Explained: The New US-Backed Gaza Aid Plan And Why UN Does Not Like It
United Nations:
A US-backed organization aims to start work in the Gaza Strip by the end of May, overseeing a new model of aid distribution in the Palestinian enclave, but the United Nations says the plan is not impartial or neutral, and it will not be involved.
WHAT IS THE GAZA HUMANITARIAN FOUNDATION?
Aid deliveries in Gaza will be overseen by the US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which was established in February in Switzerland, according to the Geneva commercial registry.
The foundation intends to work with private US security and logistics firms - UG Solutions and Safe Reach Solutions - according to a source familiar with the plan. A second source said the GHF has already received more than $100 million in commitments. It was not immediately clear where the money was coming from.
Senior US officials were working with Israel to enable the GHF to start work, acting US Ambassador to the UN Dorothy Shea told the Security Council this month, urging the UN and aid groups to cooperate. Israel said it will facilitate the GHF's work without being involved in aid deliveries.
HOW WOULD THE NEW PLAN WORK?
The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation said initially there will be four secure distribution sites - three in the south and one in central Gaza - and that "within the next month, additional sites will be opened, including in northern Gaza."
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Thursday that construction of the first distribution zones would be complete in the coming days and that Israel intends "to have large safe zones in the south of Gaza."
"The Palestinian population will move there for their own safety, while we conduct combat in other zones," Netanyahu said.
The GHF said it would "never participate in or support any form of forced relocation of civilians" and that there was no limit on the number of sites it could open, or where.
"The GHF will use security contractors to transport aid from border crossings to the secure distribution sites," it said in a statement. "Once the aid is at the sites, it will be distributed directly to the people of Gaza by civilian humanitarian teams."
Israel's UN Ambassador Danny Danon has said a few aid groups have agreed to work with the GHF. The names of those groups are not yet known.
The foundation said it is finalizing mechanisms to get aid to those who cannot access the distribution sites.
GHF also said it would not share any personally identifiable information of aid recipients with Israel and that the Israeli military "will not have a presence within the immediate vicinity of the distribution sites."
WHY WON'T THE UN WORK WITH THE NEW DISTRIBUTION MODEL?
The United Nations says the US-backed distribution plan does not meet its long-held principles of impartiality, neutrality and independence. UN aid chief Tom Fletcher has said time should not be wasted on the alternative proposal.
In a briefing to the Security Council, he explained what was wrong with the Israel-initiated plan: "It forces further displacement. It exposes thousands of people to harm ... It restricts aid to only one part of Gaza, while leaving other dire needs unmet. It makes aid conditional on political and military aims. It makes starvation a bargaining chip."
The UN Palestinian relief agency UNRWA has been described by the UN as the backbone of the aid operation in Gaza. However, Israel has accused the agency of anti-Israel incitement and its staff of being "involved in terrorist activities." The UN has vowed to investigate all accusations.
The GHF says working with Israel to develop "a workable solution is not a violation of humanitarian principles."
WHY HAS AN ALTERNATIVE AID DISTRIBUTION PLAN BEEN PROPOSED?
Israel stopped all aid deliveries to Gaza on March 2 after accusing Hamas of stealing aid, which the Palestinian militants deny, and demanding the release of all remaining hostages taken during an October 2023 attack on Israel that killed 1,200 people, according to Israeli tallies. That assault triggered the war, which Gaza authorities say has killed 53,000 people in the enclave.
In early April, Israel proposed what it described as "a structured monitoring and aid entry mechanism" for Gaza. It was swiftly rejected by UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, who said it risked "further controlling and callously limiting aid down to the last calorie and grain of flour."
Since then pressure had been growing on Israel to allow aid deliveries to resume. A global hunger monitor last week warned that half a million people face starvation - about a quarter of the population in the enclave - and US President Donald Trump acknowledged that "a lot of people are starving in Gaza."
Amid the stalemate over Israel's plan, Washington backed the newly-created GHF to oversee aid distribution.
The GHF announced last week that it aims to start work in Gaza by the end of May. In the meantime, Israel has allowed limited aid deliveries to resume this week under the existing distribution model.
WHAT WAS THE EXISTING AID DELIVERY PLAN?
Throughout the conflict, the United Nations has described its humanitarian operation in Gaza as opportunistic - facing problems with Israel's military operation, access restrictions by Israel into and throughout Gaza, and looting by armed gangs.
But the UN has said its aid distribution system works, and that was particularly proven during a two-month ceasefire, which was abandoned by Israel in mid-March. Israel first inspects and approves aid. It is then dropped off on the Gaza side of the border, where it was picked up by the UN and distributed.
"We do not need to reinvent yet another wheel," UN spokesperson Stephane Dujarric said on Monday. "We don't need a newly minted humanitarian partner to tell us how to do our work in Gaza."
Fletcher on Monday listed what the UN needs from Israel to scale up aid: at least two open crossings into Gaza - one in the north and one in the south; simplified, expedited procedures; no quotas; no access impediments in Gaza and no attacks when aid is being delivered; and being allowed to meet a range of needs, including food, water, hygiene, shelter, health, fuel and gas.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
37 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Israeli forces storm & seize Greta Thunberg's Gaza boat, white ‘chemical substance' sprayed
Activist Greta Thunberg urged her friends and family to campaign for her return in a pre-recorded message released after she and her colleagues were detained by the Israeli military in the process of blocking their Gaza-bound aid boat. Watch for all the updates.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
China's exports fall to 3-month low in May, factory output's value down to 2-year low
Amid a trade war with the United States, China's exports in May fell to a three-month low and factory-gate deflation stood at its worst in two years. read more China's May exports growth slowed to a three-month low as US tariffs slammed shipments, while factory-gate deflation deepened to its worst level in two years, heaping pressure on the world's second-largest economy on both the domestic and external fronts. Exports expanded 4.8 per cent year-on-year in value terms in May, slowing from the 8.1 per cent jump in April and missing the 5.0 per cent growth expected in a Reuters poll, customs data showed on Monday, despite a lowering of US tariffs on Chinese goods which had taken effect in early April. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Imports dropped 3.4 per cent year-on-year, deepening sharply from the 0.2 per cent decline in April and worse than the 0.9 per cent downturn expected in the Reuters poll. Exports had surged 12.4 per cent year-on-year and 8.1 per cent in March and April, respectively, as factories rushed shipments to the US and other overseas manufacturers to avoid US President Trump's hefty levies on China and the rest of the world. While exporters in China found some respite in May as Beijing and Washington agreed to suspend most of their levies for 90 days, tensions between the world's two largest economies remain high and negotiations are underway over issues ranging from China's rare earths controls to Taiwan. Trade representatives from China and the U.S. are meeting in London on Monday to resume talks after a phone call between their top leaders on Thursday. China's May trade surplus came in at $103.2 billion, up from the $96.18 billion the previous month. Beijing in May rolled out a series of monetary stimulus measures, including cuts to benchmark lending rates and a 500 billion yuan low-cost loan program for supporting elderly care and services consumption. The measures are aimed at cushioning the trade war's blow to an economy that relied on exports in its recovery from the pandemic shocks and a protracted property market slump. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Deflationary pressures Producer and consumer price data, released by the National Bureau of Statistics on the same day, showed that deflationary pressures worsened last month. The producer price index fell 3.3 per cent in May from a year earlier, after a 2.7 per cent decline in April and marked the deepest contraction in 22 months, while consumer prices extended declines, having dipped 0.1 per cent last month from a year earlier. Cooling factory activity also highlights the impact of US tariffs on the world's largest manufacturing hub, dampening faster services growth as suspense lingers over the outcome of US-China trade talks. (This is a wire copy. Except for the headline, the copy has not been edited by Firstpost staff.)
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Pakistan's delegation in U.K. following talks in U.S. over conflict with India
Pakistan's high-level delegation led by former foreign minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari has arrived in the U.K. following diplomatic engagements in New York over the recent military conflict with India, a media report said. The nine-member group on Sunday (June 8, 2025) held talks with United Nations representatives, diplomats from member states, and senior U.S. officials to present Pakistan's narrative on the conflict following the Pahalgam terror attack that claimed 26 lives, The Express Tribune reported. In response to the Pahalgam terror attack, India targeted terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, following which Islamabad resorted to military action, leading to clashes between the two countries' military. 'Our message was clear – Pakistan seeks peace,' former foreign secretary Jalil Abbas Jilani, a member of the delegation, said in Islamabad. Mr. Jilani said Islamabad sought the resolution of all issues, including the Indus Waters Treaty, through dialogue. Speaking to the media, lawmaker Khurram Dastgir highlighted the regional impact of the water dispute and called for the restoration of the 1960 World Bank-mediated treaty, which India said remained in abeyance until Islamabad ended its support for cross-border terrorism. 'We explained to U.S. officials that India's suspension of the treaty endangers the livelihood of 240 million people and undermines the region's stability,' he said. Mr. Dastgir stressed the water dispute was a matter of survival for Pakistan, asserting the country would not compromise on it. He pointed out that the Americans initially assumed the ceasefire brokered by U.S. President Donald Trump required no further involvement. "Our mission was to make them understand that intervention is necessary as India wants neither a neutral inquiry nor talks," he said. Mr. Trump claimed to have played a role in stopping hostilities between India and Pakistan following the Pahalgam attack, a claim rejected by India. New Delhi has rejected a third-party intervention on bilateral issues with Islamabad. Senator Sherry Rehman, another member of the group, said the mission was focused on advocating for peace and ensuring the water treaty and Kashmir issue remained on the international agenda. In the U.K., the delegation is expected to meet senior British officials to highlight Pakistan's stance on the conflict and its broader implications. British Foreign Secretary David Lammy recently visited both Islamabad and New Delhi. 'We want stability, but recognise the fragility of the situation, particularly in the context of terrorism,' Mr. Lammy had said in Pakistan.
