
Nature In The Balance: EDS Wraps Up Landmark Dollars And Sense Conference
The conference explored how to reshape land use practices to enhance biodiversity and carbon resilience. Speakers including Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment Simon Upton raised concerns about perverse incentives driving pine afforestation …
The Environmental Defence Society (EDS) has concluded its landmark 2025 Dollars and Sense Conference in Tāmaki Makaurau Auckland, drawing together over 350 delegates across government, business, iwi, academia, and civil society for three days of frank, future-focused conversation on aligning economic systems with ecological realities.
The conference, subtitled Making the Economy Work for Nature, comes at a pivotal moment for Aotearoa New Zealand. The Government talks a lot about economic growth. But the question asked at the conference was: how can we achieve that growth while also restoring and protecting our natural environment? And to what extent is the long term prosperity of the country dependant on thriving nature?
The event opened with an oceans symposium, which you can read about here, and was followed by two full days of intensive discussion on climate change, energy, biodiversity, freshwater, land use, environmental law reform, and the green economy.
Day one began with sobering international and local updates on biodiversity loss, climate instability and systemic risks, urging more adaptive governance and stronger investment in prevention and resilience. We are in a moment of accelerating risk, but we are not without options. The challenge is having the courage to take them.
The conference explored how to reshape land use practices to enhance biodiversity and carbon resilience. Speakers including Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment Simon Upton raised concerns about perverse incentives driving pine afforestation in our rural landscapes. Many called for greater support for place-based native ecosystem restoration and more robust data systems.
Te Maire Tau challenged delegates to rethink environmental governance through a te ao Māori lens, including proposals for smart water markets that internalise environmental costs and ensure shared obligations. Legal personhood for nature and recognition of mauri in environmental decision-making were highlighted as models with growing potential.
A central theme was the opportunity within the green economy. EU Ambassador Lawrence Meredith offered insight into Europe's progress toward net zero, while Dr Rod Carr outlined the economic logic of energy transformation. 'The business case is made. The technology is proven. The funding is available,' said Dr Carr. 'Our choices are the only thing in the way.' Sir Ian Taylor urged us to 'fast track to the future' and not to the past.
Resource management reform was another major focus. Reforming the Resource Management Act has the potential to deliver win-wins for the economy and nature. But delegates heard very little of that from Minister Bishop and Under Secretary Simon Court. While many acknowledged the need for change, there was deep concern about the current direction of travel, described by some as dis-integrated and driven by political urgency rather than long-term environmental planning. Multiple speakers expressed frustration about the erosion of environmental protections and the absence of robust national bottom lines.
The over-arching message from the conference was that nature is not a handbrake on economic growth. The two can go hand in hand and need to do so. But this will require clear-headed and clever thinking on the issues, something that has been lacking in recent political discourse.
'This year marks the 20th anniversary of EDS's environmental conferences. For two decades we've been creating spaces for these vital conversations. Finding solutions has never been more important,' said EDS CEO Gary Taylor.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scoop
3 hours ago
- Scoop
Changes To Fish & Game Continue Coalition's Handover Of Power To Polluters
Press Release – Choose Clean Water Choose Clean Water spokesperson Tom Kay says the changes announced today are clearly designed to remove Fish & Games ability to advocate for the health of rivers. Changes announced to Fish & Game this morning are another move in the Coalition Government's handover of power to intensive farming and other polluting commercial interests, and will result in the further degradation of our rivers and freshwater, say freshwater campaigners. Choose Clean Water spokesperson Tom Kay says the changes announced today are clearly designed to remove Fish & Game's ability to advocate for the health of rivers. 'Fish & Game has used its statutory purpose as a strong advocate for the health of rivers across New Zealand, and as such has helped protect numerous rivers from pollution and degradation.' 'There are some things about the system that do need fixing, but this is not only about that—this is the Coalition Govt taking advantage of an opportunity to reduce Fish & Game's influence over polluters.' 'When environmental groups, local community groups, or iwi can't afford to legally challenge a damaging activity or poorly made decision, Fish & Game is often there to ensure waterways are protected—working on behalf of their members to protect habitat for fish. But this Government is trying to stop that.' The Coalition has stated that Fish & Game's advocacy functions will be 'revised' so regional Fish & Game Councils will only be able to take court action in relation to advocacy if explicitly approved by the New Zealand Fish & Game Council or the Minister and within a new restricted advocacy policy. This morning's press release from Minister for Hunting and Fishing James Meager on the changes states they will restrict the organisation's ability to undertake court proceedings and require 'Fish & Game councils to better consider the interests of other stakeholders such as farmers and the aviation sector in decision-making'. 'It's telling that the Government has said specifically that it wants Fish & Game to better consider farming interests. Why not public health interests? Why not the interests of future generations? Why not the myriad of other commercial interests that operate in our communities? This demonstrates that this decision is another example of the Government enabling more pollution in rivers, lakes, and drinking water sources, and the handing of more power over our water to polluting commercial interests like intensive farming.' 'We know how detrimental the influence of Ministers can be over the statutory purposes of agencies like the Department of Conservation to protect our environment, for example. This is another case of Ministers being given the power to step in and stop actions that would protect our environment.' Fish & Game led the processes to secure many Water Conservation Orders —similar to National Parks—for our rivers, protecting them for anglers and the public alike to enjoy. In 2002 they launched a large campaign against 'Dirty Dairying' and the conversion of land into intensive agriculture, particularly in the South Island. More recently, Fish & Game took up a legal challenge against ongoing extreme pollution of Southland's waterways where dairy interests were wrongly claiming 'there is no evidence of diffuse discharges from farming activities, either individually or cumulatively, causing adverse effects, including significant adverse effects on aquatic life'. 'Proponents of damaging, intensive agriculture and other major polluters are all over this Government's decisions. This decision stinks of undue influence.'


Scoop
4 hours ago
- Scoop
Regional Event Promotion Fund Announcement
Press Release – Destination Hauraki Coromandel The Regional Events Promotion Fund has now supported 284 events across the motu, helping boost visitation and supporting local economies through tourism-driven initiatives. Three regional events in Hauraki Coromandel have secured funding through the Government's Regional Events Promotion Fund (REPF), aimed at increasing domestic tourism and supporting regional economies. The successful recipients are: 2026 New Zealand Women's Surfing Festival – $5,500 Whangamatā Half Marathon – $6,000 Wings and Wheels – $5,000 The REPF is available to Regional Tourism Organisations and is designed to support local events that attract domestic visitors, with a focus on driving visitation during the shoulder and off-peak seasons. A total of $5 million has been made available over two years via the International Visitor Conservation and Tourism Levy, with the aim of dispersing tourism benefits across the country. Tourism and Hospitality Minister Louise Upston says, 'Investing in these events has a direct impact, with visitors spending money in local cafés, businesses and accommodation providers, driving economic activity in our growing regional tourism, our remote and rural communities can benefit from the economic opportunities it brings.' Megan Nunn, Marketing Manager of Destination Hauraki Coromandel, says the funding support will make a tangible difference for local event organisers. 'We're really pleased to have received support through the Regional Events Promotion Fund. It's encouraging to see investment in events that reflect the character of our region and draw visitors beyond the peak period. These kinds of events help showcase the depth of experiences on offer across Hauraki Coromandel throughout the year.' The Regional Events Promotion Fund has now supported 284 events across the motu, helping boost visitation and supporting local economies through tourism-driven initiatives.


Scoop
4 hours ago
- Scoop
Changes To Fish & Game Continue Coalition's Handover Of Power To Polluters
Press Release – Choose Clean Water Choose Clean Water spokesperson Tom Kay says the changes announced today are clearly designed to remove Fish & Games ability to advocate for the health of rivers. Changes announced to Fish & Game this morning are another move in the Coalition Government's handover of power to intensive farming and other polluting commercial interests, and will result in the further degradation of our rivers and freshwater, say freshwater campaigners. Choose Clean Water spokesperson Tom Kay says the changes announced today are clearly designed to remove Fish & Game's ability to advocate for the health of rivers. 'Fish & Game has used its statutory purpose as a strong advocate for the health of rivers across New Zealand, and as such has helped protect numerous rivers from pollution and degradation.' 'There are some things about the system that do need fixing, but this is not only about that—this is the Coalition Govt taking advantage of an opportunity to reduce Fish & Game's influence over polluters.' 'When environmental groups, local community groups, or iwi can't afford to legally challenge a damaging activity or poorly made decision, Fish & Game is often there to ensure waterways are protected—working on behalf of their members to protect habitat for fish. But this Government is trying to stop that.' The Coalition has stated that Fish & Game's advocacy functions will be 'revised' so regional Fish & Game Councils will only be able to take court action in relation to advocacy if explicitly approved by the New Zealand Fish & Game Council or the Minister and within a new restricted advocacy policy. This morning's press release from Minister for Hunting and Fishing James Meager on the changes states they will restrict the organisation's ability to undertake court proceedings and require 'Fish & Game councils to better consider the interests of other stakeholders such as farmers and the aviation sector in decision-making'. 'It's telling that the Government has said specifically that it wants Fish & Game to better consider farming interests. Why not public health interests? Why not the interests of future generations? Why not the myriad of other commercial interests that operate in our communities? This demonstrates that this decision is another example of the Government enabling more pollution in rivers, lakes, and drinking water sources, and the handing of more power over our water to polluting commercial interests like intensive farming.' 'We know how detrimental the influence of Ministers can be over the statutory purposes of agencies like the Department of Conservation to protect our environment, for example. This is another case of Ministers being given the power to step in and stop actions that would protect our environment.' Fish & Game led the processes to secure many Water Conservation Orders —similar to National Parks—for our rivers, protecting them for anglers and the public alike to enjoy. In 2002 they launched a large campaign against 'Dirty Dairying' and the conversion of land into intensive agriculture, particularly in the South Island. More recently, Fish & Game took up a legal challenge against ongoing extreme pollution of Southland's waterways where dairy interests were wrongly claiming 'there is no evidence of diffuse discharges from farming activities, either individually or cumulatively, causing adverse effects, including significant adverse effects on aquatic life'. 'Proponents of damaging, intensive agriculture and other major polluters are all over this Government's decisions. This decision stinks of undue influence.'