
What is motivating Trump's reckless trade war?
Trump has struck last-minute deals with the leaders of Mexico and Canada to postpone for 30 days hefty tariffs on goods they export to the United States, temporarily averting a damaging trade war.
Over the next month, Mexico and Canada will negotiate with Trump
But it would be wrong to conclude that Trump's threat to raise tariffs 25% on America's two neighbors is just about gaining bargaining leverage.
Hours before the Canadian tariffs went into effect, Trump was asked if there was anything Canada could do to stop them. 'We're not looking for a concession,' Trump said, speaking to reporters in the Oval Office on Friday afternoon. 'We'll just see what happens, we'll see what happens.'
The real reason for Trump's threats is to show the world that he's willing to harm smaller economies even at the cost of harming America's very large one.
The point is the show to the world – not just Canada and Mexico – knows it's dealing with someone who's willing to mete out big punishments. Trump increases his power by demonstrating he has the power and is willing to use it.
The same with deporting, say, Colombians in military planes, handcuffed and shackled. Trump says, without any basis in fact, that they're criminals.
If Colombia complains about their treatment, so much the better. Trump threatens tariffs. Colombia backs down, and Trump has once again demonstrated his power.
Why did Trump stop foreign aid? Not because it's wasteful. In fact, it helps stabilize the world and reduces the spread of communicable diseases. The real reason Trump stopped foreign aid is he wants to show he can.
Why is he disregarding or threatening to tear up treaties and agreements (the Paris Agreement, Nato, whatever)? Not because such treaties and agreements are bad for America. To the contrary, they're in America's best interest.
The reason Trump is tearing them up is they tie Trump's hands and thereby limit his discretion to mete out punishments and rewards.
Don't think of these as individual 'policies.' Think of them together as demonstrations of Trump's strength.
If he doesn't reach a deal with Canada or Mexico over the next 30 days and one or both retaliate against American-imposed tariffs with their own tariffs on American exports, he'll retaliate against them with even bigger tariffs.
If some senior Republican members of Congress object that he's stepping on congressional prerogatives, so what? It's an opportunity to show them who's boss.
If a federal court temporarily stops him, so what? He'll go right on doing it and demonstrate that the courts are powerless to stop him.
Look behind what's happening, and you'll see Trump employing two techniques to gain more power than any US president has ever wielded.
The first is to demonstrate that he can mete out huge punishments and rewards.
It doesn't matter if the punishment or reward is justified. A 25% tariff on Canada? Hello?
It's a demonstration of strength.
If prices skyrocket in America for oil and lumber from Canada or for fruits and vegetables from Mexico, no problem for Trump. Most Americans don't understand how tariffs work, anyway. Trump will blame Canada and Mexico. And then threaten them with, say, 50% tariffs. Kaboom!
Which brings us to the second technique Trump is using to expand his power: unpredictability.
What makes an abusive parent or spouse, or an abusive dictator, or Trump, especially terrifying? They're unpredictable. They lash out in ways that are hard to anticipate.
So, anyone potentially affected by their actions gives them extra-wide berth — vast amounts of obedience in advance.
Trump keeps everyone guessing.
He demands Denmark sell Greenland to the United States. He chews out the CEO of the Bank of America at Davos for allegedly discriminating against conservatives. He attacks birthright citizenship.
What's next? Who knows? That's the whole point.
How else to explain the bizarre deference — cowardice — we're seeing among CEOs, the media, almost all Republican and even some Democratic lawmakers? Presumably, they're all saying to themselves: 'He could do anything, so let's be especially careful.'
In 1517, Niccolo Machiavelli argued that sometimes it is 'a very wise thing to simulate madness.'
The 'rule of law' is all about predictability. We need predictability to be free.
But much of what Trump is doing is probably either illegal yet would require months or years before the US supreme court decides so, or is in the gray area of 'probably illegal but untested by the courts.' Which suits his strategy just fine.
The media calls it 'chaos,' which is how various people and institutions experience it.
The practical consequence is that an increasing number of so-called 'leaders' — in the private, public, and nonprofit sectors, and around the world — are telling their boards, overseers, trustees, or legislatures: 'We have to give Trump whatever he wants and even try to anticipate his wants, because who knows how he'll react if we don't?'
Together, these two techniques — big demonstrations of discretionary power to reward or punish, and wild uncertainty about when or how he'll do so — expand Trump's power beyond the point any president has ever pushed it.
Which brings us to the obvious question: Why is Trump so obsessed with enlarging his power?
Hint: It's not about improving the well-being of average Americans and certainly not about making America great again (whatever that means).
True, he's a malignant narcissist and sadist with an insatiable lust for power who gets pleasure out of making others squirm.
But there's something else.
The bigger his demonstrable power and the more unpredictably he wields it, the greater his ability to trade some of that power with people with huge amounts of wealth, both in the United States and elsewhere.
I'm referring to America's billionaires, such as Elon Musk and the 13 other billionaires Trump has installed in his regime, as well as the 744 other billionaires in America, and the 9,850 Americans with at least $100m in net worth.
Together, these individuals have a huge storehouse of wealth. Many are willing to trade some of it to gain even more, and to tie down what they have more securely.
They give Trump (and his family) business deals, information, campaign money, and positive PR (propaganda). In return, he gives them tax cuts, regulatory rollbacks, and suspensions of antitrust.
I'm also referring to oligarchs in Russia, China, and Saudi Arabia. He gives them special trade deals, energy deals, intelligence deals, access to global deposits of riches; or he threatens to hold them back. In return, they give him (and his family) business deals, information, support in political campaigns, and more covert propaganda.
This is Trump's game: huge demonstrations of power, wielded unpredictably. They're eliciting extraordinary deals for Trump and his family, domestically and worldwide.
Trump says he's doing this for American workers. Nothing could be farther from the truth. He's doing this for himself and for the world's oligarchy, which, in turn, is busily siphoning off the wealth of the world.
How to stop this? The first step is to understand it.
Robert Reich, a former US secretary of labor, is a professor of public policy at the University of California, Berkeley, and the author of Saving Capitalism: For the Many, Not the Few and The Common Good. His newest book, The System: Who Rigged It, How We Fix It, is out now. He is a Guardian US columnist. His newsletter is at robertreich.substack.com

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Leader Live
18 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Trade strategy will protect UK firms from ‘harm' amid global shift
The Department for Business and Trade (DBT) said it was the UK's first Trade Strategy to be published since Brexit. It follows the publication of an industrial strategy earlier this week which set out plans to back UK industries which the Government thinks have the potential to grow. The trade plan aims to make the UK the best-connected country in the world to do business, helping to loosen regulation and expand opportunities for exporters. As part of the plan, the DBT pledged to introduce new tools and safeguards to help protect UK firms against the threat of a shifting global trade environment. This is understood to mean expanding its ability to respond to unfair trade practices, guarding sectors such as steel, and potential powers to respond to deliberate economic pressures against the UK. The decision to strengthen trade defences comes at a time of heightened uncertainty following Mr Trump's tariff announcements in April, which have hiked charges on most US imports and raised concerns over the future of global trade arrangements. The strategy nonetheless follows a trio of major deals struck between the UK and India, the US and the EU in recent months. The agreement with the US is set to implement quotas that will effectively eliminate the tariff on British steel and reduce the rate on UK vehicles to 10%. Meanwhile, the deal with India opened up trade between the two countries by lowering tariffs on exports like gin and whisky. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said the trade strategy was a 'promise to British business: helping firms to sell more, grow faster, and compete globally'. Jonathan Reynolds, the Government's Business and Trade Secretary, said: 'The UK is an open trading nation but we must reconcile this with a new geopolitical reality and work in our own national interest. 'Our Trade Strategy will sharpen our trade defence so we can ensure British businesses are protected from harm, while also relentlessly pursuing every opportunity to sell to more markets under better terms than before.' Trade minister Douglas Alexander said the Government was taking 'every step necessary to safeguard British businesses from the increasingly protectionist mood in much of the world by sharpening our defensive toolkit'. Meanwhile, the newly created Ricardo Fund aims to set aside funding to tackle complex regulatory issues and remove obstacles for UK businesses selling abroad – which the DBT said could unlock £5 billion worth of opportunities. It is also expanding the capacity of UK Export Finance – the country's export credit agency – by £20 billion to total £80 billion. The body provides Government-backed loans, guarantees and insurance to help companies trade overseas. Separate to the trade strategy, the DBT said it was calling for views across the steel industry about how future trade measures and protections should be shaped. Steel producers and businesses across the supply chain will be invited to submit feedback over a six-week 'call for evidence' period. Current safeguarding measures – which include tariff-free quotas on steel imports to limit sudden surges – expire in June next year. Mr Reynolds said the Government would 'not sit by idly while cheap imports threaten to undercut UK industry'.


Scottish Sun
22 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
CIA says Trump strikes will set back Iran's nuke programme by YEARS as White House calls for leaker to be JAILED
Scroll down for the latest updates... BUNKER BUSTED CIA says Trump strikes will set back Iran's nuke programme by YEARS as White House calls for leaker to be JAILED THE CIA says Donald Trump's weekend blitz on Iran has left key nuclear sites 'destroyed' – in a devastating blow that will take 'years' to recover from. In a bombshell statement, the Agency's director John Ratcliffe confirmed 'several key Iranian nuclear facilities' were wiped out and must be completely rebuilt. 4 CIA Director John Ratcliffe pictured on March 25 Credit: Reuters 4 Craters on a ridge at the Fordow plant after US strikes Credit: EPA 4 US President Donald Trump during a press conference after the NATO summit at the World Forum The Hague Credit: Shutterstock Editorial 4 CIA chief Ratcliffe released this statement on his profile on X Credit: X 'The CIA can confirm that a body of credible intelligence indicates Iran's Nuclear Program has been severely damaged by the recent, targeted strikes,' Ratcliffe said. 'This includes new intelligence from a historically reliable and accurate source/method that several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years.' The chief added the CIA would 'provide updates to the American public' given the 'national importance' of the operation. It comes after White House called for the arrest of whoever leaked a classified intelligence report on Iran's nuclear sites — as Donald Trump demanded CNN's Natasha Bertrand be fired 'like a dog.' Speaking at a NATO summit press conference in The Hague, the president raged at 'fake news' outlets over reports suggesting US airstrikes failed to cripple Iran's nuke programme. Trump insisted Tehran's labs were now 'totally inoperable,' citing intelligence from both Israel and Iran confirming the scale of the devastation. The uproar followed reports from CNN, MSNBC, and The New York Times citing a leaked Defense Intelligence Agency memo that raised doubts over the extent of the damage — particularly at the Fordow nuclear site. The report was based on just 24 hours of data. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said the person responsible for leaking the classified Iran intelligence report should face jail time. 'They should go to jail,' she told Fox News' Ryan Schmelz when asked about potential punishment for the leaker. Leavitt said the DIA memo had been 'discredited' by U.S. and Israeli officials — and even by Iran itself. 'CNN ran with a story they knew wasn't fully vetted,' Leavitt told Fox News, calling it a leak from 'someone with an agenda' and noting it came from 'the same reporter who once pushed the false Hunter Biden laptop narrative.' She confirmed the FBI is investigating the leak and stressed that those responsible 'should be held accountable.' Defending the strikes, Leavitt said: 'This operation achieved what decades of diplomacy and sanctions could not.' Trump went on to slam the media outlets, saying: 'We had a tremendous success. 'And this is the New York Times. I call it the failing New York Times. It's going to hell. And CNN, which is, you know, very few people are watching, and you would think they'd do the opposite. 'So it's just fake news by CNN, which has got no ratings. It's a failed network,' he added. The president didn't hold back, declaring: 'CNN is scum, the New York Times is scum, MSNBC is scum. They're bad people, they're sick. And what they've done is they want to turn this incredible victory into something less.' Trump then unleashed on Bertrand in a furious Truth Social post: 'Natasha Bertrand should be FIRED from CNN! I watched her for three days doing Fake News… 'She should be IMMEDIATELY reprimanded, and then thrown out 'like a dog'... 'She lied on the Laptop from Hell Story, and now she lied on the Nuclear Sites Story… She should not be allowed to work at Fake News CNN... FIRE NATASHA!' Stay up to date with the latest on Israel vs Iran with The Sun's live blog below...


Reuters
29 minutes ago
- Reuters
US Republican senators push back on Trump cuts to foreign aid and public media
WASHINGTON, June 25 (Reuters) - Several Republican U.S. senators on Wednesday pushed back on the Trump administration's proposed cuts to American public media stations and foreign aid, a sign the request to cancel $9.4 billion of funding could be blocked by the upper chamber. At least five Senate Appropriations Committee Republicans voiced unease with the plan to erase the congressionally-approved funding proposed by White House budget director Russ Vought. None of the five specifically said they would vote to block it in the chamber, where Republicans hold a 53-47 majority. "This package reflects the Trump administration's steadfast commitment to cutting wasteful federal spending antithetical to American interests and correcting our fiscal trajectory," Vought told the committee. The hearing marked a rare moment of resistance from Republicans who hold both chambers of Congress to Trump's sweeping efforts to exert greater control over federal spending - which the U.S. Constitution gives Congress power over. The five who expressed concerns included Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski and the Senate's former top Republican, Mitch McConnell, who have all opposed some Trump priorities before. Maine's Collins, who is the appropriations committee chair, repeatedly questioned the administration's goals in cutting foreign aid as she held up food packets and vitamins funded by these programs, which were approved earlier this year by President Donald Trump in a stopgap funding package. McConnell of Kentucky said the administration's plan to root out wasteful spending has been 'unnecessarily chaotic' and argued that instead of government efficiency, it 'created vacuums for adversaries like China' to fill soft-power gaps. Vought argued the foreign aid cuts, like some funding for LGBTQ advocacy in Uganda, are warranted because they are 'not in line with American interests,' despite the country having a draconian anti-homosexuality law that includes the death penalty for certain same-sex acts. The House of Representatives passed this funding cut package earlier this month, however, the funding changes also need to be approved by the Senate within the next several weeks to take effect. 'I want to see fundamental changes in the package, and I am already working on a substitute," Collins told reporters after the hearing. Republican Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina said he will vote for the funding cut package despite long-standing support of the U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) program because it is 'not beyond scrutiny.' A few Republicans also questioned the funding cut request that targets money for PBS public television and NPR radio stations nationwide, which receive a portion of their funding from more than $1 billion that Congress appropriates through the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. Senator Mike Rounds, a South Dakota Republican, defended his state's Native American radio stations that he said would not 'exist' without this funding, a concern shared by Nebraska Republican Senator Deb Fischer who noted parts of her state have poor cellular service. Vought said he would work with the committee on their concerns and noted that the public media funding in question is for two years in the future to allow for planning. But Murkowski, from Alaska, pushed back on the ability for rural radio stations to plan without this funding, especially for emergency communication responsibilities. "There is no way to recalibrate, there is no safety valve for them," Murkowski said. 'If President Trump and Director Vought get their way and Republicans pass this package, they will not only gut the heart of compromise that this committee is built around but zero out long-standing bipartisan investments,' said Senator Patty Murray, the top committee Democrat.