logo
Pacers let little things slip in Game 4 loss to Thunder but remain confident

Pacers let little things slip in Game 4 loss to Thunder but remain confident

INDIANAPOLIS — Since January, the Indiana Pacers have shown their strength in clutch scenarios. They've outscored the Oklahoma City Thunder by more than 20 points in fourth quarters in the NBA Finals, but they fumbled away a seven-point lead in Game 4.
For much of Friday night, Indiana looked close to taking a commanding 3-1 series lead against OKC. But self-inflicted wounds — missed free throws, poor rebounding and a second-chance point deficit — along with a stagnant offense helped the Thunder pull out the 111-104 win and even the series at 2-2.
Advertisement
'They had 38 free throws, and that was a problem,' Indiana coach Rick Carlisle said. 'They missed four. We missed eight. The difference of four is significant.
'There's a lot of little things going on, but this series is going to come down to the basics, and our inability to effectively rebound when we needed to is the biggest thing. (Getting outrebounded) 43 to 33 and a bunch of second-chance points made it difficult, and in the end, impossible.'
Indiana made 25 of 33 free throws in a game with 71 combined attempts. Oklahoma City went 34 of 38 from the stripe.
'It definitely changed the rhythm of the game,' Andrew Nembhard said of the number of free throws taken. 'We probably want to foul less.'
Pacers guard Bennedict Mathurin, typically an 80 percent free-throw shooter, couldn't replicate his Game 3 heroics and missed three key free throws down the stretch when Indiana had a chance to re-take the lead.
'I think it's very tough. It's a very tough time,' Mathurin said. 'I've made those free throws, and I love making tough free throws, but the only thing I can do is to knock them down next time.'
Mathurin also committed two fouls away from the ball, and the Thunder were awarded a free throw plus possession each time.
Indiana lost the offensive rebound battle 12-7 and was outscored 23-11 in second-chance points. The Pacers also turned the ball over 15 times.
'Their second shots were a big problem,' Carlisle said. 'When you're unable to rebound, it's hard to continue to play with pace and tempo. … But give them credit. They kept attacking, kept attacking, and their defense was great down the stretch.'
Pascal Siakam scored a team-high 20 points with eight rebounds and had five steals, four of which came in the first quarter. Tyrese Haliburton added 18 points with seven assists but committed five turnovers. Obi Toppin contributed 17 points and seven rebounds. Indiana finished the game with five players in double figures, but it wasn't enough to close the game.
Advertisement
'They made shots. They went to the free-throw line a lot of times,' Siakam said. 'And we just didn't execute at the end of the game. Rebounding, turnovers … there's so many things in the game that we just didn't do right, and it came at the right moment and they made the right play.'
In the final period, the Pacers went ice cold and scored just 17 points, managing only five points over the final four minutes. Indiana made just 5 of 18 field goals, missing all eight of its 3-pointers, and shot just 27.8 percent during the final quarter. The Thunder played with desperation, and Oklahoma City guard Shai Gilgeous-Alexander scored 15 of his 35 points in the final five minutes of the game.
'Fouls were an issue,' Carlisle said. 'He's a great player. That's the other issue. He's the MVP, and we had a couple good stands against him. We had some terrific opportunities that we did not cash in on. Hey, you're up seven at home. You have to dig in and find a way, and we were unable to do it tonight.'
As the series shifts to OKC for Game 5, the Pacers have a tough road in a hostile environment and plenty of mistakes to clean up. After dominating for much of Game 4, they let the game get away from them and appeared out of sorts as they missed shots and struggled to play their brand of basketball for the full 48 minutes.
'We gotta do a better job. I gotta do a better job of keeping pace in the game,' Haliburton said. 'I did a much better job of that last game, especially down the stretch keeping pace, getting rebounds, and really pushing. So we gotta do a better job of when we do get stops, get down running. A lot of times in that fourth, we were fouling too much, taking the ball out, having to kind of run something versus just random basketball.'
After the loss, though, the Pacers seemed confident in their ability to bounce back, as they've done since March.
Advertisement
'We've won some games on the road before, so I think we just gotta go out there with our confidence,' Siakam said. 'We'll watch (film on) what we did wrong and try to get better at those things. We just gotta go out there and do things that we've done in the past.
'And we have that confidence that we can do it. It's gonna take a lot, and it's gonna be hard, but I think we have the group capable of doing that again.'
(Photo of Tyrese Haliburton: Maddie Meyer / Getty Images)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tracy McGrady thinks Jamaal Tinsley has better handles than Kyrie Irving: "Probably the best I've seen"
Tracy McGrady thinks Jamaal Tinsley has better handles than Kyrie Irving: "Probably the best I've seen"

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Tracy McGrady thinks Jamaal Tinsley has better handles than Kyrie Irving: "Probably the best I've seen"

Tracy McGrady thinks Jamaal Tinsley has better handles than Kyrie Irving: "Probably the best I've seen" originally appeared on Basketball Network. Kyrie Irving is one of the most electrifying bucket-getters in the NBA, thanks not only to his scoring arsenal but also to his masterful handles. But according to Tracy McGrady, Jamaal Tinsley was on another level when it comes to handling the ball, even though he admits Irving is still a must-watch. Advertisement "Man, I don't think nobody had better handles than Jamaal Tinsley, even Kyrie," McGrady said on The Young Man & the Three podcast. "I think Jamaal Tinsley's handles were probably the best I've seen. That's an argument, though. He was nice with that thing on a string." The best ball handler debate Most still pick Irving as the best ball handler in NBA history. Allen Iverson, for example, belongs in that group. He aptly described Irving's style as similar to a predator playing around with its prey. "He got the best," A.I. said of Irving's handles on The Big Podcast with Shaquille O'Neal and Adam Lefkoe. "Kyrie will have you beat, and then bring it back and play with it. He's toying with people, you know what I mean? He can still just go, but if he feels like playing with you." Advertisement Now, Shaquille O'Neal disagreed with Iverson's pick, naming Jason Williams, his former Miami Heat point guard, as his personal best. O'Neal said Irving's style is too herky-jerky for his taste, while Williams had the whole package and was a smoother operator. In addition to Tinsley, Irving, Iverson and Williams, Jamal Crawford is mentioned in this conversation. Crawford's handle was so fluid that even seasoned defenders struggled to stay in front of him. He also had patented dribble moves that only he could do in a real game. Then there's Stephen Curry, whose combination of tight handles and unlimited range puts constant pressure on defenses. Curry's handle may not be as flashy as Irving's or Crawford's, but his control and ability to create space using that dribble are unmatched. Related: "Yeah, they'll probably have to do something" - Bird says the NBA will be forced to move the 3-point line back if high volume continues What Tinsley was known for in the NBA After his New York streetball days, during which he earned the nickname "Mel the Abuser," Tinsley went on to carve out a solid 11-year NBA career with multiple teams. As a rookie, he even ranked among the league leaders in assists per game, showcasing his elite playmaking from day one. Advertisement Tinsley's ball handling was controlled and deliberate, with an old-school feel contrasting with Irving's flashier approach. Whether that's a positive or a knock depends on personal taste. However, beyond his handles and playmaking, Tinsley is often remembered for his role in sparking the Malice at the Palace. As Stephen Jackson recalled on the "All The Smoke" podcast, it was Jamaal who told Ron Artest to deliver a hard foul on Ben Wallace in retaliation for a hit Artest had taken during the previous year's Eastern Conference Finals. If it weren't for Tinsley's advice, the worst player-fan brawl in NBA history might've never happened. While his unwelcome participation in the Malice will always be part of Tinsley's NBA story, his ball handling will always come No.1 . It's part of his game that too often gets lost in the conversation and one that earned quiet respect, even if it didn't always grab the spotlight. Advertisement Related: "Isiah Thomas would be right there as 1B"- Jason Kidd's candid take on Kyrie Irving being the NBA's undisputed ball-handler This story was originally reported by Basketball Network on Jun 14, 2025, where it first appeared.

Suns grab Florida basketball star Walter Clayton Jr. in latest CBS Sports mock draft
Suns grab Florida basketball star Walter Clayton Jr. in latest CBS Sports mock draft

USA Today

time12 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Suns grab Florida basketball star Walter Clayton Jr. in latest CBS Sports mock draft

Suns grab Florida basketball star Walter Clayton Jr. in latest CBS Sports mock draft Former Florida basketball guard Walter Clayton Jr. is projected to be drafted by the Phoenix Suns with the 29th overall pick in CBS Sports' latest NBA mock draft. Clayton is coming off one of the most decorated seasons in program history. The 6-foot-2-inch guard set a single-season school record with 713 points, captured Final Four Most Outstanding Player honors and shot 38.6% from three-point range while leading Florida to a national championship. CBS Sports' Gary Parrish praised Clayton's "unique shot-making profile," noting that the former Iona transfer averaged 22.3 points and hit 43.5 percent from beyond the arc over six NCAA Tournament games. Phoenix could view Clayton as a potential instant-offense option off the bench, thanks to his deep range and proven clutch gene. His winning polished game and winning pedigree also make him an attractive selection during the late first-round window. Here is everything Parrish said about Clayton and why he thinks the Suns will draft him in the 2025 NBA draft. What CBS Sports said about Clayton "Clayton was the star of Florida's national title run while averaging 22.3 points on 43.5% shooting from beyond the arc in those six NCAA Tournament games. There are concerns about his decision-making and approach to defense, but the Most Outstanding Player of the 2025 Final Four is such a skilled and unique shotmaker that he's worthy of a serious look this deep in the first round by a Phoenix franchise that probably needs to hit the reset button." CBS Sports' 2025 NBA mock draft top 10 picks Dallas Mavericks: Cooper Flagg, SF, Duke Blue Devils San Antonio Spurs: Dylan Harper, PG, Rutgers Scarlet Knights Philadelphia 76ers: Tre Johnson, SG, Texas Longhorns Charlotte Hornets: VJ Edgecombe, SG, Baylor Bears Utah Jazz: Ace Bailey, SF, Rutgers Scarlet Knights Washington Wizards: Jeremiah Fears, PG, Oklahoma Sooners New Orleans Pelicans: Kon Knueppel, SF, Duke Blue Devils Brooklyn Nets: Khaman Maluach, C, Duke Blue Devils Toronto Raptors: Derik Queen, C, Maryland Terrapins Houston Rockets: Carter Bryant, SF, Arizona Wildcats Follow us @GatorsWire on X, formerly known as Twitter, as well as Bluesky, and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Florida Gators news, notes and opinions.

Raptors mailbag: Trade RJ Barrett or Immanuel Quickley? What are expectations for Toronto next season?
Raptors mailbag: Trade RJ Barrett or Immanuel Quickley? What are expectations for Toronto next season?

Hamilton Spectator

time18 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Raptors mailbag: Trade RJ Barrett or Immanuel Quickley? What are expectations for Toronto next season?

A bit miffed that the Knicks haven't called Mother Star for permission to talk to me about the coaching opening, but then again I don't know what the answer would be. I do know it's a big part of Ye Olde Mailbag this weekend, so enjoy. Oh, and be nice to be your dad today (you listening, Super Son?) and let him enjoy Father's Day in whichever manner he wants. I saw where Rogers had been approved by the five leagues that it is involved in as a part owner of MLSE to up its stake to 75 per cent, basically just a rubber-stamping process as no league is going to refuse them in upping their stake. My question, or rather confusion, lies in Larry Tanenbaum's 25 per cent stake. I have heard for a while now that his stake can be acquired by MLSE in 2026. This would make Rogers the sole owner of MLSE. Is this a done deal? Is it a given that Larry will sell his stake? Does he have a choice? Although I don't see why he wouldn't, as MLSE has morphed away from him being really the face of the corporation and he has his new venture in the WNBA. My question is: Is his stake definitely going to be sold in 2026, or what are the factors behind it in terms of MLSE acquiring it? Thanks and have a great day. —Doug B. In deep trouble at times Friday night, the Thunder reduced the Finals to a best-of-three heading back to Oklahoma City on Monday night. In deep trouble at times Friday night, the Thunder reduced the Finals to a best-of-three heading back to Oklahoma City on Monday night. Rogers has the rights to obtain Tanenbaum's 20 per cent — he had sold five per cent earlier — this year under the original terms of partnership. It's expected that it will be, but nothing in business at that level is done until it's done and it's not done, so this will be an interesting boardroom story to follow. Good afternoon, Doug. I have really enjoyed the playoffs this year. The basketball has been good, and the series have been reasonably competitive. Has there been a year that you felt the playoffs as a whole were below par? Which NBA Finals series did you enjoy the least? And to end on a positive note, which year's NBA Finals did you enjoy the most? —A.J. Falconer in Burlington In recent vintages, I seem to recall the overall tone of the 2013 playoffs were only saved by an epic Spurs-Heat final; the rest of the playoffs were pretty bad. So maybe that covers off both aspects? I don't listen to his podcast, but I seem to read an awful lot of what he said. Do you have an opinion of Bill Simmons? —Paul M. I really don't. He's not someone I pay any attention to. He's certainly a good success story, having become this giant from a humble start as a one-trick pony Boston Sports Guy, and he has created journalism jobs as a boss, but I don't put any weight on his opinions or his weight in the sports and entertainment culture world. Hi, Mr. Smith. Been a while since I asked a question here, but I am getting excited about the upcoming season and step forward that I hope the Raptors are healthy enough to take this year. That being said, it has been often discussed that they have many duplicate pieces. How many players do you feel could make up a team that can challenge in the playoffs? Is Immanuel Quickley a starting-calibre point guard or better suited as a two? With the glut of two-threes that they have, which or how many can be in a quality playoff team? —Niagara Nick The roster as constructed right now should be a playoff team. Once you get there, it's health, matchups, hot hands and good luck that determine mainly who advances. Yeah, I'd say he's a starting quality point guard, not an all-star but certainly good enough to start in a post-season series. As for how many two-threes? I think you need probably four guards, three wings — or let's say five smalls and three or four bigs — to comprise a good roster. And give my best to Niagara. I gotta get back there soon and see if any of the old haunts are still haunting the place. Or discover some new ones. Hi, Doug. Can't complain about the playoffs being boring! Both NBA and NHL finals are competitive to say the least. Oh, the late nights and early-morning work hours mean pre-game naps for me! Some questions: 1) Many articles suggest that if the Raptors are involved in any trades, RJ Barrett is a target. No offence, but why not Immanuel Quickley? Similar age and contract, or is there less of a market for guards (mentioned Jakob Poeltl a lot, too). I automatically disregard any multiple-team trade rumour where the Raptors are the only team that benefits and someone demands a third of our roster and/or every draft pick for the next four to six years! 2) Tyrese Haliburton and SGA were both acquired by their respective teams in the first couple of years in the league by trading an all-star player. Should this be the model for team building? Or was this just two examples of savvy GMs pulling off a heist? 3) How likely is Dr. Alex McKechnie to manage another Kawhi Leonard-like recovery in the case of Brandon Ingram ? Getting back to potential trades, wouldn't it be wiser to see how well the healthy roster works together before making any moves (assuming no crazy offers too good to pass up are made!)? In this week's mailbag, Doug Smith takes questions on potential Raptors trades, the NBA Finals, Bobby Webster, the G League and much more. In this week's mailbag, Doug Smith takes questions on potential Raptors trades, the NBA Finals, Bobby Webster, the G League and much more. 4) Another draft question. Yes, the draft is largely a crapshoot, but as interest in Khaman Malauch grows, the odds of him being around for the Raptors may fall. Would it be so terrible to pick a player maybe an inch shorter with a similar wingspan? Also, based on last year, it looks like management prefers fourth- or fifth-year players rather than freshmen. Thoughts? It's sad that the team losing the championship will wonder what they need to fix when the truth is, with luck, they are essentially good enough! Thanks for keeping us going until next season! —Bernie M. The general theory I'm hearing about RJ being bandied about is that his contract, while a bit more expensive per year, has two fewer seasons left than Quickley's and that makes him a more interesting asset to discuss. And the larger value might make it easier for money to fit in a big deal. Doesn't mean it's why they want to deal him, it's that the fit is better. Big trades, like the ones that got Haliburton to Indy and SGA to OKC, are always just parts of the team-building process. And as much as we think now the Pacers and Thunder fleeced the Kings and Clippers, both Sacramento and Los Angeles firmly believed they were making deals to improve at the time. It just didn't work out. I don't know if Alex and the team's medical staff will make magic with Ingram, but their history suggests they will and it's part of the reason the Raptors pulled the trigger. They have faith in their staff. And yes, all things considered you'd want to see if things work before pulling off a big deal, but you have to strike when the opportunity arrives, if it does, and what's possible today is unlikely to be available in, say, next February. Yes, the draft is a crapshoot, no question. But it's not inches as much as it is overall skill set that will determine who gets taken. The four-year college 'vets' have generally come later in the draft and it's a conscious decision by management at that point. I don't think it should come into play with a top-10 selection. Hey, Doug. Hope you are enjoying the longer days and transition into the summer months. The warmth and sunshine just seem to change about everything for me. The firing of the head coaches for the New York Knicks (NBA) and Dallas Stars (NHL) after reaching conference finals has me scratching my head. Highly successful seasons, or in the Stars example multiple seasons. But clearly my definition of success and those organizations' definition are different. It seems the standard is now: win it all or you will be gone. Tom Thibodeau took the Knicks to a place they haven't been in a long while. One might think that's a good thing. Apparently not. What are your thoughts on this? Was the assumption that the Knicks advanced despite the coach, rather than because of him? Is there a lack of accountability by the GMs of these organizations for the roster? In other words, I gave you a championship roster, so you should have won a championship! It's not me, it's you. The Knicks and the Stars were right there. So close to getting to the finals. A play here, a bounce there and they're through. Now, a new coach, new system, etc., one could argue there is a higher likelihood you are worse next year rather than better, given how difficult it is to get to the conference finals. I don't get it. I know winning a lot of games for years on end, without getting to the ultimate goal, will cause reflection and perhaps change and rightly so (hello, Leafs ). I've just always felt that coaches get too much credit and too much blame, and the players on the court/ice ultimately will decide who's better. Maybe my thinking is flawed. —Chris I've always felt that coaches get too much blame and too much credit, but it's a hard argument to win given the focus on them and their position often as the only constant face of a franchise. But I don't think it's personal accountability as much as it is a stark lack of patience, and not to ever be forgotten is the impatience is often shown by ownership, far more often than by general managers. The owners are often the true culprit, and I think that's what was in play in New York. Kuhn has seen it all in his role as the Toronto Raptors' public address announcer since the inaugural season. Kuhn has seen it all in his role as the Toronto Raptors' public address announcer since the inaugural season. And while I can't speak to the Dallas hockey situation, I will make this point: At some juncture, some coaches have taken teams as far as they can go and there needs to be a change to take that final step, and maybe after three straight failures to take the final step a new approach is necessary. That was certainly not the case in the New York basketball scenario. The Knicks had showed constant growth and had not stagnated. Hi, Doug. Long time no submission (but doing so now to help keep you employed)! Having watched many of the playoff teams this post-season and their varying levels of skill, I'm impressed with many of those teams' future prospects — and concerned about how far Raps still have to go (in my opinion) to catch up to the better teams never mind climb over them in standings. How do you see the competitive landscape? —BBall Barry in North Bay/Sarasota I think the East is a bit of a mess and wide open right now, and I expect this Raptors roster to be quite competitive in it next season. Probably not to the level of winning the conference, but they can certainly take the next big step toward that. The distance to go isn't as great as you seem to think, I would say. Hey, Doug. Happy Super Dad Day! Wondering what you make of the latest soap opera from the New York Knicks? They fired Thibodeau and now appear to be asking the other 29 teams for permission to interview their head coach. (Maybe they should reach out to Red Auerbach. I understand he hasn't been under contract by the Celtics for a few years now.) Who should they hire? Is Dwane Casey no longer interested in coaching? If offered the position, should he accept it? I can't help to see certain similarities between the Knicks and Maple Leafs. What is it about these franchises that they appear close to returning to the finals of their respective leagues, and then everything collapses around them? Maybe Harold Ballard could be compared to James Dolan, but the Leafs have had solid — rational? — ownership for many years now. What should they do, or not do? Appreciated as always. —Phil I would never in a second recommend to a friend like Dwane that he consider working for Dolan and the Knicks. It's been a cesspool of ownership for about two decades and while Leon Rose may have cleaned it up a bit, it's still a mess. Who should they hire? Well, I'm sure there's an assistant out there who is eager for one of only 30 jobs like it on Earth who thinks he or she can somewhat survive, but I can't think of anyone in particular. Trouble is, it seems the Knicks are more interested in winning the press conference than anything, and that seldom works out. Leafs-Knicks? Maybe the common thread over the last 20 years is hubristic because neither team — until New York this spring — has been truly relevant in their sport, despite the fans' belief that they're good.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store