logo
As Trump's policies worry scientists, France and others put out a welcome mat

As Trump's policies worry scientists, France and others put out a welcome mat

Boston Globe25-03-2025

At stake are not just individual jobs, but the concept of free scientific inquiry, university presidents say. They are also rushing to fill huge holes in collective research caused by the cuts, particularly in areas targeted by the Trump administration, including studies of climate change, public health, environmental science, gender, and diversity.
Advertisement
If the movement becomes a trend, it could mean the reversal of the long-term brain drain that has seen generations of scientists move to the United States. And while at least some Europeans have noted that the changes in the United States provide a unique opportunity to build stronger European research centers, most academics say that competition is not the short-term motivation.
'This program is ultimately linked to indignation, to declare what is happening in the United States is not normal,' said Eric Berton, president of Aix Marseille University, which has earmarked 15 million euros (nearly $16.3 million) for 15 three-year positions.
He said the number of openings "wasn't much," but the goal was to "give them a little hope."
In France, Aix Marseille University is considered a leader in the push to bring in American researchers.
Since that program started, a cancer research foundation in Paris announced it was immediately putting up 3.5 million euros to welcome American cancer researchers. And last week, two universities in Paris announced they were offering positions to American scientists whose work has been curtailed or halted by the Trump administration.
'We are researchers. We want to continue to work at the highest level in these fields that are being attacked in the United States,' said El Mouhoub Mouhoud, the president of Université Paris Sciences et Lettres.
Advertisement
The university plans to welcome 15 researchers who are already working on shared projects in targeted areas including climate science, health, humanities, and gender studies, Mouhoud said. As a result, the projects would continue unfettered and the American researchers could enjoy 'academic freedom to do their research,' he said.
"That's good for everyone," Mouhoud said.
The alarms at European scientific institutions began sounding as the Trump administration started slashing jobs and freezing science grants as part of its broad cost-cutting measures.
Firings at US centers, deemed the pinnacle of science, have been announced week after week, including at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the National Science Foundation, the US Geological Survey, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
The National Institutes of Health, the world's largest funder of biomedical research, fired 1,200 employees and put grant reviews on hold, essentially turning off the tap of government funding for research projects in labs across the country.
The cuts come as some federal agencies have removed terms from websites and grant applications that are deemed unacceptable to the Trump administration, which is seeking to purge the federal government of 'woke' initiatives. Among the terms considered taboo: 'climate science,' 'diversity,' and 'gender.'
Taken together, the actions have sent a chill through academia and research institutes, with scientists worried not just for their jobs, but also the long-term viability of their research.
'
What we see today is actually censorship, censorship of fundamental values‚' said Yasmine Belkaid, president of the Pasteur Institute in Paris, who moved to France last year after 30 years in the United States, where she had led the National Institutes of Health's Center for Human Immunology.
Advertisement
"We could lose a generation of science, a generation of scientists, something that we cannot recover from," she added. "It is our duty collectively to make sure that science on the whole is protected."
Philippe Baptiste, the French minister of higher education and research, has been among the most outspoken and active European leaders on the issue. Baptiste, who led the French National Center of Space Studies before joining the government, described the Trump administration's decisions as 'collective madness' that required a swift and robust response from around the world.
Baptiste has been working with the presidents of French universities to come up with a government program. He has also pushed for a Europe-wide response, including drafting a letter signed by government ministers in 11 other European countries, which demands a coordinated effort and dedicated funding from the European Commission for startups, research, and innovation.
More than 350 scientists signed a petition published this week in the French newspaper Le Monde, similarly calling on the European Commission to set up an emergency fund of 750 million euros to accommodate thousands of researchers working in the United States.
A European Commission spokesperson said a meeting was being planned to coordinate the most effective response to the Trump administration cuts to scientific research.
In Brussels, two sister universities — Vrije Universiteit Brussel and Université Libre de Bruxelles — said they planned to market to American students a program offering 36 postdoctoral positions open to international researchers from around the world.
The positions, largely funded by European Union money, will focus on research in climate, artificial intelligence, and other areas the schools view as socially important.
Advertisement
In the Netherlands, the minister of education, culture, and science, Eppo Bruins, announced that he wanted to set up a fund 'in the very short term' to attract leading scientists in a variety of fields. While he did not mention Trump directly, he hinted at it in a letter to the Dutch House of Representatives. 'The geopolitical climate is changing, which is currently increasing the international mobility of scientists,' he wrote. 'Several European countries are responding to this and are going to attract international scientific talent. I want the Netherlands to continue to be at the forefront.'
Ulrike Malmendier, a German economist who is member of Germany's leading economic council, urged European governments to increase investment in science to attract out-of-work researchers from the United States. 'The development in the USA is a huge opportunity for Germany and Europe,' Malmendier, who is a professor at the University of California, Berkeley, told Germany's Funke media group. 'I know that a lot of people are thinking about leaving.'
This article originally appeared in

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Appeals court won't reconsider ruling that Trump must pay E. Jean Carroll $5M in sex abuse case
Appeals court won't reconsider ruling that Trump must pay E. Jean Carroll $5M in sex abuse case

Hamilton Spectator

time25 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Appeals court won't reconsider ruling that Trump must pay E. Jean Carroll $5M in sex abuse case

NEW YORK (AP) — A federal appeals court won't reconsider its ruling upholding a $5 million civil judgment against President Donald Trump in a civil lawsuit alleging he sexually abused a writer in a Manhattan department store in the mid-1990s. In an 8-2 vote Friday, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Trump's petition for the full appellate court to rehear arguments in his challenge to the jury's finding that he sexually abused advice columnist E. Jean Carroll and defamed her with comments he made in October 2022. Carroll testified at a 2023 trial that Trump turned a friendly encounter in spring 1996 into a violent attack after they playfully entered the store's dressing room. A three-judge panel of the appeals court upheld the verdict in December, rejecting Trump's claims that trial Judge Lewis A. Kaplan's decisions spoiled the trial, including allowing two other Trump sexual abuse accusers to testify. The women said Trump committed similar acts against them in the 1970s and in 2005. Trump denied all three women's allegations. In an opinion Friday, four judges voting to reject rehearing wrote: 'Simply re-litigating a case is not an appropriate use' of the process. 'In those rare instances in which a case warrants our collective consideration, it is almost always because it involves a question of exceptional importance,' or a conflict between precedent and the appellate panel's opinion, Judges Myrna Pérez, Eunice C. Lee, Beth Robinson and Sarah A.L. Merriam wrote. All four were appointed by President Joe Biden, Trump's one-time Democratic rival. The two dissenting judges, Trump appointees, Steven J. Menashi and Michael H. Park, wrote that the trial 'consisted of a series of indefensible evidentiary rulings.' 'The result was a jury verdict based on impermissible character evidence and few reliable facts,' they wrote. 'No one can have any confidence that the jury would have returned the same verdict if the normal rules of evidence had been applied.' Carroll's lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, said in a statement: 'E. Jean Carroll is very pleased with today's decision.' 'Although President Trump continues to try every possible maneuver to challenge the findings of two separate juries, those efforts have failed. He remains liable for sexual assault and defamation,' said Kaplan, who is not related to the judge. Trump skipped the trial after repeatedly denying the attack ever happened. He briefly testified at a follow-up defamation trial last year that resulted in an $83.3 million award. The second trial resulted from comments then-President Trump made in 2019 after Carroll first made the accusations publicly in a memoir. Kaplan presided over both trials and instructed the second jury to accept the first jury's finding that Trump had sexually abused Carroll. Arguments in that appeal are set for June 24. The Associated Press does not identify people who say they have been sexually assaulted unless they come forward publicly, as Carroll has done. ___ Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel Say Their ‘Partnership' Is Sealed
U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel Say Their ‘Partnership' Is Sealed

New York Times

time27 minutes ago

  • New York Times

U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel Say Their ‘Partnership' Is Sealed

U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel announced on Friday that they had entered into an agreement with the U.S. government to seal the terms of a 'partnership' between the companies, more than a year after the Japanese steel maker first tried to buy its U.S. competitor. Former President Joseph R. Biden Jr., under pressure from the United Steelworkers union, blocked the deal on the basis that it was a threat to national security. President Trump, who also initially opposed the deal, reversed himself and decided to look for a way to revive it. The companies referred to the deal as a partnership, echoing language that Mr. Trump used in describing the transaction he blessed three weeks ago. But U.S. Steel has not indicated to shareholders that it has altered the $14.9 billion sale to Nippon that they approved in April last year. 'We thank President Trump and his administration for their bold leadership and strong support for our historic partnership,' the companies said in a statement. 'This partnership will bring a massive investment that will support our communities and families for generations to come.' The companies said they had entered into agreement with the U.S. government to alleviate any security concerns posed by the deal, known as a national security agreement, which calls for roughly $11 billion in new investments by 2028. The deal will also give the U.S. government a 'golden share' in the company, a rarely used practice through which the government takes a stake in company. In the United States, the government has typically taken a stake only in companies that are ailing or in particular need of government attention, like General Motors during the 2008 financial crisis. This is a developing story. Check back for updates.

Dow Jones Index Today: DJIA Drops on Israel Strikes as Consumer Sentiment Jumps
Dow Jones Index Today: DJIA Drops on Israel Strikes as Consumer Sentiment Jumps

Business Insider

time27 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

Dow Jones Index Today: DJIA Drops on Israel Strikes as Consumer Sentiment Jumps

The Dow Jones (DJIA) is down by over 1% as the market processes the impact of Israel's attack on Iran's nuclear and military facilities. Meanwhile, oil prices are surging as the conflict threatens to disrupt energy supply chains in the Middle East. Confident Investing Starts Here: On Friday, President Trump said that Israel's strikes will actually be a positive for the market. 'I think ultimately, it would be great for the market because Iran will not have a nuclear weapon. It will be great for the market—should be the greatest thing ever for the market. Iran won't have a nuclear weapon that was a great threat to humanity,' said Trump in an interview with the Wall Street Journal. Trump also added that he was aware of the attack before it occurred and that he plans to speak with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu today. Meanwhile, consumer sentiment has finally reversed a six-month slump based on the University of Michigan's Index of Consumer Sentiment. The index's preliminary June reading came in at 60.5, above the estimate for 53.5 and up from 52.2 in May. Furthermore, UM's year-ahead inflation expectation tallied in at 5.1% compared to 6.6% last month. Long-run inflation expectations are now at 4.1%, down from 4.2%. Which Stocks are Moving the Dow Jones? Let's shift our attention to TipRanks' Dow Jones Heatmap, which illustrates the stocks that have contributed to the index's price action. In a weak finish to the week, every single technology stock within the index is falling, led by Salesforce (CRM) and Nvidia (NVDA). In addition, payment providers Visa (V) and American Express (AXP) are taking a hit after the Wall Street Journal reported that Amazon (AMZN) and Walmart (WMT) are exploring the idea of issuing proprietary stablecoins. Elsewhere, communications services, energy, and healthcare, excluding embattled UnitedHealth Group (UNH), are relatively muted as we head into the weekend. DIA Stock Moves Higher with the Dow Jones The SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF (DIA) is an exchange-traded fund designed to track the movement of the Dow Jones. In addition, DJIA can't be bought or sold, although DIA can be. Wall Street believes that DIA stock has room to rise. During the past three months, analysts have issued an average DIA price target of $466.70 for the stocks within the index, implying upside of 9.82% from current prices. The 31 stocks in DIA carry 30 buy ratings, 1 hold rating, and zero sell ratings.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store