logo
US okays Moderna's 'next generation' Covid-19 vaccine

US okays Moderna's 'next generation' Covid-19 vaccine

First Post2 days ago

The new vaccine, mNexspike (mRNA-1283), is a step toward next-generation coronavirus vaccines. It's made in a way that allows for a lower dose, a fifth of the dose of its current COVID-19 vaccine, Spikevax (mRNA-1273) by refining its immune target read more
Moderna logo is seen displayed in this illustration taken, May 3, 2022. REUTERS
Moderna, a vaccine manufacturer, said late last week that the FDA has authorised its next-generation COVID-19 vaccine.
The new vaccine, mNexspike (mRNA-1283), is a step toward next-generation coronavirus vaccines. It's made in a way that allows for a lower dose, a fifth of the dose of its current COVID-19 vaccine, Spikevax (mRNA-1273) by refining its immune target.
Moderna's approval was based on a phase 3 randomised controlled trial involving 11,400 participants ages 12 and older. The trial found that a 10-microgram (μg) dose of mNexspike demonstrated a 9.3% higher relative vaccine efficacy (rVE) compared to a 50-μg dose of Spikevax, with a 13.5% higher rVE in adults ages 65 and older. The two vaccinations have identical safety profiles, according to the manufacturer.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The approval 'adds an important new tool to help protect people at high risk of severe disease from COVID-19,' Stephane Bancel, Moderna's CEO, said in a statement Saturday.
The Food and Drug Administration approved the new vaccine for use in all adults 65 and older, and for people age 12 to 64 who have a least one health condition that puts them at increased risk from the coronavirus.
That's the same limit that the FDA set in licensing another COVID-19 vaccine option from competitor Novavax.
Those restrictions are a departure from how the US has handled COVID-19 vaccines until now, reflecting scepticism about vaccines from Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and other Trump officials.
Moderna's existing vaccine doesn't face those limits and has long been used for anyone ages 6 months and older. The company said it expected to offer both options this fall.
The news came just days after the Trump administration cancelled funding for Moderna to develop a vaccine against potential pandemic flu viruses, including the H5N1 bird flu, despite promising early study results.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Defence alert: Crypto is turning into a geopolitical weapon
Defence alert: Crypto is turning into a geopolitical weapon

Mint

time13 minutes ago

  • Mint

Defence alert: Crypto is turning into a geopolitical weapon

"I am not a fan of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies… Unregulated crypto assets can facilitate unlawful behaviour." That was Donald Trump in 2019, when he still voiced concerns shared by central bankers, International Monetary Fund (IMF) economists and financial crime experts across the world. The consensus was clear: crypto, while technologically innovative, lacked both intrinsic value and sovereign backing, and undermined anti-money laundering regimes as well as monetary integrity. Fast forward to 2025. Better educated perhaps by the America crypto lobby's campaign cheques and the sweat equity gifted to his family, Trump, now US president again, recently signed Executive Order 14178. A stroke of the pen dismantled many of the regulatory guard-rails once deemed essential. Not long after, the Trump family entered the crypto business. One of their earliest strategic partners was Pakistan, a state associated with cross-border terrorism, shady finances and furtive fund diversion. Also Read: The triumph of crypto bros: Don't just shrug and move on What should India make of a superpower whose political leaders launch private currencies? Or of a country where former convicts are rehabilitated as strategic advisors to sovereign crypto councils? Are we witnessing a global power in search of infinite minting rights without democratic oversight but with the full cover of plausible deniability? Changpeng Zhao, former CEO of Binance, pleaded guilty to serious anti-money laundering failures, spent time in US custody and paid $4.3 billion for a settlement. His crypto exchange facilitated transactions for sanctioned groups like Hamas—flows that would never get past a regulated banking system. The Binance blow-up should have ended his financial career. Instead, he now advises Pakistan's official crypto task force. Justin Sun, whose firm invested $30 million in Trump-linked World Liberty Financial, was under investigation by the US Securities and Exchange Commission for civil fraud. Today, he is a front-row guest at US political fund-raisers. Are crypto dealings the new way to buy influence in the US? This seems like a gateway through which otherwise ineligible actors—be it individuals, regimes or rogue states—are quietly admitted into the global financial order, now that the need for institutional legitimacy appears to be receding behind the opacity that once resulted in exclusion. Also Read: Mint Quick Edit | De-dollarization: Trump should target crypto, not Brics It's a return to Cold War-style shadow financing, but with the support of blockchains instead of banks. So much for the superpower that lectures the world on clean governance. When financial opacity is rebranded as innovation, geopolitics takes on a new form we should all be wary of. The IMF and World Bank have been vocal in their concerns. The IMF has warned that widespread adoption of private cryptocurrencies threatens monetary sovereignty, enables illicit flows and undermines capital controls, especially in emerging markets. We saw disruptions in El Salvador, Nigeria, and Lebanon, where crypto experiments coincided with capital volatility and institutional erosion. Terror finance remains an enduring threat to global security. The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) has repeatedly highlighted how terrorist groups exploit crypto to bypass formal banking oversight. Yet, Pakistan has FATF clearance. For a country like India—on the front-line of cross-border terrorism—this is a real risk. Crypto has operationalized what could be described as 'eHawala': borderless transfers in real time that can stay hidden. A sovereign nation should not let private entities mint currency, however trendy or popular it proves. To its credit, the Reserve Bank of India saw this coming. Its resistance to private cryptocurrency is neither timidity nor technophobia—it is an assertion of monetary sovereignty. In today's world, capital flows can be weaponized. It is therefore a matter of national security to ensure such weapons are not aimed at us. Also Read: Trump's crypto reserve: An odd idea with a silver lining for the world Yet, the pressure to capitulate is mounting. Global crypto platforms, freshly repackaged as fintech innovations, have been pushing for softer regulation. In India, domestic actors have lobbied against India's high tax on crypto gains by arguing that crypto capital must be stopped from fleeing offshore. In matters of financial security, arguing that crypto should remain unchecked because conventional checks aren't flawless is not just illogical, but dangerously juvenile. Even if the US exerts diplomatic pressure, India mustn't oblige. Instead, India should put systems in place for crypto deterrence. Cutting-edge surveillance tools, forensic finance capabilities and offensive digital arsenals could be deployed against adversarial scenarios of crypto being used as a Trojan horse to destabilize our financial system. Just as strategic weapons are kept discreet, so must this. The future of finance may well be digital. But that future must be guided by sovereign plans, not determined by offshore hype or patronage games. In the crypto age, our sovereignty must be defended with the same strategic intent that we apply to borders, seas, airspace and cyberspace. Crypto is now a geopolitical instrument and potentially a vector of strategic harm. It needs to be viewed as a weaponizable tool, even as we secure our financial architecture from any threat it may pose. This is no longer a matter for committees to discuss. It is a political decision—one that cannot be deferred without consequences. The author is a corporate advisor and author of 'Family and Dhanda'

Israeli military recovers bodies of two hostages taken by Hamas
Israeli military recovers bodies of two hostages taken by Hamas

Hindustan Times

time14 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Israeli military recovers bodies of two hostages taken by Hamas

The Israeli military has found the bodies of two hostages who were being held by Hamas, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Thursday, reported Reuters. According to Israeli forces, bodies were recovered during a special mission in Khan Younis, a city located in the southern Gaza Strip. 'Following the recovery of two bodies, 56 hostages are still held by Hamas, with fewer than half believed to be alive,' the Israeli army said, based on their latest estimates. Netanyahu added that the victims were identified as Judi Weinstein-Haggai and her husband, Gad Haggai. The war between Israel and Hamas began after a deadly attack on October 7, 2023. On that day, gunmen led by Hamas killed 1,200 people in Israel and took 251 others as hostages, according to Israeli figures. Since then, the fighting has led to heavy losses. Health officials in Gaza say more than 54,000 Palestinians have been killed during the conflict.

US-China trade tensions threaten tech partnerships
US-China trade tensions threaten tech partnerships

First Post

time20 minutes ago

  • First Post

US-China trade tensions threaten tech partnerships

As both the US and China accuse each other of violating the 90-day trade truce agreed upon in May, tech partnership between the world's top two economies is falling apart brick by brick read more Trade tensions between the US and China have escalated again as the world's two largest economies accuse each other of breaching the 90-day trade truce agreed upon in May. On Monday (June 2), Beijing accused the US of breaching the agreement after US President Donald Trump said China had ' totally violated ' it. The Chinese Commerce Ministry said that while China had upheld the deal, the US introduced 'discriminatory and restrictive measures' that 'severely undermine' the agreement. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Tech decoupling in full swing One of the many fallouts of this trade tussle is that the tech partnership between the two countries is falling apart. Last month, the Trump administration intensified its crackdown on Huawei , saying that the use of the Chinese technology giant's artificial intelligence (AI) chips could trigger criminal penalties under US export control laws. In a statement, the US Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) said, 'Using Huawei Ascend chips anywhere in the world violates US export controls.' The BIS maintains that the chips are 'likely to have been designed with certain US software or technology or produced with semiconductor manufacturing equipment that is the direct product of certain US-origin software or technology, or both.' Meanwhile, Reuters reported last month that Washington has ordered a broad swathe of companies to stop shipping goods to China without a license and revoked licenses already granted to certain suppliers. Several US firms have received letters from the Trump administration over the past few weeks, highlighting the new restrictions. The agency quoted sources as saying the letters were sent to firms shipping electronic design automation (EDA) software for semiconductors. China forcing Apple Intelligence rollout delays There are allegations that China might also be doubling down on punitive measures against US firms as trade war leverage. According to media reports, Apple's rollout of intelligence services in China is being held up by regulators. Apple is working with Alibaba to launch Apple Intelligence for Chinese users. The software would also be embedded in Alibaba devices. However, China's internet authority is sitting over approval requests. Experts are linking the approval delays to trade tensions between the two nations. Apple's business interests have been hit hard as these restrictions put local competitors Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo and Vivo in an advantageous position. The firm's business is already shrinking in the world's second-largest economy. At the start of 2023, Apple dominated the Chinese smartphone market with a 70 per cent share, while Huawei languished at 13 per cent. However, by the first quarter of this year, Apple's share dropped to below 50 per cent while Huawei's rose to 35 per cent. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump-Xi talks soon This tech decoupling is expected to continue as long as trade tensions simmer. Trump is expected to talk to China's Xi Jinping in the coming days, as confirmed by US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. 'Maybe it's a glitch in the Chinese system; maybe it's intentional. We'll see after the president speaks with the party chairman,' Bessent said, referring to Xi. Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, also hoped that the two leaders would have a 'wonderful conversation'. 'President Trump, we expect, is going to have a wonderful conversation about the trade negotiations this week with President Xi,' he said on the ABC News program 'This Week.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store