Dana White reveals how close Jon Jones came to Tom Aspinall fight and weighs in on legal trouble, after 'Bones' was accused of 'fleeing accident involving half-naked woman'
Dana White has revealed the mega-fight between Jon Jones and Tom Aspinall was 'done', before the American changed his mind and retired.
The UFC president had dropped the bombshell that Jones called it a day two days ago, before the heavyweight - who has been stripped of his belt - then confirmed the news with a post on social media.
Less than 24 hours later, it emerged that Jones was facing a misdemeanor charge of fleeing the scene of an accident. A criminal summons accusing Jones of the charge was filed in Albuquerque Metropolitan Court Tuesday. Jones has been called to appear in court on July 24 for a bond arraignment. His lawyer said he was stunned by the charge and believes the police are wrongly targeting his client.
A police officer was said to be investigating a road accident on February 21 when they discovered a woman in the passenger seat of one of the vehicles, according to a police report obtained by Mail Sport.
The woman was reportedly 'exhibiting signs of significant intoxication and lacking clothing from the waist down.'
When asked about Jones' legal trouble, retirement and how close the Aspinall fight was to getting made, White told reporters: 'We had the fight done. You saw me talking about it very confidently that this fight was going to happen and he changed his mind.'
'I saw it today,' White said about Jones' latest legal issues. 'When I saw it today I said everybody's going to think this is why he retired. Maybe that is why he retired. Who the hell knows. I don't know. These are all questions you've got to ask him.'
White also added: 'He called us and just started saying "you know what, I think I'm done, I want to retire. It's been a great run, I appreciate everything" and that was it.
'He was absolutely, positively sure that he wanted to retire and we said why don't you sleep on it, if you wake up in the morning if that's how you still feel.
'You never know what Jon Jones is dealing with and then you wake up the next day [and there's new criminal charges]. Who knows. I don't know everything that went into this decision.
'It's something you guys are going to have to ask him if you ever see him again … all I know is he made it very clear that he wanted to retire and I don't disagree with him.'
Jones' lawyer said he was 'stunned' by the decision to charge his client.
'It is truly unbelievable that the police would waste this amount of resources on such a case attorney Christopher Dodd told TMZ.
'The only thing I can think of is that the police were targeting Jon for improper purposes. We will get to the bottom of it and make sure that this baseless case is dismissed.'
'I am stunned by the Albuquerque Police Department's decision to charge him in this new case. In the thousands of cases I have handled in my career, I have never seen a case as strange and unwarranted as this one.
'Jon was not driving that night; he wasn't in the car,' Dodd continued. 'It appears that an intoxicated woman used a false allegation against Jon to avoid being arrested for DWI, and the police fell for it.
'Based on the criminal complaint, it looks like they went so far as to seek a warrant for Jon's cell phone records while conducting a misdemeanour traffic investigation. I have never heard of such a thing.'
Jones has not yet commented on the legal matter himself but wrote his retirement post on social media.
'Today, I'm officially announcing my retirement from the UFC,' it read. This decision comes after a lot of reflection, and I want to take a moment to express my deepest gratitude for the journey I've experienced over the years.
'From the first time I stepped into the Octagon, my goal was to push the boundaries of what was possible in this sport. Becoming the youngest UFC champion in history, defending my title against some of the best fighters in the world, and sharing unforgettable moments with fans across the globe—these are memories I'll cherish forever.
'I've faced incredible highs and some tough lows, but every challenge has taught me something valuable and made me stronger, both as a fighter and as a person.
'I want to thank the UFC, Dana, Hunter, Lorenzo, God, my family, coaches, teammates, and all the fans who have stood by me through every chapter. Your unwavering support and belief in me have been my foundation. To my fellow fighters, thank you for bringing out the best in me and for the respect we've shared inside and outside the cage.
'As I close this chapter of my life, I look forward to new opportunities and challenges ahead. MMA will always be a part of who I am, and I'm excited to see how I can continue to contribute to the sport and inspire others in new ways. Thank you all for being part of this incredible journey with me. The best is yet to come.'
Jones vs Aspinall would have undoubtedly been the biggest fight this year and the American has been accused of avoiding the Brit for some time now.
It seems as though fans will never know if Aspinall could have dethroned the man many consider to be the greatest and he will want to quickly find an alternative opponent to make up for lost time.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
22 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Paige Spiranac reveals shocking benefit to wearing less clothes to play golf
Golf influencer Paige Spiranac has revealed a surprising benefit to wearing less clothing on the course, after playing like 's***' during a recent outing. The former LPGA hopeful has racked up four million followers on Instagram as she's become known for her revealing outfits. But she was more conservatively dressed during a recent trip the course, as she wore a buttoned-up polo shirt and shorts. And after she performed below her best in the outfit, she offered some advice to her fans. 'If you've been following me for awhile you know I have this working theory that I play better when I wear less clothes,' she wrote on X above a photo of her in the polo. 'Can confirm that science is right once again. I played like [poop emoji] today.' The social media sensation is known for her more revealing outfits on the golf course The post drew plenty of humorous replies from Spiranac's fans as they teased the blonde social media star. 'Sorry to hear that,' one wrote on X. 'If this is true then I have an idea,' another said. And a third said: 'I didn't even recognize it was you. lolol.' The lighthearted post comes after Spiranac announced some big news in May. The golf influencer, who failed to make it on the LPGA Tour, told fans that she'd be taking her golf knowledge to the Grass League - the first high-stakes par 3 golf league - where she will look to translate her social media success to the front office. While Spiranac didn't confirm the exact title of her new position, the Grass League announced that 'golf's most influential female voice' would be joining in a 'strategic leadership role.' 'A trailblazer in both professional golf and modern sports media, Spiranac will work closely with league leadership to shape the long-term vision and growth strategy for The Grass League,' a press release read. 'Her role will encompass brand development, storytelling, creative, business development and overall content and audience strategy, positioning the league to scale it's reach across digital, broadcast, and live experiences.' Spiranac's appointment came shortly after the league's 2025 season kickstarted earlier in May with the circuit making its debut last year.
Reuters
30 minutes ago
- Reuters
US Supreme Court lifts limits on deporting migrants to countries not their own
June 23 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way on Monday for President Donald Trump's administration to resume deporting migrants to countries other than their own without offering them a chance to show harms they could face, handing him another victory in his aggressive pursuit of mass deportations. The justices lifted a judicial order that required the government to give migrants set for deportation to so-called "third countries" a "meaningful opportunity" to tell officials they are at risk of torture at their new destination, while a legal challenge plays out. Boston-based U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy had issued the order on April 18. The court's three liberal justices - Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson - dissented from the decision. After the Department of Homeland Security moved in February to step up rapid deportations to third countries, immigrant rights groups filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of a group of migrants seeking to prevent their removal to such places without notice and a chance to assert the harms they could face. Murphy on May 21 found that the administration had violated his order mandating further procedures in trying to send a group of migrants to politically unstable South Sudan, a country that the U.S. State Department has warned against any travel "due to crime, kidnapping and armed conflict." The judge's intervention prompted the U.S. government to keep the migrants at a military base in Djibouti, although U.S. officials later said one of the deportees, a man from Myanmar, would instead be deported to his home country. Of the other passengers who were on the flight, one is South Sudanese, while the others are from Cuba, Mexico, Laos and Vietnam. Reuters also reported by that officials had been considering sending migrants to Libya, another politically unstable country, despite previous U.S. condemnation of Libya's harsh treatment of detainees. Murphy clarified that any removals without offering a chance to object would violate his order. As part of its pattern of assailing various judges who have taken actions to impede Trump policies challenged as unlawful, the White House in a statement called Murphy "a far-left activist judge." The administration, in its May 27 emergency filing to the Supreme Court, said that all the South Sudan-destined migrants had committed "heinous crimes" in the United States including murder, arson and armed robbery. The dispute is the latest of many cases involving legal challenges to various Trump policies including immigration to have already reached the nation's highest judicial body since he returned to office in January. The Supreme Court in May let Trump end humanitarian programs for hundreds of thousands of migrants to live and work in the United States temporarily. The justices, however, in April faulted the administration's treatment of some targeted migrants as inadequate under U.S. Constitution's due process protections. Due process generally requires the government to provide notice and an opportunity for a hearing before taking certain adverse actions. In March, the administration issued guidance providing that if a third country has given credible diplomatic assurance that it will not persecute or torture migrants, individuals may be deported there "without the need for further procedures." Without such assurance, if the migrant expresses fear of removal to that country, U.S. authorities would assess the likelihood of persecution or torture, possibly referring the person to an immigration court, according to the guidance. Murphy found that the administration's policy of "executing third-country removals without providing notice and a meaningful opportunity to present fear-based claims" likely violates due process requirements under the Constitution. Murphy said that the Supreme Court, Congress, "common sense" and "basic decency" all require migrants to be given adequate due process. The Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on May 16 declined to put Murphy's decision on hold. In his order concerning the flight to South Sudan, Murphy also clarified that non-citizens must be given at least 10 days to raise a claim that they fear for their safety. The administration told the Supreme Court that its third-country policy already complied with due process and is critical for removing migrants who commit crimes because their countries of origin are often unwilling to take them back.
Daily Mail
37 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Oklahoma City Thunder wins NBA Championship with Game 7 victory as Tyrese Haliburton injury crushes Indiana Pacers
The Oklahoma City Thunder have been crowned NBA champions after finally seeing off the Indiana Pacers in Game 7 on Sunday night. Led by MVP Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, the Thunder secured the franchise's second-ever championship with a 103-91 win on their own court to wrap up a 4-3 series success. The Pacers were stunned by the loss of their star player Tyrese Haliburton at the end of the first quarter. He suffered an Achilles injury and left the court in tears. A spirited Pacers team did their best to compete without their main man, powered by a sensational performance from T.J. McConnell, but it was not enough to deny the Thunder. Gilgeous-Alexander, who was named Finals MVP, scored 29 points and got 12 assists while Jalen Williams scored 20 and Chet Holmgren had 18 for the Thunder, who were pushed to the brink but finished off a season for the ages. Oklahoma City won 84 games between the regular season and the playoffs, tying the 1996-97 Chicago Bulls for third-most in any season. It's the second championship for the franchise. The Seattle SuperSonics won the NBA title in 1979; the team was moved to Oklahoma City in 2008. The Pacers led 48-47 at the half even after losing star guard Haliburton to what his father said was an Achilles tendon injury about seven minutes into the game. But they were outscored 34-20 in the third quarter as the Thunder built a 13-point lead and began to run away. Bennedict Mathurin had 24 points and 13 rebounds for Indiana, which still is waiting for its first NBA title. The Pacers - who were 10-15 after 25 games and were bidding to be the first team in NBA history to turn that bad of a start into a championship - had leads of 1-0 and 2-1 in the series, but they simply didn't have enough in the end. Home teams are now 16-4 in NBA Finals Game 7s and the Thunder became the seventh champion in the last seven seasons, a run of parity like none other in NBA history. Gilgeous-Alexander became just the fourth player in NBA history to win MVP, Finals MVP, a scoring title and play for a champion in the same season. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar did it once, Michael Jordan then did it four times, and Shaquille O´Neal was the last entrant into that fraternity - until now. 'A lot of hard work, a lot of hours in the gym,' Gilgeous-Alexander said. 'This isn't just a win for me. This is a win for my family. This is a win for my friends. This is a win for everybody that was in my corner growing up. This is a win for the fans, the best fans in the world.'
