98-year-old Grunthal twins happy to still be teasing each other, living next door
Kay Rempel and Marie Chipilski might be 98 years old, but the identical twins say they still have some growing up to do.
"We should think before we speak," Rempel said.
"That's the problem," Chipilski added without hesitation. "That's why we have to stay here longer."
Cracking jokes, often at each other's expense, comes easily for the bubbly sisters, who say they have the good fortune to live independently but across the hall from each other at a 55-plus residence in Grunthal.
Earlier in the week, the twins were invited to the Manitoba Legislature to mark their 98th birthdays.
Their MLA, Konrad Narth, read a speech, all politicians gave them a standing ovation and the sisters got certificates to recognize nearly a century of living.Narth said the two "firecrackers" are best friends who enjoy joking around.
The twins say they're often complimented for their witty humour from family, friends and even strangers.
"They say we're different — we're foolish," Chipilski said, adding she believes frequent laughter is key to their longevity.
The sisters have also prioritized enjoying life, loving others and their Christian faith, rather than the predictable explanations for a long life, such as regular exercise and a good diet.
"I never did eat healthy," Chipilski said.
The sisters grew up on a family farm near New Bothwell along with 10 Friesen siblings.
The twins always got along smoothly.
"We never fought or anything," Rempel said.
"But now it's a different story," Chipilski quipped.
They later got married and had kids, and their lives took different paths. Chipilski took over the family farm with her husband, while Rempel was busy selling flowers and volunteering at church.
Rempel was the first to move to Grunthal, settling in a 55-plus residence after her husband's health took a turn. Eventually, her neighbour across the hall moved out, and Rempel invited Chipilski to move in.
"I'm sorry I did," Rempel joked.
Both widows have spent more than 20 years living across the hall from each other.
They joke the doors between their rooms are kept shut, but they spend time together daily, trading barbs and watching game shows and cooking shows on television.
"We feel like one," Chipilski said, so much so that "we have never ever given each other a hug."
It would be like hugging yourself, Rempel said: "There's no use."
Although Chipilski is going through cancer treatment, both she and Rempel say they feel great physically. They walk around their homes without assistance, aAnd it helps that they're still sharp mentally.
The sisters say they have more life ahead of them.
"I love my children too much yet," Rempel said.
"I mean, it doesn't matter how much we love them," Chipilski added. "Someday we will go — we all have to go — but I guess God isn't finished with us yet."
They hope to return to the legislature for their 100th birthdays.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Vogue
5 hours ago
- Vogue
In Motherhood, Can We Stop Using the Phrase ‘One and Done‘?
Just the one? So, are you one and done? Oh…he's an only child? I've been asked innumerable iterations of this question—typically by total strangers—since I had my son five years ago. But after experiencing postpartum depression not once, but twice, I've been ambivalent about having another baby, so my answer to this invasive, all-too-common inquiry is complicated. Some days, the language we use to talk about 'only' children makes me feel judged, or somehow less than mothers with multiple kids. Other days, I feel annoyed that questions about family planning have become as quotidian as discussing the weather. Either way, these conversations have made it clear just how many people still believe that when it comes to children, one is the loneliest number. If we remove emotion from the equation and look solely at the data, it makes sense why more families are deciding to stop at one. A recent study showed that in 2025, the average cost of raising a child until the age of 18 in the US is $300,000. This figure doesn't account for the cost of post-secondary education, which in Canada (where I am from) is expected to rise to over $100,000 for a four-year university education. In Canada, one-child families are already the most common type, representing 45% of households with kids, while the average American family downsized from 3.7 children in 1960 to 1.9 currently. With these economic pressures alone, it seems only logical that the one-child family trend will continue. But logic doesn't seem to be the leading influence when we're talking about adding more kids to the mix. In her 2013 book One and Only: The Freedom of Having an Only Child, and the Joy of Being One, Lauren Sandler writes that the reason the decision is so nuanced is because 'children are a desire, not a calculation.' I've observed how my own desire to do the 'right' thing for my child has made the age-old arguments for a second that much more persuasive. We all know them: A sibling is a lifelong friend for your child, they can keep each other busy, they'll never be lonely! It helps with socialization and learning to share. More children can share the responsibility of caring for their aging parents. There's just as much, if not more, rhetoric about the problematic nature of only children. In the late 1800s, two child psychologists coined the term only child syndrome to describe the negative traits that their research showed only children often possess, including being spoiled, selfish, maladjusted, and anti-social. I want the world for my son, of course—and yet I'm still not sure if I am up for doing it all over again. It's why I've found so much comfort in a viral TikTok video from a self-described 'one & done mom,' who argues that being a mother of one allows women to choose motherhood as well as themselves. The comment section is filled with proud moms sharing what they've been able to do with their lives by deciding not to have a second child—from travelling to reaching career goals and having more time to do the things they love.
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
I was brainwashed into wearing a hijab. But Britain mustn't introduce a burka ban
I can still recall the first tentative day that I stepped outside my home not wearing my usual hijab but with my own pixie-cut hair on display and a breeze on my ears – a completely new feeling to was six years ago when I was 31 and studying for a master's degree in philosophy at the Simon Fraser University in Vancouver, Canada. At the time I was married with a three-year-old son. I had worn the hijab since the age of nine, and had always felt it was part of the package of being a Muslim, but in recent years I had begun to have doubts. Islam has a set of rules which cover various aspects of Muslim life, from religious practices to personal matters. I had always been curious about these laws, and had previously completed a master's degree in Islamic studies. But the more I learnt the more I felt that the methodology of Islamic jurisprudence (the theory and philosophy of its rules) was problematic for women. I couldn't help seeing the laws, including wearing mandatory hijab, as essentially misogynistic. Wearing a hijab was also not common in Vancouver, which made me stand out considerably. For the first time I experienced what it truly meant to be a visible minority and it took a heavy toll on my mental health. One day, my son kept refusing to take my hand as we boarded the bus. The tired driver, concerned about safety, snapped at me that I needed parenting advice. I was deeply upset, but then found myself wondering if such a minor incident would have affected me so deeply if I hadn't been wearing a hijab? I questioned myself. As much as I love Islamic spirituality, did I really want to carry its 'flag' when I no longer believed that flag represented something good?It was a few days later that I wrote a post on social media, relaying this incident to my friends and colleagues and explaining that while I was still explicitly Muslim, I would no longer wear the hijab. The next day, when I walked into the university, I had mixed emotions of uncertainty, excitement and freedom. There were a few awkward encounters with colleagues who didn't recognise me. But most people were understanding, and I have not worn the hijab since. The decision was a key moment for my Muslim identity. For it seems being a Muslim woman today is tiresomely linked to wearing a hijab or burka. There is always a great debate. Should you cover your hair? Your face? Are these items symbols of oppression or merely an expression of faith? Oh, and we know how these topics fire up the public imagination. Sparks flew just recently in the House of Commons when Sarah Pochin, the Reform UK MP for Runcorn and Helsby, called on Sir Keir Starmer to 'ban the burka'.'Will he,' she asked from the back benches. 'In the interest of public safety, follow the lead of France, Belgium, Denmark and others and ban the burka?' Thankfully, the question got rebuffed by both the Prime Minister and Pochin's Reform UK colleagues, who said it was not their policy. But it still left me – now a post-doctoral researcher at the University of Manchester – feeling sad and threatened. I worried I might have been wrong in my perception of Britain as a liberal and tolerant place for different religions. Mainly what I struggle with, however – whenever the issue flares up in Parliament – is how on earth politicians think they can prescribe to women how to deal with such a complex and personal issue. For in my case alone, my perception of being a Muslim has changed considerably over time – and I am only 37. I grew up in Iran's capital, Tehran, a super-crowded city that was beautiful to me in many ways. I was surrounded by a loving, happy family, who were religious, but me especially so. As a child, I donned the hijab (the burka isn't big in Iran), and began fasting and praying. I came to love the three elements of Islam: the spirituality, the practising, and the community. And because I was an anxious child, I found an incomparable comfort from reading passages from the Koran and common prayers, while the rituals and rules calmed my busy mind and gave me a sense of satisfaction. I also benefited from the Muslim community that was shaped around anti-imperialist political ideas in Iran. I studied a chemical engineering degree at Sharif University in Tehran, but then – like so many of my educated friends – got married at 22 and moved to London (we had an almost semi-arranged marriage and are now divorced), and it was here that I first encountered the diversity of religious life. Unlike in Iran, I began to see that being religious could go with all types of lifestyles, and it gave me a new perception of how I could live. When we moved to Vancouver in 2017 (I wanted to study in America but Trump had banned Iranians from entering the US), I still wore my hijab. But my dislike for the misogynistic essence of Islamic laws which shaped the culture of my community began to grow. Politically I was also changing. I came to see the scale of crime and deception from the Islamic Republic in Iran, and I came to detest its version of anti-imperialism and its suppression of women. I did not want to give up on my spirituality but I began to refine my version of being Muslim, starting with removing the hijab. When I moved back to London in 2020, to begin a PhD in philosophy at the London School of Economics, my own beliefs were strengthened by those I met. In the prayer room at the university, for instance, I was very pleased to find Muslims like me with no hair covering befriending women in the full burka, and bonding over their common interest in Islam's spirituality. Now – six years on since I first removed my hair covering – I feel psychologically better. I have begun to think that although I had a happy childhood, I was perhaps brainwashed in some respects and probably missed out on exploring my feminine side and having a diverse social life. Now, I have chosen a version of being Muslim that is true to me, and to some extent I think I have inspired my own friends to do the same. As for the draining debate about the burka, I believe Muslim women wear it for all sorts of reasons. They may think it is part of a package of rules which is meant to strengthen their willpower and bring about a special type of spirituality. While I may think the rule is misogynistic, it does not imply that those who observe it are misogynists. But I also understand why some find it very offensive or dangerous. It is natural, perhaps evolutionary, to want to see someone's face in order to connect. And obviously, wearing a burka highlights that the person is an immigrant, and we know many in the UK do not like immigration. Still, the decision to wear a burka or not must be decided by the women themselves. It is very paternalistic for a government to decide how a person might practise their religion. Also, should it be banned, the Muslim community would be enraged. This is what happened in Iran in 1936 (before the Islamic Republic took over in 1978). The Shah Reza Khan Pahlavi banned head coverings in a bid to modernise the country. But that violation has remained in people's memories for generations. Despite the current hatred towards the Islamic Republic and mandatory hijab, people still rage for having their choice taken away. You have to remember, a ban does not just affect the one person wearing the burka. A large circle around that person will feel violated, regardless of whether they are Muslim or not. Also, even discussing such a ban can, I fear, cause a rise in Islamophobia. If you have a hidden tendency towards Islamophobia, and something public like this happens, it may only embolden you. Hopefully, however, nothing like this will happen. I have always felt there is something special about Britain – in how it treats Muslims and religions in general, and in how diverse and liberal it is in this regard. I really hope it stays that way. As told to Gwyneth Rees Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Province reluctant to admit rickety N.B. bridge was slated for demolition, documents show
When the William Mitton Covered Bridge in Riverview was torn down last winter, many were heartbroken. But its demolition was not surprising. Closed to traffic since 1981, the bridge developed a dramatic sag in the middle, its abutments looked ready to pop, and several beams hung lazily from the roof they once held up. Documents obtained by CBC News after a right to information request reveal the New Brunswick government's reluctance to publicly admit the bridge was slated for demolition, despite having made plans a year and a half earlier to get rid of it. The documents also show an official with the Department of Transportation and Infrastructure called for a provincial strategy to handle aging covered bridges in a less reactive way. "We are at a point in time when a discussion has to be made to invest in the covered bridge or dismantle," Glen MacDonald, the assistant director of bridge maintenance, wrote in June 2023. "There is no funding allotted for this bridge at this time." But when CBC reported on the bridge's rough condition the next month, a department spokesperson would only say the future of the bridge was "yet to be determined." Just days after the CBC story, a department superintendent, Jean-Marc Arseneault, wrote in an email that he concluded the bridge was beyond repair. "The structure should be removed before someone gets hurt," Arsenault said. That same day, Corey White of the planning and project development division wrote: "I know I am speaking to the choir here, but we really need direction from [the province] on these bridges as we will see lots more of these last-minute issues — and we can manage these in an orderly fashion if we were to get the strategy approved." By August, DTI was drafting diagrams of how to remove the bridge. WATCH | 'The structure should be removed before someone gets hurt.' That November, the department received an inspection report from a hired consultant in Fredericton. "The structure should be demolished and removed as soon as possible," said the report from Hilcon Ltd., adding that it was too dangerous to have workers near it. "In our opinion, a complete structural collapse is imminent and controlled demolition is preferable to allowing the structure to collapse into the watercourse below." Most of the emails CBC received were written when Blaine Higgs and the Progressive Conservatives were in power. Despite the dire warnings from provincial officials and experts, the bridge remained for over a year until its removal in February 2025. Throughout 2024, emails show, the spokesperson for the department was withholding telling the media about the bridge's fate. "[CTV News is] looking for a definitive answer on DTI's plans for saving this bridge, but I know we've refrained from speaking to this point in both of our previous responses," spokesperson Jacob MacDonald wrote in August 2024. In October, staff from the Town of Riverview public works department also began send photos of the bridge to department officials. "Conditions are getting worse," a Riverview official wrote. By that November, the provincial officials were also getting impatient, with one writing, "We need to strike while the iron is hot … each day that passes makes it harder to remove safely." They were also drafting "communication plans" for two scenarios: either the bridge would be removed or it would collapse. Ray Boucher of the New Brunswick Covered Bridge Association said in an interview that his group has tried hard to save the bridge but that it ultimately came down to a lack of funds. He said the department was "more than fair" giving his group time to try to raise money for the bridge, and that's why the removal was so delayed. "They virtually gave me two years before they finally decided that it had to come down," Boucher said. "So under the Higgs government, I've got nothing but praise." Chuck Chiasson, who has been transportation minister since the Liberals were elected last fall, there was a "loose strategy" on managing covered bridges when he took over. "But I want something more comprehensive that's going to be more forward-looking that we can say which ones are going to be at risk, which ones do we need to start mitigating now , nd how are we going to do that?" Chiasson said, but didn't give an exact timeline. Boucher said that he believes the department looks at the covered bridges on a case-by-case basis, and if there is a strategy, "I've never seen it." Officials do the best they can with their budget, but "a covered bridge is not an asset, it's a liability," he said. "That's the way the province looks at it." "DTI, their mandate is to get you from one side of a river to the other side of the river," Boucher said. He added that it might make more sense to have the Tourism Department take over some of the covered bridges not actively carrying traffic. When asked about this, Chiasson said it could be discussed in the future. He also confirmed that another aging covered bridge near Fundy National Park had recently been torn down as well. In 1953, New Brunswick had 340 bridges, according to the covered bridge group. Today there are 57. Not far away is New Brunswick's American cousin in terms of covered bridge fame. Vermont, with more than 100 covered bridges, adopted an official strategy to preserve them in 2003. The strategy outlines how bridges are prioritized as well as how they are to be maintained while keeping their historic character. "It's a very good document," said JB McCarthy, a covered bridge expert with the Vermont Agency of Transportation. "We've been using it for years." There's also a state covered bridge committee that monitors the bridges and highlights those in need of repair, he said. McCarthy said he's not aware of any case of a covered bridge in Vermont being taken down because of disrepair. When shown a photo of the Mitton bridge in its final years, he said he's never seen a covered bridge in Vermont get "quite that bad." The bridges are important for tourism, he added. "I think the state as a whole has an eye on these things and does the best we can to try to maintain them and squeeze them in for projects when we can." While the Mitton bridge is relegated to a memory, another covered bridge in southeast New Brunswick, the Wheaton Covered Bridge, still stands just outside Sackville. Standing high in contrast with the flat, windswept Tantramar Marsh, the bridge is beloved by locals. Mainly used by farmers to access their fields, the bridge was abruptly shut down last summer after a worrying inspection. Chiasson announced changes would be made to divert traffic around the Wheaton Covered Bridge, over a modular bridge, to preserve the older bridge's history while addressing farmers' need to use the road. Local Green Party MLA Megan Mitton has been advocating a fix for the Wheaton Covered Bridge and praised the proposal for both goals of preserving history and allowing farmers access. "In terms of just our local culture, people go get their prom photos and their wedding photos taken there," she said. "So there does need to be a strategy that's less reactive and actually plans out what's going to need to be done to deal with our bridges."
