
Waving wads of cash as inducement to sell homes and heritage in the Bo-Kaap
I spent a brief period of my early teenage life in District Six. This was during the early 1970s, when District Six was on the verge of complete destruction, and when its denizens were being moved, more rapidly, to places like Hanover Park or Retreat. It was on the Cape Flats where family members and community friends were moved to, by various means of coercion and consent.
In the Bo-Kaap, where I attended school – I walked all the way from Albert Street in District Six, through the Gardens to Vista High School – we spent many hours on the street corners and in the mosque on Upper Chiappini Street, which was built in the mid-1800s.
Whereas much of District Six was demolished by the time of South Africa's first democratic election, political economic apartheid's rampaging policies directed at places like the Bo-Kaap were replaced, seamlessly, by straight-up economic apartheid. It is a lot like the way that a place like Camps Bay was secured for white people (politically), and after apartheid it was secured for moneyed people. Very few black people had the money to own properties in Camps Bay, or anywhere along the Atlantic Seaboard, for that matter.
The Bo-Kaap, or Malay Quarter, has a rich cultural heritage which is being eroded by inducements, promises of cash, by gentrification driven by estate agents.
I guess if you wave wads of cash at relatively poor people, they would sell their homes, and in the case of the Bo-Kaap, their cultural heritage. We cannot possibly expect estate agents to understand the loss of cultural heritage of Malays and Muslims in the Bo-Kaap.
One of the problems is that the provincial government, and local politicians, seem quite uninterested in preserving heritage that is not Eurocentric or Western. Osman Shabodien, chairperson of the Bo-Kaap Ratepayers Association, has responded to the pernicious propaganda that foregrounds profit-making and painting the area white based on spurious (convenient) claims that the Bo-Kaap should not become a corner of cultural exclusivity.
'For decades, Bo-Kaap has been multicultural and we haven't had any problems,' Shabodien has said.
'Many of us attended the St Paul's Parish school, the St Monica's Maternity Hospital was donated by the church – there've been Muslim, Christian and Hindus staying in the area for all the years… Gentrification doesn't have colour, it has money and attitude that doesn't tolerate other people's cultures.'
It is a combination of profiteering and intolerance of 'others' that is driving the political economic erasure of the Bo-Kaap as a heritage site by private enterprise under the protection of the state. This is not dissimilar to the pact between the state and criminal organisations in Sicily, which I have written about before.
The Bo-Kaap, and the City Bowl, is home to the oldest mosques in the country and, well, the rampant Islamophobia, and notions of exceptionalism (and indeed of exclusivity) is precisely what is driving the city of Cape Town towards an Airbnb paradise and luxurious residences for whites, very many of whom would prefer the city to be the capital of an independent Cape, as my old colleague Mondli Makhanya has suggested in City Press.
Bo-Kaap is in the way of white exclusivity and exceptionalism
Erasure of the Bo-Kaap is part of this grand project. Worse still, is that since the departure of Thabo Mbeki – a high point of whose presidency was what should have been an epoch-defining I am an African speech – there has been a type of double movement; whites have become emboldened to the extent that they (settlers of European colonialism) are claiming indigeneity, and at the same time ethno-centrism of a particular kind has laid down the law, in a manner of speaking, that nobody is sufficiently African unless 'pure Africans' say so.
The latter is what Julius Malema and the post-Mbeki ANC bequeathed the country.
Stuck in the middle, as it were, are the coloured or mixed-race people, many of whom were born and raised and continue to live in the Bo-Kaap. For rapacious estate agents, the Bo-Kaap is in the way of profit-making, and for the Western Cape government, the Bo-Kaap is in the way of a white dominance in the Cape.
They have, of course, added colour with people who share their notions of (white/European/anti-African) purity and exceptionalism. It's the same old story of European conquest and domination; co-opt a few natives and you have a veneer of legitimacy… and you feel good about yourself.
These days, when I go to the Bo-Kaap, I see a hollowing-out of spaces, interspersed by gentrification. This gentrification has resulted in displacement and is ' pro tanto unjust in virtue of instantiating a distinctive nexus of domination between state actors, private landlords, and gentrifying residents', as Daniel Putnam of Dartmouth University wrote in 'Gentrification and Domination', research published in the Journal of Political Philosophy in 2020.
Putnam cited, appropriately, the British sociologist Ruth Glass, who explained that once the 'process of 'gentrification' starts in a district… it goes on rapidly until all or most of the original working class occupants are displaced, and the whole social character of the district is changed'.
I always find it amusing that some of our compatriots travel to places like Türkiye, and admire the beauty of places like the Suleymaniye Mosque, but they don't want to live anywhere where they can hear the athaan – the Muslim call to prayer, which the Democratic Alliance government of the province has, in one instance, considered to be a noise nuisance.
So…. you send in the estate agents to wave wads of cash, the bureaucrats approve construction, and the politicians drive the political economic (including social) agenda to remove non-whites and Muslims out of the City Bowl, and (probably) dump them in places not unlike Hanover Park and Mitchells Plan. When all is said and done, they will have established the racial grounds for secession of the Cape …. it's not beyond the imagination.
We should probably enjoy the colour and vibrancy of the Bo-Kaap while it lasts – before it becomes a whites-only space, and we're back to the era when my family and friends were driven from the City Bowl to the Cape Flats. Only this time, it's not political policy, but economic practice. DM
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
6 hours ago
- IOL News
Kursk Under Fire, Truth Under Siege
By Gillian Schutte On 5 June 2025, I attended the Russian-hosted international online press symposium titled 'Liberation of Kursk Region', a teleconference convened to present first-hand accounts, evidence, and legal testimony on the attacks carried out by the Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU) and foreign mercenaries during incursions into the Kursk Region. It was a sobering exercise in counter-memory — one that exposed the ideological filters through which Western media interprets war, and how it strategically erases certain kinds of suffering. The event brought together a panel of experts, eyewitnesses, and officials to report on the nature of these violations. Each presentation revealed both the physical damage inflicted on the Russian civilian population, as well as the deeper injury of denial — a refusal by the Western bloc to recognise the legitimacy of Russian civilian grief. The eyewitness accounts shared by three Kurskites were harrowing. One described watching elderly neighbours die when their home was shelled. Another spoke of civilians being shot at close range. A third, fighting tears, recounted the rape of women during the brief occupation of their village. These testimonies were the lived memories of war and trauma, delivered with quiet devastation. Rodion Miroshnik, Ambassador-at-Large of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, provided a comprehensive briefing on what Russia identifies as crimes committed by the Kiev regime. He detailed the shelling of border villages, destruction of non-military infrastructure, use of foreign mercenaries, and the discovery of banned Western-supplied munitions, including cluster bombs and white phosphorus, in civilian zones. Miroshnik cited ongoing investigations by the Russian Investigative Committee into violations of international humanitarian law — all allegedly ignored by the institutions tasked with upholding these laws. According to Miroshnik, several communities in the Kursk Region suffered not only bombardment but were also subject to brief occupations by AFU-aligned forces. During these episodes, civilians were reportedly displaced, forcibly taken into Ukrainian territory, and subjected to psychological trauma. Families returning to liberated areas faced destroyed homes, contaminated land, and unexploded ordnance, with little to no humanitarian intervention from the international community. Igor Kashin, Head of the Special Projects Department in the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights in the Russian Federation, presented a legal analysis of these findings. His tone was forensic. He itemised the breaches of the Geneva Conventions and other international protocols, explaining how evidence had been submitted to various global institutions — including the UN and the ICC — yet no meaningful action had followed. Olga Kiriy, a Russian filmmaker and documentarian, delivered a visual account of the devastation. Her footage showed razed schools, burning residential blocks, and civilians returning to ghost towns, still wearing the shock of war on their faces. In one of her documentaries she shows a Ukranian soldier admitting to the rape of women by himself and his unit. Her presentation conveyed what words could not: the raw aftermath of military violence on people who remain unseen and unspoken in the official Western narrative of the conflict. Ivan Konovalov, military analyst and historian, contextualised the attacks on Kursk within a broader framework. He explained that the AFU operations were tactical provocations — designed to destabilise border regions and provoke retaliation, which could then be framed by NATO-aligned media as further proof of Russian aggression. He pointed out that these attacks coincided with deliveries of new Western weaponry to Ukraine, raising serious questions about the complicity of foreign governments and arms manufacturers. The testimonies shared during the teleconference dismantled the binary framework imposed by Western media, where Ukraine is valorised as a struggling democracy and Russia is reduced to a caricature. The reality conveyed by the speakers was more complex and far more disturbing. Russia, too, has civilians. Its towns and villages are not abstract zones on a geopolitical map but home to people who have suffered death, displacement, and the terror of war. Yet these accounts are absent from global headlines. They are not debated in parliaments, nor dissected on primetime panels. Instead, they are swiftly relegated to the realm of 'disinformation' — a catch-all term used by liberal institutions to shut down inconvenient truths. This is the machinery of narrative warfare — where facts are not weighed for their truth, but for their utility to power. The West's information order sustains itself through omission, selective moral outrage, and the assumption that some lives matter more than others. As a South African journalist who has long documented structural injustice, I recognise this silencing. It follows a pattern familiar to the Global South — where international law is invoked as a weapon rather than a principle; where invasions by Western powers are called interventions, but defensive operations by others are framed as crimes; and where victims must pass ideological litmus tests before they are deemed worthy of empathy. The suffering in the Kursk Region demands recognition. The use of banned munitions against civilians, the forced displacement of families, and the destruction of non-military infrastructure all constitute grave breaches of international law. That these acts are committed using Western weapons, under the cover of Western media silence, reveals a moral crisis at the heart of the liberal order. The conference was more than a forum for Russian voices. It was a reminder that truth is not owned by the powerful. It must be spoken even when it is buried. The people of Kursk have lived through war. They have returned to broken homes and haunted fields. Their testimonies exist. Their pain is real. And their silence is manufactured by design. If the term 'liberation' is to have meaning, it must include liberation from the monopolies that determine whose pain is legitimate. It must disrupt the asymmetry of grief that defines the West's geopolitical posture. We owe that to the people of Kursk. We owe it to all communities whose trauma is edited out of history to suit imperial narratives. And we owe it to ourselves, if we are to resist becoming complicit in the global machinery of selective justice. *Gillian Schutte is a South African writer, filmmaker, and critical-race scholar known for her radical critiques of neoliberalism, whiteness, and donor-driven media. Her work centres African liberation, social justice, and revolutionary thought. ** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL or Independent Media.

The Herald
9 hours ago
- The Herald
Iran says US travel ban shows 'deep hostility' for Iranians, Muslims
Iran on Saturday blasted US President Donald Trump's travel ban on countries including the Islamic Republic, saying it showed 'deep hostility' towards Iranians and Muslims. 'The decision to ban the entry of Iranian nationals — merely due to their religion and nationality — not only indicates the deep hostility of American decisionmakers towards the Iranian people and Muslims but also violates ... international law,' a senior foreign ministry official said in a ministry statement posted on the X social media platform. Trump's proclamation on Wednesday will bar citizens from 12 countries starting on Monday at 12:01am . The countries are Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Congo Republic, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. The ban, which Trump said was necessary to protect against 'foreign terrorists', was reminiscent of a similar move he implemented during his first term in office from 2017 to 2021, when he barred travellers from seven Muslim-majority nations. Reuters

TimesLIVE
11 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Iran says US travel ban shows 'deep hostility' for Iranians, Muslims
Iran on Saturday blasted US President Donald Trump's travel ban on countries including the Islamic Republic, saying it showed 'deep hostility' towards Iranians and Muslims. 'The decision to ban the entry of Iranian nationals — merely due to their religion and nationality — not only indicates the deep hostility of American decisionmakers towards the Iranian people and Muslims but also violates ... international law,' a senior foreign ministry official said in a ministry statement posted on the X social media platform. Trump's proclamation on Wednesday will bar citizens from 12 countries starting on Monday at 12:01am . The countries are Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Congo Republic, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. The ban, which Trump said was necessary to protect against 'foreign terrorists', was reminiscent of a similar move he implemented during his first term in office from 2017 to 2021, when he barred travellers from seven Muslim-majority nations.