Elon Musk Cries 'Corruption' as Tesla Superchargers Disappear from Key US Route
Elon Musk Cries 'Corruption' as Tesla Superchargers Disappear from Key US Route originally appeared on Autoblog.
A common dealbreaker that new car buyers say steers them out of electric vehicles is the sheer state of the charging infrastructure compared to gas-powered cars. Although manufacturers like Ford, Hyundai, Genesis, and Honda offer new owners the opportunity to install a free home charging unit, this is not an entirely "one-size-fits-all" solution for all owners for various reasons.
However, as public EV charging appears in more public places and heavily trafficked corridors for the general public's use, one of America's busiest highways has taken a massive chunk of its EV charging offline.
According to a new report by NJ Advance Media and NJ.com, the New Jersey Turnpike Authority has ordered Tesla to decommission and remove 64 Superchargers at rest stops along the New Jersey Turnpike, the stretch of I-95 spanning northern and southern New Jersey. Per a May 30 statement from the New Jersey Turnpike Authority (NJTA), the state agency responsible for the maintenance and upkeep of the New Jersey Turnpike and the Garden State Parkway, the move comes as the agency decided to transition to what it calls "Universal Open Access EV chargers" starting on June 6.
These chargers, which are provided by Applegreen Electric (an arm of Irish company Applegreen, who operates NJTA's service areas), are said to be compatible "with all makes and models of EVs" and will be available on June 6 at various service areas across the Turnpike including the Vince Lombardi, Woodrow Wilson, Richard Stockton, James Fenimore Cooper, Joyce Kilmer, and Walt Whitman Service Areas, with additional chargers at the Molly Pitcher Service Area in July and the Clara Barton and John Fenwick Service Areas in Fall 2025. According to early user-reported data from Plugshare, these chargers are capable of up to 400 kW charging and are usually located next to Tesla Superchargers at select service areas.
However, this move is not without conflict. In a lengthy post on X (formerly known as Twitter) on May 30, the official account for Tesla Charging wrote that the Turnpike Authority's order came after it rejected any requests to coexist with the Applegreen chargers on the Turnpike, adding that it had been "preparing for 3 years for this potential outcome by building 116 stalls off the New Jersey Turnpike" in certain high-traffic areas.
Tesla says that it offered the NJTA "above-market commercial terms" to sweeten the deal, including offering its NJ Turnpike Superchargers with "screens and NACS with CCS1 'magic docks.'" Ultimately, Tesla called the NJTA's decision to decommission its Superchargers a step back for all EV users who use the Turnpike.
'Tesla always advocates for more infrastructure and co-location with additional third-party charging providers. This drives down costs through optionality and accelerates EV adoption by having sufficient capacity to shoulder peaks,' the automaker said on X.
Despite reaching out to invest in the state, Tesla claims that the NJTA's decision to remove Tesla superchargers is a setback for EV drivers.
"We expect that ~30 times more fast-charging capacity is needed to get to full EV adoption," it said on X. "NJTA's decision to remove, rather than add, critical charging infrastructure is a setback for New Jersey's EV adoption goals of 100% Zero-Emission New Car Sales by 2035. It removes Turnpike access to the most reliable (99.9% uptime), least congested (<1% waiters), and cost-effective (~30% lower $/kWh) charging."
In a May 30 post responding to a quote tweet from Tesla fan and Model Y owner Sawyer Merritt, Tesla CEO Elon Musk said that the NJTA's decision "sounds like corruption."
I do not own an EV, but I live in New Jersey, and while I observe that EV charging is very prevalent in many convenient places adjacent to major highways, including shopping malls like the infamous American Dream mall, large retail centers where Walmarts and Targets are located, and non-service-area roadside stops like Wawas, I view the loss of Superchargers on the Turnpike as a bit of a disservice to EV owners.
The New Jersey Turnpike is a major thoroughfare connecting two major Northeastern cities, New York and Philadelphia. Many drivers who travel on it pass through with a further destination in mind, and the faster out of Jersey, the better.
It's not just Teslas that charge at Superchargers. So far, Ford, GM, Rivian, Volvo, Polestar, Hyundai, and Genesis are just some of the manufacturers that support it, with others like Honda and Acura soon to have that capability. Though one may view Tesla Supercharging as anything but universal, as someone who has had to wait upwards of hours in line to charge non-Tesla EVs at "universal stations," keeping the Superchargers where they were would help ease any potential congestion these Applegreen chargers will have. Trust me, there will be congestion. The service areas on the Turnpike have Shake Shacks, Dunkins, and Popeyes now.
Elon Musk Cries 'Corruption' as Tesla Superchargers Disappear from Key US Route first appeared on Autoblog on Jun 3, 2025
This story was originally reported by Autoblog on Jun 3, 2025, where it first appeared.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Tesla Stock Plunged Today
Sales data continue to show that Tesla is losing market share globally. CEO Elon Musk's very public split with President Trump and other Republicans could come back to bite Tesla. Musk and Tesla could benefit from his relationship with Trump as self-driving cars become more common. These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires › It's an interesting time to be a Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) shareholder. CEO Elon Musk has stepped away from his leadership role in President Trump's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) cost-cutting effort. The timing was presumably good, as Tesla is preparing to launch its robotaxi technology in Austin. Yet Tesla stock dove 5% this morning. As of 11:40 a.m. ET, shares of the electric vehicle (EV) leader are still lower by 3.2%. The drop likely comes for two reasons. First, data on Tesla EV sales continue to show declines. German sales fell 36% year over year in May. That drop came even as overall EV sales jumped nearly 45%. The competitive Chinese market looks to be getting tougher, too. May shipments from Tesla's Chinese factory declined 15% year over year. Investors have been overlooking some of the drop in Tesla sales this year, though, as the revamped Model Y makes its way through production to increase availability for those waiting for the remodel. Another concern has investors selling Tesla stock today. Musk has started very publicly splitting with President Trump and other Republicans over the spending bill making its way through Congress. That could have ramifications as Musk lobbies regulators for a federal approach to autonomous driving rules. Self-driving cars being regulated state by state would be a major headache for Musk and Tesla. Tesla's Full Self-Driving launch in Texas is expected by the end of this month, and Musk has openly said much of Tesla's value is in that technology. His relationship with Trump could have helped him standardize regulations on the technology. A fissure in the relationship could become a barrier. That has investors nervous today, and they're keeping their eyes on Musk and his interactions with leaders in Washington. Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you'll want to hear this. On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a 'Double Down' stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you're worried you've already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it's too late. And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you'd have $366,219!* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you'd have $38,589!* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you'd have $656,825!* Right now, we're issuing 'Double Down' alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join , and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon.*Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Howard Smith has positions in Tesla. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Tesla. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why Tesla Stock Plunged Today was originally published by The Motley Fool
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Musk's xAI facility brings ‘opportunity' to Memphis, mayor says
(NewsNation) — The mayor of Memphis, Tennessee, believes Elon Musk's xAI supercomputer facility will help 'a community that is desperately in need of investment,' though some residents say otherwise. The project will occupy an empty Electrolux factory located on the city's south side. It runs gas turbines, which release chemicals like formaldehyde and nitrogen oxides, in the process of powering his AI chatbot, Grok. Some Memphians have said the tech facility is polluting the air and water in a historically Black, working-class neighborhood and have joined the NAACP to call for its closure. 'We are urging you again to ensure that xAI stops operating its unpermitted turbines in violation of clean air and open meeting act laws and to order xAI to pay penalties for operating in violation of the law,' the NAACP told county officials in a letter. President Trump, Palantir's possible partnership: What to know But Memphis Mayor Paul Young sees it as an 'opportunity for us to benefit as a city.' The project is forecasted to generate $15 to $20 million in property taxes annually and is expected to create more than 300 jobs. 'It's in a community where 75 of the properties on the list for condemnation are located in that community — the second highest in our city,' Young told NewsNation. '[There's] one grocery store. So, there are some conditions in that community that require investment.' Those unpermitted turbines, according to Young, are a work in progress. 'Well, they have 365 days to get the temporary turbines permitted, and they filed for the permits in January,' Young said. 'They're expected to have those permits by September.' Utah lawyer sanctioned for court filing that used ChatGPT Musk also wants to build a second, even more powerful data center about 10 miles away. Young told NewsNation he welcomes the investment, even with the billionaire's controversial name attached. 'My goal is to separate the project from the person and really look at what the value proposition is for our community,' Young said, adding: 'I certainly believe that the visibility that he has contributes to a lot of the pushback that we're seeing.' In February, a man was arrested and charged with an act of terrorism for saying he was 'going to burn down' the facility. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Republicans privately vent about Musk as they downplay his influence on Trump's agenda bill
When Elon Musk declared Tuesday that President Donald Trump's signature legislation was a 'disgusting abomination,' it caught the West Wing by surprise and sent Republican leaders in Congress scrambling, unsuccessfully, to get Musk on the phone. A day later, both GOP leaders and White House officials are downplaying the actual impact of the tech billionaire's outburst, even as some vent frustration with Musk behind the scenes. White House officials, while annoyed by the matter, said they ultimately did not believe the comments would impact how senators vote on Trump's prized bill. Two administration officials even went as far as suggesting Musk's opposition could actually help Trump's measure, given how toxic the Tesla CEO has become over the course of his time in Trump's orbit. House Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune both evinced no worry whatsoever that it would change Republicans' minds or sink the massive border, tax and spending cuts package. While several GOP senators had been expressing doubts about the bill for weeks, none cited new concerns over Musk's comments. Republican leaders remain bullish that they can deliver the legislation to Trump's desk by July 4 – an ambitious timeline. Whatever happens, one thing did seem clear: While Trump and Musk's alliance is not broken, the two are slowly growing apart as their interests diverge and their relationship becomes more distant. People close to the president view the situation as something of an inevitability: they braced for potential conflicts once Musk no longer enjoyed close proximity with Trump – and the outsized power that goes along with it. The one-time government employee's recent claims that he would be less involved in politics, coupled with his departure from the White House last week, almost instantly shifted some of the influence he had held for the past several months. Musk continued blasting the bill Wednesday on his social media platform X, pinning to the top of his profile a post from another user that said commentators on Fox News are almost all 'in agreement with Elon—to see so many vehemently disagreeing with Trump is wild.' Musk also on Wednesday called on Congress to draft a 'new spending bill' that wouldn't 'massively grow the deficit and increase the debt ceiling by 5 TRILLION DOLLARS.' Trump was unhappy and somewhat confused on Tuesday after Musk's initial missive, according to two sources who spoke with him, but opted to not publicly address the criticism, hoping to avoid fueling a storyline that he is feuding with his onetime shadow. One of the sources noted Trump had speculated that Musk's pushback must be related to how the bill might impact the billionaire's business ventures, including the repealing of electric vehicle subsidies. Still, the timing of his criticism irritated the White House and Senate Republican leaders, aides said, because it threatened to further complicate efforts to unite a fractious congressional coalition. Trump was 'not delighted that Elon did a 180 on that,' Johnson said Wednesday after a conversation with the president about Musk's renewed criticism. One fear among Trump advisers was that Musk's comments could provide ammunition to Republican senators who already oppose the bill, like Rand Paul, and amplify their concerns. Even if no senators withdraw their support for Trump's big policy bill in the wake of Musk's blistering assessment of its price tag, a half-dozen GOP strategists and advisers complained to CNN that it added another layer of criticism to the bill and provided another opening to critics. 'The bill was fragile enough before Elon starting weighing in,' a senior Republican Senate official told CNN. 'Unhelpful doesn't begin to describe this.' Musk's comments appeared to embolden some of the bill's critics in the House, which passed the legislation last month on a narrow margin. If the Senate makes any changes to the legislation, which is likely, it will have to go back through the House. Arizona Rep. Eli Crane, a conservative Republican who criticized the legislation for not cutting enough spending, said he was 'frustrated' with Musk for not voicing his disapproval sooner. 'Those of us that were actually trying to make cuts, we could have used his support,' Crane said Wednesday. 'That's what frustrates me – hey, if you're going to be in this fight, be in this fight when we need you.' Some White House officials and several top Republicans sought to blame Musk's criticism simply on the legislation's planned repeal of certain electric vehicle subsidies – and the impact it would have on his own struggling company, Tesla. But one Republican strategist who has worked closely with the tech billionaire downplayed that, telling CNN that Musk was genuinely troubled by projections of how much the bill would add to the deficit – the reasoning Musk has publicly cited on multiple occasions. Other people who know Musk agreed that his opposition to the bill is not just about the electric vehicle credits or solar energy subsidies, noting he sees the bill as a 'slap in the face' to what he was trying to accomplish with the Department of Government Efficiency. 'Elon is big mission, not small mission, and EV credits are small mission,' said one person who speaks to Musk. 'He fully believes it's a bad deal. All this work on DOGE [would be] a waste of effort.' Despite the consternation, some White House officials and people close to Musk doubted the dust up would have much effect on Musk's complicated relationship with the president long term. Trump does not view Musk – a fellow billionaire and the head of several companies – as an ordinary underling, people familiar with their dynamic said. Instead, he regards Musk as essentially a Democrat who came to love Trump and helped get him elected, despite policy differences. While Trump was not eager to pour fuel on the fire after Musk's comments Tuesday, one administration official said he expected the president to fire back if Musk kept up his criticism. If Musk were to start individually lobbying senators, that could also change the White House posture, one official told CNN. So far, Musk has avoided criticizing the president directly. Mostly, his ire has been directed toward members of Congress, despite Trump personally championing and lobbying for the bill. But many weren't sure how seriously to take a threat in one of Musk's Tuesday posts: 'In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people.' The world's richest man has made clear he intends to play far less of a role in the 2026 midterm elections than he did in the 2024 presidential race, when he spent $275 million to help Trump win. The strategist who works closely with Musk said a decision has not been made about whether he will follow through on his threat of trying to unseat Republicans who supported the bill. How effective Musk will be in changing minds remains an open question, as Republicans weigh that warning. Johnson, who spoke to Musk on Monday ahead of his critical messages, said the two spoke about the midterm elections and Musk said he would help Republicans keep the House majority. The speaker said that conversation ended 'on a great note.' When Johnson tried to call Musk on Tuesday evening, he didn't pick up. Still, Johnson insisted there were no hard feelings. 'Policy differences are not personal,' he said. 'I think he's flat wrong. I think he's way off on this.' Thune similarly predicted the Senate would pass the bill, despite Musk's opposition. While Thune acknowledged Musk has influence, he said Republicans understand defeat of the bill is not acceptable. 'He has some influence. He's got a big following in social media. But at the end of the day, this is a 51-vote exercise here in the Senate,' he said. 'The question for our members is going to be: Would you prefer the alternative? And the alternative isn't a good one.' Alayna Treene, Manu Raju and David Wright contributed to this report.
