logo
The 12 trees blocking a £160m bus route

The 12 trees blocking a £160m bus route

Yahoo07-02-2025

In a green pocket of Cambridgeshire hemmed by the M11, 12 century-old apple trees are entrenched in a stand-off with two yellow flags.
The 'veteran' Bramleys stand aloof like sentries on squat, gnarly trunks. They are the elder kingpins among some 2,000 fruit trees, bare branches rigid against piercing February gusts. But the gaudy flags flap wildly at their feet like yapping pups, refusing to be ignored.
They demark the width of a busway, complete with cycleway, which – if approved – will tear through the centre of this 60-acre orchard, carrying commuters from the rapidly growing new town of Cambourne seven miles away, into the science and technology hub of Cambridge four miles from here.
The estimated £160 million, 8.6 mile Cambourne to Cambridge (C2C) busway, first proposed in 2014 as part of the £500 million government-backed Greater Cambridge City Deal, has an admirable aim. To cut congestion, provide green transport, and speed the growth of this area which is rich in bio-medical research and tech innovation – the Oxford-Cambridge corridor Chancellor Rachel Reeves said last week she wants to transform into 'Europe's Silicon Valley'. It's a keystone within her drive for Britain's elusive growth.
Yet the busway would obliterate six of the veteran trees, planted in 1922, including one which is the second biggest Bramley ever recorded in Britain. Some 500 more trees would be uprooted with them – although protesters insist it would truly be around 1,000 – and 'tonnes' of carbon stored in this long undisturbed, ecologically rich soil, would be released.
Naturally, there is opposition. Last month, protesters succeeded in winning provisional Tree Protection Orders (TPOs) for these 12 veterans, which they hope could help thwart this busway route if there is a public inquiry.
And so these stoic Bramleys have now become guardians, joining the ranks of Rachel Reeves' other well-publicised ecological nemeses: the 'bats and newts' that she claims have frustrated previous infrastructure projects, most infamously the £100 million HS2 'bat tunnel'.
Coton Orchard is a microcosm of Britain's green-versus-growth conundrum. And of course, there are also bats here, too. Eight species, in fact.
'See that tall row of poplar trees?' says Anna Gazeley, 55, whose father, a watchmaker, bought Coton Orchard in 1996. 'The bats launch there and skim east to west at dusk, scraping the insects from the tops of the trees. In daylight, house martins skim north-south and as the sun sets there's aerial ballet as they weave between each other.
'Drive a bus lane through it, you won't have food for them, you won't have the insects and the habitat the insects need. If you keep forcing wildlife into ever-decreasing fragments, it will collapse.'
Gazeley won't sell her orchard, so it would need to be compulsorily purchased. Her argument, echoed by the Coton Busway Action Group and Cambridge Past, Present & Future, which owns surrounding land, is powerful.
This is an oasis, even in February. We arrive, and a Muntjac deer darts into view on cue. Gazeley points excitedly to blackened fungus on branches, the gnawed hollows that blue tits nest in. 'We have 256 species of terrestrial invertebrates, 15 of conservation concern; 28 birds on the red and amber list – 60-odd species overall,' she lists, urgently.
Just last year, a 'nationally rare' dark crimson underwing moth was discovered here. It is a designated priority habitat under the UK Biodiversity Action Plan.
Ninety per cent of orchards have been lost since the 1950s. Those remaining are special, say ecologists.
Steve Oram, a biodiversity officer at the People's Trust For Endangered Species, explains that the freestanding fruit trees provide 'dead wood habitat' which is 'rare', supplying a home for saproxylic invertebrates like click and noble chafer beetles.
'The only other place you get it is wood pasture and parkland habitat,' he explains. 'To lose this would be tragic.'
There's also its history. Peter Rayner's father once managed the orchard. Now in his 90s, Rayner recollects his boyhood picking fruit; wartime memories of Jewish refugees camping here.
'If a concrete busway is driven through the middle of the orchard it will not just destroy 500 trees and wild habitat, it will make that orchard impossible to manage and kill one of Cambridge's heritages,' he said.
Yet there is no doubt this area needs more and greener transport links. The Greater Cambridge City Deal aims to build 33,000 new homes by 2031, and create 44,000 jobs. West Cambourne is currently seeing 2,600 homes built, explains town councillor Stephen Drew.
The proposed East West Rail linking Oxford and Cambridge, another hefty infrastructure project, will bring yet more homes. Nearby housing development Bourn Airfield is set for 3,500. Traffic is predicted to increase 20%.
'At the moment we are overwhelmingly dependent on the car. The roads at commuter times are quite heavily congested,' says Drew.
In the centre of this 25-year-old town with its pastiche townhouses, buses seem frequent, but residents report crowding. Chris Howe, 68, chats outside the Fish'n'Chick'n takeaway. He's retired but currently goes to Cambridge for cancer treatment. 'I get the bus about 4.30pm out of Cambridge and can't get a seat,' he explains.
He has family who work at pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca who have their global headquarters in Cambridge and clearly thinks improved public transport is a good thing. 'What Rachel Reeves said is a good thing, growth is a good thing,' he adds. 'I think it probably does have to give,' he says of threatened green space. 'Can't the trees be replanted?'
Lorraine Brown, 53, desperately needs a bus from her home in West Cambourne, a 20-minute walk away. She had an administrative job at Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, and is currently job hunting with no car.
'I don't want to lose lovely landscapes,' she admits. 'Where possible we want the best of both worlds, but we do need a busway.'
The Coton campaigners agree. They just propose it be built elsewhere – specifically using the existing infrastructure of the A1303, the Madingley Road.
Cambridge Past, Present & Future has drawn up plans, and believe only a one-way, inbound busway is required from Cambourne to Cambridge – where they claim congestion, improved post-Covid, is worst – and a cycleway could be created elsewhere, so the A road could be extended.
'We aren't just saying 'don't do it here', we are saying 'don't do it here because it makes more sense to do it this way',' says Gazeley.
But there's more complication. The A1303 runs alongside the privately owned Madingley Woods, an ancient woodland and Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI).
The Greater Cambridge Partnership (GCP) tasked with delivering the local plan insists a busway there would threaten the wood.
A case of trees versus trees, then? The Coton campaigners argue their slimmer plan doesn't pose a risk, claiming the GCP hasn't formally considered it. The GCP stresses 'comprehensive' consideration has taken place.
As traffic whistles past, the GCP's interim director, Peter Blake, stares at the fence boundary and the approximate 8-10 metre 'buffer zone' of scrub between the wood and the roadside. He reiterates the 'current preferred option' would not work here.
'The trees in front of the fence provide a screen between the SSSI and the road so their loss would be undesirable,' he says. 'Any construction at this location would potentially impact on the root system of trees – understandably this would be something we would want to avoid.'
He won't be drawn on the B word. 'We're not getting into a bat conversation,' he says. Nor the orchard. But he stresses that the GCP has 'a commitment of 10 per cent biodiversity net gain with a target of 20 per cent across our programme' – i.e. putting back nature, including replanting an estimated 1,500 trees.
In March 2023, Cambridgeshire County Council voted in favour of an application for a Transport and Works Act Order for the busway. Last November this was submitted to the Secretary of State for Transport, Heidi Alexander. This month she is expected to say if she is calling a public inquiry. The Coton campaigners are hopeful – although they know that their TPOs could be 'steamrollered' anyway.
Perched high on their rolling arable farmland, Rob Sadler, 51, and his father John, 78, look down on it all. The fifth-generation farmers also face compulsory purchase. Their land would be cut in half by the busway, making it more difficult to farm.
They sit on John's parents' memorial bench, where their ashes are buried. They say the busway would plough through it. 'It's very upsetting,' says John.
Rob, a surveyor, explains the family is for growth. They've converted pig sheds into offices for tech start-ups. 'If science was a country, Cambridge would be the capital,' he says, proudly.
He fully supports a busway, but here? 'It's absolute nonsense,' he says.
In the orchard Anna pauses by a four-year-old sapling – grafted from what is thought to be the original Bramley. It's a long life away from providing a decades-rich habitat.
'How long before the bats feed here?' she shrugs.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK finance minister Reeves to meet China's vice premier on London trip
UK finance minister Reeves to meet China's vice premier on London trip

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

UK finance minister Reeves to meet China's vice premier on London trip

LONDON (Reuters) -British finance minister Rachel Reeves will hold a meeting with Chinese vice premier He Lifeng during his visit to Britain this week for trade talks with the United States, a British government source said on Sunday. China's foreign ministry said He would be in Britain between June 8 and June 13 when there will be talks in London with three of U.S. President Donald Trump's top aides to try to resolve a trade dispute between the world's two largest economies that has kept global markets on edge. The British government source said Reeves would host He for a bilateral meeting during the trip, although there were no details on when the talks would be held. The British finance minister met He during a visit to China in January, part of British attempts to improve ties with Beijing, one of the main policy goals of Prime Minister Keir Starmer's government. However, many British lawmakers remain sceptical of China amid regular accusations of espionage by spies working for Beijing, and plans for a new large Chinese embassy in London remains a divisive subject, with the opposition Conservative Party saying it must be blocked. The Chinese government wants to build the embassy at Royal Mint Court, a historic site near the Tower of London, which would be its largest in Europe but its requests for planning permission have been rejected by the local council, and the government will make a final decision. The Sunday Times reported that a senior U.S. official had said Washington was "deeply concerned" about the plans, due to its proximity to London's financial hubs and three significant data centres, and approval could impact UK-U.S. trade talks. "These (security) issues will be taken care of assiduously in the planning process," British technology minister Peter Kyle told Sky News on Sunday. Sign in to access your portfolio

No decision on winter fuel allowance until autumn, minister says
No decision on winter fuel allowance until autumn, minister says

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

No decision on winter fuel allowance until autumn, minister says

No decision will be taken on the winter fuel allowance until the Autumn budget – dispelling speculation that the government would make an announcement on it at next week's spending review. Sir Keir Starmer last month announced his intention to give more people access to winter fuel payments, just months after Labour decided to means test the previously universal payment. But weeks later, chaotic government messaging had left millions of pensioners with no idea what the changes will look like or when they will be announced. Asked about the changes, Peter Kyle, the secretary of state for science, innovation and technology, told Sky News: 'These issues are going to be dealt with in the run up to the autumn where these decisions are going to be taken and announced. 'But this is a spending review that's going to set the overall spending constraints for government for the next period, the next three years.' Pressed on whether that means no details will be unveiled on winter fuel next week, the technology secretary said: 'I think what you're going to see is the overall spending constraints and allowances for each government department, and then each department is then going to start talking about how it's going to allocate those.' Last week, Rachel Reeves confirmed the expected U-turn on the controversial cuts would be in place for this winter, meaning that the government will be faced with a scramble to get the changes rolled out between the October budget and the winter months. While the chancellor had previously confirmed that they would not set out how the changes would be paid for until the autumn, there was a growing suggestion from the government that details on who the changes would affect could be set out at next week's spending review. The chancellor is expected to unveil a swathe of spending cuts on Wednesday as she attempts to walk the tightrope between delivering on the party's election promises and sticking within the bounds of her self-imposed fiscal rules. Mr Kyle's comments come days after pensions minister Torsten Bell confirmed there was no prospect of returning to a universal winter fuel payment for all, saying that '95 per cent of people agree that it's not a good idea that we have a system paying a few hundreds of pounds to millionaires, and so we're not going to be continuing with that.' Winter fuel payments are a £300 payment to help with energy costs in the colder months. In July, the chancellor announced that pensioners not in receipt of pension credits or other means-tested benefits would no longer receive the benefit. As a result, just 1.5 million pensioners received the payment in winter 2024-25 – a massive drop from the 10.8 million pensioners who received it the year before. The cuts were deeply unpopular because they were seen as being disproportionately damaging to vulnerable people, and were criticised for leaving thousands of poorer pensions who were on the borderline missing out on the payment. In November, it was revealed that the government's own figures indicated it would force 100,000 pensioners into poverty in 2026. The policy was partly blamed for Labour's poor performance at the local elections – which saw them lose two-thirds of the council seats they had in 2021– as well as the previously Labour-held Runcorn and Helsby parliamentary seat to Reform UK. The cuts – combined with the £5bn welfare cuts and the party's decision to keep the two child benefit cap in place – have sparked growing concern over the direction of the government among Labour MPs.

Forcing rich pensioners to pay back winter fuel allowance would be tax ‘nightmare', Reeves warned
Forcing rich pensioners to pay back winter fuel allowance would be tax ‘nightmare', Reeves warned

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Forcing rich pensioners to pay back winter fuel allowance would be tax ‘nightmare', Reeves warned

Questions have been raised over Rachel Reeves' winter fuel U-turn after it emerged the government plans to reinstate the payments for all pensioners before attempting to claw it back from millions through higher taxes. The chancellor is expected to set out Labour's plans to reverse the controversial policy change at Wednesday's spending review, but fresh questions have been raised over how the government will distribute the payments. Reports suggest Ms Reeves will from this autumn restore the grants, worth up to £300, to the 10 million pensioners who had lost out. But only those in the bottom half of average incomes will keep the payments, with the top half of earners forced to repay the grant through higher tax bills over the course of the year. One option for the threshold at which pensioners are eligible is average household disposable income, currently around £37,000, The Times reported. Such a plan would resemble George Osborne's high income child benefit charge, which sees 1 per cent of total child benefit received taxed for every £100 earned over £60,000. It means that, over whatever threshold Ms Reeves sets for the payments, an amount will be clawed back from those on higher incomes. The plans could cost around £700 million, with the chancellor vowing to set out her plans to pay for the change at her autumn Budget. Dennis Reed, of over-60s campaign group Silver Voices, said the plans 'would be an administrative nightmare and would be likely to draw in many more pensioners into the tax system'. He told The Independent: 'The most cost effective solution is to restore the universal benefit and maybe fiddle around with the higher tax threshold in due course to target 'the millionaires'.' Mr Reed accused the government of 'casting around for ways to show it has not made a complete U-turn while gaining the political credit for doing so'. It comes after pensions minister Torsten Bell said there is no prospect of the winter fuel allowance being restored universally. He said: 'The principle I think most people, 95 per cent of people, agree, that it's not a good idea that we have a system paying a few hundreds of pounds to millionaires, and so we're not going to be continuing with that.' Sir Keir Starmer last month announced his intention to give more people access to winter fuel payments, just months after Labour made the previously universal payment means-tested in one of its first acts after taking office. Speaking in Manchester on Wednesday, Ms Reeves said: 'I had to make decisions last year to restore sound public finances, and that involved a number of difficult decisions around welfare, taxation and also public spending, including the decision to means-test winter fuel payments so only the poorest pensioners, those on pension credit, got it. 'But we have now put our public finances on a firmer footing. The economy is in a better shape, but we have also listened to the concerns that people had about the level of the means-test. 'So we will be making changes to that. They will be in place so that pensioners are paid this coming winter, and we'll announce the details of that and the level of that as soon as we possibly can.' The Treasury and Department for Work and Pensions have been asked to comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store