Australian PM Condemns Shooting Of Journalist In LA Protests
Australian Journalist Lauren Tomasi was injured by a rubber bullet in the heights of the LA protests.
Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has strongly condemned this attack.
The journalist has remained resilient and is doing better now.
Australia's prime minister on Tuesday denounced the "horrific" shooting of a rubber bullet at an Australian television reporter covering unrest in Los Angeles.
Australian 9News reporter Lauren Tomasi was hit in the leg by a rubber bullet on Sunday while reporting on live television. Her employer said she was sore but unharmed.
"She is going ok. She is pretty resilient, I have got to say, but that footage was horrific," Albanese told reporters after speaking to Tomasi.
Albanese said the reporter could reasonably have expected not to be "targeted" with a rubber bullet while doing her job in Los Angeles.
The footage showed she was "clearly identified" as a member of the media, with "no ambiguity", he said.
"We don't find it acceptable that it occurred, and we think the role of the media is particularly important."
Albanese said his government had raised the incident with the US administration but he would not comment on any future discussion with US President Donald Trump.
Trump ordered 700 US Marines and 2,000 more National Guard troops to Los Angeles on Monday after days of street protests sparked by dozens of immigration arrests.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
37 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Trump says 'helped Los Angeles survive' as unrest continues: Top updates
The anti-immigration protests in Los Angeles, which began after the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raided several businesses on June 6, have now entered their sixth day as the enforcement officers fail to quell the unrest. The protests, which were peaceful at first and began in downtown Los Angeles, soon turned violent as protesters resorted to vandalism. The protest spread to Paramount on June 7, and by June 11, t he anti-immigration protests spread to several cities, including Chicago, Austin, and Seattle, with many more protests lined up for the weekend when US President Donald Trump celebrates his 79th birthday along with the grand military parade, celebrating the 250th anniversary of the US Army. Politics over the Los Angeles protest has intensified as California Governor Gavin Newsom blamed Trump for deploying nearly 5,000 National Guard and members of the US Marines to quell the protest, accusing him of 'misusing his powers'. Newsom, a Democrat, said he believed the deployment of troops was not necessary. However, Trump called these protesters 'animals' and 'a foreign enemy'. With California filing a lawsuit against Trump's use of National Guard troops and the enforcement officers detaining as many as 400 people since June 7, here is a look at the recent developments in the Los Angeles protests: 1. President Trump on Wednesday (local time), while attending the 'Les Misérables' Opening Night at Kennedy Center with First Lady Melania Trump, said that he was proud of the work done in Los Angeles in curbing the riots. He said, 'I am very proud to have helped Los Angeles survive... If we didn't bring the National Guard and the Marines, Los Angeles would be burning to the ground, and that's not over yet... These are radical left lunatics that you're dealing with. They are tough, smart. They are probably paid many of them.' 2. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass took to X to announce the extension of the curfew in the downtown area till Thursday morning. A curfew was imposed from 8 pm Tuesday to 6 am Wednesday. She wrote, 'Curfew remains in effect tonight 8 pm - 6 am for downtown Los Angeles to stop bad actors who are taking advantage of the President's chaotic escalation.' Bass also said, 'Los Angeles will not allow fear to be used as a weapon against Angelenos who make our city strong. My administration is working with community organisations, legal advocates, and local leaders to ensure that every resident knows their rights and has the support they need. This city stands united.' A few simple truths: –Looting an Adidas store isn't justice. –Burning cities isn't speech. – @GavinNewsom isn't a good governor. And what's happening in Los Angeles aren't 'peaceful rallies' — they're third-world insurrection riots on American soil. — The White House (@WhiteHouse) June 11, 2025 3. As demonstrations against the Trump administration's immigration crackdown spread to other states, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told CNN that Trump's order to federalise the National Guard in California to respond to the protests could extend to other states. 4. Associated Press reported that the US troops have now started detaining immigrants accused of trespassing on a recently designated national defence zone. Under the Posse Comitatus Act, the troops are prohibited from conducting civilian law enforcement on US soil. However, an exception known as the military purpose doctrine allows it in some instances. 5. Dozens of mayors across the Los Angeles area joined hands to demand that the Trump administration stops the raids which have been stepped up since the first protests at downtown Los Angeles began.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Australia confident U.S. will proceed with Biden-era submarine pact after review
Australia's Defence Minister Richard Marles said on Thursday (June 12, 2025) he was confident the AUKUS submarine pact with the U.S. and Britain would proceed, and his government would work closely with the U.S. while the Trump administration conducted a formal review. In an Australian Broadcasting Corporation radio interview, Mr. Marles said AUKUS was in the strategic interests of all three countries and the new review of the deal signed in 2021 when Joe Biden was the U.S. President was not a surprise. "I am very confident this is going to happen," he said of AUKUS, which would give Australia nuclear-powered submarines. "This is a multi-decade plan. There will be governments that come and go and I think whenever we see a new government, a review of this kind is going to be something which will be undertaken," Mr. Marles told the ABC. Australia in 2023 committed to spend A$368 billion ($239.3 billion) over three decades on AUKUS, Australia's biggest ever defence project with the United States and Britain, to acquire and build nuclear-powered submarines. Australia's Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is expected to meet U.S. President Donald Trump for the first time next week on the sidelines of the G7 meeting in Canada, where the security allies will discuss tariffs and a request from the United States for Australia to increase defence spending from 2% to 3.5% of gross domestic product. Mr. Albanese had previously said defence spending would rise to 2.3% and has declined to commit to the U.S. target, saying Australia would focus on capability needs. Under AUKUS, Australia was scheduled to make a $2 billion payment in 2025 to the U.S. to help boost its submarine shipyards and speed up lagging production rates of Virginia-class submarines to allow the sale of up to three U.S. submarines to Australia from 2032. The first $500 million payment was made when Mr. Marles met with his U.S. counterpart Pete Hegseth in February. U.S. NOT MEETING PRODUCTION TARGETS The Pentagon's top policy adviser Elbridge Colby, who has previously expressed concern the U.S. would lose submarines to Australia at a critical time for military deterrence against China, will be a key figure in the review, examining the production rate of Virginia-class submarines, Mr. Marles said. "It is important that those production and sustainment rates are improved," he added. AUKUS would grow the U.S. and Australian defence industries and generate thousands of manufacturing jobs, Mr. Marles said in a statement. John Lee, an Australian Indo-Pacific expert at Washington's conservative Hudson Institute think tank, said the Pentagon review was "primarily an audit of American capability" and whether it can afford to sell up to five nuclear powered submarines when it was not meeting its own production targets. "Relatedly, the low Australian defence spending and ambiguity as to how it might contribute to a Taiwan contingency is also a factor," Mr. Lee said. Charles Edel, Australia chair at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, said AUKUS was significant for "enhancing deterrence by putting more players in the field", and it would be important for Mr. Albanese to seek reassurance from Mr. Trump when they meet. "A necessary part of the conversation will be discussing how both Australia and the U.S. are working to boost their own defence capabilities, enhancing allied integration, and delivering deterrent effects with a sense of urgency," he said. Under the multi-stage AUKUS timeline, Britain and Australia will jointly build a new AUKUS-class submarine expected to come into service from 2040. Mr. Marles said Britain's recently completed review of AUKUS was positive. Britain announced plans this month to increase the size of its nuclear-powered attack submarine fleet.
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Trade deal lacks fine print, raising doubts over US-China truce: Shaun Rein
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads "You can have companies, the big automakers like Ford and GM are rumoured to say, we need to relocate our manufacturing to China , so we can get access to rare earths despite the heavy tariffs that they would then incur by going into the United States. But here is the thing, China's media has been a lot more circumspect with the details of this so-called trade agreement," says Shaun Rein, China Market Research is a great and big question. Trump is saying the deal has been signed and he has been talking about that the Chinese are going to send rare earths and magnets in advance to whatever the United States needs because what you have seen in the last month is the lack of rare earths that were exported to the United States has really crippled the American economy You can have companies, the big automakers like Ford and GM are rumoured to say, we need to relocate our manufacturing to China, so we can get access to rare earths despite the heavy tariffs that they would then incur by going into the United States. But here is the thing, China's media has been a lot more circumspect with the details of this so-called trade has said the rumour is that they will give maybe export licenses to rare earths on a six-month trial basis to American companies. So, basically Trump is exaggerating the win in his mind and China is being a lot more honest probably saying well we do not have all the details ironed out, we want to come to an agreement but quite frankly China has the upper hand in the trade war with the United States right that the United States makes except for semiconductors, the Chinese can buy elsewhere. So, instead of buying American beef, they are buying Australian beef; instead of buying American oil, they are buying Canadian oil; instead of buying American soybeans, they are buying Brazilian soybeans. So, what you have seen is that there is a total shift in trade patterns and a total shift in power and China is at the top of the triangle, the top of the pyramid right now in terms of buying goods and trading goods from other countries. We are seeing a shift in world order right I mean that that is not true. I mean, Chinese equity markets are up 15-16% since the start of the year while the S&P 500 is only up about 2%. So, it is quite clear that the Chinese Hong Kong equity markets are outperforming the United States right the equity markets also do not necessarily reflect the economy. So, what you are seeing right now is Abigail Johnson, who is the head of Fidelity , the rumour is today that her private investment house is going to be selling 40 Chinese tech companies that they have long held because they are worried about the regulatory and I have been talking with a lot of mutual funds, I have been talking with a lot of LPs like pension funds and endowments and they are getting huge pressure from not just Trump, but previously under the Biden regime to derisk by not investing in Chinese equities, so that does not mean the economy is bad, that just means more oppression and bullying from the United States because they are trying to really contain China's economic might have happened eight years ago and that might have worked eight years ago. But the big problem is the United States has gone after Europe. The United States has gone after Canada. You even hear Howard Lutnick, the Secretary of Commerce , criticised India last week and said, why is India buying Russian weapons, they should be buying American the reality is the United States under Trump and Biden has been bullying people all around the world. And I think at some point the global south or I prefer to call it the global majority is saying you know what, let us not deal with all the drama, let us not deal with weaponization of the US dollar, weaponization of technology and let us move closer towards China where we have a lot more stable relations with Australia for instance, Australian dollar has strengthened in the last couple weeks because basically Australia is a proxy for China. Australia's economy does well when China's economy does well, whether it be buying iron ore, whether it be buying tourists going to Australia to buy products, so that is why the Aussie has strengthened and the US dollar is weakened. Now when it comes to liquidity and volume going back towards China, we are still at a very initial of the global funds only have about 25% of their holdings exposed to China. I recommend retail investors to have 15% to 20% because of the volatility and the regulatory we are seeing in my conversations with institutional investors like hedge funds that they want to come back into China, but they have not come back yet. Now, that gives a great opportunity for speculators and people who have a high-risk appetite to trade in front of the institutional personally, I am getting more exposure to Hong Kong equities the last six months because I am trying to front run what the hedge funds are doing because they still have not quite gotten into the markets yet and they will in the next three to six months because they have to make the business case, China is outperforming the S&P the United States needs a deal. Frankly, China controls about 30-35% of global manufacturing. So, America might have the money, they might have the capital, but they need to buy the products from China. At the end of the day, China makes not just rare earths, about 90% of refined rare earths, but they also make most of the ibuprofen, most of the of the antibiotics in the world comes from China. So, at the end of the day, that is real leverage. So, for instance in 2017, 18% of Chinese exports went to the US, that number is down to 14%. China on the other hand has shifted and exports to Asean, has gone up to 16%.So, basically, it is a game of chicken right now. China's economy is hurting, do not get me wrong. There are about 15 million people who are involved in the export sector. You have seen that the CPI index has dropped about 0.1%. So, we are dealing with the D-word, the economy in China is not booming, but China is not going to blink. They have the resolve to push hard back against Trump and Scott Bessent and Howard Lutnick because at the end of the day, the Americans need to buy from China. They cannot buy antibiotics from any other country in the world except for a little bit from India.
