EU changes to sustainability law risk company lawsuits, legal scholars say
By Kate Abnett
BRUSSELS (Reuters) -The European Union's plans to cut back sustainability reporting rules could expose European companies to more climate change-related lawsuits, 31 legal scholars said in a letter published on Friday.
The European Commission in February proposed loosening corporate sustainability rules for businesses in Europe, responding to criticism that EU red tape hinders competitiveness with rivals in China and the United States.
Among the changes, the EU would delete a requirement in its due diligence law for large companies to put into effect a "transition plan" to ensure they comply with the EU's targets to cut greenhouse gas emissions. Companies would still need to have such a plan, but would not be legally obliged to put it into practice.
"Mere paperwork, instead of good faith action, would suffice in meeting the obligation," the legal scholars said in the letter.
"The absence of a binding regulatory framework will correspond directly with increased liability risks for private actors," they said, referring to potential court cases from plaintiffs citing risks to the environment and public health.
The letter's 31 signatories included Thom Wetzer, Associate Professor of Law and Finance at the University of Oxford, Christina Eckes, Director of the University of Amsterdam's Centre for European Law and Governance, and Wolf-Georg Ringe, Director of the Institute of Law and Economics at the University of Hamburg.
The academics cited said court cases highlighted the climate-related legal risks businesses already face, citing pending cases against companies including TotalEnergies and Eni, from plaintiffs demanding the firms align their corporate actions with climate goals.
A European Commission spokesperson declined to immediately comment on the letter.
The Commission has previously said its proposals would make life easier for businesses while keeping the EU on track for its targets to cut CO2 emissions. The plan must be negotiated by the European Parliament and member states - a process that can take more than a year.
European businesses have long said strict regulations hampered their ability to compete globally, with U.S. President Donald Trump's aggressive deregulation drive increasing calls for Brussels to act. Campaigners have criticised the EU plans to soften sustainability rules as gutting corporate accountability.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
33 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump wields little-used law to deploy National Guard to LA riots despite Gov. Newsom's protests: ‘Unable to handle the task'
President Trump has ordered the California National Guard to secure Los Angeles from the anti-ICE rioters, despite the vocal objections of Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom and LA Mayor Karen Bass. It's the first time in 60 years that the commander-in-chief deployed a state's National Guard without the governor's blessing, and members of the Trump administration are saying the move is justified because the protests represent a 'violent insurrection' against the country. 'This is a violent insurrection,' White House Chief of Staff Stephen Miller posted Saturday night. Vice President JD Vance also used the word in describing the riots: 'Insurrectionists carrying foreign flags are attacking immigration enforcement officers, while one half of America's political leadership has decided that border enforcement is evil,' he said on X. California Democrats seethed over the rare move from a US president. The last time the National Guard was federalized in Los Angeles was in 1992 over the Rodney King riots, when the president had the state's backing. 5 Rioters wreaked havoc on Los Angeles in response to immigration enforcement activity in the area. REUTERS 'The federal government is sowing chaos so they can have an excuse to escalate. That is not the way any civilized country behaves,' Newsom said on X. The rarely used power stems from '10 U.S.C. 12406,' part of the US Code on Armed Services that allows the federal government to mobilize the National Guard in the event of 'a rebellion, or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States.' 'The federal government is taking over the California National Guard and deploying 2,000 soldiers in Los Angeles — not because there is a shortage of law enforcement, but because they want a spectacle,' Newsom added in another X post. 'Don't give them one. Never use violence. Speak out peacefully.' Bass, who previously put out a statement blasting the ICE arrests of illegal migrants in Los Angeles, said she tried to convince Trump's border czar Tom Homan not to put the National Guard on the streets. 'I'm very concerned about the potential civil unrest if there was federal intervention,' she told KNX radio. But Trump rebuked California's leaders over the riots in a Truth Social post in the wee Sunday morning hours. 'We have an incompetent Governor (Newscum) and Mayor (Bass) who were, as usual (just look at how they handled the fires, and now their VERY SLOW PERMITTING disaster. Federal permitting is complete!), unable to … handle the task,' he wrote. 5 President Trump has lashed out at California Democrats over the chaos. POOL/AFP via Getty Images President Lyndon B. Johnson, in 1965, was the last commander in chief to federalize a state's National Guard without the governor's OK. In that instance, the troops were deployed to protect civil rights protesters in Alabama. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said Saturday that the National Guard deployment was justified because the protests were interfering with ICE agents who were trying to combat a 'dangerous invasion' that was spurred by 'foreign terrorist organizations' — referencing the Mexican traffic cartels that have been designated terror groups by the Trump administration. 'The violent mob assaults on ICE and Federal Law Enforcement are designed to prevent the removal of Criminal Illegal Aliens from our soil; a dangerous invasion facilitated by criminal cartels (aka Foreign Terrorist Organizations) and a huge NATIONAL SECURITY RISK,' he wrote. He added the US Marines from Camp Pendleton in San Diego were being stood up for possible deployment. Newsom called the possibility of using active duty troops against American citizens, 'deranged.' 'Deranged = allowing your city to burn & law enforcement to be attacked,' Hegseth shot back. Meanwhile, Homan told NBC News that 'someone is going to lose their life' in the protests and suggested that Newsom and Bass could be referred to the Justice Department for criminal charges over their handling of the riots. 5 Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass hit back at President Trump's claim about the National Guard reining in the mayhem. AP 5 California Gov. Gavin Newsom accused the Trump administration of deliberately inflaming the situation. REUTERS National Guard troops were seen arriving in Los Angeles County earlier in the day on Sunday. Newsom dredged up an old clip of Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem warning former President Joe Biden against federalizing the National Guard to prevent Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) from using the troops to secure the border. Rep. Nanette Barragán (D-Calif.), whose congressional district encompasses Paramount, claimed that local law enforcement has the situation 'under control' and doesn't need assistance from the National Guard. 5 Rep. Nanette Barragán claims that local law enforcement has gotten the riots under control. AP 'I have spoken to the sheriffs on the ground, who have said they have things under control, there is no need for the National Guard, they have the manpower that they need,' she told CNN's 'State of the Union' Sunday. 'This is really just an escalation of the president coming into California. We haven't asked for the help. We don't need the help. This is him escalating it, causing tensions to rise,' she continued. 'It's only going to make things worse.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Zelenskyy: We're very close to point when Russia can be forced to end this war
President Volodymyr Zelenskyy believes that Ukraine and its allies are very close to the moment when Russia can be forced to end or at least halt the war, but this would require the United States to impose tough sanctions on Russia. Source: Zelenskyy in an interview with ABC News; a full video has been posted by the press service for the Ukrainian President's Office Quote: "Frankly speaking, we are very close to the moment when Russia can be forced to end the war, at least to stop. We feel it. Our operation Spider's Web… even though they [the Russians – ed.] are furious, they understand everything – that if there are cases like the one involving 20,000 rockets [that the US had planned to send to Ukraine but redirected to the Middle East – ed.], then we'll rely on our own strength… We don't want the war to continue, but we'll fight for ourselves if that is the only way out. We're very close. We need strong support from the United States. The US needs unity with Europe and still needs to put pressure on Putin. He doesn't want to end the war, but he can end the war under pressure from partners. In my opinion, that gives us a chance. And this doesn't sound pessimistic at all – I'm talking about reality." Details: When asked whether Trump wants to impose sanctions on Russia, Zelenskyy replied: "He is the leader of the United States of America, he has to do it. I hope so, we do believe that the US is the leader of the civilised world". A journalist reminded the Ukrainian president that Trump had recently even mentioned the possibility of imposing sanctions on Ukraine. "There has been a lot from the Russians against Ukraine," Zelenskyy said. "We certainly don't want anything like that from the US either." He stressed that Ukraine supports all US-proposed initiatives concerning a ceasefire, ending the war or any format of negotiations. Quote: "There is no need to find a balance between us and the Russians. The Russians don't want this. Sometimes there is no alternative. It's only the Russians who don't want to end the war. It doesn't matter who wants to impose sanctions on them – America must impose sanctions. There is no alternative in either case." More details: Zelenskyy said he believes "the president of the United States has all the potential, all the tools to pressure Putin – starting with sanctions, economic blockades, arms packages and rallying other European leaders who want this around him". Quote: "They [European leaders – ed.] view President Trump as the leader of the world – the free and democratic world – and they say: 'Please, be the leader. You're the leader. Stop Putin, and we'll help you, because Europe isn't as strong as America'. Europe still has to become very strong. But today, the struggle continues. President Trump can do all of this, I believe." Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Slovak PM threatens to block EU sanctions against Russia if they harm national interests
Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico has threatened to block any EU sanctions on Russia that harm Slovakia's national interests. Source: Reuters, as reported by European Pravda Details: Fico stressed that Slovakia seeks to remain a constructive EU member but described a resolution passed by the Slovak parliament, urging the government not to support any new sanctions against Russia, as a political tool with a strong message. Quote: "If there is a sanction that would harm us, I will never vote for it." More details: Fico also said he could not support any measures aimed at halting imports of Russian fuel for Slovakia's nuclear power plants. "I am interested in being a constructive player in the European Union, but not at the expense of Slovakia," he added. Background: On 5 June, Slovakia's parliament adopted a resolution urging government members to withhold support for new sanctions and trade restrictions against Russia in international organisations. On 4 June, Slovak President Peter Pellegrini rejected a petition calling for a referendum on lifting sanctions against Russia. In March, Fico threatened to block further European sanctions against Russia if he views them as jeopardising the peaceful settlement of the war in Ukraine. Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!
