logo
Why Is Google's Pixel 9a The New Template For A Successful Smartphone?

Why Is Google's Pixel 9a The New Template For A Successful Smartphone?

Forbes15-04-2025

Google's Pixel 9a
Ewan Spence
Google's Pixel 9a is picking up critical acclaim, with many noting that offering the phone at $499 marks the 9a as one of the leading mid-range smartphones. While the Pixel 9a will be seen as a win for consumers, it will also be seen as Google's next play in defining what it means to be a smartphone.
In this role, the Pixel 9a builds on the Pixel 9 and Pixel 9 Pro smartphones. So, what does the 9a tell us about Google's choices for the Pixel 9a and how they fit in the wider smartphone world? I've spent time with the Pixel 9a to find out how well its performance, photography, and AI impact today's consumer.
Google's Pixel 9a
Ewan Spence
Since revamping the Pixel line with 2021's Pixel 6, Google has stepped away from offering a phone built around the most powerful chip of the day—generally seen as that year's Snapdragon 8 series from Qualcomm. Instead, it moved to its own design of chips, namely the mobile Tensor.
The Pixel 9a sports the Tensor G4. This is the same chipset that drives the other current Pixel handsets (namely the Pixel 9, 9 Pro, 9 Pro XL, and 9 Pro Fold). The performance differential between the 9a and comparable phones at the $499 price point is less than that between the Pixel 9 Pro and other manufacturers' flagship handsets; online benchmarking shows the 9a closely matches Samsung's Galaxy A56.
Google's Pixel 9a
Ewan Spence
Artificial Intelligence is the new yardstick for smartphones, which puts the Pixel 9a in a bind. While it does offer AI (and I do not doubt that the 9a/AI combination will be heavily marketed), memory is the limiting factor in the specifications. The Pixel 9a is the first of the Pixel 9 family to come with just 8 GB of memory; even with the hardware boost provided by the Tensor G4, the Pixel 9a's ability to use the growing suite of AI tools has to be restricted.
While you might not grieve for the loss of Pixel Screenshots, Call Notes or AI Weather summaries, the 9a shows the technological limits of the current flavours of AI. If you want a full suite of AI, you will need to step beyond this phone.
When I think of the AI features I want to see on a smartphone, it's clear that the Pixel 9a offers the experience you would expect. You have Google's widely advertised Magic Eraser to remove unwanted objects, pets, and people from a photograph; you have Best Take, which lets you pick the best facial expression for multiple pictures from the same moment; and you have Add Me, which composites two pictures so the person taking the photo can add themselves in.
The Pixel 9a also has Google's Gemini Nano model, which runs the 'personal assistant' features, Circle to Search to query what's on your screen, and Magic Studio to help create images and text from natural language prompts.
The core AI toolset, supported by services in the cloud, works as advertised. While the extra bells and whistles may not be available, Google is demonstrating the AI prowess a $499 phone can deliver.
Google's Pixel 9a
Ewan Spence
It will come as no surprise to anyone that lowering the camera specs is one of the measures taken to get the cost of the Pixel 9a to stay at the $499 entry-level point. Google has retained a dual-lens format for the rear camera. The main lens is down from last year's Pixel 8a 64 megapixel sensor to 48 megapixel (which matches the main lens of the Pixel 9 Pro Fold). Ålongside that, you have the saw 13-megapixel ultrawide as the 8a.
This is certainly a downgrade on the actual numbers, although, in practice, there's not a tremendous amount of difference between the 8a and 9a. That comes down to Google's investment in AI-assisted image processing, which carries over from the 8a and the Pixel 9 family.
The macro mode is one addition to the Pixel 9a camera suite this year. This unusually uses the main camera lens and an assist from AI to capture focused images from 5 cm. As Google Product Manager Isaac Reynolds explained, consumers were already using portrait mode to take close-up pictures of food and objects, so why not ensure they had the best option possible in the Pixel 9a?
Google's Pixel 9a
Ewan Spence
The new generation of the Pixel family (once again, from the Pixel 6) has carried a strong sense of brand identity. Like many manufacturers, the design and branding focuses on two areas. The first is the operating system and the UI. With the Pixel representing Google's view of Android, there's not much identity on offer here.
The second area is the rear of the phone. Instead of an isolated raised island, the Pixel 6 and 6 Pro saw a horizontal bar that stretched across the length of the smartphone. With that choice, the Pixel range became clearly identifiable by consumers, and the phone had an identity.
The camera bar is no longer on the Pixel 9a. Instead, we have the complete opposite with an almost featureless flat back. There is a tiny raised lip around the camera lenses (functionally great to help prevent scratches on the lens) and an inlaid 'G'; otherwise, there is no style or substance. The Pixel 9a is far from iconic and is the most non-descript smartphone from a mainline manufacturer in years.
The Pixel 9a is essentially a flat block. The corners are curved, and there's a slight chamfer to the edges so they are comfortable in the hand. The screen comes with bezels, yet the 4mm bezels around the display is are the stand-out feature, but not in a good way. Switching to a dark theme helps hide this, but there's no getting away from the larger size compared to others in the mid-range.
Who wins out from all this? Google's manufacturing partners. Phones from the likes of Samsung, OnePlus, Honor, Xiaomi, and more have identifiable features that people look for. The Pixel 9a simply doesn't stand out in the mid-range. If you are looking for 'a brand', you will end up elsewhere.
Google's Pixel 9a
Ewan Spence
I'd expect to see the Pixel 9a feature heavily in discussions around "the best mid-priced phone'. It's a phone that manages to hit 'above average' in every department. That message will come through to customers.
The Pixel 9a's ability to highlight the potential of artificial intelligence on lower specification devices, the ability to deliver a new camera experience through software, and the bland design that leaves room for innovation and styling will all be noted by Google's manufacturing partners.
The Pixel 9a is a critical success, but the real success may be in the signpost it offers the whole Android community.
Now read about a UI innovation that Google could add to a Pixel 9a successor…

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

YouTube TV Review: The Best Channel Selection You'll Find
YouTube TV Review: The Best Channel Selection You'll Find

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

YouTube TV Review: The Best Channel Selection You'll Find

YouTube TV has solidified its reputation as one of the best live TV streaming services available. The Google-owned platform features an extensive array of channels and is known for its easy-to-navigate user experience. These are important details to highlight, considering the fact that the streamer has steadily increased its price over the years. It now costs $83 a month, which is more than twice its original cost. It may feel like the overall value of the service isn't as clear-cut as it once was, but its price mirrors that of its closest rival, Hulu Plus Live TV. YouTube TV's main strength for cord-cutters is its sheer number of channels. It now offers 78 of the top 100 networks, the most of any streaming service, a count that includes numerous cable staples plus all four local networks -- ABC, CBS, Fox and NBC -- and local PBS stations nationwide. See at YouTube Beyond channels, YouTube TV is easy to use: It's slick and speedy on a variety of TVs and mobile devices. Its cloud DVR is also one of the best, with unlimited storage and pretty much all the capabilities of a hardware DVR. The service also offers a 4K streaming upgrade -- for an additional $10 monthly -- which, importantly, includes unlimited simultaneous streams and downloadable DVR recordings. The big snag is the price, and if you're a cord-cutter, the trimmed-down Sling TV Blue at $46 a month is the best way to save money. At the other end of the spectrum, the $83 Hulu Plus Live TV offers a similar mix of channels, but the addition of the modified Disney Bundle that gives you access to on-demand Hulu, ESPN Plus and Disney Plus, brings some extra value. If you're wanting to stick with a familiar cable tv experience, the myriad of channels and unlimited DVR feature offered by YouTube TV makes the $83 price associated with its base package well worth the money. It's still a good deal for what you're getting. Read more: Best Streaming Devices YouTube TV is different from YouTube, the free video service with more than 2.5 billion users a month. YouTube TV offers an experience similar to cable TV, with live channels and on-demand content available on a variety of devices. It works with Apple TV, Roku, Android TV, Chromecast and Amazon Fire TV, along with numerous smart TVs, phones, tablets, game consoles and web browsers. YouTube TV's channel selection is excellent, with more from CNET's list of 100 top channels than any other competitor (although Hulu isn't too far behind). More channels don't necessarily mean more of what you want. Some services, such as Fubo, lean heavily on sports, while others are increasingly expansive. It's best to check the list at the end of this article, which compares individual channels across services, to ensure you're getting the channels you want. While competitors include several channel upgrade packages, YouTube TV includes everything for one price, with one exception explained below. The service also includes 5.1 surround sound, where available, for all subscribers (most competitors are only in stereo) and an expansion of the DVR search, which can now pick out specific sports, which is most useful for events such as the Olympics. Compared to some services with multilevel interfaces, YouTube TV is fairly simple. There are three main tabs at the top of the interface: Library, Home and Live (on mobile, these tabs are located at the bottom). Library is where your DVR content lives, and Home is where featured and live thumbnails appear. The Live tab is a familiar-looking program grid that displays both currently playing and upcoming shows. You can search for content from the top of any page, making it relatively easy to jump straight to the programming you want. Additionally, viewers can customize the live guide with their favorite channels, or set it to be sorted alphabetically or by the most-watched channels. There's also a button at the top that offers the ability to buy add-on packages and rent or buy movies within the app. A search icon allows you to type in networks or what you want to watch, and we should note that YouTube TV uses your search history for its recommendation engine. If you want, you can delete your searches. You can also perform searches with a compatible voice remote or Google Assistant. This is easier if you have an Android TV streamer, you could also perform searches on your Google Nest Mini and play it on a Roku, for example. The DVR works as you'd expect -- both time-shifting live content and playing back recorded shows -- and the system assigns your recorded content to manageable categories, such as recently recorded and most viewed. The DVR also includes the ability to rewind and fast-forward freely through recordings, even ones that aren't yet completed. The Roku interface offers a 15-second skip by default, while the Apple TV's control system via the Siri Remote is even better. You can use the touchpad to scroll through videos and it's glorious. It's so much fun, and auto-generated thumbnails make it relatively easy to get to the part you want. In the past, when a show appeared in a network's on-demand library, it would automatically replace the version in your cloud DVR, meaning you'd lose the ability to fast-forward through commercials though Google says this should no longer occur. Additionally, YouTube TV's DVR isn't truly unlimited; the shows will expire after nine months (just like Hulu), but this is still much longer than the 30 days you get with most rivals. YouTube TV rolled out a multiview feature in 2023, enabling subscribers to watch up to four separate sports streams on one screen. The functionality has since been expanded to include news and weather channels with the option to watch either two or four streams at a time. It works on smart TVs as well as phones, and all you have to do is scroll to the "Watch in Multiview" section on the home screen. On a mobile phone, the YouTube TV app operates as smoothly as the TV version. I was able to filter by channel and genre to comb through content, and the multiview feature is available on my phone as well. If your phone is connected to a smart TV or media player, you can cast YouTube TV to those devices, which can come in handy if you're watching while away from home. It's also easy to download TV show episodes and movies on the mobile app and stream them right on your phone. Although Google used to integrate YouTube into YouTube TV -- with trailers and related content on a show's About page -- this appears to no longer be the case. The company is continually tweaking the interface, and we may see YouTube content appear again at some point. It depends. The $10 4K Plus upgrade could be useful if you're looking to stream 4K sporting events and on-demand programming, but the amount of content available in 4K is still limited. There is one new feature that may prove the most useful, especially for travelers, and that's the ability to view an unlimited number of simultaneous streams, and the option to save DVR recordings for offline mobile viewing. If you're a frequent flyer or subway rider, the ability to watch prerecorded shows without an active connection is an attractive feature. As per YouTube TV's 4K page, the additional content includes shows from Discovery, ESPN, Fox Sports, FX, NBA TV, Nat Geo, NBC Sports and Tastemade. If you want to watch certain premium content (e.g. South Park), you may need to subscribe separately to premium add-ons for Max, Peacock and other services. The interface includes a 4K button to help find content, but at present, this doesn't constitute enough to stick around for. In addition to a handful of shows, there's Thursday Night Football, "live" Premier League soccer and college football on ESPN. The NCAA adds a bunch of 4K content, but if you want football, 4K or a combination of the two, Fubo offers even more sports for a $90 price tag. The 4K content that is available with the basic subscription, such as the cooking show Make This Tonight or the travel competition show Basic Versus Baller, does look good, with better contrast and color than regular broadcast TV. In context, the top tier of Netflix costs substantially more at $25 per month, but it offers thousands of hours of 4K content alone, plus offline viewing. When it originally appeared for $35, YouTube TV was an exceedingly attractive way to save money over cable. But as the service has piled on more channels, it's added further costs. When you take that $83 monthly fee and apply it to the $55 you're probably already paying for internet service, it means you're paying over $130 a month. Many cable TV providers will give you a TV and internet bundle for around the same money. Prices vary a lot, of course, and with cable, you probably have to pay rental equipment fees, taxes and other extras. Cable providers usually reserve the best bundle pricing for people who sign a contract. The same goes for "streaming" offerings, such as Comcast's StreamSaver, which can be paired with its NOW TV offering. The reason you want to cut cable in the first place remains. Read more here: Streaming vs. Cable: Which One Saves You More Money? Like Hulu with Live TV, Sling TV and others, YouTube TV is contract-free, so you can cancel anytime. Streaming services also have other advantages over cable. They're easier to watch on phones and tablets, for example. At $83 per month, you'll have to be coming from a relatively expensive cable bill to realize substantial savings with YouTube TV. If price is no object, YouTube TV goes neck and neck with Hulu Plus Live TV as the premier live TV streaming service, with a huge array of entertainment options and one of the best DVR/search combos on the market. It offers more channels than anyone else and its 5.1 surround is great for sports and movie fans. If you don't want to be beholden to a traditional cable company, it's a great alternative. Though $83 a month is a tough expenditure for some people, without a contract to worry about, you're free to jump ship to a better deal at any time. The extra $10 is still too much for so little 4K content, even if unlimited streams and DVR downloads are useful for extended families or travelers. If you want more on-demand content for your buck, then Hulu Plus Live TV's Disney bundle is fairly unbeatable. Lastly, if you're a hard-core cord-cutter and determined to save money, Sling TV Blue offers a compelling alternative, especially when paired with an antenna or an AirTV 2. Below, you'll find a comparison of the top 100 channels offered by a few of YouTube TV's competitors. For more information and comparisons with additional services, check out the full article. Yes = The channel is available on the cheapest pricing tier. No = The channel isn't available at all on that service. $ = The channel is available for an extra fee, either a la carte or as part of a more expensive package or add-on. Not every channel a service carries is listed, just the "top 100" as determined by CNET's editors. Minor channels such as AXS TV, CNBC World, Discovery Life, GSN, POP and Universal Kids didn't make the cut. Regional sports networks -- channels devoted to showing regular-season games of particular pro baseball, basketball and hockey teams -- aren't listed.

I found an Android weather app that looks like Google made it — only better
I found an Android weather app that looks like Google made it — only better

Android Authority

time4 hours ago

  • Android Authority

I found an Android weather app that looks like Google made it — only better

Andy Walker / Android Authority People were understandably upset when Google revamped its weather app and removed its lovable weather frog. Rain or shine, froggie was always ready to greet visitors looking for the day's conditions. However, with the launch of the Pixel 9 and the introduction of Pixel Weather, the frog moved to the old weather interface accessed through Google Search. While that's a suitable home, having to perform a search just to see the frog has become tiresome for many, including me. Thankfully, there's a third-party app that can help. What weather app do you use? 0 votes Whatever is on my phone to begin with. NaN % I use a third-party app (mention your choice in the comments). NaN % I don't use a weather app. NaN % Weather Master is an app I've grown to love over the past few weeks, and not just for its pro-frog stance. If I could redesign Pixel Weather, it would likely look like this. The app offers a perfect balance of clean aesthetics, playfulness, and useful information, creating a successful weather app experience. Unlike Pixel Weather, it makes efficient use of space without sacrificing these values. The use of Product Sans and Google's design language throughout the app makes it feel like an official Android app, but it gets many things right that Google's official app doesn't. A better Pixel Weather app than Pixel Weather? Andy Walker / Android Authority For starters, froggie is right there, headlining in an animation that describes the current weather conditions, along with a large readout of the current temperature and highs/lows. Below that, there's a Quick Summary section offering a more detailed text outlook, wind speed, wind gusts, and cloud cover details. This reminds me of Pixel Weather's AI summary, but it's much easier to grasp. For instance, today's outlook for my region reads: In the morning, you'll experience gentle drizzle, with a soft, light rain taking over as the day progresses. Great! I know that it's probably going to rain all day. Now I can plan my schedule, outfits, and dinner. It's concise, clear, and brief enough to read in a second or less, making a quick visit to the home screen all you need to view the day ahead. Below this is a small info strip detailing the week's temperature trend and, more interestingly, clothing and activity suggestions for the morning, evening, and night. Usually, these recommendations are pretty similar day to day, but it's a feature I'd rather have than not. Further down on the home screen, you'll find more Pixel Weather-inspired items and a widget section displaying individual metrics like humidity, pressure, and visibility. I'd prefer dedicated cards for each value to see the present and future progression. Tapping certain widgets, like wind, expands to show average speeds over a broader period. While that's sufficient, as I live in a windy region, it could offer more useful info, like gust strength. Weather Master is an app I've grown to love over the past few weeks, and not just for its pro-frog stance. In the Settings, Weather Master gives users a decent degree of control. Remember when I mentioned it's frog-friendly? You'll see 'frog-related descriptions' in the Quick Summary section by enabling the Froggy summary. It's as adorable as you think, but I prefer the clarity of the standard summary. Users can also disable the entire summary section, pushing other valuable information higher up on the home page. Weather Master is free, but the developer provides a surprisingly broad array of weather models and sources. You can keep the default Best match option if you're happy with the forecast, but I appreciate the level of customization available. It's good, but not quite great Andy Walker / Android Authority Weather Master isn't the complete package yet, and other weather apps outperform it in some areas. I would like to see deeper information for other metrics. As I mentioned, tapping on the wind tile expands it, but I get nothing about gusts. Pressure is another missed opportunity, with the app merely displaying the current value, not whether it's rising or falling. This detail is key to understanding how conditions may change in the coming hours. The app also has a radar feature, but it's not nearly as useful as it could be. For one, it doesn't seem to overlay any data in my region, and where it does offer rain intensity details in 10-minute increments, it has a habit of flashing between visual updates. This makes following a system's gradual progression difficult. Smoother transitions between data sets would be a huge upgrade. Despite these shortcomings and aside from giving Google's homeless frog a new place to settle, Weather Master is among the most approachable weather apps I've ever used. As someone who usually likes data-laden graphs, I still use this app as my first choice. It has a few issues and several bugs that haven't yet been addressed, but there are no deal-breakers here. Since the Pixel 9's arrival, I've been unsure whether Pixel Weather is truly a Google best-effort product. But after using Weather Master, I think the tech giant has been outdone once again by a minnow.

Is The Trade Desk Still a Long-Term Winner?
Is The Trade Desk Still a Long-Term Winner?

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Is The Trade Desk Still a Long-Term Winner?

The Trade Desk plays a valuable role in a digital ad space dominated by big tech companies. An expanding addressable market offers ample room for continued profitable growth. The stock's recent decline appears to be an opportunity, not a warning sign. 10 stocks we like better than The Trade Desk › Stock prices can do irrational things from day to day, or even for a few years. But if you look at more extended periods, you'll see that the market is pretty good at sniffing out winning and losing companies. That's why The Motley Fool recommends long-term investing. So, when a stock, say, The Trade Desk (NASDAQ: TTD), returns over 2,300% since its initial public offering in 2016, investors can feel like that company is genuinely worth looking at more closely. The technology company has continued to grow in a lucrative but highly competitive advertising space. Despite its long-term performance, The Trade Desk is down over 40% from its high. Is the stock still a long-term winner? Here is whether investors should consider adding the stock to their portfolios today. Advertising has been around forever, and for a good reason: It works. But an age-old industry is evolving. Advertising dollars are steadily shifting from newspapers, magazines, and broadcast television to the internet, where your online footprint generates data that companies can use to target you with ads they think you'll respond to. Google (Alphabet) and Facebook (Meta Platforms) built trillion-dollar businesses on this trend. They act as gatekeepers in internet search and social media, a $500 billion market between both segments. These companies operate walled garden ecosystems, meaning they make the rules, keep the data, and give little control to advertisers. As big and powerful as these walled gardens are, there are other opportunities in the digital advertising market -- in connected TV, online video, websites, smartphone apps, mobile web browsers, and internet audio. That's where The Trade Desk has thrived. Its technology platform enables companies to purchase ad space, target their ads to their ideal audience, and track the results of their ad campaigns. It also offers more transparency and control than these walled gardens, a big deal to advertisers, as evidenced by The Trade Desk's success over the years. Sustained, profitable business growth is the key ingredient for a winning long-term investment. The Trade Desk has generated $2.57 billion in revenue over the past four quarters, converting $0.26 of every dollar into free cash flow. The company can continue to build on that. Gross ad spending on the platform was approximately $12 billion in 2024, just a fraction of an estimated $135 billion opportunity in digital media (excluding search and social apps). Additionally, an estimated $300 billion is still spent on traditional media, which will continue to shift to digital over time. The Trade Desk's gross ad spending has grown by 24% to 25% annually from 2022 to 2024, so there aren't any signs of growth slowing down meaningfully. The Trade Desk is currently transitioning customers to its new Kokai platform, which utilizes artificial intelligence to optimize ad spending, thereby helping drive better campaign results for customers and ultimately leading to improved monetization for The Trade Desk. That could mean higher profit margins over time. Lastly, I don't think The Trade Desk gets enough credit for taking care of its shareholders. The company's discipline in managing stock-based compensation has limited share dilution to just 3.4% over the past five years. That's a big deal because a higher share count diminishes a stock's potential returns by spreading the company's profits across a broader shareholder base. Stocks with stellar long-term track records, like The Trade Desk, don't go on sale often. But that is precisely what's happened. A rare, disappointing quarter in fourth-quarter 2024 sent the stock tumbling from a valuation, as measured by enterprise value-to-revenue, that had grown increasingly hot over the past few years. When you buy and hold a stock, you are, in a way, partnering with that company. You want to feel good about who is steering the ship. On the Q4 2024 earnings call, The Trade Desk's founder and CEO, Jeff Green, discussed 15 ways the company is capitalizing on industry growth trends. It's an encouraging glimpse into The Trade Desk's leadership. Now, the stock is valued at a level rarely seen over the past six years. The Trade Desk seems poised to continue its ongoing trajectory of profitable growth moving forward. Its current price looks like a fantastic starting point for a fresh investment, as a lower valuation means that revenue and earnings growth will more likely reflect in the stock's returns. Overall, it seems likely that The Trade Desk will continue to be a winning stock over the long term. Before you buy stock in The Trade Desk, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and The Trade Desk wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $669,517!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $868,615!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 792% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 173% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Randi Zuckerberg, a former director of market development and spokeswoman for Facebook and sister to Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Justin Pope has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Meta Platforms, and The Trade Desk. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Is The Trade Desk Still a Long-Term Winner? was originally published by The Motley Fool

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store