, a rally will be outside the public library with scheduled speakers including Attorney General William Tong, state Sen. Julie Kushner, Mayor Roberto Alves and representatives from the local NAACP, the state chapter of the ACLU, the Connecticut Education Association and the Association of Religious Communities.
Organizers of the Hartford rally outside the state Capitol say Sen. Richard Blumenthal, Lt. Gov. Susan Bysiewicz and Tong will attend. In all, there are 22 rallies scheduled in the state so far.
Large rallies are planned for Manhattan, Chicago, Philadelphia and virtually all major cities Saturday. Whether smaller gatherings in the relatively little blue state of Connecticut can be effective is unknown, but organizers are flooding Facebook and Instagram with messages to encourage big turnouts.
On Tuesday, two prominent Connecticut political science professors offered varying ideas on the effectiveness of rallies in the Trump era.
Prof. Matthew Schmidt of the University of New Haven suggested that organizers need to do more than just fill the sidewalks with lots of people.
'It's complex. You need to tell a compelling story, and not just to the millions of people you put in the street. You need a sympathetic narrative that brings over another 10 million who wouldn't ever go out on the street, people who would say 'OK, (now) I think the government has gone too far,' Schmidt said.
'There's good data that says no regime has ever withstood a social movement that gets 3.5% of the adult population (protesting). But this is complex, it's not just about the headcount,' Schmidt said. 'Protests can be quite effective, and now you have a chunk of people seeing what's happening: The administration refusing to abide by court rulings, three Yale professors saying they're going to Canada, people saying we're moving toward an autocracy.'
Schmidt said government reactions to a protest can be extremely important.
'If the regime itself decides to bring force, that could reinforce the narrative that the Trump Administration is beyond the pale. I don't think they'll do that,' he said.
When asked if political protests in the current deeply polarized environment can be as effective as in the past, Schmidt replied 'I'd say it's somewhere between Occupy Wall Street and Vietnam.'
Prof. Gary Rose of Sacred Heart University said he's skeptical that Saturday's rallies will reach much beyond the population that already disliked Trump. Protests would stand the best chance of swaying people if they remain rigorously peaceful, he said, while violence or vandalism would risk alienating more voters.
'Given the tactics of the anti-Musk people with the firebombings of Teslas that you see on TV, I don't think protests will resonate very well with Middle America,' Rose said. 'During Vietnam, when people went into the Weather Underground that certainly didn't move anyone to their issues. I don't think the current opposition we see on TV every night is going to. The more violent it becomes, the less support they get — in some respects it could strengthen Trump.'
Organizers of Saturday's rallies have emphasized non-violence through all of their promotions.
'A core principle behind all Hands Off! events is a commitment to nonviolent action. We expect all participants to seek to de-escalate any potential confrontation with those who disagree with our values,' according to the mobilize.us website.
Although two Connecticut conservative towns will have rallies, most of the rest are planned in Democrat-friendly suburbs where Trump soundly fell short in the November election. Fairfield County will be host to many, while the Naugatuck Valley and northeastern Connecticut will have few. An exception is Killingly, a heavily conservative town where Trump took nearly 60 percent of the vote in November.
One town without an anti-Trump rally Saturday will be West Hartford; organizers want to focus the turnout at the Hartford protest. Local resident Mary-Ann Langton, a disability rights advocate, organized an anti-Trump gathering last Saturday at the Connecticut War Memorial and plans to make that a weekly event, with the exception of this coming weekend.
In a written statement, she criticized Trump's cutbacks in Medicaid and his dismantling of the federal education department.
'Cutting these essential programs hurts people,' she said. 'I rely on Medicaid. The only reason I can live in the community is because Medicaid covers the cost of my personal assistant,' she wrote. 'Without Medicaid, I'd be forced to live in a nursing home, and I don't think they'd want me because I'd be a troublemaker.'
She estimated that up to 50 protestors showed up Saturday to wave anti-Trump placards at passing motorists.
Among the protests planned Saturday are:
Bethel: 11 a.m. to noon at PT Barnum Square; Cornwall: noon to 1:30 p.m. at Route 4 and Route 7; Danbury: 4 to 5:30 p.m. outside the public Library, 170 Main St.; East Lyme: 3 to 5 p.m. at the Niantic Green; Enfield: Noon to 4 p.m. at town hall; Guilford: 11 a.m. to noon at the Guilford Green; Hartford: 3 to 6 p.m. outside the state Capitol; Killingly: noon to 2 p.m. outside the Dunkin near the Dayville Mall; Litchfield: 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. at the Litchfield Town Green; Middletown: 10 a.m. to noon at Main and Washington streets; New Haven: noon to 1:30 at the New Haven Green; New London: 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. outside New London Superior Court; New Milford: 11 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. at the New Milford Green; Newtown: 1 to 3 p.m. at The Pleasance park, 1 Main St.; Norwich: 2 to 4 p.m. at the Chelsea Parade field; Salisbury: 11 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. at the White Hart Inn, 15 Under Mountain Road; Stamford: noon to 1:30 p.m. outside 888 Washington Boulevard; Torrington: 1 to 2 p.m. outside the Social Securty office at 147 Litchfield St.; Warren: 9 to 10:30 a.m. at the community center, 7 Sackett Hill Road; Westport: 11 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. at the Ruth Steinkrause Cohen Bridge; Willimantic 2 to 3 p.m. outside town hall; Windsor: 3 to 4:30 p.m. at the Windsor Green.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Associated Press
33 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Vance says Musk making a 'huge mistake' in going after Trump but also tries to downplay the attacks
BRIDGEWATER, N.J. (AP) — Vice President JD Vance said Elon Musk was making a 'huge mistake' going after President Donald Trump in a storm of bitter and inflammatory social media posts after a falling out between the two men. But the vice president, in an interview released Friday after the very public blow up between the world's richest man and arguably the world's most powerful, also tried to downplay Musk's blistering attacks as an 'emotional guy' who got frustrated. 'I hope that eventually Elon comes back into the fold. Maybe that's not possible now because he's gone so nuclear,' Vance said. Vance's comments come as other Republicans in recent days have urged the two men, who months ago were close allies spending significant time together, to mend fences. Musk's torrent of social media posts attacking Trump came as the president portrayed him as disgruntled and 'CRAZY' and threatened to cut the government contracts held by his businesses. Musk, who runs electric vehicle maker Tesla, internet company Starlink and rocket company SpaceX, lambasted Trump's centerpiece tax cuts and spending bill but also suggested Trump should be impeached and claimed without evidence that the government was concealing information about the president's association with infamous pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. 'Look, it happens to everybody,' Vance said in the interview. 'I've flown off the handle way worse than Elon Musk did in the last 24 hours.' Vance made the comments in an interview with ' manosphere' comedian Theo Von, who last month joked about snorting drugs off a mixed-race baby and the sexuality of men in the U.S. Navy when he opened for Trump at a military base in Qatar. The vice president told Von that as Musk for days was calling on social media for Congress to kill Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill,' the president was 'getting a little frustrated, feeling like some of the criticisms were unfair coming from Elon, but I think has been very restrained because the president doesn't think that he needs to be in a blood feud with Elon Musk.' 'I actually think if Elon chilled out a little bit, everything would be fine,' he added. Musk appeared by Saturday morning to have deleted his posts about Epstein. The interview was taped Thursday as Musk's posts were unfurling on X, the social media network the billionaire owns. During the interview, Von showed the vice president Musk's claim that Trump's administration hasn't released all the records related to sex abuser Jeffrey Epstein because Trump is mentioned in them. Vance responded to that, saying, 'Absolutely not. Donald Trump didn't do anything wrong with Jeffrey Epstein.' 'This stuff is just not helpful,' Vance said in response to another post shared by Musk calling for Trump to be impeached and replaced with Vance. 'It's totally insane. The president is doing a good job.' Vance called Musk an 'incredible entrepreneur,' and said that Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, which sought to cut government spending and laid off or pushed out thousands of workers, was 'really good.' The vice president also defended the bill that has drawn Musk's ire, and said its central goal was not to cut spending but to extend the 2017 tax cuts approved in Trump's first term. The bill would slash spending but also leave some 10.9 million more people without health insurance and spike deficits by $2.4 trillion over the decade, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. Musk has warned that the bill will increase the federal deficit and called it a 'disgusting abomination.' 'It's a good bill,' Vance said. 'It's not a perfect bill.' He also said it was ridiculous for some House Republicans who voted for the bill but later found parts objectional to claim they hadn't had time to read it. Vance said the text had been available for weeks and said, 'the idea that people haven't had an opportunity to actually read it is ridiculous.' Elsewhere in the interview, Vance laughed as Von cracked jokes about famed abolitionist Frederick Douglass' sexuality. 'We're gonna talk to the Smithsonian about putting up an exhibit on that,' Vance joked. 'And Theo Von, you can be the narrator for this new understanding of the history of Frederick Douglass.' The podcaster also asked the vice president if he 'got high' on election night to celebrate Trump's victory. Vance laughed and joked that he wouldn't admit it if he did. 'I did not get high,' he then said. 'I did have a fair amount to drink that night.' The interview was taped in Nashville at a restaurant owned by musician Kid Rock, a Trump ally.


The Hill
38 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump hails court ruling allowing White House to restrict AP access
President Trump celebrated a federal appeals court's ruling that allows the White House, for now, to restrict The Associated Press (AP) from the Oval Office and other limited spaces when reporting on the commander-in-chief. 'Big WIN over AP today,' Trump wrote on Truth Social on Friday. 'They refused to state the facts or the Truth on the GULF OF AMERICA. FAKE NEWS!!!' The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia temporarily blocked, in a 2-1 decision on Friday, an early April order from a district court judge that allowed the AP to regain its access to key White House spaces. The ruling blocked an April 8 order by U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden that found that the news wire's exclusion from the press pool, a small cadre of reporters reporting on the president's whereabouts, was unlawful. 'The White House is likely to succeed on the merits because these restricted presidential spaces are not First Amendment fora opened for private speech and discussion,' Judge Neomi Rao said in the Friday opinion, joined by Judge Gregory Katsas. AP's spokesperson Patrick Maks said the organization is 'disappointed in the court's decision and are reviewing our options.' The White House's decision to exclude the AP originated from the news wire not wanting to use Gulf of America in its industry stylebook. The three-judge panel did not halt the part of McFadden's April order that provides AP access to the East Room. Judge Cornelia Pillard said in her dissent that being able to be in the press pool never relied on the news outlet's viewpoint until this year. 'The panel's stay of the preliminary injunction cannot be squared with longstanding First Amendment precedent, multiple generations of White House practice and tradition, or any sensible understanding of the role of a free press in our constitutional democracy,' Pillard wrote. Days after McFadden ruled in favor of AP in April, the White House removed a spot in the press pool normally occupied by wire services.

Epoch Times
39 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
US Revoking Chinese Student Visas Is a Matter of National Security, Not Brain Drain
Commentary As the Trump administration revokes visas for Chinese students, critics cry xenophobia, but evidence shows that the United States has been training and funding China's future military and tech dominance.