Trump 2025 Travel Ban Explained: Who is exempted? How will it affect you?
Nearly five months into his second term, US President Donald Trump has signed a sweeping new travel ban, targeting 12 countries with full entry suspensions and placing visa restrictions on seven others.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The executive order, signed on June 4, revives core elements of Trump's first-term immigration agenda and is scheduled to take effect at 12:01 am on Monday, June 9.
The move follows a deadly attack in Boulder, Colorado, allegedly carried out by an Egyptian national. While Egypt is not included in the ban, Trump used the incident to justify tougher scrutiny of countries with what he called 'poor vetting standards and high overstay risks.'
What is a travel ban?
A travel ban is a federal policy that restricts or prohibits nationals from specific countries from entering the United States. The scope of these bans can range from complete entry suspensions to targeted visa category limitations.
Which countries are affected?
The new order divides countries into two categories:
Complete travel ban (no entry permitted):
Afghanistan, Chad, Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Myanmar, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen.
Visa restrictions (certain categories suspended):
Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, Venezuela.
Why these countries?
The administration cited three primary justifications:
Weak document security and screening systems:
Countries such as Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen were flagged for issuing unreliable travel documents or failing to adequately screen outbound travellers.
High visa overstay rates:
Nations like Myanmar, Burundi, Laos, and Equatorial Guinea were included due to the large numbers of nationals overstaying temporary visas in the US.
Links to terrorism or state sponsorship of terror:
Iran, Afghanistan, Somalia, and Cuba were identified based on alleged associations with terrorism or insufficient cooperation with US counterterrorism measures.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
What are the exceptions?
According to the order, the following individuals are exempt:
Green card holders and legal permanent residents
Dual citizens (with one US passport)
Immediate family members of US citizens
Athletes, coaches, and teams travelling for global sporting events such as the 2026 FIFA World Cup and 2028 Olympics
Refugees already granted asylum
Afghans who assisted US military operations
Iranians fleeing religious persecution (particularly minorities)
How is this different from the 2017 travel ban?
T
rump's first travel ban in 2017, quickly dubbed the 'Muslim Ban,' was implemented without warning, sparking chaos at airports and a flurry of legal challenges. That order targeted predominantly Muslim-majority nations and was ultimately upheld by the US Supreme Court in 2018 after multiple revisions.
The 2025 order, while broader in scope, includes specific exemptions and provides a short implementation window. Its more measured rollout appears designed to avoid the logistical and legal backlash seen in 2017.
Timeline: Trump-era travel bans
January 27, 2017: Initial ban issued, targeting seven Muslim-majority countries.
March 6, 2017: Revised ban excludes Iraq, allows exemptions for visa and green card holders.
September 24, 2017: Third version includes Venezuela and North Korea.
June 26, 2018: Supreme Court upholds third version in 5–4 ruling.
January 31, 2020: Fourth expansion adds countries like Myanmar, Nigeria, and Eritrea.
June 4, 2025: Fifth and latest ban announced, affecting 19 nations in total.
The 2025 travel ban signals that immigration will once again be a defining policy axis of Trump's second term. Whether this new iteration withstands judicial scrutiny remains to be seen—but for now, the administration is betting that a more methodical rollout will mute resistance while reinforcing Trump's 'America First' doctrine.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
18 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
After AOC, Savannah Guthrie says Trump-Musk feud is ‘giving 7th grade girl' energy
Savannah Guthrie has shared her brutally honest thoughts about Elon Musk's explosive fallout with Donald Trump. During Friday's episode of Today, the 53-year-old co-host said that their ongoing feud is 'giving 7th-grade girl' energy. 'First of all, to just use TikTok language, it's giving 7th grade girl,' Guthrie said, adding, 'This back and forth, online, and from the Oval Office.' Co-host Craig Melvin laughed at her choice of words, while Meet the Press anchor Kristen Welker said, 'Savannah, you hit the nail on the head.' Also Read: Elon Musk's trans daughter Vivian reacts to his feud with Trump: 'I love…' Guthrie's scathing remark came as Good Morning America's Jonathan Karl revealed a June 6 conversation with Trump, where the president said he is 'not particularly interested' in speaking with Musk. The political correspondent noted that Trump called Musk, 'A man who has lost his mind.' The Today co-host is not the only one to publicly criticise the ongoing spat between Trump and the Tesla CEO. Democratic Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez told Spectrum 1 News on Thursday, saying, 'Oh man, the girls are fighting, aren't they?' Also Read: Jake Paul slams Donald Trump and Elon Musk for 'diss tweeting each other' 'You know, I would say that this was something that was a long time coming, where we've been seeing that these two huge egos were not long for being together in this world as friends,' Ocasio-Cortez went on, adding, 'And so I think this breakup, we've been seeing a long time coming. But we'll see what the impacts are of it legislatively.' Earlier this week, Musk wrote on X, 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.'
The Hindu
27 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Russia calls Ukraine war ‘existential', strikes back
The Kremlin said on Friday (June 6, 2025) the Ukraine war was 'existential' for Russia after it launched a wave of retaliatory drone and missile strikes that killed three rescue workers in Kyiv. The comments are Moscow's latest to dampen hopes for a breakthrough amid a flurry of meetings between Russian and Ukrainian delegations, as well as telephone calls between President Vladimir Putin and U.S. President Donald Trump, aimed at stopping the fighting. On Friday (June 6, 2025) — days after the second round of Ukrainian-Russian ceasefire negotiations in Turkey ended without meaningful progress — the Kremlin cast its three-year invasion as nothing short of a battle for the "future" of Russia. 'For us it is an existential issue, an issue of our national interest, safety, our future and the future of our children, of our country,' Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters, responding to remarks by Mr. Trump on Thursday (June 5, 2025) comparing Moscow and Kyiv to brawling children. Mr. Peskov's comments came shortly after the Russian defence ministry said its forces had launched the "massive" missile and drone strike in "response" to recent attacks by Kyiv on its territory. Ahead of the talks this week in Istanbul, an audacious Ukrainian drone attack damaged nuclear-capable military planes at Russian air bases, including thousands of kilometres behind the front lines in Siberia. Mr. Putin had told Mr. Trump he would retaliate for the brazen operation, 18 months in the planning, in which Ukraine smuggled more than 100 small drones into Russia, parked them near Russian air bases and unleashed them in a coordinated attack. 'A farce' Despite recent rounds of peace talks, Mr. Putin has repeatedly rejected a ceasefire and has instead issued a host of sweeping demands on Ukraine if it wants to halt the fighting. They include completely pulling troops out of four regions claimed by Russia, but which its army does not fully control, an end to Western military support, and a ban on Ukraine joining NATO. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has dismissed the demands as old ultimatums, questioned the purpose of more such talks and called for a summit to be attended by him, Mr. Putin and Mr. Trump. Kyiv said the retaliatory Russian barrage overnight consisted of 45 missiles and 407 drones. AFP journalists heard air raid sirens and explosions ring out over the capital throughout the night. Mr. Zelenskyy, who has repeatedly said Russia wants the war to continue, responded with a call for allies to 'decisively' ramp up pressure on Russia. 'Are we supposed to believe in a ceasefire after today?' Alicia, a Kyiv resident and marketing specialist, told AFP near one of the strike sites in Kyiv. 'I think it's a farce, and it was clear from the very beginning that there would be no truce. Our enemies are not interested in this at all,' she added. Mr. Zelensky said at least three people had been killed in the capital and that Russia had targeted nine regions of Ukraine, including Lviv and Volyn in the west, which border EU and NATO member Poland. In the western city of Lutsk, rescuers in the afternoon pulled the body of a dead man from the rubble of a nine-storey building hit overnight, the interior ministry said.
NDTV
28 minutes ago
- NDTV
'Irreparable Harm' To Career, Family: Detained Columbia Graduate Pleads For Release
Quick Read Summary is AI generated, newsroom reviewed. Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia graduate facing deportation due to his pro-Palestinian activism, details the emotional toll of his detention, missing his child's birth and losing job opportunities. A judge questions the constitutionality of his deportation. New York: A Columbia graduate facing deportation over his pro-Palestinian activism on campus has outlined the "irreparable harm" caused by his continued detention as a federal judge weighs his release. Mahmoud Khalil said in court filings unsealed Thursday that the "most immediate and visceral harms" he's faced in his months detained in Louisiana relate to missing out on the birth of his first child in April. "Instead of holding my wife's hand in the delivery room, I was crouched on a detention center floor, whispering through a crackling phone line as she labored alone," the 30-year-old legal U.S. resident wrote. "When I heard my son's first cries, I buried my face in my arms so no one would see me weep." He also cited potentially "career-ending" harms from the ordeal, noting that Oxfam International has already rescinded a job offer to serve as a policy adviser. Even his mother's visa to come to the U.S. to help care for his infant son is also now under federal review, Khalil said. "As someone who fled prosecution in Syria for my political beliefs, for who I am, I never imagined myself to be in immigration detention, here in the United States," he wrote. "Why should protesting this Israel government's indiscriminate killing of thousands of innocent Palestinians result in the erosion of my constitutional rights?" Department of Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin responded that Khalil should simply self-deport, taking advantage of the administration's offer of $1,000 and a free flight to those in the country illegally that use its CBP Home app. Khalil obtained a green card, but the Trump administration says it is revoking it. Khalil's 13-page statement was among a number of legal declarations his lawyers filed highlighting the wide-ranging negative impacts of his arrest. Dr. Noor Abdalla, his U.S. citizen wife, described the challenges of not having her husband to help navigate their son's birth and the first weeks of his young life. Students and professors at Columbia wrote about the chilling effect Khalil's arrest has had on campus life, with people afraid to attend protests or participate in groups that can be viewed as critical of the Trump administration. Last week, a federal judge in New Jersey said the Trump administration's effort to deport Khalil likely violates the Constitution. Judge Michael Farbiarz wrote the government's primary justification for removing Khalil - that his beliefs may pose a threat to U.S. foreign policy - could open the door to vague and arbitrary enforcement. Khalil was detained by federal immigration agents on March 8 in the lobby of his university-owned apartment, the first arrest under Trump's widening crackdown on students who joined campus protests against Israel's war in Gaza.
