Best SPF sprays for using over make-up ahead of heatwave coming to UK
With the UK reportedly set to experience a mini heatwave soon, if you're planning on spending time outdoors, now's the time to make sure you've got one of the best sunscreens at home to avoid sun damage.
The official guidelines on keeping our skin protected in the sun state that you should reapply sun cream every two hours, but this isn't particularly practical if you're wearing a full face of make-up. Luckily there are some of the best face SPFs on the market nowadays that can be applied seamlessly over make-up without disrupting it, to keep your safe yet still keeping your glam intact.
Here are our favourites that will keep you sun safe without ruining your make-up this spring – and lots of them are currently on sale....
Best SPF mists to apply over make-up
Garnier Ambre Solaire Over Makeup Super UV Protection Mist SPF50
We think Garnier makes some of the best sunscreens on the high street, and this can should be a handbag must-have, reports the Mirror. Currently reduced from £13 to £7.80, it's super-lightweight and looks and feels invisible on the skin, and also includes skin boosters such as vitamin E and hyaluronic acid.
Ultrasun SPF50 UV Face and Scalp Mist
Ultrasun SPFs are a hit among beauty insiders for their reliable formulas and high UVA ratings, and this mist is no exception. It's slightly more powerful than Garnier's aerosol, providing a more thorough coating, yet it remains incredibly lightweight – plus it can be used on the scalp too, an area often overlooked. It's currently down from £22 to £17.60.
Ultra Violette Preen Screen SPF 50 Reapplication Mist
Australian brand Ultra Violette has made sun protection trendy again with its sleek packaging and innovative formulas that cater to everyone (our beauty editor Laura can't get enough of its latest mineral face SPF). Unlike the others in this list, this one features a pump dispenser rather than an aerosol and has a water-like consistency, making it ideal for dry skin. Find it with 20% off here, down from £32 to £25.60.
La Roche-Posay Anthelios Invisible Fresh Mist SPF50
La Roche-Posay Anthelios Invisible Fresh Mist SPF50 is a fantastic choice for oily skin as it helps to mattify and reduce shine while also boosting your sun protection. Like many La Roche-Posay products, it's also suitable for sensitive skin. It's widely available at various retailers, including Boots, Amazon and Lookfantastic, but the cheapest we've found it currently is on Escentual, down to £12.02.
NIP+FAB Peptide Fix 2-in-1 Tone & Top Up SPF50 Mist 4%
If you're looking for an SPF mist with proper skincare benefits, this NIP+FAB one, priced at £29.95, gets our vote. It contains trending skincare ingredients peptides, with shoppers saying it has their faces looking " plumper and dewy".
Naked Sundays SPF50+ Hydrating Glow Mist
One from another top Aussie SPF brand, this cute mist, currently £17, not only sets make-up but also gives skin a lovely glow, and is perfect for top up. Shoppers also report how good it is for sensitive skin, saying it doesn't irritate rosacea.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Statesman
11 hours ago
- New Statesman
Australia is no model for assisted dying
Photo by Kelly Barnes / AAP Image via Alamy Australian laws on voluntary assisted dying (VAD) are deemed so similar to the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill that three quarters of overseas witnesses invited to give evidence to MPs were from Australia. 'This is not a revolutionary law reform,' Alex Greenwich, a politician from New South Wales, told the bill's scrutiny committee earlier this year. 'It has been tried and tested, we have appropriate safeguards in place throughout Australia, and they work.' Although Australian states extend the six-month life expectancy requirement to a year for those with neurodegenerative conditions, in terms of eligibility, process and safeguards, their laws are similar to the UK's bill. The two differ only in that self-administration of life-ending drugs would be permitted here, and a multidisciplinary panel would review cases. So when Kim Leadbeater, Labour MP and the bill's sponsor, responded with a heart emoji and '#ChoiceAtTheEndOfLife' to a Guardian article published on 7 June that showed the Australian system being abused, eyebrows were raised. An elderly couple had been granted VAD when neither were terminally ill; medics in New South Wales effectively greenlit their suicide pact. 'Looks like the safeguards didn't work,' Mark Taubert, an NHS consultant and the vice-president of the European Association for Palliative Care, responded on X. According to the palliative care doctor Rachel Clarke, the story 'could not highlight more starkly the dangers of the law we are currently debating'. MPs hearing evidence on the bill had little time with six Australian witnesses, all of whom were supportive of VAD. Their arguments didn't always stand up to scrutiny. 'The medications are completely effective. I have not experienced any failures,' said Chloe Furst, a palliative care doctor from South Australia and board member of Voluntary Assisted Dying Australia and New Zealand. But, MPs pointed out, there is no requirement that a doctor be present when someone self-administers, nor is there provision for reporting complications. In Western Australia, where this information is collected, complications were recorded in 4.3 per cent of deaths in 2023-24. Asked if it was a concern that a 'large proportion of people who opted for assisted dying cited being a burden as their reason', another witness, Meredith Blake from the University of Western Australia, replied this was 'not the evidence that we have got'. Except it is. Official state figures showed 35 per cent of those seeking VAD cited being a burden on family, friends or carers as their reason for doing so. Blake replied: 'If there are people who are saying they are a burden, that does not mean that their decision is not voluntary.' While MPs were told Australian palliative care doctors had 'embraced' VAD, I have spoken with medics in Australia who are troubled by how the legislation operates. Academics and politicians are, too. Robert Clark, a former attorney-general and MP in Victoria wrote to the committee twice with his observations: the second time after his fellow Australians had addressed MPs. Numerous aspects of their evidence were 'factually incorrect or incomplete', Clark claimed. There was not adequate palliative care available to all terminally ill patients in Australia. Evidence didn't show any reduction in non-medically assisted suicide. The right of doctors to object to VAD was not respected. Many doctors 'feel unable to raise concerns about VAD… lest they suffer adverse professional or career consequences, or else they are leaving the hospital system altogether', he said. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe British palliative care doctor Alex Hughes recently relayed his experience of assisted dying while working in Australia. Hughes, who is neutral on VAD in principle, described a borderline case in which it seemed the patient had chosen to die because of poor alternative care options. In another, he suspected the man may have been influenced by depression, but this had gone unexplored in assessment. Were assisted dying to come to the UK, doctors would be 'at a heightened risk of unconscious bias… [and] may lean towards giving patients the 'benefit of the doubt', granting assisted dying to individuals who, in reality, have more than six months to live.' The events described in the Guardian confirm that risk is not merely hypothetical. Ahead of its return to the Commons on 13 June, 1,000 doctors urged MPs to vote against the assisted dying bill. They argued it is 'deeply flawed' and unsafe. Similar statements have been made by the Royal College of Physicians and the Royal College of Psychiatrists, which say they cannot support the legislation as it stands. Such concerns are not 'noise', as Leadbeater has suggested. Many critics have no issue with the principle of safe VAD. But the passage of the bill has revealed law-making at its worst: rushed debate, the views of the vulnerable ignored or downplayed, and crucial information on how the bill would work absent. Supporters say there will be time to iron out details later. That is too risky. Under current plans, some vulnerable people will be helped – in Hughes's words – to have 'an inappropriate assisted death'. He now poses two critical questions for MPs: how many vulnerable people slipping through the net is acceptable? And can adequate safeguards be put in place 'without creating a system so cumbersome that it becomes unworkable'? It's time for MPs to be honest with themselves and the public: enabling some an autonomous death through assisted dying will inevitably put others at risk of harm. [See also: Has any Chancellor faced a challenge this daunting?] Related
The Courier
3 days ago
- The Courier
Dundee Raac homes unable to withstand extreme weather, warns climate activist
A Dundee climate activist has warned that Raac homes will be unable to withstand the effects of extreme and worsening weather conditions. Laura Young, an environmental scientist, says addressing the issue should be a 'top priority' for governments with houses in general struggling to hold up to climate change. 'We are getting wetter and wilder winters in Scotland,' said the PHD student at both Dundee and Abertay universities. 'If we are trying to make places more resilient to bad weather and climate change then addressing things like Raac concrete is absolutely crucial. 'It should be a top priority. 'I don't think there is enough attention around the fact our houses cannot withstand extreme weather already, never mind if you have Raac concrete.' The ethical influencer, known as Less Waste Laura, told The Courier that her own research has discovered those in power tend to focus solely on flooding when it comes to improving climate resilience. However, a far higher number of homes are affected by other longer-term issues that have a huge affect on mental wellbeing. 'The majority of people are not impacted by extreme flooding, more people are affected by leaking roofs, damp, and mould,' explains Laura. 'That is definitely something that is overlooked at every single level of government. 'That what's impacting more people. 'And if you've got Raac then that's even more of a worry as that's exacerbating a problem. 'Issues like leaking roofs, damp and mould – because they are chronic rather than acute – actually has long-term significant impacts on people's wellbeing and mental health.' The Courier is asking people to sign this petition and help give affected homeowners a voice. The climate scientist used her own experience of a flat she lived in on Perth Road during Strom Babet to explain. Laura's flat did not contain Raac but water poured in through the ceiling during the deluge. 'Every time it rained I was panicking – is my roof going to collapse,' said Laura. 'I had so much anxiety thinking is my living room ceiling going to come in again. 'I can't imagine on top of that thinking there was some structurally unsound concrete above my head. 'Every single time it rains are you thinking – is that getting into the Raac concrete that is going to crumble and actually make my house unsafe. 'That is a whole extra level.' The climate activist believes there are socio-economic and environmental benefits to the government stepping in and helping Raac homeowners. They could utilise the crisis as a chance to improve affected homes to help reach climate targets and help with heating bills. 'This is a brilliant opportunity to be retrofitting all sorts of other sustainability measures in these homes to make them more energy efficient,' said Laura. 'This is an opportunity to address multiple issues.'
Daily Mirror
4 days ago
- Daily Mirror
Shoppers 'come back to' face wash with loads of five-star reviews
Fresh Soy Face Cleanser has been a firm favourite since it was first launched in 1990 and it's been approved by people with sensitive or irritated skin The skincare market is awash with products flaunting cutting-edge technologies and ingredients, all designed to keep beauty enthusiasts looking their best while addressing skin issues. However, there are always those timeless staples that everyone adores, and for me, it's the Fresh Soy Face Cleanser - a gentle yet hard-working face wash. First introduced in 1990, this cleanser combines soy proteins, cucumber extract, and rosewater in its formula, creating a hydrating trio that ensures a balanced and softened complexion. The jumbo 400ml size is on offer at Sephora for £62 instead of £66, where it has thousands of five-star reviews. Elsewhere on LookFantastic, shoppers can get a 50ml version for £15 or 150ml tube for £34. This face wash does more than just boost hydration; it also doubles as a makeup remover, deeply cleansing pores without stripping the skin. The amino acid-rich soy protein helps retain skin elasticity for a smooth and supple feel, while also maintaining the skin's pH value and strengthening the moisture barrier. For those with sensitive skin, shoppers have recommended the La Roche-Posay Toleriane Dermo-Cleanser Sensitive Skin, priced at £23.50. This milky cleanser is enriched with Glycerine and La Roche-Posay Thermal Spring Water, instantly soothing and cleansing irritated skin, reported Birmingham Live. Alternatively, TikTok-viral Korean beauty brand Dr Althea's Pure Grinding Cleansing Balm has a sorbet-like texture that melts makeup and deep cleanses, which is gentle on sensitive skin thanks to the 14 essential ingredients in the formula. It's currently on 13% off on Amazon and reduced to £19.99. Fresh Soy Face Cleanser 50ml £66 £15 LookFantastic Buy Now on LookFantastic Product Description The Soy Face Cleanser is a gentle, barely foaming facial wash with a unique texture that I liken to room-temperature egg yolk, infused with a waft of crisp cucumber and fresh aloe vera. Simply dampen your skin and massage over your face and eyes to remove dirt and makeup before rinsing with water – it's perfect for daily use both morning and night. Post-rinse, my skin was devoid of any feeling of tightness, and the cleanser also helped soothe my occasional acne, aiding in a speedier recovery process. More than 2,600 customers have endorsed the Fresh cleanser with stellar five-star testimonials. One customer enthused: "It thoroughly takes off any excess dirt and makeup from my skin after my oil cleanse and I've noticed that I haven't been breaking out in spots where I normally struggle with acne due to residual makeup." Another commented: "I had my boyfriend try it after he got sunburned to wash his face, and it was extremely gentle for him as well, while still cleaning his skin." However, a group of shoppers conceded that they were "not a big fan of the scent". With one remarking: "It smells like cucumbers but it's a bit too strong for my nose, which is particularly sensitive to any fragrances." Another customer expressed her preference for a more frothy consistency, explaining: "I feel like I had to use more product than normal to wash my face because it didn't lather. It did leave my skin feeling soft and clean." One customer has been a repeat customer for years: "I have used this product on and off since I was 15 years old. Over 10 years later, I still come back to it. It is super gentle, never broken me out and removed makeup well. Don't use if you have a soy allergy, other than that, it is a wonderful product." "One small dab will clean my whole face. I love that it's not a foaming face wash and that it is extremely gentle," another satisfied customer shared. "Many cleansers that I've used have required two 'washings' in order to get all of my makeup off - Fresh's Soy Face Cleanser does not."
