logo
Why SNP national council must pass this motion on nuclear weapons

Why SNP national council must pass this motion on nuclear weapons

The National17-05-2025

The four Vanguard submarines carry the Trident nuclear missiles Britain rents at the pleasure of President Trump. It's been an axiom of Scottish politics that although the SNP's anti-nuclear policy is not in the SNP constitution, it's in the party's DNA.
In recent weeks, though, there's been a rash of reports that some people who were once important in the SNP want to back a British bomb. The timing of this has an air of panic.
Those who wish to hold fast to the crumbling totem of a British bomb are normally motivated not by real security threats or concerns but by a delusional iteration of British greatness. Bear in mind this off-stage pining for retention of the British bomb (they dare not reveal themselves) is taking place at precisely the same time as a central tenet of UK nuclear strategy is disintegrating before our eyes.
READ MORE: The real reason politicians back nuclear power instead of renewables
That tenet is Continuous At Sea Deterrence. CASD requires one Trident-carrying nuclear submarine to be at sea at any time, with the other three in various stages of readiness and refit.
The problem is that the four Vanguards are falling apart and their replacements, the new Dreadnought class, are years and billions of pounds away from entering service.
It is a good bet that, even if Broken Britain throws gargantuan sums of money at the problems of the knackered Vanguards, soon there will be times when no boat will be on station somewhere in the Atlantic.
It is not an overstatement to say CASD is literally sinking. Even now, rumours are rumbling among proud Britons who support the bomb that there have been times recently when there has been no Vanguard on patrol.
Funk – the condition, not the music – is increasingly evident in the ranks of Britain's mushy political centre's mainstream media acolytes.
Even they are increasingly clutching their political pearls in horror as Downing Street chief of staff Morgan McSweeney, cranks up his tone-deaf automatons, such as Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves, to wreak more havoc on Labour's popularity. Quite why 'some who were once something' in the SNP want to run a tartan version of McSweeney's four-dimensional chess is puzzling.
Hegemonic political power achieved by a party at the ballot box does grant the leader political leeway beyond what is technically democratic, that just a fact of life.
However, Alex Salmond and Nicola Sturgeon are now, and I say this with no political animus, historical figures. Even they ensured there would be no messing with the anti-nuclear DNA strand of the SNP.
The UK has moved from gradual to steep decline. The politics of the steep decline of Broken Britain is rather different, rather rawer, as the spectacular electoral performance of Reform UK illustrates.
READ MORE: UK wants to build new nuclear plants in Scotland, Ed Miliband says
To be fair, the Scottish Government has used some, though by no means all, its powers to mitigate that downward slip as evidenced again and again in Professor Danny Dorling's Shattered Nation. However, democracy is a cruel taskmaster and trust in politicians of all parties is at a historic low.
Recently, I attended an Electoral Reform Society event in Edinburgh where the results of recent Scottish polling on political trust were presented. Supermarkets were rated as two to three times more trustworthy than Scotland's politicians.
My party, indeed, all parties that profess probity, operating in a political and economic landscape of Broken Britain with trust in politicians at a very low ebb, need to conduct themselves in a way where the voices of the ordinary party members are respected.
That is why the following motion was tabled by the SNP Trade Union Group and Maryhill Branch of the SNP for debate at the SNP National Council on June 21.
It is designed to remind doubters, and the wider public, that ditching the party's anti-nuclear policy on removal of the British bomb from Scotland is a distraction and a further generator of public distrust.
SCOTLAND'S SECURITY
In view of destabilising events in Europe and beyond, this Council reaffirms that SNP policy is:
- To ratify the United Nations Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons when Scotland is able to do so as an independent nation.
- To support action to remove nuclear weapons from Scotland. These weapons of indiscriminate mass destruction do not protect us, but rather make us a target.
- To expose the truth about the supposed 'British' Trident nuclear weapons system. It is completely dependent on the US, which can control the system and cancel the lease of the missiles when the US president chooses.
- To develop security policies for Scotland which are relevant to our needs.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Starmer's raid on family businesses to cost his constituents 1,000 jobs
Starmer's raid on family businesses to cost his constituents 1,000 jobs

Telegraph

time33 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Starmer's raid on family businesses to cost his constituents 1,000 jobs

Labour's tax raid on family businesses is projected to cost hundreds of jobs in Sir Keir Starmer's constituency alone, new analysis shows. The revenue-raising scheme is also projected to hit the local economies of Labour constituencies harder than their Conservative, Reform and Liberal Democrat-voting counterparts. Analysis by the Confederation of British Industry (CBI), which represents nearly 200,000 UK businesses, revealed that the changes to business property relief (BPR) announced in Rachel Reeves's October Budget will stifle growth in Labour seats across the country. The CBI claims that the average gross value added (GVA) losses in seats that elected Labour MPs at the last general election will be over £24 million, compared to £20 million in Conservative seats and £18.5 million in Reform constituencies. The projections span from the October 2024 budget to April 2030, after the next general election. Only seats held by the Green Party fared worse with an average GVA loss of around £40 million, suggesting that cities and urban centres will be worst hit by the raid. The CBI expects the economic hit to result in thousands of job losses in the most-exposed constituencies. Sir Keir's seat of Holborn and St Pancras will be the fourth-worst hit constituency in the country with 1,037 jobs expected to be lost, according to the analysis. Cabinet ministers to feel the pinch in their seats Red Wall seats are also set to suffer. The analysis shows that of £14.9 billion in nationwide GVA losses, some £4.6 billion (31 per cent) of that will hit constituencies that the Tories won in 2019 and Labour won back in 2024. These seats include the 31 Red Wall seats in the North and Midlands along with other key marginal constituencies which Labour will hope to win again at the next election if it wants to stay in power. Senior Cabinet ministers will also feel the pinch in their constituencies. The second-worst hit seat in the country, Manchester Central, is currently represented by Lucy Powell, the Leader of the House of Commons. The third-worst hit seat is Birmingham Ladywood, represented by Shabana Mahmood, the Justice Secretary. Hilary Benn, the Northern Ireland Secretary, represents the ninth-worst-hit seat of Leeds South. In the October Budget, the Chancellor slashed BPR in an attempt to raise money from family businesses. BPR was originally introduced by a Labour government in the 1970s. It allows company shareholders to leave business assets to loved ones without paying inheritance tax on them. But in a sweeping change that will take effect in April 2026, full business relief will only apply to the first £1 million of a business's assets upon a shareholder's death, with everything above this subject to 20 per cent tax.

Trump says Elon Musk could face ‘serious consequences' if he backs Democrats
Trump says Elon Musk could face ‘serious consequences' if he backs Democrats

Belfast Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Belfast Telegraph

Trump says Elon Musk could face ‘serious consequences' if he backs Democrats

Mr Trump told NBC's Kristen Welker in a phone interview that he has no plans to make up with tech entrepreneur Mr Musk. Asked specifically if he thought his relationship with the mega-billionaire chief executive of Tesla and SpaceX was over, Mr Trump responded: 'I would assume so, yeah.' 'I'm too busy doing other things,' Mr Trump continued. We need your consent to load this Social Media content. We use a number of different Social Media outlets to manage extra content that can set cookies on your device and collect data about your activity. Please review your details and accept them to load the content 'You know, I won an election in a landslide. I gave him (Mr Musk) a lot of breaks, long before this happened, I gave him breaks in my first administration, and saved his life in my first administration, I have no intention of speaking to him.' The US President also issued a warning amid speculation that Mr Musk could back Democratic legislators and candidates in the 2026 mid-term elections. 'If he does, he'll have to pay the consequences for that,' Mr Trump told NBC, though he declined to share what those consequences would be. Mr Musk's businesses have many lucrative federal contracts. The US President's latest comments suggest Mr Musk is moving from close ally to a potential new target for Mr Trump, who has aggressively wielded the powers of his office to crack down on critics and punish perceived enemies. As a major government contractor, Mr Musk's businesses could be particularly vulnerable to retribution. Mr Trump has already threatened to cut Mr Musk's contracts, calling it an easy way to save money. The dramatic rupture between the President and the world's richest man began this week with Mr Musk's public criticism of Mr Trump's 'big beautiful bill' pending on Capitol Hill. Mr Musk has warned that the bill will increase the federal deficit and called it a 'disgusting abomination'. Mr Trump criticised Mr Musk in the Oval Office, and before long, he and Mr Musk began trading bitterly personal attacks on social media, sending the White House and Republican congressional leaders scrambling to assess the fallout. As the back-and-forth intensified, Mr Musk suggested Mr Trump should be impeached and claimed without evidence that the government was concealing information about the President's association with infamous paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Mr Musk appeared by Saturday morning to have deleted his posts about Epstein. In an interview, US vice president JD Vance tried to downplay the feud. He said Mr Musk was making a 'huge mistake' going after Mr Trump, but called him an 'emotional guy' who was becoming frustrated. 'I hope that eventually Elon comes back into the fold. Maybe that's not possible now because he's gone so nuclear,' Mr Vance said. Mr Vance called Mr Musk an 'incredible entrepreneur,' and said that Mr Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which sought to cut US government spending and laid off or pushed out thousands of workers, was 'really good'. Mr Vance made the comments in an interview with 'manosphere' comedian Theo Von, who last month joked about snorting drugs off a mixed-race baby and the sexuality of men in the US Navy when he opened for Mr Trump at a military base in Qatar. The Vance interview was taped on Thursday as Musk's posts were unfurling on X, the social media network the billionaire owns. During the interview, Mr Von showed the vice president Mr Musk's claim that Mr Trump's administration has not released all the records related to Epstein because Mr Trump is mentioned in them. We need your consent to load this Social Media content. We use a number of different Social Media outlets to manage extra content that can set cookies on your device and collect data about your activity. Mr Vance responded to that, saying: 'Absolutely not. Donald Trump didn't do anything wrong with Jeffrey Epstein.' 'This stuff is just not helpful,' Mr Vance said in response to another post shared by Mr Musk calling for Mr Trump to be impeached and replaced with Mr Vance. 'It's totally insane. The President is doing a good job.' Vance also defended the bill that has drawn Mr Musk's ire, and said its central goal was not to cut spending but to extend the 2017 tax cuts approved in Mr Trump's first term. The bill would slash spending and taxes but also leave some 10.9 million more people without health insurance and spike deficits by 2.4 trillion dollars (£1.77 trillion) over the decade, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. 'It's a good bill,' Mr Vance said. 'It's not a perfect bill.'

Spads being offered six-figure salaries as cost of advisers soars
Spads being offered six-figure salaries as cost of advisers soars

Scottish Sun

timean hour ago

  • Scottish Sun

Spads being offered six-figure salaries as cost of advisers soars

Scottish Labour Deputy Leader Jackie Baillie blasts "sleekit attempt" to sneak figures out during a by-election BILL CLAIM Spads being offered six-figure salaries as cost of advisers soars Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) SNP chiefs were accused of making a 'sleekit' bid to use the Holyrood by-election as cover to sneak out the soaring costs of their special advisers. Figures published by the Nats Government reveal that 17 Spads - political appointees hired to support ministers - were in post as of May 7 this year. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 Deputy leader of the Scottish Labour Party Jackie Baillie at the count for the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election Of those, one was earning a salary between £108,781 and £116,435, while seven were in a pay band of between £84,983 and £97,644, while a further nine Spads were earning between £71,393 and £78,719. The total cost of special advisers employed during the financial year for 2024-2025 was a whopping £1.7million. A request for the information was submitted by a backbench SNP MSP on the day of the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election on June 5, with a response provided by minister Jamie Hepburn the following day. The move has prompted accusations from political rivals of using the by-election as an opportunity to 'sneak' out the figures while journalists focused on coverage of the vote. Scottish Labour Deputy Leader Jackie Baillie said: 'Scots are sick of footing the bill for an SNP government that is failing to deliver. 'This sleekit attempt to sneak these figures out during a by-election won't hide the fact the SNP cannot be trusted with taxpayers' money.' And Scottish Tory shadow finance secretary Craig Hoy added: 'The SNP have wasted a shameful amount of taxpayers' money on their army of spin doctors. 'You'd be forgiven for thinking John Swinney snuck out these bombshell figures on a day when people's minds were elsewhere.' The number of Spads fell to 17 over the past year, with 19 having been in post prior to May 7 this year - three of whom were earning salaries of over £108,781. A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'Due to the appointment of a new First Minister in May 2024, there were several changes to the special adviser team. The number and total cost of special advisers reduced in comparison to the previous year.' Scottish Labour's shock win in Hamilton stuns establishment as SNP face 'false' campaign blast But, Scottish Lib Dem MSP Willie Rennie MSP hit out: 'The SNP are investing more effort in making excuses for their failures in government.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store