logo
New militarized border zone spurs national security charges against hundreds of immigrants

New militarized border zone spurs national security charges against hundreds of immigrants

Arab News15-05-2025

SANTA FE, N.M.: Several hundred immigrants have been charged with unauthorized access to a newly designated militarized zone along the southern US border in New Mexico and western Texas since the Department of Justice introduced the new approach in late April.
President Donald Trump's administration has transferred oversight of a strip of land along the US-Mexico border to the military while authorizing US troops to temporarily detain immigrants in the country illegally — though there's no record of troops exercising that authority as US Customs and Border Protection conducts arrests. The designated national defense areas are overseen by US Army commands out of Fort Bliss in the El Paso area in Texas and Fort Huachuca in Arizona.
The novel national security charges against immigrants who enter through those militarized zones carry a potential sentence of 18 months in prison on top of a possible six month sentence for illegal entry. The full implications are unclear for migrants who pursue legal status through separate proceedings in federal immigration court.
The Trump administration is seeking to accelerate mass removals of immigrants in the country illegally and third-country deportations, including Venezuelans sent to an El Salvador prison amid accusations of gang affiliation. The administration has deployed thousands of troops to the border, while arrests have plunged to the lowest levels since the mid-1960s.
The federal public defender's office in Las Cruces indicates that roughly 400 cases had been filed in criminal court there as of Tuesday as it seeks dismissal of the misdemeanor and petty misdemeanor charges for violating security regulations and entering restricted military property. Court records show that federal prosecutors in Texas — where a National Defense Area extends about 60 miles from El Paso to Fort Hancock — last week began filing the military security charges as well.
Las Cruces-based federal Magistrate Judge Gregory Wormuth is asking for input from federal prosecutors and public defense attorneys on the standard of proof for the trespassing charges 'given the unprecedented nature of prosecuting such offenses in this factual context.'
Public defenders say there needs to be proof that immigrants knew of the military restrictions and acted 'in defiance of that regulation for some nefarious or bad purpose.'
New Mexico-based US Attorney Ryan Ellison, appointed in April, says hundreds of 'restricted area' signs have been posted in Spanish and English to warn that entry is prohibited by the Department of Defense, along New Mexico's nearly 180-mile stretch of border.
In a court filings, Ellison has said there's no danger of ensnaring innocent people when it comes to immigrants who avoid ports of entry to cross the border in willful violation of federal law — and now military regulations.
ACLU attorney Rebecca Sheff said basic freedoms are at risk as the government flexes its power at the border and restricts civilian access.
'The extension of military bases ... it's a serious restriction, it's a serious impact on families that live in the border area,' she said.
The Department of Justice has warned Wormuth against issuing an advisory opinion on legal standards for trespassing in the military area.
'The New Mexico National Defense Area is a crucial installation necessary to strengthen the authority of servicemembers to help secure our borders and safeguard the country,' Ellison said in a court briefing.
Democratic US Sen. Martin Heinrich of New Mexico expressed concern Wednesday in a letter to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth that anyone may be stopped and detained by US Army soldiers for entering a 170-square-mile area along the border previously overseen by the Department of Interior and frequently used for recreation and livestock ranching.
Hegseth has emphasizing a hard-line approach to enforcement.
'Let me be clear: if you cross into the National Defense Area, you will be charged to the FULLEST extent of the law,' he said in a post on the social platform X.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Huawei Chips Are One Generation Behind US but Firm Finding Workarounds, CEO Says
Huawei Chips Are One Generation Behind US but Firm Finding Workarounds, CEO Says

Asharq Al-Awsat

timean hour ago

  • Asharq Al-Awsat

Huawei Chips Are One Generation Behind US but Firm Finding Workarounds, CEO Says

Huawei Technologies' chips are one generation behind those of US peers but the firm is finding ways to improve performance through methods such as cluster computing, Chinese state media quoted CEO Ren Zhengfei as saying on Tuesday. The chipmaker invests 180 billion yuan ($25.07 billion) in research annually and sees promise in compound chips - chips made from multiple elements - Ren said in an interview with the People's Daily newspaper of the governing Communist Party. There is "no need to worry about the chip problem", Ren said, addressing concerns stemming from US export controls. The article, published on the front page of the newspaper, come as top US and Chinese officials are set to resume trade talks for a second day in London where topics such US tech restrictions on China are expected to be discussed. Since 2019, a slew of US export curbs, aimed at curbing China's technological and military advancements, have restricted Huawei and other Chinese firms from accessing high-end chips and the equipment needed to produce them from abroad. Ren's comments are the first ever from him or Huawei about the company's advanced chipmaking efforts, which have become a flashpoint in US-China tensions. Huawei is just one of many Chinese chipmakers, Ren said in the interview, adding: "The United States has exaggerated Huawei's achievements. Huawei is not that great. We have to work hard to reach their evaluation." "Our single chip is still behind the US by a generation. We use mathematics to supplement physics, non-Moore's law to supplement Moore's law and cluster computing to supplement single chips and the results can also achieve practical conditions. Software is not a bottleneck for us," he said. Cluster computing is when multiple computers work together. Moore's law refers to the speed of chip advancement. HUAWEI'S LAUNCHES Huawei's Ascend series of AI chips compete in China with offerings from Nvidia, the global leader in AI chips. The US commerce department last month said the use of Ascend chips would be a violation of export controls. Nvidia's AI chips are more powerful than Huawei's but the company has been barred by Washington from selling its most sophisticated chips to China, causing it to lose significant market share to Huawei. In April, Huawei launched "AI CloudMatrix 384", a system that links 384 Ascend 910C chips in a cluster that companies can use to train AI models, which has been described by analysts as able to outperform Nvidia's GB200 NVL72 system on some metrics. Dylan Patel, founder of semiconductor research group SemiAnalysis, said in an article that month that it meant that Huawei and China now had AI system capabilities that could beat Nvidia. Nvidia and the US commerce department did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Ren's remarks. Ren also said about a third of Huawei's annual research spending went to theoretical research while the rest was spent on product research and development. "Without theory, there will be no breakthroughs, and we will not catch up with the United States."

UN: Trump's Cuts are 'Devastating' for Vulnerable Women Worldwide
UN: Trump's Cuts are 'Devastating' for Vulnerable Women Worldwide

Asharq Al-Awsat

time2 hours ago

  • Asharq Al-Awsat

UN: Trump's Cuts are 'Devastating' for Vulnerable Women Worldwide

The United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) has faced budget cuts before, but the impact of President Donald Trump's policies has been even more "devastating" for reproductive health worldwide, chief Natalia Kanem told AFP. The agency has been targeted by US conservatives since the Kemp-Kasten Amendment's enactment in 1985 by Congress, when the administration of then president Ronald Reagan rallied against China's population policies, accusing Beijing of promoting forced abortions and sterilizations. All subsequent Republican presidencies have cut US funding to UNFPA, and the second Trump administration is no exception. "We've had over $330 million worth of projects ended," virtually overnight, in "some of the hardest hit regions of the world" like Afghanistan, Kanem said in an interview coinciding with the release of the UNFPA's annual report Tuesday. "So yes, we are suffering." Kanem pointed to the Zaatari refugee camp in Jordan as an example, where over the years more than 18,000 pregnancies were delivered by "heroic midwives" who "conducted these over 18,000 deliveries without a single maternal death, which you know, in a crisis situation is extraordinary." "Those maternity wards today have closed. The funding cuts immediately have meant that those midwives are no longer able to do their jobs," Kanem said. Although it is too soon to estimate the precise impacts of the US cuts, they will inevitably result in increased maternal mortality and more unintended pregnancies, according to Kanem. "What's different this time for UNFPA is that our ecosystem of other reproductive health actors who might be able to fill in for us," Kanem said, adding they are "reeling from huge impact of having their funding denied." The Trump administration has slashed many such external aid programs. "So it is very lamentable that this year, to me, has been drastically worse than ever before, precisely because now everybody is caught up in the whirlwind." "The withdrawal of the United States from the funding arena for reproductive health has been devastating," Kanem said. Desire and rights American policy is not only marked by funding cuts, but also a challenge to gender equality matters. "There will be debates about concepts, but there shouldn't be any debate about the non-negotiability of the rights and choices of women and adolescent girls," Kanem emphasized. "We always embrace change, but we should not compromise on these common values which spell the difference between life and death for women and girls all around the world," she continued. "Women deserve support. Adolescent girls deserve to finish their schooling, not become pregnant, not be bartered or sent off into marriage as a non-solution to issues that families may face." The UNFPA's annual report, published Tuesday and based on the results of a survey of 14,000 people from 14 countries -- nations which represent over a third of the world's population -- also underscores concerns that millions of people around the world cannot create the families they desire. More than 40 percent of those over the age of 50 reported not having the number of children they wanted -- with 31 percent saying they had fewer kids than they desired and 12 percent saying they had more than they wanted. More than half of respondents said economic barriers prevented them from having more children. Conversely, one in five said they were pressured into having a child, and one in three adults reported an unintended pregnancy. The majority of people "live in countries where fertility rates have fallen so far and so fast that they are below replacement," Kanem said. "We know that the issue of population pressure takes almost like a headline drastic view. Some people think there are way too many people. Others are saying we don't have enough, women should have more babies," Kanem said. "What UNFPA really cares about is a woman's true desire, rights and choices," Kanem said.

Jurors making ‘good progress' toward Weinstein retrial verdict
Jurors making ‘good progress' toward Weinstein retrial verdict

Al Arabiya

time2 hours ago

  • Al Arabiya

Jurors making ‘good progress' toward Weinstein retrial verdict

Jurors reported making headway Monday in the sex crimes retrial of disgraced Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein, despite internal tensions raising the risk of a deadlocked jury and potential mistrial. 'We're making good progress,' Judge Curtis Farber read from a final note sent by jurors at the end of the third day of closed-door deliberations in the New York courtroom. Earlier, Farber read aloud two other notes from the 12-member jury. In the first, a juror expressed a desire to speak to the judge 'about the situation that isn't very good.' In the second, jurors asked for 'the entire definition of reasonable doubt and rules of the jury especially to avoid a hung jury.' A hung jury occurs when jurors are unable to reach a unanimous verdict after extended deliberations. In that case, the judge can declare a mistrial, and the case may be tried again. On Monday morning, Weinstein — whose 2017 downfall helped ignite the global #MeToo movement — looked on impassively from his wheelchair as the judge, prosecutors, and defense attorneys engaged in tense exchanges. The jury is deciding whether Weinstein is guilty of sexually assaulting Miriam Haley and former model Kaja Sokola in 2006, and raping aspiring actress Jessica Mann in 2013. This retrial follows a decision by a New York state appeals court to overturn Weinstein's 2020 convictions due to procedural irregularities. His 23-year sentence was vacated, but he remains imprisoned on separate charges. 'Playground stuff' On Friday, a juror reported internal tensions, telling the court that 'people are being shunned. It's playground stuff,' and asked to resign. Judge Farber denied the request. Weinstein's attorney, Arthur Aidala, moved for a mistrial in response to the discord, but the judge refused. By midday Monday, a different juror reported improvements in the atmosphere. 'Things are going well, the tone is very different today, we are finding headways,' she said, prompting visible relief from the judge. During the trial, the three alleged victims testified in detail about how Weinstein allegedly lured them to his apartment or hotel room in New York, then forced them into unwanted sexual acts. In closing arguments, prosecutor Nicole Blumberg summed up the women's testimony by saying, 'He raped three women. They all said no.' She emphasized Weinstein's power over his accusers, urging jurors to hold him accountable. 'The defendant thought the rules did not apply to him. Now it is time to let him know that the rules apply to him.' Weinstein did not testify but told FOX5 in a Friday interview that while he may have acted 'immorally,' he maintained that he did nothing criminal. His legal team has argued the women fabricated their claims to obtain financial settlements or damages.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store