‘A refuge for the connected' — ActionSA slams NPA, calls for Batohi's removal
NPA boss Shamila Batohi continues to face criticism over her leadership, with ActionSA protesting in Tshwane on Thursday, calling for her removal.
While the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) continues to face criticism over its failure to lead successful prosecutions in several high-profile cases, ActionSA staged a protest outside the justice minister's offices in Tshwane on Thursday, 19 June, calling for the removal of NPA boss Shamila Batohi.
'Worryingly, the NPA has become a refuge for the politically connected, a place where accountability is avoided, justice is delayed and prosecutions collapse with alarming regularity,' said ActionSA president Herman Mashaba and the party's parliamentary head Athol Trollip in a joint statement after submitting a memorandum.
'Supported by victims of the NPA's failure to ensure that our criminal justice system protects the public and tackles rampant lawlessness, ActionSA's demand for the removal of advocate Batohi rests on the lived experiences of those who have been failed by a prosecuting body clearly incapable of fulfilling its mandate.'
Batohi has faced criticism after several State Capture cases have been thrown out of court.
ActionSA supporters emphasised the Timothy Omotoso case, with the Nigerian televangelist walking free in April after being cleared of all 32 charges – including rape and human trafficking.
Hlengiwe Zondi, 23, an ActionSA supporter who arrived from Johannesburg, told Daily Maverick that she attended Thursday's protest because she was concerned about what the Omotoso case meant for her own safety.
'I am very scared. I am very scared for myself, for my younger sisters. I am scared for every single girl.
'The release of Omotoso after so much clear evidence against him, for me, was an indication that not a single woman or girl is safe under the current leadership of the NPA … What angers me most is that the leader of the NPA is a woman herself,' Zondi said.
Sibongile Msomi, 48, said, 'These are the cases you want to use and set an example to intruders like Omotoso, whose actions amounted to peeing on our sovereignty. He needs to be brought back.
'There will be no shame in the NPA in doing that, failed as they have. In fact, many South Africans would be delighted to see Omotoso brought back to face the music. I did not trust the NPA at all since the Zuma years, but now I hate them for their conduct in the Omotoso and many State Capture cases,' said.
Msomi, who said she was not a supporter of ActionSA, urged all South Africans to voice their displeasure with the criminal justice system.
'It only benefits the rich and corners ordinary South Africans,' Msomi said.
Omotoso left the country in May and was declared a prohibited person for overstaying his visa and entering SA on a false permit.
'Batohi must go. We need somebody new, hopefully with a much clearer vision and guts,' Tisietso Mofokeng, 39, from the East Rand, said on Thursday.
The ActionSA leaders said that while Batohi's 2018 appointment was met with hope that the NPA would move past an era defined by State Capture, 'that hope has curdled into deep public disillusionment'.
'The institution remains directionless, riven by internal factionalism, and wholly unable, or unwilling, to act decisively against either high-level corruption or pervasive violent crime.
'From troubling vacancy rates across provinces and key units within the NPA, to the failure to prosecute any high-profile cases arising from the Zondo Commission, to botched cases involving Timothy Omotoso, Ace Magashule, Moroadi Cholota and Zizi Kodwa, and the apparent laissez-faire approach to consequence management within the institution, the case for the removal of the NDPP is made by her own widely evident failures as the head of the institution.
Batohi refuses to step aside
Batohi has repeatedly denied that the NPA is in crisis.
'I want to say that, as the NDPP, I will not be stepping down because I believe that we are doing a really good job to serve the people of this country – as we have been – and, particularly, the victims of crime,' Batohi told MPs in Parliament this week.
Batohi conceded there were '10 to 12 cases… that the NPA is coming for a lot of flak on'.
'There are legal processes and I urge that we consider these cases individually and consider where is the actual problem. And once we understand the actual problem, make sure we put in place solutions which address the problem,' she said.
'There are huge systemic problems in the criminal justice system. And I want to say that as the national director, I will not be [stepping] down because I believe that we are doing a really good job. And I will continue with my really good team to serve the people of this country,' said Batohi.
In a recent SABC interview, Batohi said, 'There certainly have been setbacks and I don't want to underplay that. There've been major setbacks for the institution. But we're dealing with them.'
During her presentation to the parliamentary justice committee on Tuesday, Justice Minister Mmamoloko Kubayi said one of the problems facing the NPA was corruption. She said lifestyle audits could help address this.
'With lifestyle audits, we are able to see the patterns. We have agreed that this work will be done and we have committed that it will be started in this financial year,' she said.
Batohi's term is set to expire in January 2026, and civil society groups have called on President Cyril Ramaphosa to make the appointment process of her successor public, in a similar fashion to the public interviews Batohi faced before she was appointed. DM
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
34 minutes ago
- IOL News
Constitutional Court: Champion of the People or Protector of the Elite?
South Africa's first woman Chief Justice and the head of the Constitutional Court Mandisa at her interview with the Judicial Services Commission on February 2, 2022. Image: Timothy Bernard/African News Agency(ANA) Kim Heller The thirty-year-old Constitutional Court is a living shrine to the supreme pledge of equality and justice in democratic South Africa. The real test of the highest court in the land is whether it is an effectual guardian of the people, especially of the most powerless and marginalised in society. In the injustice of apartheid, courts accorded legality to an inhumane regime and the judiciary was weaponised against the African majority. In democratic South Africa, justice must be done and seen to be done so that the historically disempowered can believe in the promise of a free and equitable nation. Early landmark judgments in the Constitutional Court affirmed the right of citizens to access life-saving HIV treatment, adequate water and housing. These judgements created an air of optimism that the apex court would be a faithful chamber of justice for ordinary South Africans. Another important victory for citizens was the Constitutional Court's ruling that permits civil rights organisations and individuals to present cases before it. However, the vital mission of safeguarding citizens' rights and improving fair access to justice has been frustrated by the sluggish enactment of crucial judgments on socio-economic rights, impaired state capacity, and a lack of government accountability. Recent entanglements of the Court in political wars have also negatively affected its standing and trustworthiness. The 2021 Constitutional Court's sentencing of former President Jacob Zuma to fifteen months in prison for contempt of Court without a criminal trial was celebrated by many of his political opponents. Amidst this cheer from his rivals, many ordinary South Africans saw this ruling as an ominous political weaponisation of the judiciary and a wretched betrayal of justice. Fury mounted, people protested, and over three hundred were killed in one of the worst outbreaks of civil turmoil in democratic South Africa. President Cyril Ramaphosa's Phala Phala matter was a case that tested the Constitutional Court's impartiality. After a Parliamentary Section 89 panel found prima facie evidence of misconduct by the President, he approached the Constitutional Court to review and set aside the panel's report. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Ramaphosa's bid was dismissed, and the President was duly directed to the High Court. Many hailed this as an expression of equality before the law in South Africa. A grand show of exercising justice without fear or favour. Few wanted to recognise this as a potentially cowardly act driven by a fear of ruling on such a sensitive matter involving the first citizen of the country. The long delay by the Constitutional Court in delivering a judgment on the EFF and ATM's challenge to the National Assembly's decision not to act on the Section 89 panel findings raises concerns about the court's impartiality, constitutional accountability, and the burning issue of delaying justice. Politically charged, expedient legal judgements set a dangerous precedent for any court of law. The contamination of a single judgement can cast doubt over the entire body of good work done by the Constitutional Court and forever tarnish its standing as an independent legal organ. When legal precepts are sacrificed on the altar of political expediency, no one wins. Justice Edwin Cameron has spoken of how the legitimacy of the judiciary rests on the faith of ordinary people that "judges will protect the weak against the strong" and "the poor against the powerful." Research conducted by the Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (IJR) in 2023 showed that trust in the Constitutional Court had plummeted by over 20% since 2007. This decline is echoed in Stats SA's 2023 data, which revealed that trust in the judiciary was falling "consistent with wider patterns of disillusionment in state institutions." The IJR notes that "South Africans are increasingly seeing the judiciary as part of an elite compact that does not serve their interests". The responsibility of the Constitutional Court in democratic South Africa is monumental, given the country's history of racial oppression and lingering structural inequality. Access to justice is a cardinal pillar of democracy and essential to the Constitutional promise of equality for all. Former Deputy Chief Justice Dikgang Moseneke wrote how courts must never evade their responsibility as agencies of change. Justice Albie Sachs spoke of how constitutionalism is not about fine words on paper but that it is about the living pulse of justice in people's lives. Then South African President Thabo Mvuyelwa Mbeki is sworn in as President of the Republic of South Africa by the President of the Constitutional Court Justice Arthur Chaskalson (C) and Chief Justice Ismail Mohammed (L) at the Union Buildings in Pretoria, 16 June 1999. Image: AFP Transformative constitutionalism places the judiciary at the forefront of addressing structural inequality and fostering a new compact of social parity. However, the chasm between the lofty promises of the Constitution and the everyday injustices that still plague the majority of South Africans is vast. The real work and true triumphs of the Constitutional Court lie in delivering justice to the poor and marginalised by helping to dislodge inequality rather than perpetuate it. If it is to be a guard dog of elites rather than a guardian of the people, its promise will fade as surely as the Rainbow Nation itself. In an interview with City Press in 2020, Dr Muzi Sikhakhane SC spoke about how justice needs to be accessible to all rather than being the exclusive preserve of those who are experts in navigating the complexities of law. As the Constitutional Court steers its future it must avoid becoming a faraway fortress or an exclusive carriage of legal privilege. Extensive outreach programmes on legal rights and legal access would help boost it as an organ of people's power. The inclusion of African languages as languages of record in all courts across South Africa, including the apex court, is imperative if justice is to be done. Justice Albie Sachs spoke of how we do not want our Constitution to be 'a castle for the rich and powerful' and how rather we want it to be a refuge for the poor and marginalised. Our expectations of the judiciary may be too high. After all, the rule of law is not a precise science. Nor is it a godly creation or a holy piece of art. It is but the handiwork of men and women flawed by their specific biases, interests, and life orientations. The Constitutional Court, like our fragile democracy, is a work in progress. * Kim Heller is a political analyst and author of No White Lies: Black Politics and White Power in South Africa. ** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL, Independent Media or The African.
Eyewitness News
37 minutes ago
- Eyewitness News
Committee convened by Shivambu to begin work to explore possibility of forming political party
JOHANNESBURG - A committee convened by former uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) Party secretary-general, Floyd Shivambu, will begin its work next week to explore the possibility of forming a political party. Shivambu said they would consult South Africans from all walks of life about the need of another party in the country. ALSO READ: 'I will never resign from the MK Party,' says Shivambu This latest project comes after he was demoted by the MK Party from secretary-general to an ordinary member. Shivambu held a briefing on Thursday, where he said that he had not turned his back on the belief that black political parties should unite. "We are not dividing black political parties. We are listening to people, and they will tell us if there is a need for a political party. If a majority of the people, and genuinely so, say there is no need to form a political party, we will humbly listen to that."
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
ActionSA demands Batohi's removal over NPA's ‘growing failures'
ActionSA has asked the justice minister to initiate Batohi's removal and begin a process of investigating deep-rooted dysfunction within the NPA. ActionSA members yesterday marched and protested outside the office of the minister of justice in Pretoria to demand the removal of the national director of Public Prosecution Shamila Batohi due to what it described as the growing list of failures by the NPA under her leadership. Action SA president Herman Mashaba led the protest, which saw some victims sharing their injustices by the NPA before a memorandum of demands was signed and handed over to a representative of the minister. Demands to justice minister In the memo, the party demanded that the minister, as the Cabinet member responsible for justice and constitutional development, engaged President Cyril Ramaphosa to exercise the powers afforded him under Section 12 of the National Prosecuting Authority Act and initiate the formal process for the removal of Batohi. A call for Batohi's suspension and investigation into NPA Mashaba said the process must begin with her immediate suspension, pending an investigation into the systemic dysfunction in the NPA. ALSO READ: Hawks and NPA explain why corruption investigations and prosecutions take long 'While acknowledging that overhauling and correcting the NPA does not begin and end with the removal of Batohi, it remains an important first step in demonstrating that continued poor performance will be met with decisive action. 'South Africans are clear in their demand for us to fight to end the culture of impunity and to put the institution on notice that it must either deliver, or face the consequences,' he said. 'Genuine sense of hope' Mashaba said Batohi's appointment in December 2018 was intended to mark a break from the dark era of state capture, a period marked by political interference and institutional decay. 'Her arrival was met with rare national consensus and a genuine sense of hope that justice would finally be restored and those responsible for looting the state would be held accountable. Yet, nearly six years later, that hope has curdled,' he said. NOW READ: Batohi clarifies NPA infiltration claims to justice minister amid criticism
