
Belgian donor scandal sees man with cancer gene conceive 52 children
Belgium has found itself in the midst of a scandal after it was revealed that a Danish sperm donor with a pathogenic gene mutation conceived 52 children with 37 different Belgian women between 2007 and 2018.
The gene mutation, known as TP53, confers a significantly increased risk of cancer.
Belgium has the so-called 'six-women rule', setting the legal limit of six families per donor. However, this was rarely implemented in practice because donations are made anonymously.
As a result, fertility centres were unaware if they had each used the same donor multiple times.
The Belgian government has decided to change the existing law and get rid of the provision of anonymity — including the intention of doing so in its coalition agreement.
"It is all hands on deck now to work on the texts for this purpose, and with this latest news, it has become all the more important to realise this ," Billy Buyse, a spokesperson for Health Minister Frank Vandenbroucke, told Euronews.
"So this will definitely be pushed through under this government," Buyse emphasised.
MP for the right-wing N-VA party Frieda Gijbels tabled a bill on removing anonymity a few months ago. However, local media reported that there is opposition from the industry.
This has a lot to do with the six-women rule and how well this has been implemented. In the last three years alone, 22 violations of the rule have been identified.
N-VA president Valerie Van Peel, who led the dossier in the previous two legislatures, cited pressure from some fertility doctors not to take steps.
"There are of course doctors who have committed violations themselves," Gijbels said. "They don't like the lids going off the jars."
The proposal to lift anonymity has also sparked concerns that donors may be deterred.
However, Gijbels said examples from abroad prove otherwise. She pointed to France, which in 2022 decided that donors of sperm, eggs and embryos will have their identities put on the record.
"In France, they have lifted anonymity and the number of donors has even increased,' Gijbels said.
Vandenbroucke's cabinet was only informed about the extent of the scandal involving the Danish donor at the end of May.
However, the Federal Agency for Medicines and Health Products (FAGG), responsible for quality controls and donation irregularities, was made aware much earlier.
In November 2023, the agency received a European rapid alert about the Danish sperm donor and the fact he had a pathogenic gene mutation linked to an increased risk of cancer.
Some affected mothers were notified by the fertility centres in the months that followed. This was then confirmed to the FAGG.
"We were baffled that the FAGG did not notify us immediately. First, they did not let us know that a medical risk had arisen, but we were also unaware of the large number of victims," Vandenbroucke told domestic media.
Earlier this week, it came to light that 67 children across Europe were allegedly conceived with this sperm, in 46 families, and that 52 children in Belgium were affected. So far, at least 10 children have been diagnosed with cancer. Meanwhile, 23 were diagnosed with the gene mutation, making them more vulnerable to developing a wide range of cancers.
An audit of the FAGG will be carried out with a specific focus on internal quality processes, enforcement and inspection, as well as communication with externals. The first results are expected after the summer.
Vandenbroucke also asked the FAGG to check with the families concerned whether their child had undergone genetic screening in the meantime, as it had not followed up with families since first informing them of the issue with the donor.
Finally, Vandenbroucke has also called for an improved system at the European level, "because different quotas apply in all countries and nobody knows how often foreign donor sperm is really used."
Three Serbian nationals have been arrested in France in connection with the vandalism of Jewish sites in Paris over the weekend, according to local media, with the incident drawing parallels with previous similar cases where Russian involvement was suspected.
Three synagogues, a Jewish restaurant and a Holocaust memorial were sprayed with green paint on Saturday in the city's historic Marais district and 20th arrondissement.
Authorities in Paris immediately launched an investigation into "damage committed on religious grounds". On Monday, the Serbian nationals were reportedly arrested in the southeastern region of Alpes-Maritimes as they were preparing to leave France.
The vandalism bears similarities to two other apparent antisemitic attacks on Jewish sites in Paris in recent years, with authorities stating that there was reason to believe Russian intelligence services were involved in a bid to stir tensions in the French society.
A source close to the investigation told AFP that French authorities believed the latest incident was a destabilisation operation from a foreign actor, "given the similarities with the modus operandi used for the 'red hands' graffiti".
In May 2024, red hands were painted at the Parisian memorial for those who saved people from the city's Jewish community from Nazi persecution during the 1940-1944 occupation of France.
Three Bulgarian nationals were identified by French authorities as being behind the tags.
In October 2023, dozens of Stars of David were graffitied on walls in Paris and its outskirts. In that case, two Moldovan nationals were apprehended, according to domestic press. French security services said a Moldovan-Russian businessman was identified as their potential handler.
In the 2023 case, media including AFP and Le Monde cited French intelligence sources saying that that the vandalism had been "commissioned by Russian security services". Moscow denied any involvement and described the reports as "stupid" and "outrageous".
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has criticised his French counterpart Emmanuel Macron over the latest vandalism, saying he must do more to clamp down on antisemitism in France.
The country has a large Jewish population, which has made it a frequent flashpoint for rising antisemitism. In recent years, reports of antisemitic incidents have surged in France, with a sharp rise reported in 2023 after the 7 October Hamas attacks in Israel.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
Most NATO members endorse Trump demand to up defence spending
Most US allies at NATO have endorsed US President Donald Trump's demand that they invest 5% of GDP on defence and are ready to ramp up security spending, the alliance's Secretary General Mark Rutte said on Thursday. "There's broad support," Rutte told reporters after chairing a meeting of NATO defence ministers at the alliance's Brussels headquarters. "We are really close," he said, adding that he has "total confidence that we will get there" by the next NATO summit in three weeks. European allies and Canada have already been investing heavily in their armed forces, as well as on weapons and ammunition, since Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. At the same time, some have balked at US demands to invest 5% of GDP on defence; 3.5% on core military spending and 1.5% on the roads, bridges, airfields and sea ports needed to deploy armies more quickly. In 2023, as Russia's war on Ukraine entered its second year, NATO leaders agreed to spend at least 2% of GDP on national defence budgets. So far, 22 of the 32 member countries have done so, and others are still struggling to meet the target. Trump and his NATO counterparts appear likely to endorse the new goal at a summit in The Hague on 24-25 June. Trump insists that US allies should spend at least 5% so America can focus on security priorities elsewhere, mostly in the Indo-Pacific and on its own borders. He has gained important leverage over other NATO countries by casting doubt over whether the United States would defend allies that spend too little. The new goal would involve a 1.5% increase over the current 2% goal for defence budgets. It means that all 32 countries would be investing the same percentage. The United States spends by far more than any other ally in dollar terms. But according to NATO's most recent figures, it was estimated to have spent 3.19% of GDP in 2024, down from 3.68% a decade ago. It's the only ally whose spending has dropped since 2014. While the two new figures do add up to 5%, factoring in improvements to civilian infrastructure so that armies can deploy more quickly significantly changes the basis on which NATO traditionally calculates defence spending. The seven-year time frame is also short by the alliance's usual standards. The far more modest 2% target, set after Russia annexed Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula in 2014, was meant to be reached over a decade. According to US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, Trump has done nothing less than save NATO. He told reporters that European allies around the table on Thursday had said: "We hear you. We all need increased capabilities. We all need to spend more. Thank you, President Trump, for reviving this alliance. It was an alliance that was sleepwalking to irrelevance." The extra spending will also be needed should the Trump administration announce a force draw down in Europe, where around 84,000 US troops are based, leaving European allies to plug any security gaps. Asked what the Pentagon's plans are, Hegseth did not explain but he said: "It would only be responsible for the United States to continually assess our force posture, which is precisely what we've done." "America can't be everywhere all the time, nor should we be and so there are reasons why we have troops in certain places," he said, offering the assurance that any review would be done "alongside our allies and partners to make sure it's the right size." During the meeting, Hegseth and his defence counterparts also approved purchasing targets for stocking up on weapons and military equipment to better defend Europe, the Arctic and the North Atlantic. The "capability targets" lay out goals for each of the 32 nations to purchase priority equipment like air defence systems, long-range missiles, artillery, ammunition, drones and "strategic enablers" such as air-to-air refuelling, heavy air transport and logistics. Each nation's plan is classified, so details are scarce. The new targets are assigned by NATO based on a blueprint agreed upon in 2023, the alliance's biggest planning shakeup since the Cold War, to defend its territory from an attack by Russia or another major adversary. Under those plans, NATO would aim to have up to 300,000 troops ready to move to its eastern flank within 30 days, although experts suggest the allies would struggle to muster those kinds of numbers.


France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
NATO to propose upping members' defence spending to 5%, chief indicates broad support'
Most US allies at NATO endorse President Donald Trump 's demand that they invest 5 percent of GDP on their defence needs and are ready to ramp up security spending even more, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte said Thursday. 'There's broad support,' Rutte told reporters after chairing a meeting of NATO defence ministers at the alliance's Brussels headquarters. 'We are really close,' he said, and added that he has 'total confidence that we will get there' by the next NATO summit in three weeks. European allies and Canada have already been investing heavily in their armed forces, as well as on weapons and ammunition, since Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. At the same time, some have balked at US demands to invest 5 percent of GDP on defense — 3.5 percent on core military spending and 1.5 percent on the roads, bridges, airfields and sea ports needed to deploy armies more quickly. In 2023, as Russia's full-scale war on Ukraine entered its second year, NATO leaders agreed to spend at least 2 percent of GDP on national defense budgets. So far, 22 of the 32 member countries have done so, and others still struggle to do so. Pressured by Trump Trump and his NATO counterparts appear likely to endorse the new goal at a summit in The Hague on June 24-25. Trump insists that US allies should spend at least 5 percent so America can focus on security priorities elsewhere, mostly in the Indo-Pacific and its own borders. He has gained important leverage over the other NATO countries by casting doubt over whether the US would defend allies that spend too little. The new goal would involve a 1.5 percent increase over the current 2 percent goal for defence budgets. It means that all 32 countries would be investing the same percentage. The United States spends by far more than any other ally in dollar terms. But according to NATO's most recent figures, it was estimated to have spent 3.19 percent of GDP in 2024, down from 3.68 percent a decade ago. It's the only ally whose spending has dropped since 2014. Seven-year time frame While the two new figures do add up to 5 percent, factoring in improvements to civilian infrastructure so that armies can deploy more quickly significantly changes the basis on which NATO traditionally calculates defence spending. The seven-year time frame is also short by the alliance's usual standards. The far more modest 2 percent target – set after Russia annexed Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula in 2014 – was meant to be reached over a decade. The extra spending will also be needed should the Trump administration announce a force draw down in Europe, where around 84,000 US troops are based, leaving European allies to plug any security gaps. The new targets are assigned by NATO based on a blueprint agreed upon in 2023 – the military organisation's biggest planning shakeup since the Cold War – to defend its territory from an attack by Russia or another major adversary. Under those plans, NATO would aim to have up to 300,000 troops ready to move to its eastern flank within 30 days, although experts suggest the allies would struggle to muster those kinds of numbers. NATO planners believe that the targets must be met within 5-10 years, given the speed at which Russia is building its armed forces now, and which would accelerate were any peace agreement reached to end its war on Ukraine.


Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
Did Merz achieve everything he wanted from meeting with Trump?
Friedrich Merz has held talks with US President Donald Trump in the White House, his first visit to Washington since becoming Germany's chancellor. The three topics that were most important during the meeting were defence spending, tariffs and Ukraine and according to a press statement released by Merz shortly before the meeting, the German side was well prepared for the meeting. German Council of Foreign Relations senior research fellow Rachel Tausenfreund said the meeting "could not have gone better for Merz." Tausenfreund says Merz's answers were "well crafted" and that "specifics over the tough trade negotiations were avoided." Trump said the White House was in good shape, that the new administration had "fixed it up, and having it tippy toppy" like "they have in Germany." Trump said both leaders feel it is "very sad" what is going on in Ukraine and added that between five and six thousand soldiers a week are being killed there. The US president mentioned the 75-minute phone conversation he had had with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Wednesday, where Putin reportedly promised to retaliate to Ukraine's audacious drone strikes deep inside Russia on Sunday that that took out a third of the country's bombers. Trump said that he didn't think Putin was "playing games," and blamed former President Joe Biden for the full scale invasion starting. Trump also said he thinks Putin wants "the whole thing," referring to all of Ukraine. Merz suggested he wanted Germany and the US to play a joint role in ending the war. Merz also underlined the good relationship between Germany and US and said he was looking forward to "good cooperation" between both nations. Merz highlighted Germany's commitment to NATO after the government locked in billions of euros of additional defence spending. Relations between Germany and the US had grown frosty, particularly after the Trump administration accused Europe of "freeloading," regarding NATO and defence spending. The US administration is frustrated over what it views as insufficient European contributions. "We want to have the strongest conventional army in Europe," Merz said in the press release ahead of the conference. Trump welcomed the increase in Germany's spending on defence, although suggested he would eventually cap Germany's efforts to rearm. Merz said that Europe still needs US support and friendship ahead of Friday's D-Day anniversary. Trump claimed that under the Biden administration, the numbers for US recruitment for the army were the lowest ever, but now they have broken records. Merz asked how as Germany is having a tough time filling reserves, to which Trump replied: "spirit. They love our country again and you're going to do the same thing." Trump called Merz "difficult" but a good man and said he could imagine US troops would remain in Germany. Director of the Aspen Institute, Dr Stormy-Annika Mildner, says that whilst confrontational with tariff threats and talk of troop withdrawals, "this partnership requires more active management than ever. All the more important, then, that Chancellor Merz sought an early dialogue in Washington." "It seems good work was done ahead of time to let Trump know that Merz had different positions from Merkel on issues which are important to Trump. Trump seemed eager to position himself as a friend to Merz," Tausenfreund added. On the topic of Trump's recent US travel ban on citizens from 12 countries, the US president said: "I even hate to say this in front of the chancellor, but you have a little problem too with some of the people you let in. It's not your fault," and suggested he had warned former chancellor Angela Merkel not to open the borders in 2015 to allow over a million Syrian refugees in. Regarding tariffs, Europe is in danger of becoming flooded by steel after Trump increased tariffs on aluminium and steel to 50%. Asides from that the EU is also facing a 25% tariff on cars and a 10% levy on all other imports. The US has also launched several investigations into pharma, semiconductors and aircrafts that could lead to further tariffs. Trump has further threatened to impose a 50% tariff on all EU goods as of 9 July if negotiations fail to meet his expectations. Dr Stormy-Annika Mildner told Euronews that the relationship with the United States remains central to Germany "both economically and politically." On the subject of China and Trump's phone call with leader Xi Jinping, Trump said they struck a deal, but they needed to make sure "everyone understands what the deal is." He also said Jinping will be visiting the US and he'll be visiting China with US First Lady Melania Trump.