
Sir Keir launches a new fleet of subs, but we can't even fend off a single dinghy
Happy Strategic Defence Review Day, when Santa pops down the chimney and hands out guns to childish MPs. Once more: 'everything has changed'. Yet again: 'the world is more dangerous than ever'. This time the Government is going to make us safer by attaching nuclear bombs to planes. Clearly someone has never seen Thunderball.
The PM launched Operation Sound Butcher Than Reform at a shipyard in Govan, underscoring the preposterous but influential belief that Russia intends to invade Britain. If it does, it better not start with hard-as-nails Govan. They don't just throw Molotov cocktails, they drink 'em.
As always with the PM's speeches, the crowd looked as if they were gathered around a grave, the life gradually sucked out of them as Starmer droned on about drones.
Sailors, he said, told him 'nothing works unless we all work together. In this moment of danger for our country, that's the spirit we need!' The good news is we're halfway there – 'nothing works' – though why he proposes to launch a billion submarines into the Atlantic when we can't fend off one dinghy in the Channel, je ne sais pas.
The Tories hit upon the real problem with the review: they hadn't read it. Later in the Commons, shadow boom-boom secretary James Cartlidge vented that while he'd not been given a copy, the media and industry enjoyed advanced sight that morning, defying parliamentary custom and raising serious questions about security.
Cartlidge needs to put his own house in order. By leaning over the press gallery, any spy disguised as a correspondent for the Racing Post could easily read the notes he had balanced on his knee. The word SECURITY! was scribbled in pen.
The Telegraph knows more than we do, lamented MPs. Simon Hoare suggested the House be suspended. We were one glass of sherry from a buffer demanding a general election.
If you want to see the review so much, said Defence Secretary John Healey, I'll leave some copies outside. 'Attenshun!' Mark Francois marched out like Windsor Davies, returned with a review and it wound up in the lap of Jesse Norman: what do you expect me to do with it, ducky? Jesse got as far as the foreword before obviously finding it as dull as ditchwater, flipped open his phone and read his WhatsApps instead.
The Telegraph provides you with in-depth analysis; all Jesse could say is that the review is competently stapled.
Healey talked nonsense - '...best of defence technology with the heavy metal of our platforms...' and the Tories pointed out that without a budget, his pledges remain 'fantasy'. Tan Dhesi, the dim chairman of the defence committee, asked if this strategic defence review will be 'fully matched with a completely, corresponding, ambitious strategic defence review', apparently unaware that we were discussing said review right now.
The most interesting contributions came from what remains of the Commons Left, who wished to know why the Government is switching from strategic to tactical nuclear weapons, ie defensive to offensive, and how this will increase independence if the tech is reliant upon America.
Labour's voting fodder laughed; one could smell the uranium on their breath. It's good for jobs, they said. But if there is a nuclear war, I doubt unemployment will be our chief problem.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
41 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Britain's Got Talent final sparks MORE Ofcom complaints as Amanda Holden and Alesha Dixon's 'revealing' dresses deemed 'too much for family viewing'
The final of Britain's Got Talent sparked MORE Ofcom complaints after Amanda Holden and Alesha Dixon's opted for 'revealing' dresses to close out the series. Viewers watched the remaining acts battle it out for the top spot and saw magician Harry Moulding win a chance to perform at the Royal Variety Performance and £250,000 last Saturday night (31 May 2025). However what got people really talking where judges Amanda, 54, and 46-year-old Alesha's outfits. According to The Mirror, telly regulator Ofcom received 72 complaints over their ensembles. The publication was told that they were deemed 'too revealing for a family show'. Amanda looked incredible in a white floor length gown with a plunging neckline. From A-list scandals and red carpet mishaps to exclusive pictures and viral moments, subscribe to the DailyMail's new Showbiz newsletter to stay in the loop. The star scraped her hair back out of her face and opted for a smoky eye. Meanwhile Alesha rocked a sheer glittery shirt dress with a black bra and matching underwear. It comes after Amanda defiantly hit back at Ofcom complaints over her daring outfits on Britain's Got Talent. The judge often steals the limelight on the long-running ITV show with her very glamorous outfits. She is known for sporting some bold ensembles while taking to the judging panel alongside Simon Cowell, Alesha Dixon and Bruno Tonioli. Her looks have raised eyebrows and have sparked more than 1,000 Ofcom complaints over the years, but Amanda has now firmly brushed off the criticism. Amanda said she works closely with her stylist on creating each look and insisted she loves every single outfit she has worn on the show since its launch in 2007. From A-list scandals and red carpet mishaps to exclusive pictures and viral moments, subscribe to the Daily Mail's showbiz newsletter to stay in the loop. She told Closer magazine: 'What you see on TV, I really love. 'I'm always asked about the Ofcom complaints, but every outfit on the show is checked before I leave my dressing room, so I'm never worried. 'I think people should have fun with fashion!' It is not the first time Amanda has defended her fashion choices on the talent competition after coming under fire from some viewers. In 2022, she said: 'Fashion is about taking risks. I encourage everyone to have a little fun and be a little daring. I'd be bored playing it safe.' She added that her co-star Alesha Dixon, 46, never cops criticism for her racy outfits, describing the level of complaints as 'bizarre'. The TV star's bold fashion choices on Britain's Got Talent are often a talking point among fans of the series, with Amanda repeatedly forced to hit back at criticism. In one very famous moment, a daring Julien Macdonald gown she wore during the semi-final of BGT in 2017 attracted a staggering 663 Ofcom complaints. The plunging floor-length dress plunged down to the navel, with a cut-out panel that reached the small of her back - but it came under fire when furious viewers deemed it 'inappropriate'. Despite the £11,000 ensemble causing hundreds of viewers to complain to Ofcom, the media regulator decided not to investigate. Ofcom said that while it recognised the dress 'had potential to offend some viewers during what is a family show' - the outfit 'would not have exceeded most viewers' expectations'. In 2019, another of Amanda's dresses on the show sparked nine Ofcom complaints. The judge wore for a sheer dress with spiderweb detailing over the chest, but it was branded 'inappropriate' by viewers, with nine viewers complaining about the look. However, Amanda appeared to see the funny side as she took to Instagram to share a joke about a water bottle sitting on the judges panel acting as a 'nipple cover'. The following night, she sparked more Ofcom complaints as she strutted her stuff in a gown by Lebanese designer Saiid Kobeisy. In another controversy, the regulator said the dress received 34 complaints relating to her dress. During an October 2020 episode, Amanda once again wowed as she wore a plum Suzanne Neville dress with a lace corset top that flashed plenty of leg In 2020, after wearing a navy Celia Kritharioti off-the-shoulder dress with a V-neckline - another 235 Ofcom complaints were made She has continued to show off her bold looks on the 2025 series of Britain's Got Talent and has provided she won't let the backlash change her style During an October 2020 episode, Amanda once again wowed in a plum Suzanne Neville dress with a lace corset top that showed off her toned legs. Of the 896 reported complaints made to Ofcom about the episode, 136 of these were about her dress, with Amanda sharing her 'baffled' reaction to the outrage. 'Just to say this dress got a tiny 136 complaints out of the 896 we apparently got that night,' she said on Instagram at the time. 'Surely there are more terrible and important things to write you agree? I'm baffled why it's still going on.' In 2020, after wearing a navy Celia Kritharioti off-the-shoulder dress with a V-neckline - more Ofcom complaints were made. Amanda was hit by 235 complaints but firmly hit back at the criticism in another impassioned Instagram post. She has continued to show off her bold fashion-forward looks on the 2025 series of Britain's Got Talent and has provided she won't let the backlash change her style.


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Britain is now too poor for even virtue-signalling socialism
We have told the private equity barons to get lost, and might take Thames Water back into public ownership. We have renationalised the railways, slashing fares and buying some new rolling stock at the same time. And we have pumped plenty of fresh 'investment' into the steel industry as we save it from the ravages of free market capitalism. In some alternative universe, Britain's Labour Government would be indulging in some high-profile virtue signalling this week. In this one, unfortunately, a very different narrative is unfolding. It turns out that we are now too poor for even socialism – we have already run out of 'other people's money'. This should have been the week for a Labour Government with a huge majority to indulge its Big State instincts. It is surely clear to everyone that Thames Water is now broken, and it will inevitably require some form of bail-out from the Government if the taps and the sewers in the capital are to keep operating. Whichever bright spark at Ofwat who decided to impose a massive fine on Thames Water only last week, and whichever civil servant who approved it, must be feeling a little sheepish now that the private equity giant KKR has pulled out of rescue talks. The Government might be expected to step in with a plan to take it into state ownership. The problem is the Treasury doesn't have the money, either to service its debts or to repair the pipes. Instead, it is scrabbling around for some other form of refinancing. Likewise, last week the Government should have been celebrating the return of South West Railways to public ownership. We should have expected some razzmatazz, with red flags fluttering on the platforms of Poole and Dorchester, free tea handed out in a Marx mug, and some flashy Tik Toks about the 'People's Railway'. It didn't happen. Instead, the very first 'public train' you could catch was a rail replacement bus running from Waterloo to Woking. True, there was a quickly repainted 'Great British Railways' logo, but that was where the budget ran out. As relaunches go, it was about as flat as a glass of warm prosecco on the delayed train to Cornwall. Meanwhile, the Government may soon be forced to take what remains of British Steel into public ownership as its Chinese owners grow tired of its mounting losses. But the Government doesn't have the cash to spend. Add it all up, and one point is clear: the UK is now too poor for virtue-signalling socialism. That national debt is close to hitting 100 per cent of GDP, and will almost certainly punch through that crucial barrier over the summer. Taxes are running at a 70-year high, but the budget deficit keeps getting wider and wider, with the Chancellor racking up an extra £20 billion of debt in April alone. Receipts are falling with entrepreneurs and nom-doms fleeing the country, and the growth the Starmer administration promised has failed to materialise. Mrs Thatcher once famously observed that: 'the problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money'. Unfortunately for Sir Keir Starmer's Government, the money had already mostly run out before it took office, and what little was left in the kitty was immediately frittered away on higher public sector wages. We can all argue about whether it is better for the water industry, the railways, or steel manufacturing to be in the public or the private sector. And yet we could probably all agree on this point: Britain's crumbling infrastructure, and its shrinking manufacturing base, need more money spent on them. This should have been the perfect month to demonstrate what the public sector can do. Unfortunately, Britain is too poor to afford it any more – and until that changes, the virtue-signalling will have to remain on hold.


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
First Thing: Trump's 50% tariffs on foreign steel and aluminum take effect
Good morning. The US has doubled tariffs on foreign steel and aluminum imports to 50%, pressing ahead in the face of criticism from key trading partners with a measure that Donald Trump says is intended to revive the American industry. After imposing and rapidly lifting tariffs on much of the world, only to reduce them, the president last week refocused on the global steel and aluminum markets – and the dominance of China. Trump signed an executive order formalizing the move on Tuesday. Higher tariffs 'will more effectively counter foreign countries that continue to off load low-priced, excess steel and aluminum in the United States market and thereby undercut the competitiveness of the United States steel and aluminum industries', the order said. Does the tariff apply to all trading partners? It applies to all trading partners except Britain, the only country so far that has struck a preliminary trade agreement with the US during a 90-day pause on a wider array of Trump tariffs. The Palestinian Red Crescent Society has detailed the harrowing account of one of its paramedics, who told the organisation he heard Israeli troops shoot first responders while they were still clinging to life. Asaad al-Nasasra, 47, was one of two first responders to survive the 15 March attack on a convoy of emergency vehicles in which 15 medics and rescue workers were killed. He told the PRCS that after the attack in Gaza he was detained and tortured for 37 days by Israeli forces. What else did he say? In the account he gave to colleagues, Nasasra said some of the paramedics survived the initial assault and were calling for help when they were shot dead, the PRCS said. US immigration authorities have taken into custody the family of Mohamed Sabry Soliman, the man who allegedly used incendiary devices to attack a Colorado rally for Israeli hostages, the Department of Homeland Security said. Twelve people were wounded in Boulder on Sunday when Soliman, 45, allegedly attacked people at a rally calling for the release of hostages in Gaza in what the FBI called an 'act of terrorism'. During the attack, Soliman shouted 'Free Palestine'. The Trump administration quickly seized on Soliman's immigration status to push its mass deportation agenda. Soliman, who was born in Egypt, was in the US on an expired tourist visa after entering the country in 2022. He applied for asylum that year and received work authorization that later expired. What has Trump said? The US president has blamed the attack on his predecessor, arguing it was the result of Joe Biden's 'ridiculous open border policy'. Since the attack, other Republicans have also politicized the events, blaming Democrats for the attempted murders. Republican firebrand Marjorie Taylor Greene has admitted that she did not read Donald Trump's tax and spending bill before voting for it – and that she would have voted against it had she read it thoroughly. Elon Musk, meanwhile, has opened a new rift with Trump by denouncing the bill as a 'disgusting abomination' for causing the deficit to grow dramatically. The world will never forget the Tiananmen Square massacre, the US secretary of state and the president of Taiwan have said on the 36th anniversary of a crackdown that China's government still tries to erase from domestic memory. Ukraine has detonated a massive underwater blast targeting the key bridge connecting the Russian-occupied Crimean peninsula to Russia, damaging its underwater supports. Millions of legal immigrants may be left unable to work after the US Social Security Administration quietly instituted a rule change to stop automatically issuing them social security numbers. Trump has falsely claimed these programs are being used to attract unauthorized immigrants to vote for Democrats. The senator and two-time Democratic presidential hopeful Bernie Sanders is on tour with Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez trying to build a new progressive movement. He spoke to the Guardian about why he thinks Republicans are scared to speak up and what went wrong for Kamala Harris and the Democratic party in 2024: 'They don't have much of a message for working people, other than to say Trump is dangerous. I think that's just not enough.' Umar Patek, a convicted bombmaker involved in the deadly 2002 Bali bombings, says that he is now a changed man. Launching his own coffee business on Tuesday in the city of Surabaya, the former member of the al-Qaida-linked terror group Jemaah Islamiyah says he is now more interested in 'brewing peace'. Patek was sentenced to 20 years in prison in 2012 for his role in the bombings, which killed 202 people, in what remains Indonesia's deadliest terror attack: Patek helped mix 50kg of the 1 tonne of explosives used in the bombs, while prosecutors said he helped assemble suicide vests, detonator cords and boosters. At Tuesday evening's launch, Husnul Khotimah, an Indonesian survivor, confronted Patek about his crimes. A 200-year-old illustrated condom will go on display with Dutch golden age masters in Amsterdam this week, after the 19th-century 'luxury souvenir' became the first-ever contraceptive sheath to be added to the Rijksmuseum's art collection. The condom, which was probably made of a sheep's appendix circa 1830, is thought to have come from an upmarket brothel in France. First Thing is delivered to thousands of inboxes every weekday. If you're not already signed up, subscribe now. If you have any questions or comments about any of our newsletters please email newsletters@