logo
A Look at 8 Interactive Anatomy Apps for Med Students

A Look at 8 Interactive Anatomy Apps for Med Students

Medscape21-05-2025

In her first semester of medical school, Ava Dunlap took part in a small-group seminar where students would review real and hypothetical patient cases. One day, the students analyzed the historical case of Admiral Horatio Nelson, who was shot and killed on a naval ship in 1805.
The students had to visualize how the bullet traversed each part of his body in its pathway, think through what they might see on imaging for other similar penetrating wounds, and consider how they would treat them.
As had become typical for the group, the first step was to pull up Complete Anatomy — an interactive anatomy learning platform — on a TV to better visualize how the bullet tore through Nelson's tissues. Using the app's vast capacities, the students were able to virtually 'pull layers off as the bullet went deeper to figure out where that path was,' said Dunlap, who attends Mercer University School of Medicine in Columbus, Georgia.
'This is why these things happened in this patient,' she recalls learning, 'and we were able to visualize that more than just drawing it on the board or copying and pasting pictures into our document.'
Medical students at Mercer don't always have access to the cadaver lab, but they can use Complete Anatomy anytime they want. (It's included with their tuition.) So, Dunlap regularly reviewed the app.
'It would make me more oriented when I got into cadaver lab,' she said.
Some medical schools, such as NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York City, are moving away from the use of cadavers in anatomy coursework. One study found that medical students who study anatomy through a mixed reality device performed as well on a practical exam as students who used cadavers to study. The mixed reality method reduced teaching time, too.
'Certainly [virtual anatomy apps] are not meant to fully replace the techniques and/or the kind of feel of an actual human, but they can really help, I think, to augment learning and allow learning to happen over and over at a time and a space that's convenient to our learners,' said Traci Wolbrink, MD, co-director of the Center for Educational Excellence and Innovation at Boston Children's Hospital.
If you are a medical student, these eight interactive anatomy apps may help to boost learning.
1. Complete Anatomy
This 3D learning platform (and app) is used at 'top medical universities around the world,' according to its creator 3D4Medical. It offers over 13,000 interactive structures from 12 body systems. There are layer-controlled systems, interactive cross sections, depictions of muscle motion, full-body skeletal maps, and realistic textures.
It is cross platform, meaning that students can access it from any device. This app is considered 3D4Medical's 'flagship app and the most updated one,' according to parent company Elsevier customer service representative Marianna Odivilas.
First-year medical student Dunlap used Complete Anatomy almost daily last semester.
Aside from occasionally getting 'a little bit buggy' when she tried to rotate the images, there were no other downsides, she said.
'It offers dynamic simulations of muscle movement, deeper anatomical detail, and even virtual dissection tools,' said Andres Diaz in an email. Diaz is studying at the University of Arizona College of Medicine in Tucson, Arizona. He has completed 2 years of medical school and is now working on his PhD in cancer biology. 'The trade-off is that it's more complex, takes up a lot of storage, and is better suited for larger screens (PC/tablet) than mobile phones,' he said.
The app is discounted for students to $39.99 for the first year, and then it goes up to $74.99 per year. For professionals, it costs $99.99 per year.
2. Essential Anatomy 5
Students can get a comprehensive education on anatomy with this 3D, interactive anatomy app, which provides detailed models of the human body. Essential Anatomy 5 is also by 3D4Medical, but it is not cross-platform.
It may be considered more 'outdated' than Complete Anatomy which 'offers broader information and more features,' Odivilas said in a web chat. However, Essential Anatomy 5 has worked perfectly well for Ashwin Chetty, a second-year medical student at Yale School of Medicine.
'It's essentially an interactive dissection but clean, easy to understand,' Chetty told Medscape Medical News . 'I don't know how I would have learned anatomy without it.'
The app includes 11 body systems, 8200 anatomical structures, and comes with preset modes, Chetty said, 'where you can get just pelvic anatomy, just facial anatomy, different organ systems.'
The app costs $19.99 on the App Store and $11.99 on Google Play.
3. Visible Body Suite (VBS)
Many schools — over 1000 academic institutions including Tufts University, University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, and some K-12 districts — offer students the VBS platform, which includes a 3D interactive anatomy app and web-based version, according to the company. VBS offers anatomical models of humans and other animals. The app provides cadaveric and diagnostic images, histological slides, and a virtual microscope.
VBS, which now includes many features from the Human Anatomy Atlas app (talked about next), costs $34.99 per year for students and $199 per year for classroom and professional subscriptions. Medical schools and other academic institutions may offer students access to VBS through institutional subscriptions.
4. Human Anatomy Atlas
While features of this app are now part of the aforementioned VBS app, it can also be purchased by itself. This app — an older, less expensive and less encompassing version of VBS — is by far the best anatomy app on the market, said Diaz.
Diaz used the app extensively during his first 2 years of medical school. '…it played a major role in helping me succeed on anatomy exams and solidify core concepts,' he said in an email. 'Its ability to isolate and rotate structures, along with labeled layers, made it very user-friendly and ideal for visual learners.'
The limitation of Human Anatomy Atlas is that it is relatively static, Diaz said. 'While it excels in structural detail, it doesn't simulate motion or biomechanics well, which meant I needed to supplement it with additional videos or resources.'
The Human Anatomy Atlas 2025 app costs $24.99.
5. Kenhub
Kenhub is a web-based tool for learning anatomy. (Note: It is not a standalone app, but medical students can also add Kenhub to their mobile home screens and this may provide functionality similar to an app.)
Kenhub offers many interactive tools customized for beginner to advanced learners. It provides thousands of anatomic illustrations, video tutorials about basic anatomy and clinical applications, interactive quizzes, a color-coded interactive atlas to learn anatomical structures, and numerous comprehensive articles.
The main anatomy-related content references used to support the tools are 'Gray's Anatomy for Students' and 'Moore's Clinically Oriented Anatomy,' according to the website.
Users can obtain a free plan that provides access to the anatomy atlas and articles or purchase a premium plan that provides additional access to quizzes, videos, and other supplemental materials.
Kenhub Premium costs $39 per month or $87 for a 3-month subscription. Lifetime access costs $290.
6. Muscle & Motion
This interactive app focuses on the biomechanics and anatomy of movement. It offers over 2000 high-quality 3D videos about different muscles and their functions. Students can watch videos and animations about how different muscles move in real time and learn about each muscle's origin, insertion, and action.
Students may also access a video library on common movement dysfunctions, posture, and core training.
Subscriptions options are: $10 per month, $40 annually, or $80 for 3 years.
7. BioDigital
This app provides a library of over 600 3D interactive health condition models along with simulations of physiology and procedures. It combines anatomy with physiology and pathology, so it is helpful for exploring disease processes alongside anatomical structures.
There is a free version which includes limited storage and model views.
A paid version — which offers complete access to the library of over 700 models and unlimited storage — costs $19.99 per year.
8. BlueLink Anatomy
This website is not an app per se, but 'it has a really good cadaveric images, as well as excellent quizzes and ways to assess yourself,' Diaz wrote in a text message.
It's a collection of anatomy lectures, videos, quizzes, and practice questions. BlueLink Anatomy includes comprehensive lab manuals, conceptual images, educational screencasts, and online modules which are interactive.
It is 'a multimedia-based education resource developed by Dr B. Kathleen Alsup and Glenn Fox of the Division of Anatomical Sciences at the University of Michigan Medical School,' according to the website. 'BlueLink is a portable and scalable approach to engaging students within a digital ecosystem.'
Materials are free to use for educational purposes and 'are designed for global access and helping to promote education equity,' the website says.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

HHS Journal Ban Won't Stop Corruption — It'll Make It Worse
HHS Journal Ban Won't Stop Corruption — It'll Make It Worse

Medscape

time32 minutes ago

  • Medscape

HHS Journal Ban Won't Stop Corruption — It'll Make It Worse

Robert F. Kennedy Jr has threatened to bar federal scientists from publishing in top medical journals. This move risks backfiring on two major fronts. First, it will only accelerate private industry's sway over the scientific record. Second, launching new, government-run journals will demand vast resources and years of effort — and still won't earn the credibility of established publications. With nearly five decades in medical and scientific writing, editing, and publishing — across nonprofit and commercial organizations, legacy print and digital platforms, and both subscription-based and open-access models — I write from experience. To see the flaws in Kennedy's proposal, we need to understand what works and what doesn't in science publishing. Primary, peer-reviewed medical/scientific literature has evolved and thrived in a culture of self-criticism, through letters columns, corrections, retractions, and open debate. The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) , The Lancet , and JAMA remain the gold standards in medical publishing because of their rigorous peer review, global reach, and editorial independence from government or corporate influence. Here's where RFK Jr's main objection with the current system seems to lie. The Secretary has portrayed medical journals as hopelessly corrupted by industry. Extensive firewalls, guidelines, and rules have been established to govern the relationship of industry to medical journals. They rest largely on honest disclosure with authors, editors, and readers paying attention. Cracks in those barriers are not unknown. But the solution lies in strengthening these firewalls, not sidelining them. A ban on government employees from submitting to NEJM , The Lancet , JAMA, and other top-tier titles will deliver more power — not less — to pharmaceutical, device, and biotech companies to set the scientific agenda. Far from reducing 'corruption,' such a misguided policy would magnify the role of the very stakeholders RFK Jr decries. And if federal grant support diminishes, the research that is published will become increasingly supported by industry, compounding the mistake. The notion of creating new government-owned medical journals from scratch is not an absurd idea. But Kennedy's illusion of fast-tracking NIH-affiliated "preeminent journals" that stamp federal‐funded work as unquestionably legitimate is a gargantuan endeavor. Building editorial boards, peer‐review standards, submission platforms, indexation in PubMed, and marketing to researchers worldwide takes years of work from countless individuals and would cost a substantial amount of money. Even then, a journal's reputation rests on trust and perceived independence. Readers judge not only the science but also the integrity of the editor–owner relationship. The hazard is that the owner (the government) would have to be trusted by the readers, or no one would bother reading these publications. A government 'house organ' would likely be viewed skeptically if the federal government can withdraw or prohibit publications at will. Banning federal scientists from submitting to journals the administration doesn't like does not cleanse the literature of industry influence — it deepens those ties. And while government-run journals might one day exist, they won't arrive fully baked, credible, or conflict-free. Better to invest in the proven mechanisms of editorial independence, enhanced peer review, and clearer disclosure than in a rushed, state-controlled alternative destined to struggle for trust and impact. If RFK Jr wants a better list of reforms, here's what I suggest: Take on predatory publishers and their fake journals, fake authors, and fabricated institutions and references — a threat that existed even before generative chat powered by artificial intelligence (AI). Take aim at rapacious mainstream publishers, whose excess profit margins and subscription price gouging represent a financial drain on researchers, readers, and academic libraries. Crack down on excessively large author fees to have an article considered/reviewed/published. Promote the publication of reproducibility studies. Raise the alarm about the use of AI in peer view and the creation of manuscripts — including the data in them. These steps aren't as sexy as proclaiming publishing bans for government scientist or launching new journals on whose mastheads you can put your own name. But they have the virtues of solving real problems and not making existing problems worse — which, as a physician, seems like something I've heard before somewhere …

Musk Is the $350 Billion Rocket Man Who Fell to Earth
Musk Is the $350 Billion Rocket Man Who Fell to Earth

Bloomberg

time2 hours ago

  • Bloomberg

Musk Is the $350 Billion Rocket Man Who Fell to Earth

The popcorn emoji is out in force as the world's richest person feuds with its most powerful leader. Even Thierry Breton, the European regulator who was a frequent target of Elon Musk's ire, is at it. Still, as entertaining as the billionaire's spat with Donald Trump may be, it also carries costly lessons for a $630 billion space economy dominated by Musk's Space Exploration Technologies Corp. — such is the danger of codependence between de facto monopolies and increasingly protectionist states. This danger wasn't high on the agenda at the peak of Trump's bromance with Musk, when the president-elect described SpaceX's reusable rocket revolution in the way a Renaissance monarch might have praised a successful colonial expedition — with a mix of national pride, geopolitical influence and financial potential: ' I called Elon. I said, 'Elon, was that [landing maneuver] you?' He said, 'Yes, it was.' I said, '...Can Russia do it?' 'No.' 'Can China do it?' 'No.' 'Can the United States do it, other than you?' 'No, nobody can do that.' 'That's why I love you, Elon.''

Sen. Warren asks for contingency plans on national security after Trump and Musk's social media fallout
Sen. Warren asks for contingency plans on national security after Trump and Musk's social media fallout

CBS News

time2 hours ago

  • CBS News

Sen. Warren asks for contingency plans on national security after Trump and Musk's social media fallout

Sen. Elizabeth Warren is asking Secretary of State Marco Rubio for information on the Trump administration's contingency plans if billionaire Elon Musk breaches his companies' current contracts with the U.S. amid the ongoing public fallout between him and President Trump. In a letter to Rubio as acting national security adviser and obtained by CBS News, Warren said Mr. Trump and Musk's public disagreements about the upcoming reconciliation bill that escalated into a public online spat could "have serious implications for U.S. national security." The Massachusetts Democrat mentioned Mr. Trump's proposal to terminate Musk's government contracts and subsidies, which the world's richest man followed with a threat that SpaceX would "begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately." Musk has since walked back his threat. "No petty social media fight between the president and a billionaire should jeopardize U.S. national security," Warren said. In addition to contingency plans for SpaceX, the senator asked for information regarding the impact on U.S. agencies' satellite communications if Musk's Starlink is turned off. Additionally, she asked Rubio to provide any analysis that the Trump administration has conducted "of its authorities and options under the Defense Production Act to address vendor lock, monopolies, or contractor refusal to meet national security needs." She asked to receive answers to her questions by June 14, whether through a classified briefing or preferably a public response that can be released to Congress and the public, the letter said. Warren has been a vocal opponent of Musk and his involvement in the Trump administration. Last week, she released a report that outlines instances her office has found of Musk benefiting from it. Musk's rocket company has received tens of billions of dollars from the federal government over the last decade, including $3.8 billion in the 2024 fiscal year alone, according to federal records. The bulk of those federal grants are from NASA, which has paid SpaceX billions over the last decade to ferry astronauts and supplies to and from the International Space Station. The agency has also awarded SpaceX upwards of $2 billion in recent years to design and build a lunar lander, as part of NASA's Artemis program, which aims to return humans to the moon for the first time in a half-century. While the public spat appears to have cooled somewhat, Mr. Trump told NBC News' Kristen Welker in a phone interview on Saturday that he has no plans to make up with the mega-billionaire. "I'm too busy doing other things," Trump continued. "You know, I won an election in a landslide. I gave him a lot of breaks, long before this happened, I gave him breaks in my first administration, and saved his life in my first administration, I have no intention of speaking to him." When asked by a reporter Friday if he's still considering rolling back subsidies to Musk as a money-saving move, Mr. Trump suggested he was open to it. "He's got a lot of money, he gets a lot of subsidy. So we'll take a look at that," the president said on Air Force One. "Only if it's fair for him and for the country. I would certainly think about it, but it has to be fair." This isn't the first time the president has needled Musk over his companies' federal subsidies. In a 2022 feud, Mr. Trump claimed Musk would be "worthless" without hefty subsidies for "electric cars that don't drive long enough" and "rocketships to nowhere." The two mended their relationship then and Musk spent hundreds of millions to help elect Mr. Trump in 2024. The billionaire went on to lead the Trump White House's cost-cutting Department of Government Efficiency until last week. contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store