Sir John A. Macdonald statue now visible outside Queen's Park for first time in nearly 5 years
A statue of Canada's first prime minister John A. MacDonald is seen outside Queen's Park in Toronto on June 11, 2025. (CTV News Toronto)
After nearly five years hidden behind plywood, a statue of Sir John A. Macdonald at the edge of Queen's Park is back in the open air.
Hoarding and scaffolding that had surrounded the granite likeness of Canada's first prime minister was removed starting Wednesday morning.
The statue had been covered since it was splashed with bright pink paint in July 2020 in a summer of protests following the murder of George Floyd, and as Canadians came to terms with history of residential schools.
A man places flowers on a statue of Sir John A. Macdonald after demonstrators threw pink paint on it at Queen's Park in Toronto on Saturday, July 18, 2020. The man said it was disappointing to see the statue vandalized and the flower were to show his...
A man places flowers on a statue of Sir John A. Macdonald after demonstrators threw pink paint on it at Queen's Park in Toronto on Saturday, July 18, 2020. The man said it was disappointing to see the statue vandalized and the flower were to show his respect to Sir John A. Macdonald.THE CANADIAN PRESS/Carlos Osorio
Across the country, statues of Macdonald—who is considered an architect of the residential school system—became the targets of vandalism.
Last month, a committee that has been mulling over what to do with the Macdonald statue at the Ontario legislature voted to clean the statue and remove its covering.
John A. MacDonald
Hoarding covers the statue of Canada's first prime minister John A. MacDonald outside Queen's Park in Toronto. (CTV News Toronto)
The effigy has received a new protective coating to keep paint from sticking and will be under watch by legislative security.
Speaker Donna Skelly acknowledged Wednesday that Macdonald is a controversial figure and that the pain from residential schools remains raw.
'It's a part of history that we acknowledge, but we can't change that. What we can change is how we work with and reflect the roles of Indigenous peoples on the grounds of Queen's Park.'
Skelly says consultations with Indigenous people will continue, in search of a way to reflect the hurt caused by residential schools while celebrating the contributions Indigenous communities have made.
There is no timeline to come to a consensus.
At an unrelated event Wednesday, Deputy Premier Sylvia Jones welcomed the unveiling.
'I think it's frankly an exciting day to be reminded and acknowledge our history. And yes, history good and bad,' Jones said.
Sir John A. MacDonald
Hoarding covering the statue of Canada's first prime minister John A. MacDonald outside Queen's Park in Toronto was removed on Wed. June 11. (CTV News Toronto)
Speaking last month about the decision to unbox Macdonald, the eyes of Ontario's only First Nations MPP and a survivor of a residential school filled with tears.
'It's not just a statue,' Sol Mamakwa said. 'It's a statue of oppression. It is a statue of colonialism.'
Mamawka was not available for an interview Wednesday but noted on Instagram the statue's uncovering lands during Indigenous History month and on the heels of the passage of Bill 5.
The New Democrat MPP has predicted the statue will be vandalized again.
Skelly says she welcomes protests and sharing of concerns.
'But, we have to do it peacefully, and we have to do it respectfully, and we have to do it within the law.'
She adds that if laws are broken, there will be consequences.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Canada's UN vote on Israel criticized as departure from past position
Canada joined 148 other countries in voting in favour of a United Nations resolution that calls for an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire in the war in Gaza, despite opposition to the motion from the U.S. and Israel. The vote Thursday took place days after Ottawa imposed sanctions against two far-right Israeli cabinet ministers for 'inciting violence against Palestinians' in the West Bank, in a rare rebuke to an allied country. It's another example of how Canada's policy toward Israel appears to be shifting under Prime Minister Mark Carney, who took office in March. A major Jewish-Canadian lobby group condemned the Canadian government's vote, saying it marked a significant departure from Ottawa's previous position at the United Nations. 'The resolution makes no demand for Hamas to disarm or be excluded from Gaza's future. It ignores Israel's right to self-defence, dismisses its legitimate security concerns, and says nothing of the existential threat posed by a genocidal terrorist group,' the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs (CIJA) noted in a statement. CIJA noted that last September, when Justin Trudeau was still prime minister, Canada abstained from a similar UN resolution vote on the grounds, according to the Department of Global Affairs, that Canada could not 'support a resolution where one party, the state of Israel, is held solely responsible for the conflict.' The Jewish-Canadian group argued that Canada's vote will only embolden Hamas, the Palestinian militant group fighting Israel. Hamas is designated as a terrorist group by Ottawa. Canada, Western allies sanction two Israeli lawmakers for incitement of 'extremist violence' The resolution also called for the release of all hostages held by Hamas, and unrestricted access for the delivery of desperately needed food to 2 million Palestinians. The vote in the 193-member General Assembly was 149-12, with 19 abstentions. Speaking before the vote, Israel's UN Ambassador Danny Danon vehemently opposed the resolution. He denied that Israel was using starvation as a weapon of war, calling the accusation 'blood libel,' and insisted that aid is being delivered. Experts and human-rights workers say hunger is widespread in Gaza and that Palestinians are at risk of famine if Israel does not fully lift its blockade and halt its military campaign, which it renewed in March after ending a ceasefire with Hamas. Ottawa did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Bob Rae, Canada's ambassador to the United Nations in New York, told the General Assembly Thursday that the Canadian government 'profoundly regrets' that the resolution 'does not with explicit language, condemn Hamas's horrific terrorist attacks on October the 7th, 2023, in which over 1,200 people were killed' in Israel. He said Hamas's taking of hostages, 'many of whom were killed, still remain in captivity, and is entirely unacceptable to us and frankly, I think, to this assembly.' Mr. Rae said he is sorry that an amendment could not be made to the resolution, adding that Canada continues to condemn Hamas and 'it is clear that Hamas must disarm and that the organization cannot have any role to play in the future governance of Gaza.' Thursday's vote also comes ahead of a UN conference next week that aims to reinvigorate an international push for a two-state solution between Israel and the Palestinians. The United States has urged countries not to attend. NDP foreign affairs critic Heather McPherson said voting for the resolution is the 'bare minimum' Canada should be doing to help Gaza. She said Ottawa should be suspending its free-trade agreement with Israel, take more action to end all weapons trade with Israel and recognize the state of Palestine. Asked about the criticism of the Canadian government from CIJA, Ms. McPherson said the group 'seems very out of touch' on some things. 'There are children that are dying right now of hunger.' With reports from the Associated Press and Reuters
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Business groups urge Carney to pause Digital Services Tax in fear of Trump backlash
A group of Canadian business associations are pressing Prime Minister Mark Carney to pause the implementation of 'discriminatory' taxes that have spurred U.S. President Donald Trump to retaliate with proposed tax hikes. In a letter sent to Mr. Carney on Thursday, six industry associations representing a wide variety of businesses – including Canada's major banks, life insurers, retailers and the venture capital community – asked the government to pause the scheduled June 30 payment of the Digital Services Tax, which was introduced in 2024 and targets large U.S. technology companies. Canada passed the DST retroactively to 2022 after the Liberal government said it could no longer wait for a multilateral agreement to emerge from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development for taxing global tech giants, most of which are based in the U.S. The deadline for filling the first DST return for 2022-2024 and paying the tax is June 30. Canadian business groups press Ottawa on digital tax as U.S. bill targets investors Canada's Digital Services Tax and online regulation bills are likely Trump trade targets Implementing a DST in Canada was intended to ensure digital businesses that monetize the data and content of Canadian users are 'paying their fair share,' the federal government said in its 2024 budget document. The Canadian business groups said pausing the DST would allow negotiations ahead of – and at – the G7 summit next week, to continue without the 'risk of further escalation by the administration on current tariff actions that place considerable risk on Canadian businesses and families.' The DST is just one tax among a broader group of 'unfair' taxes Mr. Trump has flagged in his recent One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Other taxes on Mr. Trump's hit list are diverted profits taxes and the undertaxed profits rule, both of which are global initiatives meant to ensure multinational firms pay enough tax. Canada released draft legislation last year to implement a UTPR as an amendment to Canada's Global Minimum Tax Act, but did not table it in Parliament. The Canadian business associations' letter expresses concern that the DST, UTPR and GMT run counter to Mr. Carney's plan to build a single Canadian economy, strengthen relations with the U.S. and reduce costs for Canadians. 'The unintended consequence of the DST and other digital taxes is that they have handed the U.S. Administration a ready-made issue to rally support from U.S. lawmakers who are now working to retaliate,' the letter says. A key example is Section 899 of Mr. Trump's bill – a U.S. tax proposal that is targeting foreign jurisdictions that have implemented a discriminatory tax. The bill was recently passed by the U.S. House of Representatives, but still requires Senate approval. If Section 899 becomes law, Canadians could see withholding and income tax increase by five percentage points in the first year – rising to a maximum of 20 per cent for income tax and up to 50 per cent total for withholding tax, on any holding of an American asset held by a Canadian or the U.S. subsidiary of Canadian company. 'Every pension fund, retirement fund, investment account, and deeply interconnected investment funds with American holdings, held by the likes of teachers, municipal workers, elected officials, and regular everyday Canadian families, are at risk,' the Canadian business associations' letter says. If Canada wants to commit to building stronger ties with the U.S., the group said it cannot be achieved if Ottawa proceeds with its current timeline to collect a punitive retroactive tax on digital service companies on June 30. 'The dire downstream effects of this are still avoidable,' the letter says. Meanwhile, 21 members of the U.S. Congress have sent a letter of their own urging Mr. Trump to push Canada to drop the DST before the end of the month, when the first payment is due. In a June 11 letter, the U.S. Congress group said 90 per cent of what Canada would collect under its DST will come from U.S. firms. 'Allowing Canada to proceed with this unprecedented, retroactive tax on U.S. firms would send a signal to the rest of the world that they have the green light to proceed with similar discriminatory cash grabs targeting our firms, workers, and tax base,' the letter says. The June 11 letter, alongside another letter sent last week to the U.S. administration from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other trade groups, say that Canada has the regulatory authority to delay the date of payment and other provisions of the DST without having to pass new legislation. Canada's Department of Finance did not respond Thursday to a request for comment on the tax. The Canadian group of business associations – which consists of the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, Canadian Life and Health Insurance Association, Retail Council of Canada, Canadian Venture Capital Association, Future Borders Coalition and Canadian Bankers Association – said the current political climate and risks to the Canadian economy could not have been foreseen when the DST was first introduced. 'There is still time to correct course and demonstrate that Canada is serious about strengthening alliances, improving competitiveness, and restoring affordability,' the letter says. 'The alternative will lead Canada down a very difficult path.'
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
As it hosts G7, Canada under pressure to further boost military spending by tens of billions
Canada is facing hard budget choices as it plays host to the Group of Seven summit starting Sunday and prepares for a looming NATO meeting where Western allies will be asked to commit to further defence spending hikes in the face of rising threats from Russia and other rivals. Defence and security will be an underlying theme at the G7 forum in Kananaskis, Alta., where all but one of the member countries also belong to the NATO military alliance, which is poised to cement a new defence spending pact at The Hague one week later. The G7 includes Canada, the United States, Japan, Britain, Germany, France and Italy. A bigger NATO military spending target will place steep new demands on the federal treasury at a time when Canada's economy is hurting from trade wars with the United States and China, the federal budget deficit topped $43-billion last year and after a significant injection of defence money this month. It was only June 10 that Prime Minister Mark Carney unveiled $9.3-billion in new funding for Canada's military and announced the country's defence spending would hit 2 per cent of Gross Domestic Product. That meets the existing North Atlantic Treaty Organization expenditure target and represents a level of spending not seen in Canada since the Cold War. NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte has already announced that he expects member countries will agree to boost defence spending as a percentage of their annual economic output to 3.5 per cent. Plus, it's anticipated that NATO countries in late June will also agree to a separate but related target: a further 1.5 per cent of GDP for investments in security-related infrastructure and resources − for a total of 5 per cent. Opinion: Great new military spending, Canada. Where's the money going to come from? Hiking Canada's defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP would require Canada to spend an additional $45-billion to $50-billion each year on its military − above and beyond the investments that Mr. Carney announced this week, said David Perry, president of the Canadian Global Affairs Institute. At the same time, Mr. Carney's Liberals promised $20-billion over four years for nation-building projects including trade corridors, infrastructure and investments in the Arctic plus another $11.8-billion for housing through Build Canada Homes, a new agency for affordable housing. Recent polling by Nanos Research found 65.2-per-cent support among Canadians for raising spending to the current NATO target of 2 per cent but only lukewarm backing for a further boost to 5 per cent. Only 17.3 per cent of respondents embraced the higher benchmark. The poll of 1,120 Canadians was conducted June 1 to June 3 and is considered accurate to within 2.9 percentage points 19 times out of 20. Pollster Nik Nanos said public support for more military spending falls off beyond the current NATO target. 'Once we get beyond 2 per cent, politically, it's going to be much more difficult, because we might not be funding social programs or health care or other important priorities,' he said. 'And you know what the research suggests, at least now, is that things like jobs and the economy and health care are rising in importance.' He said Mr. Carney will have to persuade Canadians that further military spending will create more prosperity and jobs. He said the fact that U.S. President Donald Trump has linked increased defence spending and the Canada-U.S. trade relationship has made it easier to rationalize military budget increases in order to protect market access to the United States. Opinion: Can Canada have both guns and butter? Carney shows us, yes, we can Don Drummond, a former senior Finance Department official, said the federal government will have no choice but to raise taxes in the years ahead. He said Canada's finances are in a structural deficit that can't be solved by a growing economy and it's unfair to pass bigger debt loads onto future generations. 'The pot's not big enough: They only have two choices: cut transfers to provinces or raise taxes,' Mr. Drummond said of Ottawa. Personal and corporate income taxes are already too high, in his opinion, which only leaves the goods and services tax. Canada hasn't spent 3.5 per cent of its annual economic output on the military since the early 1960s. Few NATO countries have already surpassed 3.5 per cent. Among G7 countries, the United States was expected to hit 3.19 per cent in 2024, according to estimates in a recent NATO report. Britain was expected to reach 2.33 per cent, Germany, 2.10 per cent, France, 2.03 per cent and Italy 1.5 per cent. Japan, which embraced pacifism 80 years ago, has significantly hiked military spending in recent years and is on track to reach 2 per cent by 2027-2030. Former parliamentary budget officer Kevin Page said Canada could make defence spending a priority if it chooses. He noted that the Trudeau government made Indigenous people a priority and raised federal expenditures in this area by more than $50-billion annually over a 10-year period to more than $60-billion in 2023-24 He said he expects Canada to be on track to run a deficit of about $60-billion this fiscal year, depending on the fall federal budget. Mr. Page, now president of the University of Ottawa's Institute of Fiscal Studies and Democracy, said Canada has the fiscal margin of manoeuvre to keep running significant deficits given it's financially in better shape than some peer countries. Mr. Carney may be able to free up more financial capacity: the Liberal Party promised in the recent election campaign that it would attempt to save $28-billion over three years in spending cuts, including a cap on the size of the public service.
