
The CDC Opposes RFK Jr.'s COVID Vaccine Guidance, Saying Children 'May Receive' Their Shots
On Tuesday, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. stated that the CDC will no longer recommend COVID-19 vaccinations for pregnant people and healthy children. A mere two days later, the CDC seemingly contradicted that advice with its newly updated Child and Adolescent Immunization Schedule with what it calls "shared clinical decision-making" for children aged 6 months to 17 years who are not moderately or severely immunocompromised.
"Shared clinical decision-making vaccinations are individually based and informed by a decision process between the health care provider and the patient or parent/guardian," states the CDC. "Where the parent presents with a desire for their child to be vaccinated, children 6 months and older may receive COVID-19 vaccination, informed by the clinical judgment of a healthcare provider and personal preference and circumstances."
This means that health insurance providers will still be required to cover the COVID-19 vaccinations for kids in this age group. According to the New York Times, this also means the shots will continue to be available to the 38 million low-income children under the Vaccines for Children program.
But what about pregnant people? According to the NYT, the CDC's official position is "no guidance." This contradicts a still-live CDC web page updated Sept. 10, 2024, stating that pregnant people are at increased risk for COVID-19 and resulting complications such as preterm birth or stillbirth. That same web page also states that COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy is safe and effective and that these vaccines are not associated with fertility problems in women or men.
What RFK Jr. had to say
In a shift to federal public health guidance, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced on May 27 that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention will no longer encourage COVID-19 vaccinations for pregnant people and healthy children. The pivot, shared by Kennedy in a 58-second video posted to X, formerly Twitter, marks a significant departure from the CDC's stance just two weeks ago, when it reiterated the importance of high-risk groups, which included expecting parents.
"I couldn't be more pleased to announce that as of today, the COVID vaccine for healthy children and healthy pregnant women has been removed from the CDC recommended immunization schedule," Kennedy said, flanked by Jay Bhattacharya, director of the National Institutes of Health, and FDA Commissioner Marty Makary.
The trio framed the decision as a return to evidence-based policymaking. Makary said "no evidence" supports healthy children benefit from routine COVID vaccination, while Bhattacharya called the update "common sense and good science."
The update comes just after a similar policy announcement from the Trump administration, which last week stated it would no longer recommend annual COVID shots for younger adults and children. Instead, older adults (65 and up), and anyone over six months with underlying conditions like diabetes, obesity, chronic respiratory diseases or cancer will be prioritized in vaccination efforts.
Meanwhile, pregnant people appear to have been reclassified under RFK Jr.'s guidance and are no longer encouraged to get COVID-19 vaccines.
The CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices is scheduled to meet on June 25 to finalize COVID-19 vaccine recommendations for this fall.
What does this new COVID-19 vaccine guidance mean for families?
The new CDC versus RFK Jr. guidance may leave parents or pregnant people wondering how to move forward. While the change reflects a broader approach based on individual risk assessment, it also places more responsibility on families to navigate complex medical decisions without the same level of clear federal direction.
The new CDC guidelines state that children 6 months and older may receive the COVID-19 vaccination as long as a healthcare provider and parent agree.
The guidance is more unclear for pregnant people. This change reopens the debate about whether vaccination during pregnancy remains a protective measure or an unnecessary risk.
What should you do now?
Here are a few tips for navigating the latest vaccine guidance changes and making the most informed decisions for yourself and your family.
Talk to your doctor
Any medical decisions, especially during pregnancy and for young children, should be consulted with your primary care provider or OB-GYN. They can help you determine individual needs and risks.
Assess your risk factors
The COVID-19 vaccination guidelines state that it is "especially important to get your 2024-2025 COVID-19 vaccine if you're ages 65 and older, are at high risk for severe COVID-19 or have never received a COVID-19 vaccine." The same goes for children and adults who are moderately to severely immunocompromised, but guidelines vary based on age and vaccination history.
You may also want to check COVID levels in your area to further assess your risk.
Stay informed
As federal health guidance evolves, it's important to monitor updates from reputable and trusted medical sources, including your state health department and professional medical associations.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
8 minutes ago
- CBS News
Transcript: Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan," June 1, 2025
The following is the transcript of an interview with Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi, Democrat of Illinois, that aired on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan" on June 1, 2025. MARGARET BRENNAN: We turn now to the top Democrat on the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, that's Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi. He's in Illinois. Good morning to you. I want to get-- REP. KRISHNAMOORTHI: --Good morning. MARGARET BRENNAN: I want to get straight to it. You heard from the Secretary of State this week that the State Department is going to work with Homeland Security to aggressively revoke visas for Chinese students, including those with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields. There are like 300,000 Chinese students with visas in this country. The U.S. government already has a heightened level of vetting. What's going to change? REP. KRISHNAMOORTHI: I don't know. There's not enough details, but what it looks like if they're targeting all people of Chinese origin who are on international student visas because he's not limiting it to just people who might have ties to the Chinese Communist Party, and if they do have those ties, they don't belong here, especially if they're committing nefarious acts. However, this appears to be much broader and it's terribly misguided and it appears prejudicial and discriminatory. My own father was, came here on an international student visa. And I believe that these people are vital for our economy and for entrepreneurship in this country. And I think this is going to harm America more than help. MARGARET BRENNAN: You said if someone has ties to the Chinese Communist Party they shouldn't be here. Does that mean all the, the students who are children of leaders, for example Xi Jinping's own daughter, shouldn't have been allowed here? REP. KRISHNAMOORTHI: Well, if they were engaged in nefarious activities and if they are somehow deeply connected to the CCP, I think that we should be very careful. But in this particular case, they're not only going after people who might fall in that category, but it's anybody who is from China, including Hong Kong by the way, where people are actually persecuted for various freedoms they're trying to exercise, and who come here seeking to exercise those freedoms. So this is a terrible, terribly misguided policy. MARGARET BRENNAN: The Biden administration did conduct heightened vetting, as you know, of Chinese students. Do you think that there is a legitimate argument for expanding this, that certain areas should just be off limits? REP. KRISHNAMOORTHI: I think that you should definitely have heightened vetting, especially in certain critical areas because we know that the CCP tries to steal, for instance, intellectual property or worse. But the way that this is currently structured looks very, very suspicious and you have to remember that the people that are cheering for this policy, what Marco Rubio had called for, is the Chinese Communist Party. Why? Because they want these people back. They want the scientists and the entrepreneurs and the engineers who can come and help their economy. And so we are probably helping them, as well as other countries, more than helping ourselves with this policy. MARGARET BRENNAN: The Defense Secretary is traveling in Asia right now and he said in a defense forum speech that Beijing is quote "concretely and credibly preparing to use military force." He said their military is rehearsing. Take a listen. PETE HEGSETH: Any attempt by Communist China to conquer Taiwan by force would result in devastating consequences for the Indo-Pacific and the world. There's no reason to sugar coat it. The threat China poses is real and it could be imminent. MARGARET BRENNAN: He did not say what the consequences would be. Are you encouraged by what appears to be a statement of support for allies? REP. KRISHNAMOORTHI: I am. I think what he's saying is largely correct, but I think the problem is at the same time he says that, either Donald Trump or even him or others say other things that push away our friends, partners and allies in the region and cause confusion. And so we need to be consistent and thoughtful with regard to our statements, and we need to be also very methodical about our actions in trying to curb military aggression by the Chinese Communist Party in the South China Sea and with regard to Taiwan. MARGARET BRENNAN: Since you track U.S. intelligence, I wanted to ask you if you have any insight into what appears to be the swarm of Ukrainian drones that has destroyed 40 Russian military aircraft deep inside Russian territory overnight. Sources are telling our Jennifer Jacobs that the White House wasn't aware that this attack was planned. What can you tell us about the level of US intelligence sharing with Ukraine right now and helping them with their targets? REP. KRISHNAMOORTHI: I don't want to get into classified information, but what I can say is that it's a little bit more strained in light of what Donald Trump has said recently. The one thing that I can also say is that Trump was right the other day to say that Putin is crazy in the way that he's going after civilian areas in Ukraine repeatedly, and so the Ukrainians are striking back. At the end of the day, the only way that we can bring these hostilities to an end is by strengthening the hand of the Ukrainians. Trump should, at this point, realize that Putin is playing him and aid the Ukrainians in their battlefield efforts. That's the best way to get to some type of armistice or truce at the negotiating table sooner rather than later. MARGARET BRENNAN: All right, Congressman Krishnamoorthi thank you for your insights today.


Forbes
8 minutes ago
- Forbes
Elon Musk Doesn't Agree With Every Trump Administration Action
Elon Musk—a key adviser to President Donald Trump who left his formal role in the government Friday—said in an interview with CBS News earlier in the week he thought criticism of his Department of Government Efficiency was 'unfair' and said he doesn't want to 'take responsibility for everything this administration's doing.' President Donald Trump speaks during a news conference with Elon Musk on May 30, 2025 inside the ... More Oval Office at the White House in Washington. During an interview with CBS News, Musk initially shied away from questions about the impact of Trump's tariffs on his businesses before openly discussing DOGE and what he said were 'unfair' criticisms. 'If there was some cut, real or imagined, everyone would blame DOGE,' Musk told CBS News' David Pogue. He went on to discuss the administration more broadly, saying, 'it's not like I agree with everything the administration does … So it's like, I mean, I agree with much of what the administration does. But we have differences of opinion.' Musk said he doesn't want to 'take responsibility for everything this administration's doing,' but if he brought up his disagreements publicly it 'creates a bone of contention,' saying, 'I'm a little stuck in a bind.' On Tuesday, CBS News released a clip of the interview in which Musk criticized the 'big, beautiful bill' Trump has been advocating for in Congress. The clip showed Musk saying he was 'disappointed' about the bill, which he said 'increases the budget deficit, not just decreases it, and undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing.' The comments quickly made headlines, and the following day Musk confirmed his official departure from the government. Musk endorsed Trump and became a megadonor after an assassination attempt on the president while he was campaigning in July, and Musk ended up giving more than $200 million to help Trump get elected. After he won a second term in November, Trump announced Musk would lead the Department of Government Efficiency, which the president said would 'slash excess regulations, cut wasteful expenditures, and restructure Federal Agencies.' Musk became a special government employee—which limited his service term to 130 days—when Trump was inaugurated, and he began the work of slashing the federal workforce and spending. DOGE's work—which included laying off hundreds of thousands of federal employees—drew bipartisan criticism and a number of legal challenges that are still playing out in court. Trump regularly praised Musk, though, and Friday when the pair were discussing Musk's government departure, Trump thanked Musk for the 'colossal change' DOGE spearheaded and said he thinks Musk will continue helping the government. 'I'll continue to be visiting here and be a friend and adviser' to Trump, Musk said Friday at a press conference with the president. $2 trillion. That's initially how much Musk said DOGE would save the government, though he later lowered the estimate to $1 trillion. DOGE's website claims it has so far saved the government an estimated $175 billion, though the website has frequently featured errors like counting contracts multiple times, using 'billions' when it meant to report 'millions,' and more, according to The New York Times. A reporter from CNN estimated last week that less than half of the $175 billion figure is supported with documentation on DOGE's sites. Trump privately questioned whether Musk and DOGE could follow through on the amount of cuts they said they would make, according to a report in The Wall Street Journal Saturday. Unnamed officials in the administration told the Journal Trump asked, 'was it all bullshit?' and wondered if Musk could actually cut $1 trillion in government spending. Forbes estimates Musk has a net worth of about $422.7 billion as of Sunday morning, making him the wealthiest person in the world. Trump Defends Spending Bill After Musk Says It 'Undermines' DOGE Cuts (Forbes) Elon Musk on DOGE and why he doesn't want to "take responsibility for everything the administration's doing" (CBS News) Trump Defends Spending Bill After Musk Says It 'Undermines' DOGE Cuts (Forbes) Trump Questioned Extent Of Musk's DOGE Cuts, Report Says (Forbes)


Fox News
33 minutes ago
- Fox News
WATCH LIVE: New Jersey gubernatorial candidate Jack Ciattarelli holds rally
All times eastern FOX News Radio Live Channel Coverage WATCH LIVE: New Jersey gubernatorial candidate Jack Ciattarelli holds rally