Thunder send message in Game 1 annihilation of Grizzlies. OKC is ready to win a title now.
Thunder send message in Game 1 annihilation of Grizzlies. OKC is ready to win a title now.
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Do the Thunder have what it takes to reach the Finals?
Oklahoma City has the pieces—but do they have the experience to win three playoff series?
Don't give the Oklahoma City Thunder the NBA's Larry O'Brien Championship Trophy yet.
It's just Game 1 of a first-round Western Conference series.
But what a game it was for the Thunder.
The performance – a dominating 131-80 victory over the Memphis Grizzlies on Sunday – was befitting of a team ready to make a championship run.
The Thunder were masterful offensively and defensively,
The Grizzlies were not ready to handle Oklahoma City's talent, depth, intensity, speed, ball movement and commitment to defend.
It was a message the Thunder needed and wanted to send.
OKC VS. MEMPHIS GAME 1: Thunder make NBA history in blowout of Grizzlies
ANALYSIS: Lakers know what they must do to rebound from loss to Timberwolves. Can they do it?
If one Jalen Williams (20 points, six assists, five rebounds, three steals) wasn't enough, the Thunder have a Jaylin Williams (nine points, five rebounds, three assists, two blocks) who does damage, too.
Every Thunder starter scored at least 12 points, led by Jalen Williams, Chet Holmgren (19 points, 10 rebounds, two blocks), MVP candidate Shai Gilgeous-Alexander (15 points, five assists, two blocks) and Isaiah Hartenstein (14 points, eight rebounds, five assists).
The Thunder trailed 9-8 with 6:55 left in the first quarter, and once the Thunder went ahead 11-9, it was the beginning of the annihilation. The Thunder led 41-22, 55-22, 78-36, 99-48 and 122-67.
At one point in the third quarter, the Thunder outscored the Grizzlies 22-0 in fastbreak points, were 37-for-68 from the field and 13-for-32 on 3-pointers and had 27 assists on 38 made field goals – and the Grizzlies were 21-for-63 from the field and 3-for-22 on 3s.
There's no more to be said about Game 1.
The Thunder were the best team in the NBA this season – a franchise-record 68 victories, and they were No. 1 defensively, No. 3 offensively (the only team to finish in the top three in both categories) and No. 1 in net rating, outscoring opponents by 12.7 points per 100 possessions. It was the second-best net rating in NBA history – behind the 1995-96 Chicago Bulls. The other four teams in the top five all won titles.
Thunder executive vice president Sam Presti's goal is to build a team that can win at a high level for several seasons. He has that team now with Gilgeous-Alexander, Jalen Williams, Holmgren, Hartenstein, Lu Dort, Isaiah Joe, Alex Caruso, Cason Wallace, Aaron Wiggins and Jaylin Williams.
Presti has never won Executive of the Year, and that's a problem for other league executives who vote for the award. He is the best team-builder in the league – excellent in the draft, free agency and trades.
Now, it's about winning a title. The Thunder lost in the second round last season, and that's all the majority of the group has on its postseason résumé: one first-round series win. Among the West playoff teams, the Thunder have the second-fewest combined games of playoff experience. Jumping from that point to NBA championship is not an easy leap, but this Thunder squad has the goods to do it.
The Thunder will be tested once they dispatch Memphis. Denver or the Clippers await in the second round and then either the Los Angeles Lakers, Minnesota Timberwolves, Houston Rockets or Golden State Warriors in the conference finals.
If Game 1 is the indicator, the Thunder are more than ready for the challenge. That Larry O'Brien Trophy gets a little closer with each victory.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Steven Adams attributes Rockets' improved playoff offense to faster pace, ball movement
Houston's 'double big' lineups featuring Alperen Sengun and Steven Adams are usually bigger than their opponent, but that doesn't mean the Rockets have to play slower. In Friday's Game 6 victory at Golden State, which tied the best-of-seven, first-round playoff series at three games apiece, Adams played a season-high 31 minutes off the bench. Advertisement And yet, the Rockets had 99 possessions as a team versus the Warriors — a significant increase from a series-long average of 93.9 (including just 89 in a Game 1 loss). After averaging 95.7 points in the first three games of the series (two losses), Houston is scoring at a per-game average of 117.3 points over its last three (two wins). In an exclusive postgame interview with SportsTalk 790's Matt Thomas, play-by-play radio broadcaster for the Rockets, Adams stressed the importance of pace. When asked what had changed since two losses at Golden State earlier in the series, Adams responded: We trusted our execution, we trusted our defense, and that's what we're relying on. We're moving the ball. We're not slowing down, and I think that's the main thing. We need to keep the pace up. We've always been a fast-paced team and we can't let teams slow us down. Adams finished with a season-high 17 points in Game 6, making all four of his field-goal attempts and 9-of-16 from the free-throw line (56.3%). That free-throw percentage was well above Adams' 40.5% clip over his previous two NBA seasons (2022-23 and 2024-25) combined, and he attributed the improvement to the repetition that resulted from Golden State's intentional fouling (or hacking) strategy. 'I just need some reps, bro,' Adams told Thomas. Advertisement With Adams in a featured Game 7 role, the Rockets will look to complete their comeback and become just the 14th team in NBA history to overcome a 3-1 deficit in a playoff series. Tipoff is at 7:30 p.m. Central on Sunday night, with televised game broadcasts available on TNT and Space City Home Network. Thomas will have the radio call on SportsTalk 790 and across the team's radio network. More: Rockets center Steven Adams finishes second for NBA's 2024-25 Teammate of the Year award This article originally appeared on Rockets Wire: Steven Adams: Rockets' playoff offense needs fast pace, ball movement
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
3 early Minnesota Timberwolves NBA free agency targets in 2025 offseason
The post 3 early Minnesota Timberwolves NBA free agency targets in 2025 offseason appeared first on ClutchPoints. The Minnesota Timberwolves made their first NBA Western Conference Final appearance last year, a milestone the franchise had not achieved in its 34 years of existence. This time around, they managed to defeat a couple big-name teams in the West and were playing their second consecutive conference finals, but failed to cross the final hurdle in the face of the Oklahoma City Thunder. Advertisement The NBA offseason has begun for several teams, and the Timberwolves are also looking to explore options to improve their roster around the former No. 1 pick, Anthony Edwards, who has established himself as the face of the franchise by galvanizing his teammates and bringing an unmatched energy to the Timberwolves fans. However, even with Edwards running the offence, there were some shortcomings of the team as a whole, whose roster was built for the postseason, but they came up short against the Thunder, which exposed a few of the team's weaknesses. Even the Timberwolves have some of the key players in the free agency, like Nickeil Alexander-Walker, Julius Randle, and Naz Reid, both have player options except Alexander-Walker, who might be the first one to leave. Then again, after three decades of almost complete nothingness to begin the franchise's history, this is a good problem to have. 'Not quite' is far more palatable than 'nowhere near.' Timberwolves 2025 NBA free agency targets Nickeil Alexander-Walker (Timberwolves) Re-signing Alexander-Walker will be one of the top priorities for the Timberwolves, as he has become one of the key rotation players of the team in recent years. This past season was his best in Minnesota, as he averaged 9.4 points, 3.2 rebounds, and 2.7 assists per game, shooting 44% from the field and 38% from long range. Advertisement The only issue in re-signing Alexander-Walker will be the looming second apron. Alexander-Walker is projected to get $14-20 million on his next deal, and the Wolves might not have the cash. Chris Paul (San Antonio Spurs) Chris Paul is one of the best point guards in the NBA currently and has been one of the top names for the past few years. His ball-handling ability in the paint and the vision to make plays in traffic is something that the Timberwolves desperately need when Edwards is not on the court. Chris Paul would also complement players like Randle and Gobert if he decides to come to Minnesota. Paul averaged 8.8 points, 7.4 assists — seventh in the league — and 3.6 rebounds per game, and played in all 82 games for the Spurs. He is one of those players who are edging to the end of their careers, but Paul still has some gas left in the tank and could act as a mentor for the younger players on the team. Tyus Jones (Phoenix Suns) Phoenix Suns guard Tyus Jones is one feasible option for the Timberwolves, as he is still young and can be developed alongside Edwards. Meanwhile, he averaged 10.2 points, 5.3 assists, and 2.4 rebounds per game this season, all lower than his numbers from the year prior, but the Suns were a disaster. Advertisement Jones has good ball-handling skills and does not allow unforced turnovers easily. He signed a one-year deal with the Suns a season prior to this one and can help the Timberwolves trade lightly with the second tax apron. Who stays, who goes: Timberwolves' pending free agents The Timberwolves need to nail this offseason as they need to balance the incoming and outgoing players. Nickeil Alexander-Walker, Julius Randle, and Naz Reid, all key players, could be released before next season as the Timberwolves try to juggle financial issues. Other players like Joe Ingles, Jesse Edwards, Bones Hyland, and Tristen Newton are in free agency. The financial complications for the Timberwolves might not allow them to sign blockbuster players, and they might have to settle with players who can free up their wage bill.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
2025 NBA Finals: Thunder and Pacers are the modern blueprint of what winning looks like
The deeper we go into the NBA Playoffs, the more one truth gets hammered home: If you've got a guy on the floor who can't shoot or defend, he's getting exposed and you're probably getting sent home. But the 3-and-D archetype with the guy who just stands in the corner isn't quite enough anymore. All players on the floor must ideally be able to dribble and make quick decisions. That's why the Boston Celtics won the title last year. Sure, they had stars in Jayson Tatum and Jaylen Brown. But they also surrounded them with well-rounded pieces. When Tatum and Brown were sharing the floor with Derrick White, Jrue Holiday, and Al Horford, everyone could shoot and make a read, and nobody was a defensive liability. Even with bench units, there was no obvious weak link. Advertisement The same blueprint is playing out this season with the Oklahoma City Thunder and Indiana Pacers facing off in the NBA Finals. Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, Jalen Williams, and at least one of Lu Dort, Alex Caruso, or Cason Wallace have shared the floor for 88% of Oklahoma City's playoff minutes. In 176 of those minutes, at least four of them have played together and, during that time, the Thunder have outscored opponents by a staggering 18.1 points per 100 possessions. Every single one of those guys can defend, process the game fast, and create offense either for themselves or someone else. SGA is the hub, but OKC's success hinges on the fact that nobody else gums up the system. Dort cuts. Wallace connects. Caruso makes instant reads. There's no ball-stopper, no spacer who can't dribble, no defender the Thunder can't trust to ferociously execute a game plan. Even OKC's bigs fit the mold: Chet Holmgren can shoot, pass, and handle. And while Isaiah Hartenstein doesn't shoot 3s, he plays with elite feel as a finisher and facilitator. (Henry Russell/Yahoo Sports Illustration) Indiana functions similarly. Tyrese Haliburton is their engine, but the pieces around him — Andrew Nembhard, Aaron Nesmith, Pascal Siakam, and Myles Turner — are all skilled enough to play with tempo, precision, and relentless energy. And they all shoot the hell out of the ball: Nembhard, Nesmith, Siakam, and Turner are all shooting over 40% from 3 on over three attempts per game in the playoffs. Everyone can eat in this system. Nesmith of course had his all-time hot streak to fuel a historic Pacers comeback in Game 1. Siakam went off for 39 in Game 2 and 31 in Game 6 against the Knicks, winning himself East Finals MVP. Nembhard has had separate games with over 20 points and over 10 assists while playing lockdown defense. Even with bench units featuring T.J. McConnell and Thomas Bryant, the Pacers can go on a scoring flurry like they did to close out New York. Advertisement Their historic comebacks break the mold too. The Pacers don't turn to clear-out, hero-ball isolations. They stick with their flow: pace, movement, and speed. In the moments that most teams tighten up, Indiana just keeps running its offense. The throughline with both teams is clear: there are no dead zones, everyone is a threat. It's a roster with continuity and a system built on interchangeable skill sets, rapid processing, and nonstop effort. And two excellent coaching staffs led by Mark Daigneault and Rick Carlisle who constructed these systems and devised game plans to unleash their players' strengths. We've seen prototypes before, like the Beautiful Game Spurs, and the Warriors dynasty. But today's shift is a product of how the game has evolved. Pace is at an all-time high. So is spacing. A record-high 42.1% of shots were taken from 3 this season, and they were launched from farther than ever before: 26.2 feet on average above the break. Advertisement Screens are also being set farther from the hoop: the average on-ball screen came 25.7 feet from the rim, another all-time high. Defenses are switching more than ever: 24.6% of the time this year, up from just 7.7% a decade ago and 15.8% a half-decade ago. All of that means defenders have to cover more ground and do it faster than ever. Every offensive possession stretches the floor horizontally and vertically. On top of that, playoff officiating has made the game more physical than it's been in decades. Players have to be tough enough to absorb contact and relentless enough to fight through every screen, closeout, and rotation. That's part of why the Thunder and Pacers have made it this far. Both teams are deep with guys who meet those demands. Teams with shorter benches run out of answers fast. They either put a target on the floor or ask key players to dial it back to avoid fouling out. As always, when a blueprint starts working, everyone else tries to replicate it. But copying the trend and executing it are two very different things. And this year's playoff exits made that brutally clear. OKC is the model franchise. (AP Photo/Nate Billings) (ASSOCIATED PRESS) The Knicks and Timberwolves both made the conference finals, but neither felt like they belonged by the end of it. New York has a ton of guys who can generate shots and offer lengthy defense. But it's hard to win when your two best players are the weakest links on defense. Karl-Anthony Towns is an aloof liability at every spot on the floor. And Jalen Brunson is both tiny and unaware with poor technique fighting through screens. Until one of them is replaced, it's hard to take the Knicks seriously as a team that'll still be playing in June. Advertisement Minnesota looked like a team from another era against OKC. Julius Randle is a ball-stopper and Anthony Edwards dazzled on-ball but disappeared off it. At just 6-foot-3, Edwards has to evolve through movement: cuts, catch-and-shoot 3s, relocations, connective passing. And Minnesota's offense must change to best promote the development of its 23-year-old star. Coaches can only do with what they have though. The Pacers and Thunder were built from the top down by their front offices to play this way with rosters that can go deep into the bench. But the lead tacticians do have a choice in the matter. Daigneault spent all season experimenting with lineup combinations, playing everyone on his roster, creating a culture where everyone contributes to the greater good. The system Carlisle installed naturally promotes these habits on top of continuing to go deeper into his rotation as the playoffs advanced. One of the challenges for teams looking to take the next step will be navigating the new collective bargaining agreement with rules that make it nearly impossible to have three stars on max contracts and survive with one-dimensional role players on minimum deals. The Heatles approach is no longer a realistic option. We've exited the superteam era. And given the way the best teams are playing and the way they're constructed, and given the restrictions of the new CBA, this likely isn't a temporary trend. It's more of a structural shift where the teams that last are built around four pillars: shooting ability, quick decision-making, offensive adaptability, and defensive versatility. That foundation is necessary to support at least one superstar, who also must embrace those qualities. Some teams like the Cavaliers need to add more toughness. Others need shooting, like the Magic and Pistons. And some teams like the Rockets also need a star. Advertisement Even veteran teams will start to feel the pressure. If OKC levels up again next year, Denver will have to ask hard questions. Nikola Jokić checks every box the Nuggets could possibly want in a star. But do they have enough shooting around him? And can Michael Porter Jr. thrive in this era with his limited creation and defensive shortcomings? Golden State went out and got Jimmy Butler to support Steph Curry, but that isn't enough when the roster is littered with players who can't shoot or playmake. Has the contention window already shut on the Warriors and they just don't know it? And in Los Angeles, Luka Dončić's slow-it-down style may not get him quite as far as it did in Dallas given the way the NBA is evolving. The Lakers may need to rethink what it looks like to build around Luka. And Luka needs to rethink how much of the ball he really needs to dominate. Maybe being a top-five player isn't enough in this era. Maybe you can't be the system, but you have to thrive within one. So here we are: Thunder vs. Pacers for all the marbles. Two small-market franchises, built from the ground up, now defining what winning looks like in the modern NBA. They didn't do it with an aging max-contract trio. They did it with deep and versatile rosters that can throw out lineup after lineup of five guys who can all shoot, dribble, guard, and make decisions in half a second. Advertisement And none of this works without stars who buy in. SGA did. Haliburton did. When your best players excel within the system, the ceiling gets higher. The Thunder and Pacers are not just the Finals teams; they're the blueprint.
